政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/136280
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113656/144643 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51707273      線上人數 : 491
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136280


    題名: 探討品牌社群訊息特性對口碑傳遞效果之影響—以品牌社群凝聚力為干擾變數
    The Influences of Brand Community Message Characteristics on WOM Transmission: Using Brand Community Cohesiveness as Moderator
    作者: 李昀慈
    Li, Yun-Tzu
    貢獻者: 陳建維
    Chen, Chien-Wei
    李昀慈
    Li, Yun-Tzu
    關鍵詞: 品牌社群
    品牌社群凝聚力
    訊息特性
    電子口碑
    口碑傳遞
    Brand community
    Brand community cohesiveness
    Message characteristic
    Electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM)
    Word-of-mouth transmission
    日期: 2021
    上傳時間: 2021-08-04 14:27:15 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 近年來，有越來越多商家或用戶成立Facebook社團，作為促進用戶和商家或是用戶之間交流的管道，社團可以將用戶聚集起來，交換相關資訊以及分享自身經驗，更藉由用戶間按讚、評論與分享等互動行為，達成品牌與產品口碑的傳播。因此，本研究欲瞭解訊息特性其呈現的方式與口碑傳遞效果的關係，期望藉由研究結果給予有意投入Facebook社團的企業或廣告代理商業者作為經營上的參考。
    首先，本研究針對過往文獻進行探討，發覺凝聚力與認同感是展現在品牌社群中的重要特徵，也確認社群凝聚力的高低將會影響社群成員參與社群的積極程度，進而改變社群中成員的個人行為。而針對口碑的訊息特性，依據以往研究區分為「訊息呈現方式」及「訊息內容類型」，其中包含訊息生動性、訊息互動性、訊息娛樂性及訊息資訊性等四大特性，在口碑的傳遞行為上則根據社群成員的互動行為含括了分享(Shares)、按讚(Likes)、評論(Comments)等不同的傳遞方式，並確認其在表示的意圖上具有差異。因此，本研究以文獻探討的結果，推論出在各訊息特性下，不同程度的訊息呈現方式將會影響口碑傳遞的效果，同時品牌社群凝聚力的高低也可能對於訊息特性與口碑傳遞效果存在干擾效果，透過內容分析法針對目標社群的貼文內容進行編碼與後續統計分析。
    經分析後發現，訊息生動性、訊息娛樂性與訊息資訊性對於口碑傳遞的成效皆具有正面影響，其中在預算有限的情況下以文字搭配圖片的生動性呈現方式，將促發成員按讚與留言的行為發生，以提升產品在社群中的知曉程度；而在內容類型方面，應特別重視訊息的娛樂性，將能帶來更好的口碑傳遞效果。至於在品牌社群凝聚力的分析，可以發現品牌社群凝聚力對於訊息特性與按讚數具有干擾效果，因此在品牌社群凝聚力相對較高的社團中，應以最能提升按讚數的訊息呈現方式進行，將能為貼文帶來的較多的按讚數，達到更好的口碑傳遞效果。
    In recent years, more and more businesses or users set up a Facebook community as a channel to build relationships between users and users or users and merchants. These virtual communities not only gather users to share their experiences, but also spread the brand and product information through the actions of like, comment and share. Therefore, to provide suggestions for businesses or advertising agencies interested in investing in the Facebook community, this research is going to discover the relationship between message characteristics and the word-of-mouth transmission.
    After exploring past literature, this study confirmed that the community cohesion will affect the positive participation of community members in the community. This study also distinguished between different types of the message content (e.g. entertainment, informational) and characteristics of the message (e.g., vividness, interactivity), and summarized that members engage in their community via like, comment, and share. Then, this study deduced that different degree of message presentation will affect the effect of word-of-mouth transmission, while the brand community cohesion may also interfere with the effect of word-of-mouth transmission.
    This study found that the vividness, entertainment, and information of the message has positive impacts on the effect of word-of-mouth transmission. As for the brand community cohesion, the results showed that brand community cohesion has a moderating effect in the numbers of likes. As such, in the community with high community cohesion, the message should be carried with the presentations which will be able to bring more likes for the post, to achieve a better word-of-mouth transmission effect.
    參考文獻: 一、 中文文獻
    1. 方欣（2019）。臨場感對網路口碑效果的影響。東吳大學企業管理學系碩士論文，台北市。
    2. 吳品臻（2017）。Facebook貼文內容對閱聽人投入行為之影響－ 以全聯福利中心粉絲專頁為例。未出版之碩士論文，國立臺灣科技大學設計系，台北市。
    3. 林玉凡（2015）。Facebook粉絲頁發文策略對線上參與度影響之研究。國立臺灣科技大學管理研究所博士論文，台北市。
    4. 徐晏涵（2013）。品牌社群網站之口碑效果研究。東吳大學企業管理學系碩士論文，台北市。

    二、 英文文獻
    1. Abfalter, D., Zaglia, M. E., & Mueller, J. (2012). Sense of virtual community: A follow up on its measurement. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(2), 400-404.
    2. Abubakar, A. M., & Ilkan, M. (2016). Impact of online WOM on destination trust and intention to travel: A medical tourism perspective. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 5(3), 192-201.
    3. Aggarwal, P. (2004). The effects of brand relationship norms on consumer attitudes and behavior. Journal of consumer research, 31(1), 87-101.
    4. Albert, N., Merunka, D., & Valette-Florence, P. (2008). When consumers love their brands: Exploring the concept and its dimensions. Journal of Business Research, 61(10), 1062-1075.
    5. Algesheimer, R., Dholakia, U. M., & Herrmann, A. (2005). The social influence of brand community: Evidence from European car clubs. Journal of marketing, 69(3), 19-34.
    6. Alreck, P. L., & Settle, R. B. (1995). The importance of word-of-mouth communications to service buyers. Paper presented at the Proceedings of American Marketing Association.
    7. Aramendia-Muneta, M. E. (2017). 4.2 Spread the Word–The Effect of Word of Mouth in e-Marketing.
    8. Arndt, J. (1967). Role of product-related conversations in the diffusion of a new product. Journal of marketing research, 4(3), 291-295.
    9. Bagozzi, R. P., & Dholakia, U. M. (2002). Intentional social action in virtual communities. Journal of interactive marketing, 16(2), 2-21.
    10. Bagozzi, R. P., & Dholakia, U. M. (2006). Antecedents and purchase consequences of customer participation in small group brand communities. International Journal of research in Marketing, 23(1), 45-61.
    11. Baird, C. H., & Parasnis, G. (2011). From social media to social customer relationship management. Strategy & leadership.
    12. Barreda, A. A., Bilgihan, A., Nusair, K., & Okumus, F. (2015). Generating brand awareness in online social networks. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 600-609.
    13. Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research.
    14. Bergami, M., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2000). Self‐categorization, affective commitment and group self‐esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(4), 555-577.
    15. Blanchard, A. L. (2007). Developing a sense of virtual community measure. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(6), 827-830.
    16. Bressler, S. E., & Grantham, C. (2000). Communities of commerce: Building internet business communities to accelerate growth, minimize risk, and increase customer loyalty: McGraw-Hill Professional.
    17. Brown, J., Broderick, A. J., & Lee, N. (2007). Word of mouth communication within online communities: Conceptualizing the online social network. Journal of interactive marketing, 21(3), 2-20.
    18. Carah, N. (2014). Like, comment, share: Alcohol brand activity on Facebook.
    19. Carroll, B. A., & Ahuvia, A. C. (2006). Some antecedents and outcomes of brand love. Marketing letters, 17(2), 79-89.
    20. Carron, A. V. (1982). Cohesiveness in sport groups: Interpretations and considerations. Journal of Sport psychology, 4(2).
    21. Carron, A. V., Widmeyer, W. N., & Brawley, L. R. (1985). The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport and Exercise psychology, 7(3), 244-266.
    22. Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C., & Guinalíu, M. (2010). Relationship quality, community promotion and brand loyalty in virtual communities: Evidence from free software communities. International journal of information management, 30(4), 357-367.
    23. Chang, Y.-T., Yu, H., & Lu, H.-P. (2015). Persuasive messages, popularity cohesion, and message diffusion in social media marketing. Journal of Business Research, 68(4), 777-782.
    24. Cheung, C. M., Chiu, P.-Y., & Lee, M. K. (2011). Online social networks: Why do students use facebook? Computers in Human Behavior, 27(4), 1337-1343.
    25. Cheung, C. M., & Thadani, D. R. (2012). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication: A literature analysis and integrative model. Decision support systems, 54(1), 461-470.
    26. Cho, C.-H. (1999). How advertising works on the WWW: Modified elaboration likelihood model. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 21(1), 34-50.
    27. Cho, Y., Hwang, J., & Lee, D. (2012). Identification of effective opinion leaders in the diffusion of technological innovation: A social network approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(1), 97-106.
    28. Chu, S.-C., & Choi, S. M. (2011). Electronic word-of-mouth in social networking sites: A cross-cultural study of the United States and China. Journal of Global Marketing, 24(3), 263-281.
    29. Chu, S.-C., & Kim, Y. (2011). Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites. International Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 47-75.
    30. Constant, D., Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1996). The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organization science, 7(2), 119-135.
    31. Coyle, J. R., & Thorson, E. (2001). The effects of progressive levels of interactivity and vividness in web marketing sites. Journal of advertising, 30(3), 65-77.
    32. Daugherty, T., & Hoffman, E. (2014). eWOM and the importance of capturing consumer attention within social media. Journal of Marketing Communications, 20(1-2), 82-102.
    33. De Valck, K., Van Bruggen, G. H., & Wierenga, B. (2009). Virtual communities: A marketing perspective. Decision support systems, 47(3), 185-203.
    34. De Vries, L., Gensler, S., & Leeflang, P. S. (2012). Popularity of brand posts on brand fan pages: An investigation of the effects of social media marketing. Journal of interactive marketing, 26(2), 83-91.
    35. DeAndrea, D. C., & Walther, J. B. (2011). Attributions for inconsistencies between online and offline self-presentations. Communication research, 38(6), 805-825.
    36. Dholakia, U. M., Bagozzi, R. P., & Pearo, L. K. (2004). A social influence model of consumer participation in network-and small-group-based virtual communities. International Journal of research in Marketing, 21(3), 241-263.
    37. Dick, A. S., & Basu, K. (1994). Customer loyalty: toward an integrated conceptual framework. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 22(2), 99-113.
    38. Drèze, X., & Hussherr, F.-X. (2003). Internet advertising: Is anybody watching? Journal of interactive marketing, 17(4), 8-23.
    39. Dwyer, P. (2007). Measuring the value of electronic word of mouth and its impact in consumer communities. Journal of interactive marketing, 21(2), 63-79.
    40. Ellison, N. B., & Boyd, D. M. (2013). Sociality through social network sites The Oxford handbook of internet studies.
    41. Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2005). Self-construal, reference groups, and brand meaning. Journal of consumer research, 32(3), 378-389.
    42. Etzioni, A. E., Oren. (1999). Face-to-face and computer-mediated communities, a comparative analysis. The information society, 15(4), 241-248.
    43. Füller, J., Jawecki, G., & Mühlbacher, H. (2007). Innovation creation by online basketball communities. Journal of Business Research, 60(1), 60-71.
    44. Fortin, D. R., & Dholakia, R. R. (2005). Interactivity and vividness effects on social presence and involvement with a web-based advertisement. Journal of Business Research, 58(3), 387-396.
    45. Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of consumer research, 24(4), 343-373.
    46. Fournier, S., & Avery, J. (2011). The uninvited brand. Business horizons, 54(3), 193-207.
    47. GAO, U. (1996). General Accounting Office, Content Analysis: A Methodology for Structuring and Analyzing Written Material. Washington, DC: GAO/PEMD-10.3, 1.
    48. Gavin, M. B., & Hofmann, D. A. (2002). Using hierarchical linear modeling to investigate the moderating influence of leadership climate. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(1), 15-33.
    49. Goldfarb, A., & Tucker, C. (2011). Advertising bans and the substitutability of online and offline advertising. Journal of marketing research, 48(2), 207-227.
    50. Goodrich, K. (2011). Anarchy of effects? Exploring attention to online advertising and multiple outcomes. Psychology & marketing, 28(4), 417-440.
    51. Graham, J., & Havlena, W. (2007). Finding the “missing link”: Advertising`s impact on word of mouth, web searches, and site visits. Journal of advertising research, 47(4), 427-435.
    52. Gupta, P., & Harris, J. (2010). How e-WOM recommendations influence product consideration and quality of choice: A motivation to process information perspective. Journal of Business Research, 63(9-10), 1041-1049.
    53. Hagel, I., & Armstrong, A. G. (1997). Net gain. McKinsey Quarterly(1), 140-153.
    54. Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: what motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet? Journal of interactive marketing, 18(1), 38-52.
    55. Hsu, C. P., Chiang, Y. F., & Huang, H. C. (2012). How experience‐driven community identification generates trust and engagement. Online Information Review.
    56. Hu, X., & Ha, L. (2015). Which form of word-of-mouth is more important to online shoppers? A comparative study of WOM use between general population and college students. Journal of Communication and Media Research, 7(2), 15-35.
    57. Hung, K. H., & Li, S. Y. (2007). The influence of eWOM on virtual consumer communities: Social capital, consumer learning, and behavioral outcomes. Journal of advertising research, 47(4), 485-495.
    58. Jang, H., Olfman, L., Ko, I., Koh, J., & Kim, K. (2008). The influence of on-line brand community characteristics on community commitment and brand loyalty. International journal of electronic commerce, 12(3), 57-80.
    59. Jensen Schau, H., & Muñiz Jr, A. M. (2006). A tale of tales: the Apple Newton narratives. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 14(1), 19-33.
    60. Kang, M. (2004). The research regarding the introduction and an activity of community concept from marketing. Korea Society of Management Education Research, 7(2), 77-98.
    61. Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (2017). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications: Routledge.
    62. Kim, C., & Yang, S.-U. (2017). Like, comment, and share on Facebook: How each behavior differs from the other. Public Relations Review, 43(2), 441-449.
    63. Kim, J. W., Choi, J., Qualls, W., & Han, K. (2008). It takes a marketplace community to raise brand commitment: the role of online communities. Journal of marketing management, 24(3-4), 409-431.
    64. Koh, J., Kim, Y.-G., & Kim, Y.-G. (2003). Sense of virtual community: A conceptual framework and empirical validation. International journal of electronic commerce, 8(2), 75-94.
    65. Kozinets, R. V. (1999). E-tribalized marketing?: The strategic implications of virtual communities of consumption. European management journal, 17(3), 252-264.
    66. Kozinets, R. V. (2002). The field behind the screen: Using netnography for marketing research in online communities. Journal of marketing research, 39(1), 61-72.
    67. Kozinets, R. V., De Valck, K., Wojnicki, A. C., & Wilner, S. J. (2010). Networked narratives: Understanding word-of-mouth marketing in online communities. Journal of marketing, 74(2), 71-89.
    68. Krippendorff, K. (1980). Validity in content analysis.
    69. Lee, F. S., Vogel, D., & Limayem, M. (2002). Virtual community informatics: what we know and what we need to know. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
    70. Lee, M., & Youn, S. (2009). Electronic word of mouth (eWOM) How eWOM platforms influence consumer product judgement. International Journal of Advertising, 28(3), 473-499.
    71. Lee, M. K., Shi, N., Cheung, C. M., Lim, K. H., & Sia, C. L. (2011). Consumer`s decision to shop online: The moderating role of positive informational social influence. Information & management, 48(6), 185-191.
    72. Lin, K.-Y., & Lu, H.-P. (2011). Why people use social networking sites: An empirical study integrating network externalities and motivation theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1152-1161.
    73. Litvin, S. W., Goldsmith, R. E., & Pan, B. (2008). Electronic word-of-mouth in hospitality and tourism management. Tourism Management, 29(3), 458-468.
    74. Liu, Y., & Shrum, L. J. (2002). What is interactivity and is it always such a good thing? Implications of definition, person, and situation for the influence of interactivity on advertising effectiveness. Journal of advertising, 31(4), 53-64.
    75. Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103-123.
    76. Mangold, W. G., & Faulds, D. J. (2009). Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Business horizons, 52(4), 357-365.
    77. McAlexander, J. H., Schouten, J. W., & Koenig, H. F. (2002). Building brand community. Journal of marketing, 66(1), 38-54.
    78. McQuail, D., & Van Cuilenburg, J. J. (1983). Diversity as a media policy goal: A strategy for evaluative research and a Netherlands case study. Gazette (Leiden, Netherlands), 31(3), 145-162.
    79. McWilliam, G. (2000). Building stronger brands through online communities. MIT Sloan Management Review, 41(3), 43.
    80. Muniz, A. M., & O`guinn, T. C. (2001). Brand community. Journal of consumer research, 27(4), 412-432.
    81. Muntinga, D. G., Moorman, M., & Smit, E. G. (2011). Introducing COBRAs: Exploring motivations for brand-related social media use. International Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 13-46.
    82. Murad, A., Lederman, R., Bosua, R., Chang, S., Pirotta, M., & Wark, J. D. (2017). Health practitioner perceptions of using a health virtual community of practice for their continuing professional development. PACIS 2017 Proceedings.
    83. Naylor, R. W., Lamberton, C. P., & West, P. M. (2012). Beyond the “like” button: The impact of mere virtual presence on brand evaluations and purchase intentions in social media settings. Journal of marketing, 76(6), 105-120.
    84. Nieto, J., Hernández-Maestro, R. M., & Muñoz-Gallego, P. A. (2014). Marketing decisions, customer reviews, and business performance: The use of the Toprural website by Spanish rural lodging establishments. Tourism Management, 45, 115-123.
    85. Oh, Y., & Kim, S. (2004). Strategy of brand marketing using on-line community. Journal of Information Society, 16(12), 20-37.
    86. Park, N., Kee, K. F., & Valenzuela, S. (2009). Being immersed in social networking environment: Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(6), 729-733.
    87. Parks, M. R., & Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 1(4), JCMC144.
    88. Porter, C. E., & Donthu, N. (2008). Cultivating trust and harvesting value in virtual communities. Management Science, 54(1), 113-128.
    89. Porter, C. E., Donthu, N., MacElroy, W. H., & Wydra, D. (2011). How to foster and sustain engagement in virtual communities. California management review, 53(4), 80-110.
    90. Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Finding commection in a computerized world: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.
    91. Rui, J., & Stefanone, M. A. (2013). Strategic self-presentation online: A cross-cultural study. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 110-118.
    92. Sawhney, M., Verona, G., & Prandelli, E. (2005). Collaborating to create: The Internet as a platform for customer engagement in product innovation. Journal of interactive marketing, 19(4), 4-17.
    93. Schau, H. J., Muñiz Jr, A. M., & Arnould, E. J. (2009). How brand community practices create value. Journal of marketing, 73(5), 30-51.
    94. Schiffman, L. G., & Kanuk, L. L. (2000). Consumer behavior, 7th. NY: Prentice Hall, 15-36.
    95. Shankar, V., Smith, A. K., & Rangaswamy, A. (2003). Customer satisfaction and loyalty in online and offline environments. International Journal of research in Marketing, 20(2), 153-175.
    96. Shaw, M. E. (1981). Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior: McGraw-Hill College.
    97. Sánchez-García, I., & Currás-Pérez, R. (2011). Effects of dissatisfaction in tourist services: The role of anger and regret. Tourism Management, 32(6), 1397-1406.
    98. Sohn, D. (2014). Coping with information in social media: The effects of network structure and knowledge on perception of information value. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 145-151.
    99. Sotiriadis, M. D., & Van Zyl, C. (2013). Electronic word-of-mouth and online reviews in tourism services: the use of twitter by tourists. Electronic Commerce Research, 13(1), 103-124.
    100. Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of communication, 42(4), 73-93.
    101. Sun, T., Youn, S., Wu, G., & Kuntaraporn, M. (2006). Online word-of-mouth (or mouse): An exploration of its antecedents and consequences. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 11(4), 1104-1127.
    102. Swanson, S. R., & Hsu, M. K. (2009). Critical incidents in tourism: Failure, recovery, customer switching, and word‐of‐mouth behaviors. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 26(2), 180-194.
    103. Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social science information, 13(2), 65-93.
    104. Taylor, D. G., Lewin, J. E., & Strutton, D. (2011). Friends, fans, and followers: do ads work on social networks?: how gender and age shape receptivity. Journal of advertising research, 51(1), 258-275.
    105. Tonteri, L., Kosonen, M., Ellonen, H.-K., & Tarkiainen, A. (2011). Antecedents of an experienced sense of virtual community. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2215-2223.
    106. Valente, T. W., & Davis, R. L. (1999). Accelerating the diffusion of innovations using opinion leaders. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 566(1), 55-67.
    107. Van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media: Oxford University Press.
    108. Wallace, D., Walker, J., Lopez, T., & Jones, M. (2009). Do word of mouth and advertising messages on social networks influence the purchasing behavior of college students? Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 25(1).
    109. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication research, 23(1), 3-43.
    110. Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis: Sage.
    111. Wirtz, J., Den Ambtman, A., Bloemer, J., Horváth, C., Ramaseshan, B., Van De Klundert, J., Canli, Z. G., Kandampully, J. (2013). Managing brands and customer engagement in online brand communities. Journal of service Management.

    三、 網路資料
    1. 財團法人台灣網路資訊中心（2019）。2019 年台灣網路報告。檢索日期：2021年6月6日，取自https://www.twnic.tw/doc/twrp/201912e.pdf
    2. 財團法人台灣網路資訊中心（2020）。2020 年台灣網路報告。檢索日期：2021年6月6日，取自https://www.twnic.tw/doc/twrp/202012e.pdf
    3. Facebook, Inc. (2021, January 27). Facebook Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2020 Results. Retrieved June 6, 2021, from https://investor.fb.com/investor-news/press-release-details/2021/Facebook-Reports-Fourth-Quarter-and-Full-Year-2020-Results/default.aspx
    4. Facebook, Inc. (2021, April 28). Facebook Reports First Quarter 2021 Results. Retrieved June 6, 2021, from https://investor.fb.com/investor-news/press-release-details/2021/Facebook-Reports-First-Quarter-2021-Results/default.aspx
    5. Napoleon(2021, May). Facebook users in Taiwan. Retrieved June 6, 2021, from https://napoleoncat.com/stats/facebook-users-in-taiwan/2021/05
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際經營與貿易學系
    108351031
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108351031
    資料類型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202100691
    顯示於類別:[國際經營與貿易學系 ] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    103101.pdf3592KbAdobe PDF28檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋