English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51632117      Online Users : 563
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 文學院 > 中國文學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/135716
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/135716


    Title: 師門.學脈.道統:韓元震與李柬“湖洛論爭”之義理背景
    The School, Divisions, and Succession to the Way: The Doctrinal Backgrounds of Han Yuanzhen and Li Jian`s "Huluo Debate"
    Authors: 陳逢源
    Chen, Feng-Yuan
    Contributors: 中文系
    Keywords: 韓元震; 李柬; 湖洛論爭; 栗谷學脈; 朝鮮儒學
    Han Yuanzhen; Li Jian; the Huluo Debate; Ligu School; Korean Confucianism
    Date: 2020-06
    Issue Date: 2021-06-10 14:14:24 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 朝鮮儒學從四端七情之辨,進而及於人心道心問題,層層而進,逐漸明朗,性之所向,理氣問題,正是其中關鍵所在,韓元震與李柬所爭是師門宗旨,也是數代積累的儒學問題,“湖洛論爭”如同漣漪逐漸擴散,造成巨大影響,成爲朝鮮儒學史中最可注意的學術論辯。李柬以未發之時難言氣質之性,聖人與凡人同禀明德本體,提出“聖凡心同”,主張“人物性同論”;韓元震認爲未發仍有氣質之性,認爲聖人與凡人不同,提出“聖凡心不同”,主張“人物性異論”。兩人針鋒相對,最後以老師權尚夏表態支持韓元震而告一段落,確立性於氣質得見,爲師門心法所在,韓元震於後標舉學脈宗旨,建構朝鮮學術主體地位,藏道統於東國,貢獻卓著,湖洛論爭正是觸發其儒學事業的關鍵。
    Korean Confucian scholars researched the differentiation between "four beginnings" (siduan) and "seven emotions" (qiqing), and gradually progressed to the issues concerning the human mind and the Way. Their findings disclosed that "principle" (li) and "material-force" (qi) are key concepts central to Confucianism. These issues were subjects of dispute between scholars Han Yuanzhen (1682-1751) and Li Jian (1677-1727), who represented their own schools of thought. They also remained unsolved issues in Confucianism for many generations. In fact, this so-called "Huluo Debate" made such an enormous impact that it became the most important academic polemic in the history of Korean Confucianism. Li Jian advocated "Sameness of Human Nature" and held that it was impossible to define one`s temperament before one`s expression, and hence saints and commoners had the same original mind. Han Yuanzhen, on the other hand, advocated "Diversity of Human Nature" and argued that people had distinct temperaments by nature and therefore saints and commoners` minds were different. Their views were diametrically opposed and resulted in frantic debates. Finally, their tutor, Quan Shangxia (1641-1712), settled the debates by supporting Han`s opinion, confirming that one`s inner nature could be found in one`s temperament. Thereafter, Han not only promoted the creeds of his school but also constructed the Succession to the Way (daotong) in Korea. All in all, the "Huluo Debate" is the basis of Han Yuanzhen`s remarkable achievement of Confucianism.
    Relation: 人文中國學報, 30期, pp.197-236
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[中國文學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    18.pdf7542KbAdobe PDF2239View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback