English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51733691      Online Users : 601
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 文學院 > 哲學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/134842


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/134842


    Title: 奧古斯丁的「訴諸意欲能力的論證」： 霍普金斯對「標準詮釋」的批評
    Augustine’s Argument from the Power to Will: Jasper Hopkins on the “Standard Interpretation”
    Authors: 劉若韶
    Lau, Edward Yeuk-siu
    Contributors: 哲學系
    Keywords: 預知與自由 、 神學命定論 、 神學相容論
    foreknowledge and freedom 、 theological fatalism 、 theological compatibilism
    Date: 2020-07
    Issue Date: 2021-04-22 15:30:18 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 「神學命定論」問題（上帝的預知與受造物的自由是否相容）一直是在哲學神學中受關注的課題。根據羅偉的看法，奧古斯丁對這個問題的最主要回應是「訴諸意欲能力的論證」。奧古斯丁主張，人的任何意欲行為都是在他的能力以內，也就是說，意志就其本質而言是自由的。奧古斯丁以這個論點作為基礎，論證上帝的預知與人的自由是相容的。羅偉對這個論證的分析與批判，被認為是對奧古斯丁回應神學命定論問題的「標準詮釋」。霍普金斯批評羅偉未正確掌握奧古斯丁的解決方案所以失敗的理由，但是霍普金斯本人卻沒有清楚說明真正的理由何在。本文藉著檢查霍普金斯對奧古斯丁的論證的表述，以及對標準詮釋的批評，嘗試釐清「訴諸意欲能力的論證」需要面對的問題。
    According to William Rowe, Augustine’s principal response to the problem of theological fatalism consists in his argument from the power to will. For some years, Rowe’s presentation and critique of the argument has been accepted as the standard interpretation of Augustine’s solution. Jasper Hopkins maintains that while Augustine’s solution does not succeed, the reasons for the lack of success has not been accurately stated by Rowe. By reexamining Hospers’ analysis of Augustine’s argument as well as his criticisms on Rowe, I try to discern what constitutes a real challenge for Augustine’s argument.
    Relation: 哲學論集, No.52, pp.23-50
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[哲學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2449View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback