English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51717937      Online Users : 601
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 傳播學院 > 新聞學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/134171


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/134171


    Title: 2005年縣市長選舉選民投票決定之影響因素：台北縣、台中市、雲林縣以及高雄縣的分析
    A Study of Voting Behavior: The Election for County Magistrates and City Mayors in 2005
    Authors: 劉嘉薇
    Liu, Jia-Wei
    Contributors: 新聞系
    Keywords: 縣市長選舉 ; 投票 ; 社會學派 ; 社會心理學派 ; 理性抉擇學派 
     elections for county magistrates and city mayors ; vote ; sociological approach ; social psychological ; rational choice approach
    Date: 2008-03
    Issue Date: 2021-03-02 14:49:16 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 過去探討投票決定的因素涵蓋社會學派、社會心理學派，以及理性抉擇學派所提出的理論，這三大學派解釋了許多國內中央層級選舉的投票行爲，但地方選舉的研究卻相對地缺乏。地方縣市長選舉是否同樣受到這些因素的影響？何者影響較大？在不同的縣市是否呈現不同的解釋模式？本研究發現，在任何單一縣市中，社會學途徑的影響都最弱，社會心理學途徑的影響都最強。雖然如此，四縣市之間各途徑影響力仍有不同。將四縣市合併比較，台中市選民相較於高雄縣選民，展現更高理性抉擇的傾向；相對地，高雄縣選民相較於台中市選民，則更偏向候選人因素的心理取向。因此，台中市與高雄縣選民投票行爲分別位於這兩種投票途徑的兩端，而台北縣、雲林縣的選民投票行爲則介於理性選擇與社會心理學取向之間。
    The factors affecting voting behavior have been discussed in sociological, social psychological, and rational choice theories. These three approaches explain many voting behavior cases in terms of central level national elections but pay relatively less attention to local level elections. Are the elections for county magistrates and city mayors affected by these three factors? Which of these three influence local elections more? Do the elections in different counties and cities reflect different explanation models? We find that in any of the four counties and cities, the sociological approach is weakest, while the social psychological is strongest, in explaining voting behavior. Nonetheless, the influence of these approaches differs among these four counties and cities. Comparing these four counties and cities, we find that the rational choice approach is more effective in Taichung City than in Kaohsiung County. Conversely, the voters in Kaohsiung County prefer the psychological approach of candidate`s factor more than the ones in Taichung City. Consequentially, on one hand, the voting behavior models of voters in Taichung City and Kaohsiung County are located in the extremes of the two voting approaches. On the other hand, the voting behavior models of Taipei County and Yunlin County are situated between the approaches of rational choice and social psychology.
    Relation: 台灣民主季刊, 5卷1期, 1-43
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.6448/TDQ.200803.0001 
    DOI: 10.6448/TDQ.200803.0001 
    Appears in Collections:[新聞學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    13.pdf2017KbAdobe PDF2328View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback