Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/133878
|
| Title: | 臺灣大學圖書館與首爾大學圖書館學科服務與學科館員比較研究
A Comparative Study of the Subject Service and Subject Librarians: Between The National Taiwan University Library and Seoul National University Library |
| Authors: | 安智鉉
An, Ji-Hyun |
| Contributors: | 王梅玲
Wang, Mei-Ling
安智鉉
An, Ji-Hyun |
| Keywords: | 大學圖書館
學科服務
學科館員
嵌入式圖書館服務
嵌入式圖書館員
University Library
Subject Service
Subject Librarian
Embedded Library Service
Embedded Librarian |
| Date: | 2020 |
| Issue Date: | 2021-02-01 14:06:28 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 大學圖書館是大學的重要組成部分，是大學內的一個文化載體和場所，是在校學生課程之外的課外活動，是師生獲得資訊及知識的重要機構，是師生開展專業學習和科學研究的重要基地，是大學實現教育功能的重要渠道。
學科服務是一種深刻、專業化、首創新資訊服務，隨著圖書館學科服務內容的深化、服務範圍擴大、服務重心的拓展，學科服務的重心逐步從最初的傳播到深度的服務項目。對臺灣與韓國而言，除了少數大學圖書館外，對學科服務的認知度本身就很低，提供高完成度學科服務的大學圖書館並不多。臺灣大學圖書館和首爾大學圖書館是代表各國的大學圖書館，是在兩國最早引進學科服務的大學圖書館之一，也是提供優秀學科服務的大學圖書館。
本研究是以深度訪談與內容分析方式，探討臺灣大學圖書館與首爾大學圖書館學科服務與學館員的情形，並比較兩個大學圖書館的異同。本研究共得結論：(1)臺灣大學圖書館學科服務組織功能、學科館員任務、知能培育；(2)首爾大學圖書館學科服務組織功能、學科館員任務、知能培育；(3)臺灣大學圖書館與首爾大學圖書館學科服務模式與學科館員制度的異同；(4)學科服務對提高大學圖書館的服務品質產生正面影響；(5)學科館員的學科主題背景並不是必備因素；(6)臺灣大學圖書館與首爾大學圖書館皆未提供專門學科館員培訓課程；(7)臺灣大學圖書館與首爾大學圖書館引進學科服務的背景及發展歷程極其類似，但現今已各自發展出不同的面貌；(8)臺灣大學圖書館與首爾大學圖書館之間，無存在因不同國家而呈現明顯的差異；(9)重做學科專家還是屈居學科聯絡館員？；(10)本研究與國內相關研究之差別。
The university library is an important part of the university. This is a cultural carrier and place within the university, and an extracurricular activity outside the school curriculum, moreover an important institution for teachers and students to acquire information and knowledge. In addition an important base for teachers and students to carry out professional study and scientific research, furthermore an important channel for universities to realize its educational function.
Subject service is a deep, specialized and innovative information service. As the content of library subject service deepens, the scope of service expands and the service center expands, the emphasis of subject service gradually spreads from the original to the deep. For Taiwan and South Korea, apart from a few university libraries, The cognition of subject services is low in itself, and there are not many university libraries offering high-finished subject services. The National Taiwan University Library and the Seoul National University Library are representative of each country, one of the first to introduce academic services in each countries, and also a university library to provide excellent academic services.
The research is conducted in depth interview and content analysis method to explore the similarities and differences between National Taiwan University Library and Seoul National University Library Subject service and Subject librarian. This study concludes: (1) Duties, competence and training of subject librarians and the organizational role of subject service in the National Taiwan University Library; (2) Duties, competence and training of subject librarians and the organizational role of subject service in the Seoul National University Library; (3) The commonalities and differences between the the subject service management model and the subject librarian system of the National Taiwan University Library and the Seoul National University Library; (4) The Subject services have a positive effect on improving the quality of service in the university libraries; (5) The subject background of the subject librarian is not a necessary element; (6) The National Taiwan University Library and the Seoul National University Library do not provide professional education for subject librarian training; (7) The National Taiwan University Library and the Seoul National University Library have very similar backgrounds and development processes, but they have shown different developments in recent years; (8) There is no obvious differences due to their national differences between the National Taiwan University Library and the Seoul National University Library; (9) Working yourself up to being a subject specialist or being complacent as a liaison librarian?; (10) Differences between this study and domestic correlation studies. |
| Reference: | 王梅玲 (2005)。英美與亞太地區圖書資訊學教育。臺北市：文華。
王梅玲、謝寶煖 (2014)。圖書資訊學導論。 臺北市：五南。
王雪韻、王秀平 (2011)。高校圖書館建立學科館員制度的探討。中華醫學圖書情報雜誌，20(4)，7-8。doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-3982.2011.04.003
王貴海 (2012)。學科館員2.0與學科館員1.0的比較研究。圖書館學刊，2012年 01，136-138。
任吉剛、李曉紅、李鳳俠 (2015)。中美大學圖書館學科館員制度的比較分析及其啓示。中華醫學圖書資訊雜誌，(6)，20-23。
吳宇凡、薛理桂 (2013)。我國與韓國總統文件管理發展歷程比較。圖書與資訊學刊，(82)，69-94。
吳瑠璃（1995）。參考館員。臺北市：圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典。檢自http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1681054/?index=3
初景利（2012）。我國圖書館學科服務的難點與突破。中華醫學圖書情報雜誌，4，1-4。
初景利、孔青青、欒冠楠 (2013)。嵌入式學科服務研究進展。圖書情報工作， 57(22)，11-17。
林荷鵑 (1994)。大學圖書館設置學科專家之研究。臺北市: 漢美。
邱銘心 (2009a)。學科專家館員專業能力的探究與人才培育的規劃：以北美地區圖資教育與訓練為例。圖書資訊學刊，7(1&2)，77-99。
邱銘心 (2009b)。學科專家館員人才招募研究：以在美國圖書館學會認可之圖書資訊研究所就讀之潛在學科專家為例。圖書資訊學研究，3(2)，55-74。
邱銘心、蔡妍芳 (2011)。大學圖書館學科服務之經營與管理研究。圖書館學與資訊科學，37（2），73–93。
胡選振 (2014)。美國5所高校圖書館學科服務的實例分析及啓示。農業圖書情報學刊，26(7)，168-171。
唐文惠 (2011)。高校圖書館學科館員勝任力研究。高校圖書館工作，31(1)，39-41。
唐淑香、付曉梅 (2015)。學科服務發展簡述。山東圖書館學刊，2015(6)，14-18。
袁則銘 (2016)。殖利率利差與景氣預測—以臺灣與韓國為例。中原大學，桃園市。
國立臺灣大學圖書館 (2015)。國立臺灣大學圖書館年報2013。檢自： https://issuu.com/ntulib/docs/ar_2013
國立臺灣大學圖書館 (2016)。國立臺灣大學圖書館年報2015。檢自： https://issuu.com/ntulib/docs/ar_2015
國立臺灣大學圖書館 (2018)。國立臺灣大學圖書館年報2017。檢自： https://issuu.com/ntulib/docs/ar2017
國立臺灣大學圖書館 (2019)。國立臺灣大學圖書館年報2018。檢自：https://issuu.com/ntulib/docs/ar2018
國立臺灣大學圖書館 (2020a)。國立臺灣大學圖書館年報2019。檢自： https://issuu.com/ntulib/docs/ar_2019
國立臺灣大學圖書館 (2020b)。臺大學圖書館參考服務部落格。檢自： http://tul.blog.ntu.edu.tw/
國立臺灣大學圖書館(2020c)。HELP講堂/MASTER講堂。檢自：https://www.lib.ntu.edu.tw/HELP
國立臺灣大學圖書館(2020d)。常問問題FAQ。檢自：http://web.lib.ntu.edu.tw/question
國立臺灣大學圖書館(2020e)。圖書館學科館員服務。檢自： http://lib.ntu.edu.tw/subject_service
國立臺灣大學圖書館(2020f)。臺大學術典藏。檢自：https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/
國立臺灣大學圖書館(2020g)。與館員有約。檢自：https://www.lib.ntu.edu.tw/ask
國立臺灣大學圖書館(2020h)。館員協助課堂教學。檢自： https://www.lib.ntu.edu.tw/node/3570
國家圖書館(2016)。圖書館法。檢自 https://www.ncl.edu.tw/content_321.html
張育銘、陳巧倫、陳芷洛 (2015)。臺灣大學圖書館參考服務部落格使用效益分析研究。大學圖書館，19(2)，129-157。doi:10.6146/univj.19-2.06
張翔 (2011)。基於SERVICE的嵌入式學科服務營銷——武漢大學圖書館學科服務探索。大學圖書館學報，2011年05，73-76。
曹桂平 (2015)。我國臺灣地區高校圖書館學科專家/指導教師制度及其啓示。圖書與資訊，2015(5)，65-69。
許人友 (2015)。以服務創新觀點探討大學圖書館推廣學科服務模式研究(碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學，南投縣。
陳巧倫 (2014)。國立臺灣大學研究生對圖書館學科服務使用情形初探。大學圖書館，18(2)，166-179。
陳昭珍 (2012)。從全球化與在地化重新定義大學圖書館的角色及改變之道。國立成功大學圖書館館刊，21，52-65。
陳雅文 (1995)。個案研究法。臺北市：圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典。檢自：http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1681584/
傅寶真 (1975)。學科專家在蛻變中之大學圖書館。國立中央圖書館館刊。
楊美華 (1989)。大學圖書館之經營理念。臺北市: 臺灣學生書局。
楊美華 (2014)。大趨勢微觀察:大學圖書館的轉型與超越。圖書資訊與檔案學研究所，台北市。
楊廣鋒、代根興 (2010)。學科館員服務的模式演進及發展方向。大學圖書館學報，28(1)，5-8。
楊韻蓉 (2014)。以SCONUL資訊素養標準探討數學領域學科服務需求(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，台北市。
廖球、高飛 (2016)。嵌入式學科服務評價體系研究。情報探索，6，55-58。 doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-8095.2016.05.012
劉昌澔 (2017)。臺灣大學圖書館與淡江大學覺生紀念圖書館推動學科服務之比較(未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學資訊與圖書館學系，台北縣。
樊健 (2013)。論大學圖書館的育人功能。大學圖書館學報，31(5)，32-35。
潘淑滿 (2003)。質性研究：理論與應用。臺北市：心理出版社。
範愛紅 (2012)。學科服務發展趨勢與學科館員新角色: 康奈爾範例研究。圖書情報工作，56(05)，15-20。
蔡妍芳 (2011)。大學圖書館對學科服務的認知態度研究（碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所、台北縣。
蔡金燕(2013年5月)。數位時代學術圖書館的學科服務。圖書館學科服務研討會暨數位化論文典藏聯盟102年年會，高雄市。檢自：https://www.tbmc.com.tw/event/ddc_past/20130524.03.pdf
鍾雪珍 (2010)。學科專家參考諮詢系統研究：以中國科學院國家科學圖書館為例。圖書與資訊學刊，(72)，39-51。
羅亞泓 (2015)。廣州高校圖書館嵌入式學科服務的SWOT分析和策略研究。圖書資訊工作，59(7)，112-116。
蘇筱喻 (2019)。臺灣大學圖書館學科服務。2019年臺灣大學圖書館學科服務組之導覽報告，臺北市
강미혜[姜美惠](1998). 주제전문사서직에 관한 문헌연구: 대학도서관을 중심으로[大學圖書館學科館員文獻研究]. 사회과학연구[社會科學研究], 5, 1-22.
국가법령정보센터[國家法令資訊中心](2019). 대학도서관진흥법[大學圖書館振興法]. 檢自 http://www.law.go.kr/%EB%B2%95%EB%A0%B9/%EB%8C%80%ED%95%99%EB%8F%84%EC%84%9C%EA%B4%80%EC%A7%84%ED%9D%A5%EB%B2%95
국립중앙도서관[國立中央圖書館] (2008). 주제전문사서 인력수급 전망 및 제도화 방안 연구[學科館員人力供需前景及制度化方案研究]. 서울시: 국립중앙도서관[國立中央圖書館].
김기영, 최윤희[金基英、崔允喜] (2015). 대학도서관 주제전문서비스에 영향을 미치는 조직 내부 요인 탐색[探索影響大學圖書館學科服務的組織內部因素]. 한국문헌정보학회지[韓國文獻情報學會誌], 49(4), 335-354.
김다해, 김기영[金多海、金基英] (2009). 고객관계관리 (CRM) 관점에서의 대학도서관 주제전문서비스에 관한 연구[顧客關係管理(CRM)觀點中大學圖書館學科服務研究]. 정보관리학회지[情報管理學會誌], 26(3), 89-110.
김명환[金明煥] (2020). 2020 년대 서울대 도서관의 나아갈 방향[2020年代首爾大學圖書館的前進方向]. 서울대학교도서관보[首爾大學圖書館報], 142, 5-13.
남영준, 허운순[南英俊，許雲順] (2005). 주제전문사서 양성을 위한 문헌정보학 교과과정 연구[爲培養學科館員的文獻情報學課程研究]. 한국도서관•정보학회지[韓國圖書館情報學會誌], 36(3), 39-64.
노동조 & 남민석[盧東朝&南民錫] (2013). 주제전문사서제의 도입 여부가 도서의 선정과 대출에 미치는 효과분석[學科館員制度對圖書選定和借閱的效果分析]. 정보관리학회지[情報學會誌], 30(3), 229-247.
노동조, 안인자, 노영희, & 김성진[盧東朝、安仁子、盧英姬&金成珍] (2008). 주제전문사서 인력수급 전망 및 제도화 방안 연구[學科館員人力供求前景及制度化方案研究]. 서울: 국립중앙도서관[國立中央圖書館].
노영희 & 오의경[盧英姬&吳義京] (2018). 공공도서관의 주제전문서비스와 주제전문사서에 대한 문헌정보학과 재학생 인식 조사[對公共圖書館的學科服務和學科館員的文獻情報學在學生認識調查]. 한국문헌정보학회지[韓國文獻情報學會誌], 52(2), 5-25.
노영희, 노동조, 안인자, & 김성진[盧英姬、盧東朝、安仁子&金成珍] (2008). 주제전문서비스 운영실태 분석 연구[學科服務營運現狀分析研究]. 한국도서관•정보학회지[韓國圖書館情報學會誌], 39(4), 97-123.
노영희, 신영지, & 곽우정[盧英姬、申英智&郭宇貞] (2017). 주제전문인력 확보 및 제도화 방안에 관한 연구[關於學科服務人才確保及制度化方案的研究]. 한국비블리아학회지, 28(4), 5-33.
노영희，오의경，& 심효정[盧英姬、吳義京&沈孝貞] (2017). 주제별 특성화서비스 및 주제전문사서에 대한 현장사서의 의견 조사 연구[現場圖書館員對學科服務及學科館員的意見調研]. 한국도서관정보학회지[韓國圖書館情報學會誌], 48(4)， 321-350.
노옥순[盧玉順] (1984). 대학도서관 참고사서의 자격요건에 관한 연구[大學圖書館參考館員的資格條件研究]. 연세대학교 대학원 도서관학과[延世大學圖書館研究所], 박사학위논문.
노옥순[盧玉順] (1986). 정보써어비스의 새로운 추세와 적용문제에 관한 고찰[關於資訊服務新趨勢和適用問題的考察]. 한국문헌정보학회지[韓國文獻情報學會誌], 13, 73-94.
문화체육관광부[文化體育觀光部] (2017). 전국도서관통계조사[全國圖書館統計調查]. 檢自https://www.libsta.go.kr/libportal/openMdg/resourceRoom/statsRsc/getStatsRscDetail.do
민다혜[閔多惠] (2018). 대학도서관의 주제전문서비스 이용자 만족도에 관한 연구[大學圖書館學科服務讀者滿意度研究]. 한국정보관리학회 학술대회 논문집[韓國情報管理學會學術大會論文集], 61-64.
박경호[樸景浩] (2018). 도서관 서비스의 질적 향상을 위한 이용자 만족도 조사 분석[爲提高圖書館服務品質的讀者滿意度調查分析]. 서울대학교 도서관보[首爾大學圖書館報], 140, pp. 1-30. 檢自 http://s-space.snu.ac.kr/bitstream/10371/152747/1/14001%20%eb%b0%95%ea%b2%bd%ed%98%b8.pdf
박수희, 정동열[樸秀熙、鄭東烈] (2012). 대학도서관 리에종사서 교육훈련 프로그램 모형 개발[大學圖書館學科聯絡館員教育培訓項目模型發展]. 한국문헌정보학회지[韓國文獻情報學會誌], 46(4), 311-339.
변제연[卞齊妍] (2012). 주제전문사서의 직업전문성 요구에 대한 대학도서관 실무자와 문헌정보학 전공학생의 인식 차이에 관한 연구[關於學科專家職業專業性需求的工作人員和專業學生認識差異的研究]. (碩士), 성균관대학교 일반대학원成均館大學研究所, 首爾市. KERIS Theses & Dissertations database.
서울대학교 중앙도서관 학과전담 연구지원실[首爾大學中央圖書館學科全擔研究支援室] (2015). 서울대학교 중앙도서관 학과전담 연구지원서비스 백서 2007-2013[首爾大學中央圖書館學科全擔研究支援服務白皮書2007-2013] . 서울시:서울대학교 중앙도서관[首爾大學中央圖書館].
서울대학교 중앙도서관 학술연구지원실[首爾大學中央圖書館學術研究支援室] (2020). Home. 檢自：https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_TLDfujpyBWLeUgYEs7Kbg/featured
서울대학교 중앙도서관[首爾大學中央圖書館] (2009). 현황(2008)： 시설현황, 직원현황, 자료현황, 예산현황, 제본현황, 데이터베이스 구축현황, 이용현황[現況(2008)：設施現狀、職員現狀、資料現狀、預算現狀、裝訂現狀、資料庫構建現狀、利用現狀]. Bulletin of the seoul national university library, 131, 143-157.
서울대학교 중앙도서관[首爾大學中央圖書館] (2010). 현황(2009)：시설현황, 직원현황, 자료현황, 예산현황, 데이터베이스 구축현황, 이용현황[現況(2009)：設施現狀、職員現狀、資料現狀、預算現狀、資料庫構建現狀、利用現狀]. Bulletin of the seoul national university library, 132, 155-168.
서울대학교 중앙도서관[首爾大學中央圖書館] (2016a). 현황(2012년)：시설현황, 직원현황, 자료현황, 예산현황, 데이터베이스 구축현황, 이용현황[現況(2012年)：設施現狀、職員現狀、資料現狀、預算現狀、資料庫構建現狀、利用現狀]. 서울대학교도서관보[首爾大學圖書館報], 135/138, pp. 139-195.
서울대학교 중앙도서관[首爾大學中央圖書館] (2016b). 현황(2013년)：시설현황, 직원현황, 자료현황, 예산현황, 데이터베이스 구축현황, 이용현황[現況(2013年)：設施現狀、職員現狀、資料現狀、預算現狀、資料庫構建現狀、利用現狀]. 서울대학교도서관보[首爾大學圖書館報], 135/138, pp. 196-231.
서울대학교 중앙도서관[首爾大學中央圖書館] (2016c). 현황(2014년)：시설현황, 직원현황, 자료현황, 예산현황, 데이터베이스 구축현황, 이용현황[現況(2014年)：設施現狀、職員現狀、資料現狀、預算現狀、資料庫構建現狀、利用現狀]. 서울대학교도서관보[首爾大學圖書館報], 135/138, pp. 232-268.
서울대학교 중앙도서관[首爾大學中央圖書館] (2016d). 현황(2015년)：시설현황, 직원현황, 자료현황, 예산현황, 데이터베이스 구축현황, 이용현황[現況(2015年)：設施現狀、職員現狀、資料現狀、預算現狀、資料庫構建現狀、利用現狀]. 서울대학교도서관보[首爾大學圖書館報], 135/138, 269-319.
서울대학교 중앙도서관[首爾大學中央圖書館] (2017). 현황(2016년)：시설현황, 직원현황, 자료현황, 예산현황, 데이터베이스 구축현황, 이용현황[現況(2016年)：設施現狀、職員現狀、資料現狀、預算現狀、資料庫構建現狀、利用現狀]. 서울대학교도서관보[首爾大學圖書館報], 139, 173-196.
서울대학교 중앙도서관[首爾大學中央圖書館] (2018). 현황(2017년)：시설현황, 직원현황, 자료현황, 예산현황, 데이터베이스 구축현황, 이용현황[現況(2017年)：設施現狀、職員現狀、資料現狀、預算現狀、資料庫構建現狀、利用現狀]. 서울대학교도서관보[首爾大學圖書館報], 140, 65-86.
서울대학교 중앙도서관[首爾大學中央圖書館] (2019). 현황(2018년)：시설현황, 직원현황, 자료현황, 예산현황, 데이터베이스 구축현황, 이용현황[現況(2018年)：設施現狀、職員現狀、資料現狀、預算現狀、資料庫構建現狀、利用現狀]. 서울대학교도서관보[首爾大學圖書館報], 141, 59-80.
서울대학교 중앙도서관[首爾大學中央圖書館] (2020). 서울대학교 중앙도서관. 檢自： https://lib.snu.ac.kr/
서울대학교도서관[首爾大學圖書館] (2019a). 도서관통계[圖書館統計]。檢自 http://library.snu.ac.kr/statistics_col
서울대학교도서관[首爾大學圖書館] (2019b)。소책자2019[小冊子2019]。檢自 http://library.snu.ac.kr/sites/default/files/library-brochure/2019_kor.pdf
서울대학교도서관[首爾大學圖書館] (2020a). 현황：시설현황, 직원현황, 자료현황, 예산현황, 데이터베이스 구축현황, 이용현황[現況：設施現狀、職員現狀、資料現狀、預算現狀、資料庫構建現狀、利用現狀]. 서울대학교도서관보[首爾大學圖書館報], 142, 119-146.
서울대학교도서관[首爾大學圖書館] (2020b). Research Guides. 檢自：https://libguide.snu.ac.kr/main
서울대학교도서관[首爾大學圖書館] (2021)。직원소개•연락처[職員介紹•聯繫方式]。檢自 https://library.snu.ac.kr/staff
신승철, 김기태, 홍순영, 김미향, 김기숙, 송지형, ... & 김현자[申勝澈、金基泰、洪順英、金美香、金基淑、宋智亨、... &金炫子] (2017). 서울대학교 도서관 70 년사: 1946-2016[首爾大學圖書館70年史：1946-2016]. 서울대학교 중앙도서관[首爾大學 中央圖書館].
신은자[申恩子] (2019). 사서와 타학문분야 연구팀의 공동 연구 및 출판에 관한 연구[圖書館員與其他學科領域研究小組的共同研究和出版研究]. 한국문헌정보학회지[韓國文獻情報學會誌], 53, 143.
심원식[沈元植] (2009). 주제전담사서 양성을 위한 사서 재교육 프로그램의 개발에 관한 연구[關於培養學科館員的圖書館員再培訓項目發展的研究]. 한국도서관•정보학회지[韓國圖書館情報學會誌], 40(1), 541-560.
안인자, 노동조, 노영희, & 김성진[安仁子、盧東朝、盧英姬&金成珍] (2009). 주제전문사서를 위한 능력중심 교육과정 개발 연구[爲學科館員發展以能力爲中心的教育課程的研究]. 한국문헌정보학회지[韓國文獻情報學會誌], 43(1), 333-361.
왕혜숙[王慧淑] (2013). 동아시아 가족의 다양성: 한국과 대만의 가족제도와 규범 비교 연구[東亞家庭的多樣性:韓國和臺灣的家庭制度和規範比較研究]. 사회사상과 문화[社會思想和文化], 27, 351-398.
이용구, 우윤희[李龍九、禹潤喜] (2015). 대만 문헌정보학 분야의 공저 네트워크 분석 연구[臺灣圖書資訊學領域的合作者網絡分析研究]. 정보관리학회지[情報管理學會誌], 32(2), 167-192.
정동열[鄭東烈] (2002). 지식기반시대 대학도서관의 주제전문화 역할 방향에 관한 연구[於知識基礎時代大學圖書館的學科專業文化作用方向的研究]. 한국문헌정보학회지[韓國文獻情報學會誌], 36(3), 5-23.
정일준[丁一俊] (2013). 대만과 한국의 발전국가로의 전환 비교연구-1950 년대 미국의 아시아 냉전전략을 중심으로[臺灣和韓國向發展國家轉變的比較研究-以1950年代美國的亞洲冷戰戰略爲中心]. 사회와 역사[合會與歷史], 100, 447-484.
정재영[鄭在泳] (2007). 주제전문사서 양성을 위한 협력모형구축에 관한 연구: 도서관 관련 주체들의 역할을 중심으로[關於培養學科館員的合作模式構建的研究：以圖書館相關主體的作用爲中心]. 한국문헌정보학회지[韓國文獻情報學會誌], 41(1), 391-409.
정재영[鄭在泳] (2009). 대학도서관의 주제전문사서제 운영방안 연구: 3 개 대학도서관의 서비스 사례 분석을 중심으로[大學圖書館的學科館員制度營運方案研究：以3個大學圖書館的服務案例分析爲中心]. 한국도서관•정보학회지[韓國圖書館情報學會誌], 40(3), 119-136.
존쳉[鄭學禮] (2014). 교육에 관한 유교의 철학과 현대사회에서의 가치[儒教在教育方面的哲學和在現代社會中的價值]. 교육철학연구[教育哲學研究], 36(3), 203-219.
중앙도서관[中央圖書館] (2008). 현황(2007)： 시설현황, 직원현황, 자료현황, 예산현황, 제본현황, 데이터베이스 구축현황, 이용현황[現況(2007)：設施現狀、職員現狀、資料現狀、預算現狀、裝訂現狀、資料庫構建現狀、利用現狀]. Bulletin of the seoul national university library, 130, 151-166.
중앙도서관[中央圖書館] (2011). 현황(2010)：시설현황, 직원현황, 자료현황, 예산현황, 데이터베이스 구축현황, 이용현황[現況(2011)：設施現狀、職員現狀、資料現狀、預算現狀、資料庫構建現狀、利用現狀]. Bulletin of the seoul national university library, 133, 115-128.
중앙도서관[中央圖書館] (2012). 현황(2011)：시설현황, 직원현황, 자료현황, 예산현황, 데이터베이스 구축현황, 이용현황[現況(2011)：設施現狀、職員現狀、資料現狀、預算現狀、資料庫構建現狀、利用現狀]. Bulletin of the seoul national university library, 134, 112-157.
최흥식[崔興植] (2012). 대학도서관의 주제전문사서에 대한 이용자 인식제고방안에 관한 연구[對大學圖書館學科館員的讀者認識建議方案研究]. 한국도서관정보학회지[韓國圖書館情報學會誌], 43(1), 303-319.
한국교육학술정보원[韓國教育學術資訊院] (2018). 2018년 대학도서관 통계분석 자료집[2018年大學圖書館統計分析資料集], 대구.
한국도서관협회[韓國圖書館協會] (2020a). information service. 檢自 https://www.kla.kr/jsp/fileboard/termdic.do?procType=view&f_termdic_seq=5085
한국도서관협회[韓國圖書館協會] (2020b). 대학도서관[大學圖書館]. 檢自 https://www.kla.kr/jsp/fileboard/termdic.do?procType=view&f_termdic_seq=1325
한국도서관협회[韓國圖書館協會] (2020c). 주제전문사서[學科館員]. 檢自 https://www.kla.kr/jsp/fileboard/termdic.do?procType=view&f_termdic_seq=6038
한상완[韓相完] (1986). 한국의 대학도서관 정보서비스에 있어서 주제전문사서의 현황과 기능에 관한 조사연구[關於韓國大學圖書館資訊服務學科館員的現狀和功能的調查研究]. 정보관리학회지[情報管理學會誌], 3(2), 42-74.
홍순영[洪順英] (2010). 주제전문서비스의 현황과 과제 : 서울대 학과전담서비스를 중심으로[學科服務的現狀和課題:以首爾大學學科專門服務爲中心]. Bulletin of the Seoul National University Library, 132, 63-92. 檢自 http://hdl.handle.net/10371/62133
황재영[黃在英] (2011). 전문도서관의 주제전문서비스 운영 현황과 사서의 인식 분석[專門圖書館學科服務運行情況和圖書館員的認識分析]. 한국도서관•정보학회지[韓國圖書館情報學會誌], 42(4), 137-158.
Adolphus, M. (2010). The Hybrid Librarian. Retrieved from https://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/archived/librarians/management/viewpoints/hybrid.htm
American Library Association [ALA] (2005). Guidelines for information services. Retrieved from
http://www.ala.org/rusa/stnd_gen_local.html
http://www.ala.org/ala/rusa/rusaprotools/referenceguide/guidelinesinformation.htm
Arthur, M., & Tierney, B. G. (2014). Subject librarian initiative at the University of Central Florida Libraries: Collaboration amongst research and information services, acquisitions and collection services, and the Office of Scholarly Communication.
Association of Research Libraries [ARL] (2007). Liaison Services. Washington, D.C., Association of Research Libraries.
Åström, F., Hansson, J., & Olsson, M. (2011). Bibliometrics and the changing role of the university libraries.
Auckland, M. (2012). Re-skilling for research: An investigation into the role and skills of subject and liaison librarians required to effectively support the evolving information needs of researchers. Research libraries UK, 4.
Bartnik, L. (2007). The embedded academic librarian: The subject specialist moves into the discipline college. Kentucky Libraries, 71(3), 4-9.
Bell, S., & Shank, J. D. (2004). The blended librarian: A blueprint for redefining the teaching and learning role of academic librarians. Temple University Libraries.
Bereday,George (1964).Comparative Method in Education. Holt Rinehart and Winston.
Chanetsa, B., & Ngulube, P. (2017). Qualifications and skills of subject librarians in selected African countries. International Information & Library Review, 49(3), 187-200.
Chawner, B., & Oliver, G. (2013). A survey of New Zealand academic reference librarians: Current and future skills and competencies. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 44(1), 29-39.
Chu, J., & Zhang, D. (2008). Subject librarian 2.0 and subject services. Library & Information Service, 52(2), 6-8.
Colding, L. K., & Venecek, J. (2015). There`s Going to Be an Evolution: The Subject Librarian Initiative in Review. The Reference Librarian, 56(2), 133-145.
Collings, D. G. (1971). Comparative librarianship. Encyclopedia of library and information science, 5, 492.
Corlett-Rivera, K. (2017). Subject librarian as coauthor: A case study with recommendations. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 24(2-4), 189-202.
Corrall, S. (2008). The emergence of hybrid professionals: New skills, roles and career options for the information professional. Online Information 2008 Proceedings, 28, 67-73.
Corrall, S. (2014). Designing libraries for research collaboration in the network world: An exploratory study. Liber Quarterly, 24(1).
Dewey, B. I. (2004). The Embedded Librarian: Strategic Campus Collaborations. Resource Sharing & Information Networks, 17(1-2), 5-17.
Fang, C. (2013). 7 - Academic libraries: focusing on service. Chinese Librarianship in the Digital Era, 85-112: Chandos Publishing.
Guo, J., Huang, Q., & Lu, X. (2014). Design and Implementation of a Subject Librarian Training Program for University Libraries in China. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 54(2), 43-51.
Hay, F. J. (1990). The Subject Specialist in the Academic Library: A Review Article. Journal of academic librarianship, 16(1), 11-17.
Hinchliffe, L. J. (2010). The value of academic libraries: A look forward. College & Research Libraries News, 71(9), 466-467.
Hoffman, N., Beatty, S., Feng, P., & Lee, J. (2017). Teaching research skills through embedded librarianship. Reference Services Review, 45(2), 211-226. doi:10.1108/RSR-07-2016-0045
Hoodless, C., & Pinfield, S. (2018). Subject vs. functional: Should subject librarians be replaced by functional specialists in academic libraries?. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 50(4), 345-360.
Huvila, I., Holmberg, K., Kronqvist-Berg, M., Nivakoski, O., & Widén, G. (2013). What is Librarian 2.0–New competencies or interactive relations? A library professional viewpoint. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 45(3), 198-205.
Jaguszewski, J., & Williams, K. (2013). New roles for new times: Transforming liaison roles in research libraries.
Levine-Clark, M., & Carter, T. M. (2013). ALA glossary of library and information science. Chicago : ALA editions, an imprint of the American Library Association.
Luckert, Y. (2015). CORE COMPETENCIES For Subject Specialist Liaison Librarians Research Services Public Services Division University of Maryland Libraries. Digital Repository at the University of Maryland. doi: 10.13016/M21758。
Luckert, Y., Mack, D., Cossard, P., & Baykoucheva, S. (2013). Liaison Librarian Task Force 2012 - 2013, The University of Maryland Libraries, Final Report, 31 May 2013. In: Digital Repository at the University of Maryland. Retrieved from https://drum.lib.umd.edu/bitstream/handle/1903/17456/Liaison%20Task%20Force%20Final%20report%2010%20June%202013.pdf?sequence=1
Martin, J. A. (2010). Understanding Faculty Needs: A Case Study at the University of Toledo. 圖書館學與資訊科學, 36(1).
Martin, J. V. (1996). Subject specialization in British university libraries: a second survey. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 28(3), 159-169.
Mashroofa, M. M. (2013).Subject specialization of librarians of science and technology libraries in Sri Lanka. Paper presented at: IFLA WLIC 2013 - Singapore - Future Libraries: Infinite Possibilities in Session 197 - Science and Technology Libraries. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mohamed_Mashroofa/publication/262805160_Subject_Specialization_of_Librarians_of_Science_and_Technology_Libraries_in_Sri_Lanka/links/00b7d538ea9796366e000000/Subject-Specialization-of-Librarians-of-Science-and-Technology-Libraries-in-Sri-Lanka.pdf
Pandey, Rajesh Kumar. (2017). Academic Libraries in India: Opportunities and Future Challenges. University News: A Weekly Journal of Higher Education. New Delhi: Association of Indian Universities, 55(22), 14-17.
Pospelova, A., Tsurtsumia, R., & Tsibulnikova, M. (2018). Embedded librarians as providers of knowledge services. Libraries and the Academy, 18(4), 651-669. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/pla.2018.0039
Reference and User Services Association [RUSA] (2017). Professional Competencies for Reference and User Services Librarians. RUSA Board of Directors. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/rusa/resources/guidelines/professional
Reitz, J. M. (2004). Dictionary for library and information science: Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited.
Rudasill, L. M. (2010). Beyond subject specialization: The creation of embedded librarians. Public Services Quarterly, 6(2-3), 83-91.
Russo, M. F., & Daugherty, A. (2013). Embedded Librarianship: What Every Academic Librarian Should Know : What Every Academic Librarian Should Know. Santa Barbara, California: Libraries Unlimited.
Schoonover, D., Kinsley, K. M., Colvin, G., Julian, R., Buck Kachaluba, S. A., Vandegrift, M., & Wyckoff, T. (2014). Core Competencies for Subject Librarians at the Florida State University Libraries.
Shelley, A. (2014). Professional development opportunities for academic subject librarians. In Adult and Continuing Education: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, 171-189: IGI Global.
Shumaker, D. (2012). The embedded librarians: taking knowledge where it`s needed. Online, 36(4), 24.
Shumaker, D., & Talley, M. (2009). Models of embedded librarianship: Final report. Special Libraries Association, 9, 1-195. Sun, H. (2019). Research on Collaborative Subject Service Mode in Academic Libraries.
Shumaker, D., & Tyler, L. A. (2007). Embedded Library Services: An Initial Inquiry into Practices for Their Development, Management, and Delivery.
SNU NOW (2019). 채용공고[招募公告]. 檢自：https://www.snu.ac.kr/snunow/notice/job-openings?md=v&bbsidx=126576
Virgil, C. L. (2013). An Analysis of the Academic Library and the Changing Role of the Academic Librarian in Higher Education 1975--2012. Thesis (Ed.D.)--Lindenwood University, 2013.,
Williams, K. (2009). Subject Librarian 2.0: Preparing liaison librarians for 21st century academic environments.
Woodhead, P. A., & Martin, J. V. (1982). Subject specialization in British university libraries: A survey. Journal of librarianship, 14(2), 93-108. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
圖書資訊與檔案學研究所
107155026 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107155026 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202100009 |
| Appears in Collections: | [Graduate Institute of Library, Information and Archival Studies] Theses
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 502601.pdf | | 2980Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 89 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
