English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51672740      Online Users : 645
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/133586
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/133586


    Title: 刑事獨立沒收與追徵立法之必要-以德;美立法為觀察
    The Necessity of Independent Confiscation and Forced Collection in the Criminal Code: from the Viewpoints of German and United States Legislations
    Authors: 楊雲驊
    Yang, Yun-Hua
    簡士淳
    Chien, Steven
    Contributors: 法律系
    Keywords: 沒收;追徵;民事沒收;扣押;國際刑事司法互助
    Confiscation;Forced Collection;Civil Forfeiture;Judicial Attachment;International Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters
    Date: 2015-05
    Issue Date: 2021-01-18 15:31:36 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 我國刑法將沒收與追徵等列為從刑,對於被告因訴訟障礙事由或事實原因以致無法無實體判決時,即無法對於犯罪所得進行沒收或追徵,讓犯罪者坐享犯罪成果,變相鼓勵犯罪,極為不妥。相對於此,屬不同法系之德國與美國,針對此問題均有周詳之沒收或追徵規定。本文以介紹 ; 評價此二國法制與實務為中心,並對我國未來立法提出建議。
    Since the Criminal Code of the Republic of China categorizes confiscation and forced collection as accessory punishments, the proceeds of crime will not be confiscated or forcibly collected if the defendant cannot beconvicted. By enabling the defendant to keep the proceeds of crime, we are sending the message that criminal endeavor is actually profitable. Meanwhile, the Germany and the United States have established sophisticated legal systems regarding the mechanism of confiscation and forced collection. This article aims at analyzing the legal structures and practices of these two countries and seeks to provide policy suggestions for future legislation.
    Relation: 月旦法學雜誌, No.第 241 期, pp.88-124 頁
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.3966/102559312015060241005
    DOI: 10.3966/102559312015060241005
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    34.pdf1112KbAdobe PDF2220View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback