政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/132582
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 114396/145431 (79%)
造访人次 : 53060608      在线人数 : 805
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/132582


    题名: 道歉後的制度性安排：澳洲條約機制引進對我國之啟發
    Is Treaty-making a Way of Decolonization?: Learning from Australia`s Treaty Debates
    作者: 黃之棟
    Huang, Morgan Chih-Tung
    贡献者: 問題與研究
    关键词: 條約 ; 原住民族 ; 主權 ; 憲法肯認 ; 去殖民 
    Treaty ; Indigenous Peoples ; Sovereignty ; Constitutional Recognition ; Decolonization
    日期: 2020-09
    上传时间: 2020-11-16 13:47:49 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 2016年8月1日原住民族日當天，蔡英文總統代表政府正式向原住民族道歉。自此之後，臺灣的原住民族政策便邁入了新頁。在眾多後續討論中，原住民族自治議題尤其受到族人與各界的關注。對此，現階段政府的規劃，是希望參酌美加紐等國經驗，透過「實質談判程序機制」來達到自治。此方案近似於前述原住民族先進國所採取的「條約模式」，也就是透過原住民族和國家（中央、地方政府）協商談判並簽訂協定的方式，來確認進而規範兩者間的關係。面對此一嶄新的方案，各界的討論卻相對有限。無獨有偶地，近來澳洲也對條約機制的引進，展開了一系列的討論。有鑑於此，本文擬從該國對相關機制的思索乃至論辯出發，希望以此來作為未來我國制度規劃時的借鏡與反省。整體來說，條約制度的引進必然會觸及既有憲政架構的更動乃至主權議題，這也使得相關討論會涉及理論論證與法制磨合。由於這些議題具備高度政治性，故也相當敏感。對此，作者嘗試從政策學習與制度磨合的角度出發，嘗試以憲法肯認、條約、原住民族主權三位一體的理解，來捕捉澳洲對相關議題的討論。除此之外，由於條約機制實務上經常被用來作為國家正當化其權力來源的工具，故作者也對引進此制度可能的限制進行分析。
    In 2016, President Ing-wen Tsai apologized to the Taiwanese indigenous peoples on behalf of the government, which is known as the National Apology. Echoing this National Apology, the Council of Indigenous Peoples reaffirmed its proposal called the ＂substantive negotiation process＂. Before long, this innovative treaty-making provision opened a debate on whether or not such process can really fit in with Taiwan`s current constitutional and legal system. As a way to move forward, this article attempts to scrutinize similar treaty debates in Australia. In doing so, it has become more clear that treaty-making, (indigenous) sovereignty, and the Constitution are not separate issues, but rather, a connected one. As treaty forms the basic relationships between government/state and indigenous peoples, the debate itself is about the fundamental question of power-sharing and decolonization. Given that the government often treats treaty-making as a way of legitimatizing its power, this article cautions that indigenous peoples must stay alert to the possible harms of treaty-making. There is always a danger that buying into coloniser`s concept, i.e. treaty or sovereignty, could sink the whole indigenous struggle into the frameworks of the settler`s/state`s logic.
    關聯: 問題與研究季刊, 59卷3期, 123-155
    数据类型: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.30390/ISC.202009_59(3).0004
    DOI: 10.30390/ISC.202009_59(3).0004
    显示于类别:[問題與研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    29.pdf1340KbAdobe PDF2239检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈