政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/132557
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113873/144892 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51960257      線上人數 : 395
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/132557


    題名: 既有強權對崛起強權的政策選擇分析：以美國對「日本崛起」與「中國崛起」之回應為例
    An Analysis of Dominant Powers` Policy Options toward Rising Powers: Examples of the U.S. Reactions to the Rise of Japan and China
    作者: 陳亮智
    Chen , Liang-chih Evans
    劉兆隆
    Liu, Chao-lung
    貢獻者: 問題與研究
    關鍵詞: 美日關係 ; 美中關係 ; 制衡 ; 交往 
    U.S.-Japan Relations ; U.S.-China Relations ; Balancing ; Engagement
    日期: 2019-03
    上傳時間: 2020-11-16 13:38:45 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本文認為，「既有強權美國vs.崛起強權日本」（1931～1941）與「既有強權美國vs.崛起強權中國」（1993～2018）的比較，能為現今的美中關係提供許多建設性的思考。本文從既有強權的角度觀察其如何回應崛起強權；以Randall Schweller的歸納為基礎而建立一個相對完整的政策選擇全貌。作者發現：面對1931～1941年崛起的日本，美國先採「中立、綏靖」，後改採「制衡」，最終採「戰爭」。面對1993～2018年崛起的中國，美國以「交往」為基調而佐以「戰略夥伴關係」，然因中國崛起與美國重返亞洲，其逐漸轉成「既交往又制衡」，是典型的「混合策略」。如此，成就兩個不同的大國互動結果。
    This paper argues that the comparative study of the two cases - the US dominant power vs. the Japan rising power (1931-1941) and the US dominant power vs. the China rising power (1993-2018) can provide ample constructive thinking on the contemporary US-China relations. This paper focuses on how a dominant power reacts to a rising power. An analytical framework of dominant powers` policy options toward rising powers, based on Randall Schweller`s theories, is developed and applied to this study. This paper has found that facing a rising Japan from 1931 to 1941, the US first opted for neutrality and appeasement, but later changed to balancing, which eventually led to war. In contrast, facing a rising China from 1993 to 2018, the US opted for engagement in principle and supplemented it with strategic partnership. However, in the case of rising China, due to the return of the US to Asia, the US gradually shifted its policy to engagement while balancing - this type of shift is a typical mixed strategy. As such, two different kinds of interactions between great powers have resulted in different consequences.
    關聯: 問題與研究季刊, 58卷1期, 89-142
    資料類型: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.30390/ISC.201903_58(1).0003
    DOI: 10.30390/ISC.201903_58(1).0003
    顯示於類別:[問題與研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    3.pdf1739KbAdobe PDF2235檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋