政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/132533
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113656/144643 (79%)
造访人次 : 51722176      在线人数 : 597
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/132533


    题名: 書評：洪席耶《現代：藝術、時間、政治》
    Book Review of Jacques Rancière`s Modern Times. Essays on Temporality in Art and Politics
    作者: 楊彩杰
    Yeung Choi Kit, Sabrina
    贡献者: 政治大學哲學學報
    关键词: 洪席耶 ; 感性劃分 ; 時間性 ; 美學體制 
    Jacques Rancière ; Distribution of Sensible ; Temporality ; Aesthetic Regime
    日期: 2020-01
    上传时间: 2020-11-12 15:59:47 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 賈克．洪席耶（Jacques Rancière, 1940-）的《現代：藝術、時間、政治》由四篇文章構成。第一篇〈時間、敘事和政治〉認為政治時間不是一條從過去走向未來的單軌道直線，而是代表著諸種生活形式的劃分。第二篇從諸種生活形式之間衍生的矛盾出發，重新定義美學的現代性。第三篇〈舞蹈時刻〉指出現代舞的時間是獨特的，這份獨特性為它與其他表演方式，以及與生活之間的關係提供了一種新的關係範式。第四篇〈電影時刻〉以三部電影為例，分析它們的三種時間性體現。綜合而言，此書首先從時間的角度補足了洪席耶《感性劃分》中對感性平等的思考，其次延續了他對社會科學的批評。把此書結合洪席耶的其他作品，就能揭示了洪席耶整個關於美學體制思考的龐大計劃。
    Jacques Rancière`s Modern Times: Essays on Temporality in Art and Politics consists of four essays. The first essay argues that the political time is not a temporal chain which is composed of consecutive moments in time and stretches from the past to the future, but a boundary that implies the hierarchy of life forms separating those who have time from those who have not. The second essay redefines the aesthetic modernity by showing that the notions of modernity and postmodernity are incapable of conceptualizing the transformations that have subverted the logic of the artistic regimes from the old to the new. The third and the fourth essays, using dance and film as examples, explain how the discussed examples draw a new fabric of sensual experience and how they weave the sensual forms of the new community. All in all, this book reflects on the concept of equality in relation to temporality. It then inherits and continues Rancière`s critics towards certain themes in social science, such as grand narratives. Taking this book and his earlier writings together, we can see a systemic and concise presentation of Rancière`s studies on aesthetic regimes.
    關聯: 政治大學哲學學報, 43, 117-136
    数据类型: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.30393/TNCUP.202001_(43).0004
    DOI: 10.30393/TNCUP.202001_(43).0004
    显示于类别:[政治大學哲學學報 THCI Core] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    7.pdf777KbAdobe PDF2267检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈