English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51749155      Online Users : 623
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 教育學院 > 教育學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/131833
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131833


    Title: 教育創業家目的感之個案研究
    A Case Study on Purpose of Education Entrepreneurs
    Authors: 黃映涵
    Contributors: 詹志禹
    黃映涵
    Keywords: 創業
    創業家
    教育創業
    目的感
    Entrepreneurship
    Entrepreneur
    Education entrepreneur
    Innovation
    Sense of purpose
    Date: 2020
    Issue Date: 2020-09-02 12:54:36 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在全球化經濟型態的轉變與影響下,創業(Entrepreneurship)為現代社會中廣受討論、也炙手可熱的新興職業選擇。各學門對創新創業的相關研究也日益增加,尤其以企業管理領域為數最多。然而,自二十世紀中期起逐漸興起源自於對資本主義的反思、並以改善或解決現存社會議題為目標的社會企業(Social Entrepreneurship,也譯為社會創業),豐富並擴大了創業的範疇,也促進更多的討論和思考。而隸屬於社會企業一環的教育創業,則由於發展時間晚、關注領域小,以此為主題的研究仍為少數。本研究者具有對教育及創業領域的涉略經驗,並且長期關心相關議題,加上對於史丹佛大學教育系教授William Damon從探討美國當代年輕人心理發展,依此提出與人類終極關懷、內心滿足感、生命意義密切相關的目的感(purpose)研究深感興趣。便採用目的感之概念內涵,希冀從目的感的角度分析並檢視教育創業家的親身經驗,整合提出相關的研究發現與建議,茲提供相關教育工作者、創業者、決策者、教師、家長等參考。本研究透過訪談及資料分析結果發現,教育創業家個案即使個人經驗與創業領域不同,卻共同具備的特質:真心關懷、由內而發的動機、不以結果為最終目的等。並且,其目的感的發展受個人特質、及環境脈絡等多方面影響。
    Because of the trend and influence of globalization, as well as the worldwide changing of economy system, “Entrepreneurship” becomes a widely-discussed issue. And relevant research is also increasing accordingly, especially in management field. However, some opposite viewpoints appeared due to the the reflection of Capitalism. Social entrepreneurship, which targeting at improving or solving certain existing social problems, is one of the most important examples. The emersion of social entrepreneurship not only enrichs and expands the research of entrepreneurship, but also promotes more discussions.Educational entrepreneurship, which is a part of social entrepreneurship, is the minority of this research field because it’s late developing and less of a concern.
    Since researcher has experience being both a teacher and an entrepreneur, and also caring the relevant issue for a few years. Researcher is strongly interested in the concept of sense of purpose, which came from a modern psychological adolescent research host by William Damon and relates to human ultimate concern, satisfaction and life-meaning, etc.. Therefore, this research attempts to use the notion and context of sense of purpose to analyze educational entrepreneur’s experience, and address some further advices and information for educators, entrepreneurs, and parents. Through the process of interview and data analysis, the result shows that despite of the difference of each educational entrepreneur’s experiences, they still own some common traits in concern, motivation and so on. Otherwise, the development of sense of purpose might be influenced by personal character strength and context factors.
    Reference: 壹、中文文獻
    王玉珍(2018)。青少年目的感經驗之探究,教育心理學報,49(3),437-459。
    王玉珍、吳清麟(2017)。成人生涯召喚量表織編制及其信效度分析,教育心理學報,49(1),1-21。
    王保進(2001)。知識經濟時代下之教育省思,國立教育資料館:現代教育論壇 [知識經濟與教育]研討會。
    牛涵錚、辛敏綺(2011)。創新與創業精神研究之回顧與發展,創新與管理,8(4),33-62。
    石宜家、謝季宏、吳和堂(2011)。國小教師的工作壓力、工作滿意度與生命意義感因果關係之研究。教育學刊,37,177-214。
    何畏、易家詳譯(2005)。經濟發展理論(原作者:J. A. Schumpeter)。台北縣新店市:左岸文化。
    何英奇(1990)。生命態度剖面圖之編製。師大學報,35,71-94。
    何英奇(民76)。大專學生之生命意義感及其相關:意義治療法基本概念之實徵性研究。教育心理學報,20,87-106。doi:10.6251/BEP.19870601.6
    林惠彥、陸洛、吳佩瑀、吳婉瑜(2012)快樂的員工更有生產力嗎?組織支持與工作態度之雙重影響。中華心理學刊,54(4),451-469。
    呂淑惠、吳明隆(2014)。高雄市國小特教教師正向心理、生命意義感與生活滿意度之相關研究。美和學報,33(1),195-216。
    吳芝儀、李奉儒(譯)(1995)。質的評鑑與研究(原作者:Potton, M. Q.)。台北:桂冠。
    吳和堂(2014)教師生命意義感量表之發展。教育理論與實踐學刊,29,91-122。
    吳淑英(2004)。生命教育方案對國小資優學童生命意義感影響之研究。資優教育研究, 4(2),17-42。
    吳清山(2004)。學校創新經營理念與策略。教師天地,128,30-44。
    吳清山、林天祐(2003)。創新經營。教育資料與研究,53,134-135。
    吳清山、林天祐(2014)。教育U辭書。臺北市:高等教育。
    吳清山(2015)。「實驗教育三法」的重要內涵與策進作為。教育研究月刊,258,42-58。
    吳靜吉、樊學良(2011)台灣創造力教育相關政策與實踐經驗,創造學刊,2(1),5-28。
    吳靜吉(2017)。創造力是性感的。臺北市:遠流。
    李弘善(譯)(2013)。未來教育—2030年教師備忘錄(原作者:Barnett Berry & the TeacherSolutions 2030 Team)。臺北市:遠流。
    李政賢(譯)(2014)。質性研究:設計與計畫撰寫(原作者:Catherine Marshall、Gretchen B. Rossman)。臺北市:五南。
    胡述兆(民84)。圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典。臺北市:漢美。
    林佩璇(2000)。個案研究及其在教育研究上的應用-質的研究方法。高雄:麗文。
    社企流(2014)。社企力!社會企業=翻轉世界的變革力量。用愛創業,做好事又能獲利!台北市:果力文化。
    徐凡甘著、邱淑宜採訪整理(2018)。我的選擇,是把生命活得更好:從換腎少年、創業青年到偏鄉教師,總統教育獎得主徐凡甘的甘苦人生。臺北:時報出版。
    高義芳、沈怡臻(2009)。社會企業創業家其人格特質、創業動機、個人能力與關係網絡之研究:以個案為例。創業管理研究,4(4),29-55。
    教育部(2002)。創造力教育白皮書:打造創造力國度(Republic of Creativity,
    許芳菊(譯)(2013)。邁向目的之路:幫助孩子發現內心的召喚,踏上自己的英雄旅程(原作者:William Damon)。臺北市:天下雜誌。
    許英傑、黃慧玲、劉鳳冠(2007)。創業精神、創業機會與零售業態創新:以燦坤3C連鎖店為例。創業管理研究,2(1),165-196。
    郭貞伶、廖建容(2016)。品格:履歷表與追悼文的抉擇(原作者:David Brooks)。臺北市:天下文化。
    郭靜晃(2007)社會行為研究法。台北市:洪葉文化。
    張玉文、羅耀宗(譯)(2007)。杜拉克精選:創新管理篇(原作者:Peter Drucker)。臺北市:天下遠見。
    張芬芬(2010)。質性資料分析的五步驟:在抽象階梯上爬升。初等教育學刊,35,87-120。
    張楚、張希慈(2015)。感謝我們始終對話。臺北市:三采文化。
    陳以亨、林思吟、陳先郡(2016)。三創教育之發展與推動─以臺灣、芬蘭、日本為例。創造學刊,7(2),1-19。
    陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。臺北市:五南。
    陳珍德、程小蘋(2002)。癌症病人生命意義之研究。彰化師大輔導學報,23,1-48。
    陳家聲、吳奕慧(2007)。華人創業家心理與行為特質之初探。創業管理研究,2(1),1-30。
    陳蕙芬(2014)。從教育預見未來。新聞學研究,119,211-218。
    陳蕙芬(2015)。創意、創新與創業課程在教育領域之實踐與反思。國民教育,55(1),61-67。
    曾文志(2006)。就算短暫,也是永恆-談正向心理學的發展。師友月刊,465,57-63。
    曾文志(2010)。走過正向心理學的第一個十年。師友月刊,513,62-66。
    黃惠秋(2005)。認識自我-生命教育課程對國中生自我概念及生命意義感之影響。慈濟大學教育研究所學位論文,未出版,花蓮縣。
    劉安婷(2014)。出走,是為了回家:普林斯頓成長之路。臺北市:天下文化。
    葉重新(2001)。教育研究法。台北市:心理。
    親子天下雜誌(2013)。國中學習力調查:1/4不能完全聽懂上課內容。親子天下雜誌,33。取自https://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5031643&utm_campaign=copylink_-website_share-icon&utm_medium=website_share&utm_source=copylink
    蔡純姿(2005)。學校經營創新模式與衡量指標建構之研究(未出版之博士論
    文)。國立臺南大學,臺南市。
    蔡敦浩、利尚仁、林韶怡(2007)。複雜性科學典範下的創業研究,創業管理研究,2(1),31-60。
    蔡敦浩、利尚仁、林韶怡(2008)。創業研究的新趨向-敘說探究之應用,中山管理評論,16(2),321-350。
    謝如梅、劉常勇(2009)。國際創業研究計畫:「全球創業觀察」之模式、方法與意涵。創業管理研究,4(3),1-27。
    顏秀如、張明輝(2005)。學校創新經營的意涵與實施計畫。中等教育,56(3),28-53。
    簡忠仁、周婉茹、鄭伯壎(2015)。使命型創業家的立命與立業:內聖外王的實踐歷程。本土心理學研究,44,3-71。

    貳、西文文獻
    Baumeister, R. F. (1991). Meanings of life. New York, NY: Guilford.
    Benard, B. (1995). Fostering Resilience in Children. ERIC Digest.
    Bronk, K. C. (2013). Purpose in life: A critical component of optimal youth development. Springer Science & Business Media.
    Bronk, K. C. (2012). A grounded theory of youth purpose. Journal of Adolescent Research, 27, 78–109. doi:10.1177/0743558411412958.
    Damon, W. (2008). The path to purpose: Helping our children find their calling in life. New York, NY: Free Press.
    Damon, W. (2009). The path to purpose: How young people find their calling in life. New York, NY: Free Press.
    Damon, W., Menon, J., & Cotton Bronk, K. (2003). The development of purpose during adolescence. Applied developmental science, 7(3), 119-128.
    Dees, J. G. (1998). Enterprising Non-Profits. Toolkit for Social Entrepreneurs. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological method (2nd ed.). NY: McGraw-Hill.
    Drucker, P.F. (1985). Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles. NY : Harper and Row.
    Drucker, P.F. (1987). Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles. Pan Books.
    Drucker, P.F. (2005). The Essential Drucker on Technology. NY : HarperCollins.
    Eisenberg, N. (1992). The Caring Child. Cambridge, MA: Harverd University Press.
    Fauchart, E., & Gruber, M. (2011). Darwinians, communitarians, and missionaries: The role of founder identity in entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Journal, 54(5), 935-957.
    Frankl, V. E. (1966). What is meant by meaning? Journal of Existentialism, 7, 21–28.
    Frankl, V. E. (1978). The unheard cry for meaning: Psychotherapy and humanism. New York, NY: Siomn Schuste.
    Frankl, V. E. (1988). The will to meaning: Foundations and applications of logotherapy (2nd ed.). New York, NY: New American Library.
    Gummesson, E. (1991). Qualitative Methods in Management Research. Sage Publications. Newbury Park, CA.
    Hill, C.W., Jones, G. R., & Schilling, M. A. (2014) Strategic management: theory: an integrated approach. Cengage Learning.
    Hablas, R., & Hutzell, R. (1980). The Life Purpose Questionnaire: An alternative to the Purpose in Life test for geriatric, neuropsychiatric patients. In S. A. Wawrytko (Ed.), Analectica Frankliana: The proceedings of the First World Congress of Logotherapy (pp. 211-215). Berkeley, CA: Strawberry Hill.
    Jazaieri, H., Jinpa, G. T., McGonigal, K., Rosenberg, E. L., Finkelstein, J., & Simon-Thomas, E., et al. (2013). Enhancing compassion: A randomized controlled trial of a compassion cultivation training program. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14 (4), 1113–1126. doi:10.1007/s10902-012-9373-z.
    Jim, H. S., Purnell, J. Q., Richardson, S. A., Golden-Kreutz, D., & Andersen, B. L. (2006). Measuring meaning in life following cancer. Quality of Life Research, 15, 1355-1371. doi:10/1007s11136-006-0028-6
    Kim, E. S., Strecher, V. J., & Ryff, C. D. (2014). Purpose in life and use of preventive health care services. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(46), 16331-16336.
    Malin, H., Reilly, T. S., Quinn, B., & Moran, S. (2014). Adolescent purpose development: Exploring empathy, discovering roles, shifting priorities, and creating pathways. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 24(1), 186–199. doi:10.1111/jora.12051.
    Malin, H., Liauw, I., & Damon, W. (2017). Purpose and character development in early adolescence. Journal of youth and adolescence, 46(6), 1200-1215. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0642-3.
    Mead, G. H. (1934), Mind, Self and Society. Chicago, IL: University Of Chicago Press.
    Meier, A., & Edwards, H. (1974). Purpose-in-Life Test: Age and sex differences. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 30(3), 384-386.
    Mill, J. S. (1848). Principles of political economy. London, England: John W.
    Parker.
    Miller, W. L. & Crabtree, B. F. (1992). Doing qualitative research. (1st ed.).
    London:Sage.
    Miller, T. L., Grimes, M. G., McMullen, J. S., & Vogus, T. J. (2012). “Venturing for Others with Heart and Head: How Compassion Encourages Social Entrepreneurship”, Academy of Management Review, 37(4), 616-640.
    Moran, S., Bundick, M., Malin, H., & Reilly, T. (2013). How supportive of their specific purposes do youth believe their family and friends are? Journal of Adolescent Research, 28(3), 348–377.doi:10.1177/0743558412457816.
    Nikos Mourkogiannis (2006). Purpose: The Starting Point of Great Companies. Palgrave Macmillan.
    Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Davis, C. G. (2002). Positive responses to loss: Perceiving benefits and growth. In C. R. Snyder & S. Lopez, (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology. (pp. 598-607). New York: Oxford University Press.
    Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press.
    Reker, G. T., & Peacock, E. J. (1981). The Life Attitude Profile (LAP): A multidimensional instrument for assessing attitudes toward life. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 13, 264-273.
    Reker, G. T., & Wong, P.T. P. (1988). Aging as an individual process: Toward a theory of personal meaning. In J. E. Birren & V. L. Bengston (Eds.), Emergent theories of aging (pp. 214–246). New York, NY: Springer.
    Riessman, C. K.(1993). Narrative Analysis. NewBury Park: Sage.
    Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (1998). The role of purpose in life and personal growth in positive human health. In P. T. P. Wong & P. S. Fry (Eds.), The human quest for meaning: A handbook of psychological research and clinical applications (p. 213-235). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
    Ryff, C. D., Keyes, C. L., & Hughes, D. L. (2003). Status inequalities, perceived discrimination, and eudaimonic well-being: Do the challenges of minority life hone purpose and growth?. Journal of health and Social Behavior, 275-291.
    Schumpeter, J.A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Seligman, Martin E. P. (2003). Authentic Happiness: Using the New Positive Psychology to Realize Your Potential for Lasting Fulfillment. Nicholas Brealey.
    Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Starck, P. L. (2008). Theory of meaning. In M. J. Smith & P. R. Liehr (Eds.), Middle range theory for nursing (2nd ed., pp. 85-103). New York, NY: Springer.
    Susan S. & Beverley F. (2005). Compassionate love for close others and humanity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22(5), 629-651.
    Van de Ven, A. H., Hudson, R., & Schroeder, D. M. (1984). Designing New Business Startups: Entrepreneurial, Organizational, and Ecological Considerations. Journal of Management, 10, 87-107.

    參、網路資源
    IOH開放個人經驗平台https://ioh.tw/
    Teachers Pay Teachers網站https://www.teacherspayteachers.com/
    公益交流網https://npost.tw/
    台北DiD黑暗對話社會企業http://www.did-tpe.com/
    未來大人物https://becomingaces.com/
    社企流網站 https://www.seinsights.asia/
    國立政治大學創新與創造力研究中心http://www.ccis.nccu.edu.tw/zh_tw/34/35/45
    國立臺灣大學教學資源網http://ctld.ntu.edu.tw/fd/teaching_resource/page1-1_detail.php?bgid=&nid=300
    親子天下創新100 https://feature.parenting.com.tw/2019edu100
    雜學校網頁https://zashare.org/
    繭裹子https://www.twine.com.tw/
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    教育學系
    103152005
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103152005
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202001424
    Appears in Collections:[教育學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    200501.pdf4791KbAdobe PDF236View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback