Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131808
|
Title: | DFC挑戰活動在課程設計上的運用─以某私立中學為例 The Application of Design for Change Challenge in Course Design:The Case of a Private Secondary School |
Authors: | 蕭政宏 Hsiao, Cheng-Hung |
Contributors: | 黃東益 Huang, Tong-Yi 蕭政宏 Hsiao, Cheng-Hung |
Keywords: | DFC挑戰活動 情緒教育 公共參與 “DFC Challenge” Activities Emotional Education Public Engagement |
Date: | 2020 |
Issue Date: | 2020-09-02 12:50:30 (UTC+8) |
Abstract: | 民國103年11月,教育部發布「十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱」,期於108學年度起,依照不同教育階段逐年實施。『十二年國民基本教育課程』的發展,本於全人教育精神,強調學生為「自發」主動的學習者,學校教育應善誘學生的學習動機與熱情,引導學生妥善開展與自我、與他人、與社會、與自然的「互動」,以謀求彼此的互惠與「共好」。DFC挑戰的核心理念與相關步驟,恰好符合我國現今發展的十二年國民基本教育:學生主動觀察感受周遭環境,發揮創造力想像與實踐各類方案,透過團體分享,以期對環境帶來改變與提升。
本研究以某私立中學高中部一年級及國中部二年級學生為研究對象,進行規模性的DFC挑戰活動;筆者採取調查研究法、觀察研究法、行動研究法、次級資料法與敘事分析法,以了解下列問題:如何全面性、規模性地進行DFC挑戰活動?如何將情緒教育概念導入DFC挑戰活動?DFC挑戰活動與公共參與的關聯性為何?學生是否能在進行DFC挑戰活動後,培養出正向適宜的情緒?學生是否能在進行DFC挑戰活動後,培養出公民社會的積極責任感?研究者主體以問卷和訪談方式,讓參與DFC挑戰的某私立中學學生,回答本身對於DFC的認知了解、親自參與課程活動前後的情緒反應、執行DFC挑戰所遭遇的問題與困難,及探究自我在DFC挑戰活動中的心境轉變。
我們得到了下列研究結果:DFC挑戰活動對校園及班級氛圍的改變,讓成功完成挑戰的班級體認,他們有能力透過思考與行為,真正地凝聚班級向心力、改善環境、關心週遭並解決問題;同時,DFC課程對學生公共參與及正向情緒的提升,顯著地發生在成功完成挑戰的班級小組。研究過程中,筆者蒐集並思索出多項建議,包括課程長度調整、輔助活動與公民教育、輔導教育的導入,為找出最適合某私立中學教育環境的DFC課程設計方式。 In November 2014, the Ministry of Education issued the "12-Year National Basic Education Curriculum Master Plan", which was to begin in the 108th school year. It will be implemented on a year-by-year basis according to the different stages of education. The development of the "12-year National Basic Education Curriculum" is based on the spirit of whole-person education, emphasizing students as self-motivated and active learners. School education should induce students` motivation and enthusiasm for learning, and guide them to develop a proper relationship with themselves, with others, with society and with nature. The core concepts and steps of the “DFC Challenge” are in line with today`s developments in Taiwan. "Twelve years of basic national education”: students take the initiative to observe and experience their surroundings, use their creativity to imagine and implement various solutions, and work in groups sharing to bring changes and enhancements to the environment.
This study was conducted with first-year students in the Upper School and second-year students in a Private Secondary School to conduct a large-scale “DFC challenge” activitiy. The author adopts survey research method, observational research method, action research method, secondary data method and narrative analysis method in order to understand the following questions: How can the “DFC Challenge” be conducted comprehensively and at scale? How is the concept of emotion education adapted to the “DFC Challenge” and what is the relevance of the “DFC Challenge” to public engagement? Are students able to develop positive appropriate emotions after performing “DFC challenge” activities? Do students develop an active sense of responsibility in civil society after undertaking the “DFC challenge”? Through questionnaires and interviews, students who participated in the “DFC challenge” were asked to answer questions about their knowledge of DFC, their emotional responses before and after participating in the activities, the problems and difficulties they encountered in implementing the “DFC challenge”, and their own changes in their state of mind during the “DFC challenge”.
We obtained the following findings: the “DFC challenge” made a difference to the campus and classroom climate, and classes that successfully completed the challenge recognized that they have the ability to think and act in ways that truly build classroom cohesion, improve the environment, care for their neighbors, and solve problems. The increase in public engagement and positive emotions of the DFC program is evident in the class groups that successfully complete the challenge. In the course of the research, the author collected and considered a number of suggestions, including curriculum length adjustment, supplementary activities and civic education, and introduction of counseling education, in order to find out the most suitable DFC curriculum design for school`s educational environment. |
Reference: | 王敏(2017)。DFC教學方案應用於發展國小學童減量使用一次性產品環境素養之研究,臺北市立大學學習與媒材設計學系課程與教學碩士學位在職專班碩士論文,未出版,台北。 王文科、王智弘(2011)。教育研究法(增訂第十六版)。台北:五南。 方益壽(1995)。組織管理心理學。中國:山東大學出版社。 史美瑤(2012)。21世紀的教學:以「學生學習為中心」的教師發展。評鑑雙月刊,36,42-44。 何青蓉(2004)。閱讀,對話,書寫與文化理解:一個多元文化教育方案的實踐經驗。高雄師大學報,17,1-20。 李立旻(2017)。大學生公共參與經驗與學生權利意識關係之研究─以北區大學校院為例,國立臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系碩士論文,未出版,台北。 吳亭萱(2010)。幼兒情緒教育之探究,國立屏東科技大學幼兒保育系所碩士論文,未出版,屏東。 洪涼絹(2015)。DFC課程運用在綜合活動領域以提升學生自我概念之行動研究,國立新竹教育大學教育與學習科技學系課程與教學碩士在職專班碩士論文,未出版,新竹。 許芯瑋、社團法人臺灣童心創意行動協會(2012)。給孩子改變世界的機會。台灣:凱信企管。 張振成(2001)。教師實施情緒教育應有的素養及策略。台灣教育,21,58-61。 張春興(1989)。張氏心理學辭典。台北:東華書局。 張子超(2000)。教育大辭書。台北:教育部國立編譯館。 陳秀蓉(2001)。怎麼實施情緒教育增進教師輔導與管教效能。學生輔導,75,8-9。 黃曉薇(2016)。DFC行動方案融入綜合活動學習領域之行動研究,國立新竹教育大學教育與學習科技學系課程與教學碩士在職專班碩士論文,未出版,新竹。 黃亭雙(2017)。DFC教學法融入國小中年級課程之行動研究─兼論與環境教育議題之探討,國立清華大學環境與文化資源學系所碩士論文,未出版,新竹。 黃光雄、蔡清田(1999)。課程設計─理論與實際。台北:五南。 黃政傑(1999)。課程改革。台北:漢文。 蔡秀玲、楊智馨(2013)。情緒管理(第三版)。台灣:揚智。 蔡清田(2000)。教育行動研究。台北:五南。 謝秉陞、許瀞文(2007)。以精神分析觀點探討女性網路相簿點閱者認同位置的建構與差異。資訊社會研究,13,229-255。
Beane, J. A. (1986). Curriculum planning and development. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Eisenberg, N., Lennon, R., & Roth, K. (1983). Prosocial development: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 19(6), 846–855, from https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.19.6.846 Glatthorn, A. A. (1987). Curriculum leadership. Glenview,IL: Scott, Foresman and Company. Goodlad, J., I. (1979). Curriculum Inquiry: The Study of Curriculum Practice. New York: McGraw Hill. Hess, D., &Posselt, J.(2002)How High School Students Experience and Learn from the Discussion of Controversial Public Issues. Journal of curriculum and supervision, 17(4),283-314. Ralph, W. T.(1949). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Skilbeck, M.(1976). School-Based Curriculum Development. Paris:OECD. Stenhouse, L.(1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann. |
Description: | 碩士 國立政治大學 行政管理碩士學程 102921073 |
Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102921073 |
Data Type: | thesis |
DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202001376 |
Appears in Collections: | [行政管理碩士學程(MEPA)] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
107301.pdf | | 6330Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 164 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|