English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51673102      Online Users : 491
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131785


    Title: Shapley value衡量的股權結構與資本支出之關聯
    The relationship between equity structure as measured by Shapley value and capital expenditure
    Authors: 林盛冠
    Lin, Sheng-Kuan
    Contributors: 蕭明福
    Shaw, Ming-Fu
    林盛冠
    Lin, Sheng-Kuan
    Keywords: 大股東
    追蹤資料
    資本支出
    Shapley value
    Tobin`s Q
    Date: 2020
    Issue Date: 2020-09-02 12:45:51 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文將台灣上市公司大股東分成內部大股東及外部大股東兩類,並且為了減少股東股份所有權原始數據與其真實影響力之間的差距,於是將股份所有權轉化為Shapley value來衡量,發現內外部大股東與公司資本支出的相互關係為 : 內部大股東與公司資本支出的關係為負相關,外部大股東與公司資本資出的關係為正相關。而若比較股東股份所有權未轉化及轉化為Shapley value前後所得出迴歸結果之差異,可以發現到說,Shapley value可有效縮小股份原始數據與其真實影響力之間的差距,不會因其原始數據絕對數量的大小,造成迴歸結果出現矛盾。
    此外,本文也依照Tobin’s Q的高低將公司分類,進一步進行股東股份所有權與公司資本支出變動率的分組迴歸。迴歸結果顯示,內部大股東與公司資本支出變動率的關係,會隨著公司Q值的提升而傾向更強烈的負相關,這可能與台灣擁有眾多家族企業有關;外部大股東則是與之相反,隨著公司Q值的提升,其與公司資本變動率的正相關關係會愈來愈強烈,推測是與投資人會依照公司前景來做選擇,在多承受相同的風險下,高成長公司會比低成長公司較受投資人的青睞。
    除此之外,本文也將產業依主計處分類標準,個別分類進行迴歸,發現本文之模型較適合運用在衡量傳統行業,例如 : 紡織、食品製造、營建工程等;但在衡量另外一些產業可能就不是那麼合適,例如 : 航空運輸、資訊服務或批發業等,推測與產業興盛的先後有關。
    另外在財務指標的方面,發現到說,槓桿比率在不同公司間的效用有相異的情形,在Q值小的公司,槓桿越高,資本變動率越低;相反的,Q值高的公司,槓桿越高,資本變動率越高,公司可能會比較積極的去做一些新的投資計劃。除此之外,在公司投資機會低時,也就是Q值不高的情況下,公司的資本支出會與公司規模大小呈顯著負相關,表示說小公司可能會因資訊相對的不透明,或者監督機制發揮的困難,而導致公司會有過度投資的情況。
    Reference: 一、中文參考文獻
    王振寰、溫肇東 (2011), 《家族企業還重要嗎? 》,新北市:巨流圖書。
    王育偉、鄭揚耀 (2013), 「公司治理、資本支出決策與公司價值」,《管理與系統》,20(4),665-695。
    林嬋娟、張哲嘉 (2009), 「董監事異常變動、家族企業與企業舞弊之關聯」,《會計評論》,48(1),1-33。
    林嬋娟、潘昭容、王大維 (2015), 「從家族企業論析自由現金流量與投資決策之關聯性」, 《臺大管理論叢》,26(1),95-123。
    洪儒瑤、洪裕琨 (2007),「Tobin’s Q與內部人持股關係符合展望理論嗎?--行為財務觀點」,《中華技術學院院報》36(1), 213-228。
    歐育誠 (2001), 「公司價值和系統風險關係之實證研究: 以台灣上市公司為例」,高雄 :中山大學企業管理研究所。

    二、英文參考文獻
    Alvarez, R., Jara, M. and Pombo, C. (2018) ‘’Do institutional blockholders influence corporate investment? Evidence from emerging markets, ’’ Journal of Corporate Finance, 53(6), 38-64.
    Andrei, D., Mann, W. and Moyen, N. (2019) ‘’Why did the q theory of investment start working? ’’ Journal of Financial Economics, 133(2), 251-272.
    Arslan, Ö. (2008), ‘’Overinvestment and investment inefficiency: A study on UK firms,’’ Journal of Economic & Management Perspectives, 2(3), 134.
    Basu, N., Paeglis, I. and Rahnamaei, M. (2016), ‘’Multiple blockholders, power, and firm value,’’ Journal of Banking & Finance, 66(5), 66-78.
    Bennedsen, M. and Wolfenzon, D. (2000), ‘’The balance of power in closely held corporations,’’ Journal of financial economics, 58(1-2), 113-139.
    Berle, A. and Means, G. (1932), The Modern Corporation and Private Property, New York:Mac-millan
    Blose, L. E. and Shieh, J. C. (1997), ‘’Tobin`s q‐Ratio and market reaction to capital investment announcements,’’ Financial Review, 32(3), 449-476.
    Cho, M. H. (1998), ‘’Ownership structure, investment, and the corporate value: an empirical analysis,’’ Journal of financial economics, 47(1), 103-121.
    Chung, I. Y., Koford, K. J. and Lee, I. (1993), ‘’Stock market views of corporate multinationalism: Some evidence from announcements of international joint ventures,’’ The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 33(3), 275-293. Dalecky, A., Chauvet, S., Ringuet, S., Claessens, O., Judas, J., Larue, M. and Cosson, J. F. (2002), ‘’Large mammals on small islands: short term effects of forest fragmentation on the large mammal fauna in French Guiana,’’ Revue d`écologie Terra et la Vie, 54(1), 145-164
    Eckbo, B. E. and Verma, S. (1994), ‘’Managerial shareownership, voting power, and cash dividend policy,’’ Journal of Corporate Finance, 1(1), 33-62.
    Edmans, A. and Manso, G. (2011), ‘’Governance through trading and intervention: A theory of multiple blockholders,’’ The Review of Financial Studies, 24(7), 2395-2428.
    Goergen, M. and Renneboog, L. (2001), ‘’Investment policy, internal financing and ownership concentration in the UK,’’ Journal of Corporate Finance, 7(3), 257-284.
    Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. (1976), ‘’Theory of the firm: Management behavior, agency costs and capital structure,’’ Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-60.
    Jensen, M. C. (1986), ‘’Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers,’’ The American economic review, 76(2), 323-329.
    Kao, M. F., Hodgkinson, L. and Jaafar, A. (2019), ‘’Ownership structure, board of directors and firm performance: evidence from Taiwan,’’ Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 19(1), 189-216
    Kim, E. H. (1978), ‘’A mean‐variance theory of optimal capital structure and corporate debt capacity,’’ The journal of Finance, 33(1), 45-63.
    Konijn, S. J., Kräussl, R. and Lucas, A. (2011), ‘’Blockholder dispersion and firm value,’’ Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(5), 1330-1339.
    Laeven, L. and Levine, R. (2008), ‘’Complex ownership structures and corporate valuations,’’ The Review of Financial Studies, 21(2), 579-604.
    Lamont, O. A. (2000), ‘’Investment plans and stock returns’’ The Journal of Finance, 55(6), 2719-2745.
    La Porta, R., Lopez‐de‐Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. (2002), ‘’Investor protection and corporate valuation’’ The journal of finance, 57(3), 1147-1170. Levin, A., Lin, C. F. and Chu, C. S. J. (2002), ‘’Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties,’’ Journal of econometrics, 108(1), 1-24. McConnell, J. J. and Muscarella, C. J. (1985), ‘’Corporate capital expenditure decisions and the market value of the firm,’’ Journal of financial economics, 14(3), 399-422. Milnor, J. W. and Shapley, L. S. (1978), ‘’Values of large games II: Oceanic games,’’ Mathematics of operations research, 3(4), 290-307.
    Morgado, A. and Pindado, J. (2003), ‘’The underinvestment and overinvestment hypotheses: an analysis using panel data,’’ European Financial Management, 9(2), 163-177. Morck, R., Stangeland, D. and Yeung, B. (2000), ‘’Inherited wealth, Corporate Governance, and Economic Growth: The Canadian Disease,’’ National Bureau of Economic Research, No. w6814
    Miller, E. M. (1977), ‘’Risk, uncertainty, and divergence of opinion,’’ The Journal of finance, 32(4), 1151-1168. Majluf, N. S. and Myers, S. C. (1984), ‘’Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have," Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187-221.
    Rajverma, A. K., Arrawatia, R., Misra, A. K. and Chandra, A. (2019) ‘’Ownership structure influencing the joint determination of dividend, leverage, and cost of capital,’’ Cogent Economics & Finance, 7(1), 1600462.
    Scott Jr, D. F. and Martin, J. D. (1975) ‘’Industry influence on financial structure,’’ Financial Management, 4(1), 67-73.
    Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. W. (1986), ‘’Large shareholders and corporate control,’’ Journal of political economy, 94(3-1), 461-488.
    Oulton, N. (1981), ‘’Aggregate investment and Tobin`s Q: the evidence from Britain,’’ Oxford Economic Papers, 33(2), 177-202.
    Pindado, J. and De La Torre, C. (2009), ‘’Effect of ownership structure on underinvestment and overinvestment: empirical evidence from Spain,’’ Accounting & Finance, 49(2), 363-383.
    Shapiro, N. Z. and Shapley, L. S. (1978), ‘’Values of large games, I: a limit theorem,’’ Mathematics of Operations Research, 3(1), 1-9.
    Shapley, L. S. and Shubik, M. (1954), ‘’A method for evaluating the distribution of power in a committee system,’’ The American Political Science Review, 48(3), 787-792.
    Stepanov, S. and Suvorov, A. (2017), ‘’Agency problem and ownership structure: Outside blockholder as a signal,’’ Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 133(1), 87-107.
    Titman, S., Wei, K. J. and Xie, F. (2013), ‘’Market development and the asset growth effect: International evidence,’’ Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 48(5), 1405-1432.
    Utama, C. A. and Utama, S. (2019), ‘’Board of commissioners in corporate governance, firm performance, and ownership structure,’’ International Research Journal Of Business Studies, 12(2), 111-136.
    Vogt, S. C. (1994), ‘’The cash flow/investment relationship: evidence from US manufacturing firms,’’ Financial management, 23(2), 3-20.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    經濟學系
    107258020
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107258020
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202001411
    Appears in Collections:[經濟學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    802001.pdf1667KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback