English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51756873      Online Users : 529
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131342


    Title: 社群網站上影響社群商務意願的因素調查
    The Factors Influencing Social Commerce Intention on Social Network Sites
    Authors: 林思妤
    Lin, Sih-Yu
    Contributors: 洪叔民
    Horng, Shwu-Min
    林思妤
    Lin, Sih-Yu
    Keywords: 電子商務
    社群網站
    社群商務
    社群商務意願
    E-commerce
    Social network sites
    Social commerce
    Social commerce intention
    Date: 2020
    Issue Date: 2020-08-03 18:41:16 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在電子商務和社群網站的急速發展之下,衍生出了社群商務,也就是一種能夠讓使用者直接在社群網站上完成交易的行為。社群商務在近年來不斷成長,許多學者也開始研究這塊領域,然而到目前為止仍有許多有待探討的議題。過去研究均指出社群網站上有許多因素能夠影響使用者持續參與社群網站互動,然而隨著社群商務興起,這些因素是否也能連帶影響使用者的社群商務參與意願尚不清楚。基於此點,本研究旨在探討社群網站上有哪些因素會影響使用者的社群商務參與意願,並將此意願分為接收與給予行為,期望能透過此研究讓社群商務經營者以及其他管理者了解能夠如何經營在社群網站上的社群商務。
    本研究透過問卷調查進行分析,共回收276份有效問卷,並經過分析後發現,資訊支持、情感支持、對社群網站商家的信任和認知有用性對於社群商務意願之接收行為有正向且顯著的影響,且利他行為、互惠性、結合型資本、資訊支持和對社群網站商家的信任對於社群商務意願之給予行為有正向且顯著的影響。另外,在比較此兩類社群商務意願後,發現在利他行為、知識自我效能和結合型資本對於給予行為之影響力較接收行為更顯著,而認知有用性則是對接收行為之影響力較給予行為更顯著。本研究也在後續針對此結論提出對於社群商務經營者和其他管理者的建議和後續可研究方向。
    As e-commerce and social network sites thrive, social commerce, a hybrid combining the characteristics of e-commerce and social network sites, has appeared accordingly. Social commerce has grown rapidly since and researches on this subject boomed, but still, there are issues waiting to be explored. Researches pointed out that multiple factors can affect users’ intentions to interact with one another on social network sites. However, whether these factors also influence users’ intentions of using social commerce on social network sites remains unknown. Thus, this paper will examine the factors which influence social commerce intention in receiving and giving on social network sites.
    This research is conducted via an online survey, and a total of 276 valid questionnaires are retrieved. Results showed that information support, emotion support, trust in merchants, and perceived usefulness have positive and significant effects on social commerce receiving intentions, while altruism, reciprocity, bonding capital, information support, and trust in merchants have positive and significant effects on social commerce giving intentions. Comparing the social commerce intentions of receiving and giving, we can see that altruism, knowledge self-efficacy, and bonding capital have greater effects on giving than receiving, while perceived usefulness showed otherwise. In the end, we provided management implications of the results for social commerce business owners and suggested further research topics.
    Reference: Animesh, A., Pinsonneault, A., Yang, S. B., & Oh, W. (2011). An odyssey into virtual worlds: exploring the impacts of technological and spatial environments on intention to purchase virtual products. MIS quarterly, 789-810.
    Ba, S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2002). Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: Price premiums and buyer behavior. MIS quarterly, 26(3), 243–268.
    Ba, S., Stallaert, J., & Whinston, A. B. (2001). Research commentary: introducing a third dimension in information systems design—the case for incentive alignment. Information systems research, 12(3), 225-239.
    Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94.
    Bai, Y., Yao, Z., & Dou, Y. F. (2015). Effect of social commerce factors on user purchase behavior: An empirical investigation from renren. com. International Journal of Information Management, 35(5), 538-550.
    Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191–215.
    Bock, G. W., & Kim, Y. G. (2002). Breaking the myths of rewards: An exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing. Information resources management journal (IRMJ), 15(2), 14-21.
    Busalim, A. H., & Hussin, A. R. C. (2016). Understanding social commerce: A systematic literature review and directions for further research. International Journal of Information Management, 36(6), 1075–1088.
    Chen, J. V., Yen, D. C., Pornpriphet, W., & Widjaja, A. E. (2015). E-commerce web site loyalty: A cross cultural comparison. Information Systems Frontiers, 17(6), 1283-1299.
    Chen, J., & Shen, X. L. (2015). Consumers` decisions in social commerce context: An empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems, 79, 55-64.
    Comrey, A.L. (1973). A first course in factor analysis. New York, Academic Press.
    Constant, D., Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1996). The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organization science, 7(2), 119-135.
    Crocker J. & Canevello A. (2008). Creating and undermining social support in communal relationships: the role of compassionate and self-image goals. Journal of personality and social psychology, 95(3), 555–575.
    Dai, H., & Salam, A. F. (2014). Does service convenience matter? An empirical assessment of service quality, service convenience and exchange relationship in electronic mediated environment. Electronic Markets, 24(4), 269-284.
    Datareportal (2020). Digital 2020: Global Digital Overview, Retrieved May 18 2020, from: https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2020-global-digital-overview
    Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8), 982-1003.
    Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace 1. Journal of applied social psychology, 22(14), 1111-1132.
    Dholakia, U. M., Bagozzi, R. P., and Pearo, L. K. (2004). A social influence model of consumer participation in network- and small-group-based virtual communities. International journal of research in marketing, 21(3), 241–263.
    Ernst, C. P. H., Pfeiffer, J., & Rothlauf, F. (2013). Hedonic and utilitarian motivations of social network site adoption. Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz: Working Papers in Information Systems and Business Administration, 1-14.
    Evans, C., Hackney, R., Rauniar, R., Rawski, G., Yang, J., & Johnson, B. (2014). Technology acceptance model (TAM) and social media usage: an empirical study on Facebook. Journal of Enterprise Information Management.
    Fang, Y. H., & Chiu, C. M. (2010). In justice we trust: Exploring knowledge-sharing continuance intentions in virtual communities of practice. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 235-246.
    Fassnacht, M., & Koese, I. (2006). Quality of electronic services: conceptualizing and testing a hierarchical model. Journal of service research, 9(1), 19-37.
    Fisher, R. J., & Ackerman, D. (1998). The effects of recognition and group need on volunteerism: A social norm perspective. Journal of consumer research, 25(3), 262-275.
    Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Inexperience and experience with online stores: The importance of TAM and trust. IEEE Transactions on engineering management, 50(3), 307-321.
    Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS quarterly, 27(1), 51-90.
    Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M. C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the association for information systems, 4(1), 7.
    Gottlieb, B. H., & Bergen, A. E. (2010). Social support concepts and measures. Journal of psychosomatic research, 69(5), 511-520.
    Granovetter, M. S. (1977). The strength of weak ties. Social networks (pp. 347-367). Academic Press.
    GSM Association (2019). Social commerce in emerging markets: Understanding the landscape and opportunities for mobile money. Retrieved May 18 2020, from:https://www.gsma.com/mobilefordevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Social-commerce-in-emerging-markets.pdf
    Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of marketing theory and practice, 19(2), 139-152.
    Hair, J.F., W.C. Black, B.J. Babin, and R.E. Anderson (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). NJ, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall.
    Hajli, N. (2015). Social commerce constructs and consumer`s intention to buy. International Journal of Information Management, 35(2), 183-191.
    Hajli, N. (Ed.). (2015). Handbook of research on integrating social media into strategic marketing. IGI Global.
    Han, B. O., & Windsor, J. (2011). User`s willingness to pay on social network sites. Journal of computer information systems, 51(4), 31-40.
    Harman, H. H. (1976). Modern factor analysis. University of Chicago press.
    Haythornthwaite, C. (2005). Social networks and Internet connectivity effects. Information, Community & Society, 8(2), 125-147.
    Hoffman, D. L. & Novak, T. P. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations. Journal of marketing. 60(3), 50-68.
    Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
    Hu, M., Zhang, M., & Luo, N. (2016). Understanding participation on video sharing communities: The role of self-construal and community interactivity. Computers in human behavior, 62, 105-115.
    Instagram Business (2019). New to Instagram Shopping: Checkout, Retrieved May 19 2020, from: https://business.instagram.com/blog/new-to-instagram-shopping-checkout
    Kalman, M. E. (1999). The effects of organizational commitment and expected outcomes on the motivation to share discretionary information in a collaborative database: communication dilemmas and other serious games (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California).
    Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B. C., & Wei, K. K. (2005). Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: an empirical investigation. MIS quarterly, 113-143.
    Kim, D. J., Song, Y. I., Braynov, S. B., & Rao, H. R. (2005). A multidimensional trust formation model in B-to-C e-commerce: a conceptual framework and content analyses of academia/practitioner perspectives. Decision support systems, 40(2), 143-165.
    Kim, S., & Park, H. (2013). Effects of various characteristics of social commerce (s-commerce) on consumers’ trust and trust performance. International Journal of Information Management, 33(2), 318-332.
    Kollock, P. (1999). The economies of online cooperation. Communities in cyberspace, 220-339.
    Kozinets, R. V., De Valck, K., Wojnicki, A. C., & Wilner, S. J. (2010). Networked narratives: Understanding word-of-mouth marketing in online communities. Journal of marketing, 74(2), 71-89.
    Lakhani, K. R., & Von Hippel, E. (2003). How open source software works: “free” user-to-user assistance. Research Policy, 32(6), 923–943.
    Lal, P. (2017). Analyzing determinants influencing an individual’ s intention to use social commerce website. Future Business Journal, 3(1), 70-85.
    Li, M. N. (2006). An introduction to Amos and its uses in scale development: Graphics & basic. Taipei: Psychoco.
    Liang, T. P., Ho, Y. T., Li, Y. W., & Turban, E. (2011). What drives social commerce: The role of social support and relationship quality. International journal of electronic commerce, 16(2), 69-90.
    Lin, J., Yan, Y., & Chen, S. (2017). Understanding the impact of social commerce website technical features on repurchase intention: a Chinese guanxi perspective. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 18(3), 225.
    Lin, N. (2002). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action (Vol. 19). Cambridge university press.
    Liu, Y., & Shrum, L. J. (2002). What is interactivity and is it always such a good thing? Implications of definition, person, and situation for the influence of interactivity on advertising effectiveness. Journal of advertising, 31(4), 53-64.
    Ma, W. W., & Chan, A. (2014). Knowledge sharing and social media: Altruism, perceived online attachment motivation, and perceived online relationship commitment. Computers in human behavior, 39, 51-58.
    Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Patil, A. (2006). Common method variance in IS research: A comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management science, 52(12), 1865-1883.
    Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of management review, 20(3), 709-734.
    McConnell, K. E. (1997). Does altruism undermine existence value?. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 32(1), 22-37.
    McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). The impact of initial consumer trust on intentions to transact with a web site: a trust building model. The journal of strategic information systems, 11(3-4), 297-323.
    McKnight, D. H., Cummings, L. L., & Chervany, N. L. (1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management review, 23(3), 473-490.
    McKnight, D.H., Choudhury, V. and Kacmar, C. (2002), Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information systems research, 13(3), 334-359.
    Mouakket, S. (2015). Factors influencing continuance intention to use social network sites: The Facebook case. Computers in human behavior, 53, 102-110.
    Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of management review, 23(2), 242-266.
    Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2009). Flow theory and research. Handbook of positive psychology, 195-206.
    Novak, T. P., Hoffman, D. L., & Yung, Y. F. (2000). Measuring the customer experience in online environments: A structural modeling approach. Marketing science, 19(1), 22-42.
    Ou, C. X., Pavlou, P. A., & Davison, R. M. (2014). Swift guanxi in online marketplaces: The role of computer-mediated communication technologies. MIS quarterly, 38(1), 209-230.
    Park, D. H., Lee, J., & Han, I. (2007). The effect of on-line consumer reviews on consumer purchasing intention: The moderating role of involvement. International journal of electronic commerce, 11(4), 125-148.
    Pelaprat, E., & Brown, B. (2012). Reciprocity: Understanding online social relations. First Monday, 17(10).
    Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879.
    Pöyry, E., Parvinen, P., & Malmivaara, T. (2013). Can we get from liking to buying? Behavioral differences in hedonic and utilitarian Facebook usage. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 12(4), 224-235.
    Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
    Qiu, L., & Benbasat, I. (2005). An investigation into the effects of Text-To-Speech voice and 3D avatars on the perception of presence and flow of live help in electronic commerce. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 12(4), 329-355.
    Ramayah, T., & Ignatius, J. (2005). Impact of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and perceived enjoyment on intention to shop online. ICFAI Journal of Systems Management (IJSM), 3(3), 36-51.
    Ridings, C. M., & Gefen, D. (2004). Virtual community attraction: Why people hang out online. Journal of Computer-mediated communication, 10(1), JCMC10110.
    Ridings, C. M., Gefen, D., & Arinze, B. (2002). Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities. The journal of strategic information systems, 11(3-4), 271-295.
    Schaefer, C., Coyne, J. C., & Lazarus, R. S. (1981). The health-related functions of social support. Journal of behavioral medicine, 4(4), 381-406.
    Schurr, P. H., & Ozanne, J. L. (1985). Influences on exchange processes: Buyers` preconceptions of a seller`s trustworthiness and bargaining toughness. Journal of consumer research, 11(4), 939–953.
    Shiau, W. L., & Chau, P. Y. (2015). Does altruism matter on online group buying? Perspectives from egotistic and altruistic motivation. Information Technology & People.
    Shumaker, S. A., & Brownell, A. (1984). Toward a theory of social support: Closing conceptual gaps. Journal of social issues, 40(4), 11-36.
    Söllner, M., Hoffmann, A., & Leimeister, J. M. (2016). Why different trust relationships matter for information systems users. European Journal of Information Systems, 25(3), 274-287.
    Statista (2020). Global retail e-commerce sales 2014-2023, Retrieved May 18 2020, from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/379046/worldwide-retail-e-commerce-sales/
    Sun, J. C. Y., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self‐efficacy and self‐regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British journal of educational technology, 43(2), 191-204.
    Tajvidi, M., Wang, Y., Hajli, N., & Love, P. E. (2017). Brand value Co-creation in social commerce: The role of interactivity, social support, and relationship quality. Computers in Human Behavior, 105238.
    Tan, C. W., Benbasat, I., & Cenfetelli, R. T. (2013). IT-mediated customer service content and delivery in electronic governments: An empirical investigation of the antecedents of service quality. MIS quarterly, 37(1), 77-109.
    Technavio (2017). Global Social Commerce Market 2017-2021, Retrieved May 18 2020, from: https://www.technavio.com/report/global-social-commerce-market?tnplus
    Tsai, Y. H., Joe, S. W., Lin, C. P., Wang, R. T., & Chang,
    Y. H. (2012). Modeling the relationship between IT-mediated social capital and social support: Key mediating mechanisms of sense of group. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(9), 1592-1604.
    Van der Heijden, H. (2004). User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS quarterly, 28(4), 695-704.
    Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
    Wang, H., Fang, H., & Tang, Q. (2019). Exploring the Role of Technical Features in Promoting the Intention to Continue Sharing Contents in Social Commerce Platform. Journal of Service Science and Management, 12(02), 214.
    Wang, X., Lin, X., & Spencer, M. K. (2019). Exploring the effects of extrinsic motivation on consumer behaviors in social commerce: Revealing consumers’ perceptions of social commerce benefits. International Journal of Information Management, 45, 163-175.
    Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2000). “It is what one does”: why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. The journal of strategic information systems, 9(2-3), 155-173.
    Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS quarterly, 35-57.
    Williams, D. (2006). On and off the’Net: Scales for social capital in an online era. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 11(2), 593-628.
    Yahia, I. B., Al-Neama, N., & Kerbache, L. (2018). Investigating the drivers for social commerce in social media platforms: Importance of trust, social support and the platform perceived usage. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 41, 11-19.
    Zeithaml, V.A. (1987), Defining and Relating Prices, Perceived Quality and Perceived Value. Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA.
    Zhang, H., Lu, Y., Gupta, S., & Zhao, L. (2014). What motivates customers to participate in social commerce? The impact of technological environments and virtual customer experiences. Information & Management, 51(8), 1017-1030.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程)
    107363012
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107363012
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202000744
    Appears in Collections:[企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程)] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    301201.pdf1453KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback