政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/131292

政大典藏 > College of Education > Master of Education in School Administration > Theses > Item 140.119/131292

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131292

Title:	教師賦權增能知識基礎與熱點前沿之可視化分析 Visual analysis of the intellectual bases, research hotspots and fronts of Teacher empowerment
Authors:	鄭瑋婷 Cheng, Wei-Ting
Contributors:	吳政達 Wu, Cheng-Ta 鄭瑋婷 Cheng, Wei-Ting
Keywords:	教師賦權增能可視化分析 Citespace 知識基礎研究熱點研究前沿 Research front Teacher empowerment Visual analysis Citespace Intellectual base Research hotspot
Date:	2020
Issue Date:	2020-08-03 18:31:20 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	十二年國民基本教育課程總綱的革新浪潮下，學校全體成員共同參與的意識抬頭，提倡以學校為中心發展校本課程及領導者權力下放，第一線教師成為課程研究、詮釋及發展的重要核心角色，顯見教師賦權增能的重要性。而現今資訊技術的蓬勃發展有利於教育研究的數據蒐集與檢索，龐雜大量的資訊透過知識圖譜的可視化分析，可進行系統性的整理，以做為教學決策、教育革新等方面的參考依據。　　本研究使用WoS核心合輯資料庫社會學科索引做為文獻來源，以「教師賦權增能」（teacher empowerment）做為主題詞檢索，共得683篇主題文獻。剔除無關文獻後，最終數據為主題文獻477篇，及其施引文獻3, 914篇。進一步透過Citespace軟體繪製文獻共被引聚類視圖，探究教師賦權增能研究領域的知識基礎，並以關鍵字共現聚類視圖呈現研究熱點，同時轉換成時間線視圖與時區視圖，從時間軸的角度分析研究熱點。最後藉由突發性探測，取得高突發性文獻及高突發關鍵詞以揭示研究前沿。　　研究結果發現，本研究領域中高中介中心性文獻之作者分別為White（1992）、Bogler（2004）、Sweetland（2000）、Yukl（1999）、Marks（1997）；文獻共被引分析之七個有效聚類包含「教師賦權增能」、「工作條件」、「家長參與」、「授權教師」、「參與式管理」、「學校創新」及「合作教師」，為教師賦權增能研究領域文獻之知識基礎。而高頻次及高中心性的關鍵字「賦權增能」、「領導力」、「管理」、「師範教育」及「成效」及關鍵字共現分析之十個有效聚類包含「支持少數學生」、「教師領導」、「良好的實踐」、「組織承諾」、「行動研究」、「批判教育學的制定」、「專業發展課程」、「學校政策」、「另類觀點」及「管理學校效能」為研究熱點。Lee和Nie（2014）探討教師心理賦權增能的文獻至今仍持續突現，為研究前沿之一；「政策」、「影響力」、「青年」及「干預」四個關鍵字突現期延續至今，亦為本研究領域文獻之研究前沿。　　Going with the tide of the innovation of Directions Governing for the 12-Year Basic Education Curricula, the sense of common participation of all members in school has risen. School-based curriculum development and leadership decentralization are advocated. Front-line teachers having become a core role in curriculum research, interpretation and development, which shows the importance of teacher empowerment. The rapid development of information technology is conducive to the data collection and retrieval of educational research. Through the visual analysis of knowledge mapping, a large amount of information can be systematically sorted out to serve as a reference for teaching decision-making, educational innovation and other aspects. 　　In this study, 683 thematic articles were collected from core collection of the Web of Science database within the Topic search term “teacher empowerment”. After excluding the irrelevant references, the final data were 477 subject references and 3,914 citing articles. Citespace was used to draw the references co-citation map to explore the intellectual bases of teacher empowerment research field. The research hotspots were presented in word co-occurrence clustering map, and converted into timeline and timezone view to analyze the research hotspots from the perspective of timeline. Lastly, the research fronts were revealed by obtaining high burstiness literature and terms through citation burst detection. 　　The results show that the authors of the literature on high betweenness centrality were White (1992), Bogler (2004), Sweetland (2000), Yukl (1999) and Marks (1997)；The seven effective clusters of document co-citation analysis include “Teacher empowerment”, “Working condition”, “Parent involvement”, “Empowering teacher”, “Participative management”, “School innovation” and “Cooperating teacher”, which are the intellectual bases of this research. The high frequency and high betweenness centrality keywords are “empowerment”, “leadership”, “management”, “teacher education” and “performance”；The ten effective clusters of co-word analysis include “Supporting minority student”, “Teacher leadership”, “Good practice”, “Organizational commitment”, “Practitioner research”, “Enacting critical pedagogy”, “Professional development programme”, “School policy”, “Alternative perspective” and “Managing school effectiveness”, which are the research hotspots of this research. Lee and Nie (2014) continue to highlight the literature on psychological empowerment of teachers, which is one of the research fronts. The four keywords “policy”, “influence”, “youth” and “intervention” are also the research fronts.
Reference:	壹、中文文獻方瑀紳（2015）。科技教育研究主題的演進與研究前沿：1970~ 2013年研究文獻的共被引分析（未出版博士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。王秀玲、林新發、康瀚文、梁玟燁、蔡麗華（2006）。國民中學教師專業權能、知識管理對教學創新行為影響之研究。初等教育學刊，29，23-56。王娟、陳世超、王林麗、楊現民（2016）。基於CiteSpace的教育大資料研究熱點與趨勢分析。現代教育技術，26（2），5-13。王麗雲、潘慧玲（2000）。教師彰權益能的概念與實施策略。教育研究集刊，（44），173-199。江惠真（2019）。十二年國教高中新舊課綱轉化之系統取徑。評鑑雙月刊，（79）， 22-25。任磊、杜一、馬帥、張小龍、戴國忠（2014）。大資料可視分析綜述。軟體學報， 25（9），1909-1936。邱均平、温芳芳（2011）。近五年來圖書情報學研究熱點與前沿的可視化分析—基於13種高影響力外文原刊的計量研究。中國圖書館學報，37（192），51-60。何嘉惠（2018）。國民小學校長分散式領導、教師彰權益能與教學創新關係之研究（未出版博士論文）。臺北市立大學，臺北市。李杰、陳超美（2017）。CiteSpace：科技文本挖掘及可視化。中國北京市：首都經濟貿易大學出版社。易高峰、劉盛博、趙文華（2009）。《高等教育研究》研究熱點及其知識基礎圖譜分析。高等教育研究，（10），74-80。胡志剛（2017）。陳超美教授又一力作，你要的 CiteSpace 應用的完美範文來了。【科學網】取自http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-43950-1043931.html 侯劍華（2009）。工商管理學科演進與前沿熱點的視覺化分析（未出版博士論文）。大連理工大學，中國大連市。柯文濤（2019）。工具的祛魅：CiteSpace在教育研究中的應用與反思。重慶高教研究，7（5），117-128。焦曉靜、王蘭成（2015）。知識圖譜的概念辨析與學科定位研究。圖書情報工作，59（15），5-11。陶穎、周莉、宋豔輝（2017）。知識域視覺化中的共被引與耦合研究綜述。圖書情報工作，61（11），140-148。陳輝、陳力丹（2017）。跨文化傳播研究的知識結構與前沿熱點：基於CiteSpace的可視化圖譜分析。國際新聞界，7，58-89。陳悅、陳超美、劉則淵、胡志剛、王賢文（2015）。CiteSpace知識圖譜的方法論功能。學科學研究，33（2），242-253。陳悅、陳超美、胡志剛、王賢文（2014）。引文空間分析原理與應用：CiteSpace實用指南。中國北京市：學科出版社。陳超美、陳悅、侯劍華、梁永霞（2009）。 CiteSpaceⅡ：科學文獻中新趨勢與新動態的識別與視覺化。情報學報，（3），401-421。郭昭佑、陳美如（2002）。教師如何從事課程評鑑：從賦權增能評鑑理念談起。教育研究月刊，88，83-93。張昭仁（2001）。教師權能-從心理權能理論談起。學校行政雙月刊，（16），112-140。張攸萍、吳政達（2019）。教育領域績效責任研究之發展及現況:文獻計量分析取向。教育研究月刊，302，25-44。黃哲彬（2004）。國民小學校長賦權增能行為與學校效能關係之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺南大學，臺南市。趙星（2017）。基於論文合著網路的科研合作研究（未出版碩士論文）。黑龍江大學，中國哈爾濱市。趙國慶、黃榮懷、陸志堅（2005）。知識視覺化的理論與方法。開放教育研究，11（1），23-27。樊璠（2011）。美國教師賦權增能研究（未出版碩士論文）。瀋陽師範大學，中國瀋陽市。潘慧玲、陳文彥（2018）。校長促進教師專業學習的槓桿：校長學習領導對教師課堂教學研究影響之仲介模式分析。教育研究集刊，64（3），79-121。劉則淵、梁永霞、陳悅（2013）。學科計量學之父普賴斯對世界和中國的影響—紀念普賴斯逝世 30 周年。學科學與學科技術管理，34（12），5-9。蔡蔚萍、林曾（2016）。近20年來美國教育社會學研究的熱點論題與前沿演進—基於《Sociology of Education》1996-2015年文獻共被引網路圖譜的分析。學術論壇，38（7），100-109。鍾任琴、黃增榮（2000）。中小學教師權能量表編製之研究。朝陽學報，5，345-372。魏瑞斌、蔣倩雯、張瑞麗（2019）。基於文獻共被引和共詞分析的研究方法的比較研究—以共詞分析和內容分析為例。情報雜誌，38（2），36-42。貳、英文文獻 Ayers, W. (1992). Work that is real: Why teachers should be empowered. In Hess Jr, G. A., Empowering teachers and parents: School restructuring through the eyes of anthropologists(pp. 13-27). California, CA :Greenwood Publishing Group Baum, N. L., Cardozo, B. L., Pat-Horenczyk, R., Ziv, Y., Blanton, C., Reza, A., ... & Brom, D. (2013). Training teachers to build resilience in children in the aftermath of war: A cluster randomized trial. In Child & Youth Care Forum , 42(4), 339-350. Springer US. Baran, E., Correia, A. P., & Thompson, A. (2011). Transforming online teaching practice: Critical analysis of the literature on the roles and competencies of online teachers. Distance Education, 32(3), 421-439. Bauch, P. A., & Goldring, E. B. (1996). Parent involvement and teacher decision making in urban high schools of choice. Urban Education, 31(4), 403-431. Beauchamp, M. R., Barling, J., & Morton, K. L. (2011). Transformational teaching and adolescent self‐determined motivation, self‐efficacy, and intentions to engage in leisure time physical activity: A randomised controlled pilot trial. Applied Psychology: Health and Well‐Being, 3(2), 127-150. Benabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2003). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. The review of economic studies, 70(3), 489-520. Bendermacher, G. W. G., Oude Egbrink, M. G. A., Wolfhagen, I. H. A. P., & Dolmans, D. H. J. M. (2017). Unravelling quality culture in higher education: a realist review. Higher Education, 73(1), 39-60. Blasé, J., & Roberts, J. (1994). The micropolitics of teacher work involvement: Effective principals` impacts on teachers. Alberta Journal of Educational Research. Blasé, J., & Blasé, J. (1996). The micropolitical orientation of facilitative school principals and its effects on teachers sense of empowerment. Journal of Educational Administration, 35(2), 138-164. doi:10.1108/09578239710161777 Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (1991). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Bogler, R., & Somech, A. (2004). Influence of teacher empowerment on teachers` organizational commitment, professional commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(3), 277-289. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2004.02.003 Clement, M., & Vandenberghe, R. (2000). Teachers’ professional development: a solitary or collegial (ad) venture?. Teaching and teacher education, 16(1), 81-101. Chen, C. (2004). Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive knowledge domain visualization. Proceedings of the National Academy of　Sciences, 101(suppl 1), 5303-5310. Chen, C. (2005). The centrality of pivotal points in the evolution of scientific networks. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces (pp. 98-105). Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359-377. Chen, C. (2012). Predictive effects of structural variation on citation counts. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(3), 431-449. Chen, C., Hu, Z., Liu, S., & Tseng, H. (2012). Emerging trends in regenerative medicine: a scientometric analysis in CiteSpace. Expert opinion on biological therapy, 12(5), 593-608. Carnoy, M., & MacDonell, J. (1989). School District Restructuring in Sante Fe, New Mexico. CPRE Research Report Series RR-017. Eckley, M. E. N. (1997). The relationship between teacher empowerment and principal leadership styles, unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, Malvern, PA. Edwards, J. L., Green, K. E., & Lyons, C. A. (2002). Personal empowerment, efficacy, and environmental characteristics. Journal of Educational Administration. Egghe, Leo (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131-152. doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7 Freire, P. (1996). Pedagogy of the oppressed (revised). New York: Continuum. Frymier, J. (1987), Bureaucracy and the Neutering of Teachers, Phi Delta Kappan, 69, 9-14. Fuzzzy. (2019, May 12). What is Citation Analysis? [kknews]. Retrieved from https://kknews.cc/education/oekneo5.html Freeman, D.J., Brimhall, P.A., & Neufeld, J. (1994), Who’s in charge now? A principal’s endeavour to empower teachers, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA, April. Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, web of science, and Google scholar: strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338-342. Flaherty, A., O`Dwyer, A., Mannix-McNamara, P., & Leahy, J. J. (2017). The influence of psychological empowerment on the enhancement of chemistry laboratory demonstrators` perceived teaching self-image and behaviours as graduate teaching assistants. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(4), 710-736. doi: 10.1039/c7rp00051 Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for science. Science, 122(3159), 108-111. Glickman, C. D. (1990). Pushing school reform to a new edge: The seven ironies of school empowerment. Phi Delta Kappan, 72(1), 68-75. Griffith, J. (1996). Test of a model of the organizational antecedents of parent involvement and satisfaction with public education. Human Relations, 49(12), 1549-1571. Hatcher, R. (2005). The distribution of leadership and power in schools. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26(2), 253-267. Huang, Y. T., Liu, H., & Huang, L. (2020). How transformational and contingent reward leaderships influence university faculty`s organizational commitment: the mediating effect of psychological empowerment. Studies in Higher Education, 1-18. Holloway, J., Nielsen, A., & Saltmarsh, S. (2018). Prescribed distributed leadership in the era of accountability: The experiences of mentor teachers. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(4), 538-555. Hong, H., & Hamot, G. E. (2020). Differential effects of state testing policies and school characteristics on social studies educators’ gate-keeping autonomy: A multilevel model. Theory & Research in Social Education, 48(1), 74-100. Hong, F. Y. (2017). Antecedent and consequence of school academic optimism and teachers’ academic optimism model. Educational Studies, 43(2), 165-185.dio: 10.1080/03055698.2016.1248902 Johnson, D. C. (2010). Implementational and ideological spaces in bilingual education language policy. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13(1), 61-79. Johnson, S. M., & Landman, J. (2000). " Sometimes Bureaucracy Has Its Charms": The Working Conditions of Teachers in Deregulated Schools. Teachers College Record, 102(1), 85-124. Keddie, A. (2011). Supporting minority students through a reflexive approach to empowerment. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 32(2), 221-238. Keedy, J. L., & Finch, A. M. (1994). Examining teacher-principal empowerment: An analysis of power. Journal of Research & Development in Education. Knijnik, J., & Luguetti, C. (2020). Social justice narratives in academia: challenges, struggles and pleasures PETE educators face in understanding and enacting critical pedagogy in Brazil. Sport, Education and Society, 1-13. Krauss, S. E., Zeldin, S., Abdullah, H., Ortega, A., Ali, Z., Ismail, I. A., & Ariffin, Z. (2020). Malaysian youth associations as places for empowerment and engagement. Children and Youth Services Review, 104939. Leggett, N., & Newman, L. (2019). Owning it: educators’ engagement in researching their own practice. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 27(1), 138-150. Lee, A. N., & Nie, Y. (2017). Teachers’ perceptions of school leaders’ empowering behaviours and psychological empowerment: Evidence from a Singapore sample. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(2), 260-283.doi: 10.1177/1741143215578448 Lee, A. N., & Nie, Y. (2014). Understanding teacher empowerment: Teachers` perceptions of principal`s and immediate supervisor`s empowering behaviours, psychological empowerment and work-related outcomes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 41, 67-79. Lee, V. E., Loeb, S., & Marks, H. M. (1995). Gender differences in secondary school teachers` control over classroom and school policy. American Journal of Education, 103(3), 259-301. Lightfoot, S. L. (1986). On goodness in schools: Themes of empowerment. Peabody Journal of Education, 63(3), 9-28. Luguetti, C., Kirk, D., & Oliver, K. L. (2019). Towards a pedagogy of love: exploring pre-service teachers’ and youth’s experiences of an activist sport pedagogical model. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 24(6), 629-646. Luguetti, C., & Oliver, K. L. (2019). ‘I became a teacher that respects the kids’voices’: challenges and facilitators pre-service teachers faced in learning an activist approach. Sport, Education and Society, 1-13.Lumadi, M. W., Maguvhe, M. O., & Dzapasi, A. (2012). Transformational efficacy of a curriculum for people with visual impairment. The Anthropologist, 14(4), 291-303. Erss, M., Kalmus, V., & Autio, T. H. (2016). ‘Walking a fine line’: teachers’ perception of curricular autonomy in Estonia, Finland and Germany. Journal of curriculum studies, 48(5), 589-609. doi: 10.1080/00220272.2016.1167960 Maeroff, G. I. (1988). The Empowerment of Teachers. Overcoming the Crisis of Confidence. Teachers College Press, 1234 Amsterdam Ave., New York, NY 10027. Martin, O. L. (1990). Instructional Leadership Behaviors That Empower Teacher Effectiveness. Marks, H. M., & Louis, K. S. (1997). Does teacher empowerment affect the classroom? The implications of teacher empowerment for instructional practice and student academic performance. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(3), 245-275. McCharen, B., Song, J., & Martens, J. (2011). School innovation: The mutual impacts of organizational learning and creativity. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 39(6), 676-694. Michalsky, T., & Schechter, C. (2013). Preservice teachers` capacity to teach self-regulated learning: Integrating learning from problems and learning from successes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 30, 60-73. Mills, M. (2000). Issues in implementing boys’ programme in schools: Male teachers and empowerment. Gender and education, 12(2), 221-238. Muijs, D., & Harris, A. (2003). Teacher leadership—Improvement through empowerment? An overview of the literature. Educational Management & Administration, 31(4), 437-448. Muijs, D., & Harris, A. (2006). Teacher led school improvement: Teacher leadership in the UK. Teaching and teacher education, 22(8), 961-972. Murphy, J. , & Louis, K.S. (Eds) (1994), Reshaping the Principalship: Insights from Transformational Reform Efforts. Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, CA. Narin, F., & Olivastro, D. (1993). Patent citation cycles. Library Trends, 41(4),700-709. Newman, L., & Leggett, N. (2019). Practitioner research: with intent. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 27(1), 120-137. Niemi, H., Kynäslahti, H., & Vahtivuori-Hänninen, S. (2013). Towards ICT in everyday life in Finnish schools: seeking conditions for good practices. Learning, Media and Technology, 38(1), 57-71. Parker, M., Patton, K., Madden, M., & Sinclair, C. (2010). From committee to community: The development and maintenance of a community of practice. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 29(4), 337-357 Pollak, J. P., & Mills, R. A. (1997). True Collaboration: Building and Maintaining Successful Teams. Schools in the Middle, 6(5), 28-32. Peterson, N. A. (2014). Empowerment theory: Clarifying the nature of higher-order multidimensional constructs. American Journal of Community Psychology, 53(1-2), 96-108. Rosenholtz, S. (1991). Teachers’ Workplace: The Social Organization of Schools. Teachers College Press, New York, NY. Raths, L. E., & Wassermann, S. (1991). Theories of Empowerment. Childhood Education, 67(4), 235-239. Rogow, D., Haberland, N., Del Valle, A., Lee, N., Osakue, G., Sa, Z., & Skaer, M.(2013). Integrating gender and rights into sexuality education: field reports on using It`s All One. Reproductive health matters, 21(41), 154-166. Schechter, C. (2010). Learning from Success as Leverage for a Professional Learning Community: Exploring an Alternative Perspective of School Improvement Process. Teachers College Record, 112(1), 182-224. Smith, L. C. (1981). Citation analysis. Sprague, J. (1992). Critical perspectives on teacher empowerment. Communication Education, 41(2), 181-203. Smylie, M. A. (1988). The enhancement function of staff development: Organizational and psychological antecedents to individual teacher change. American Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 1-30. Small, H., & Griffith, B. C. (1974). The structure of scientific literatures I: Identifying and graphing specialties. Science Studies, 4(1), 17-40. Shapira-Lishchinsky, O., & Tsemach, S. (2014). Psychological empowerment as a mediator between teachers’ perceptions of authentic leadership and their withdrawal and citizenship behaviors. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(4), 675-712. Short, P. M., Greer, J. T., & Melvin, W. M. (1994). Creating empowered schools:Lessons in change. Journal of Educational Research, 32(4), 38–52. Somech, A. (2002). Explicating the complexity of participative management: An investigation of multiple dimensions. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(3), 341-371. Somech, A. (2005). Teachers’ personal and team empowerment and their relations to organizational outcomes: contradictory or compatible constructs?. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(2), 237-266. Somech, A. (2005). Directive versus participative leadership: Two complementary approaches to managing school effectiveness. Educational administration quarterly, 41(5), 777-800. Somech, A. (2010). Participative decision making in schools: A mediating-moderating analytical framework for understanding school and teacher outcomes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(2), 174-209. Stylianou, A., & Zembylas, M. (2019). Head teachers’ spirituality and inclusive education: a perspective from critical realism. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(4), 419-435.doi: 10.1080/13603116.2018.1441336 Stolk, M. J., Bulte, A. M., de Jong, O., & Pilot, A. (2009). Strategies for a professional development programme: empowering teachers for context-based chemistry education. Chemistry education research and practice, 10(2), 154-163. Stolk, M. J., Bulte, A. M., de Jong, O., & Pilot, A. (2009). Towards a framework for a professional development programme: empowering teachers for context-based chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 10(2), 164-175. Stolk, M. J., De Jong, O., Bulte, A. M., & Pilot, A. (2011). Exploring a framework for professional development in curriculum innovation: Empowering teachers for designing context-based chemistry education. Research in Science Education, 41(3), 369-388. Sweetland, S. R., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). School characteristics and educational outcomes: Toward an organizational model of student achievement in middle schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(5), 703-729. Tannehill, D., & MacPhail, A. (2017). Teacher empowerment through engagement in a learning community in Ireland: Working across disadvantaged schools. Professional development in education, 43(3), 334-352. dio: 10.1080/19415257.2016.1183508 Thomson Reuters(2014).Web of science. Retrieved from https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/solutions/webofscience-platform/ Tindowen, D. J. (2019). Influence of Empowerment on Teachers’ Organizational Behaviors. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(2), 617-631. Unterhalter, E., Heslop, J., & Mamedu, A. (2013). Girls claiming education rights: Reflections on distribution, empowerment and gender justice in Northern Tanzania and Northern Nigeria. International Journal of Educational Development, 33(6), 566-575. Valente, M. E. (1999). The Relationship of Organizational Health, Leadership, and Teacher Empowerment. Veenman, S., Denessen, E., Gerrits, J., & Kenter, J. (2001). Evaluation of a coaching programme for cooperating. Educational Studies, 27(3), 317-340. Vera-Baceta, M. A., Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2019). Web of Science and Scopus language coverage. Scientometrics, 1-11. Webb, R., Vulliamy, G., Hämäläinen, S., Sarja, A., Kimonen, E., & Nevalainen, R.(2004). A comparative analysis of primary teacher professionalism in England and Finland. Comparative education, 40(1), 83-107. Weiss, C. H., Cambone, J., & Wyeth, A. (1992). Trouble in paradise: Teacher conflicts in shared decision making. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(3), 350-367. Whitaker, K. S., & Moses, M. C. (1990). Teacher empowerment: A key to restructuring. Clearing House, 64, 127-130. White, P. A. (1992). Teacher empowerment under “ideal” school-site autonomy.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(1), 69-82. Wright, P. (2020). Transforming mathematics classroom practice through participatory action research. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1-23. Wright, A. (2012). Fantasies of empowerment: mapping neoliberal discourse in the coalition government’s schools policy. Journal of education policy, 27(3), 279-294. York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of educational research, 74(3), 255-316. Yukl, G., & Fu, P. P. (1999). Determinants of delegation and consultation by managers. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 20(2), 219-232. Zeldin, S., Gauley, J. S., Barringer, A., & Chapa, B. (2018). How high schools become empowering communities: A mixed‐method explanatory inquiry into youth‐adult partnership and school engagement. American journal of community psychology, 61(3-4), 358-371. Zhu, J., Yao, J., & Zhang, L. (2019). Linking empowering leadership to innovative behavior in professional learning communities: the role of psychological empowerment and team psychological safety. Asia Pacific Education Review, 20(4), 657-671.doi: 10.1007/s12564-019-09584-2 Zimmerman, M. A., & Rappaport, J. (1988). Citizen participation, perceived control,and psychological empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16(5), 725-750.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學學校行政碩士在職專班 106911004
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106911004
Data Type:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/NCCU202000785
Appears in Collections:	[Master of Education in School Administration] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
100401.pdf		3026Kb	Adobe PDF2	17	View/Open

社群 sharing

Loading...