Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131119
|
| Title: | 被遺忘權的實然與應然 —以數位上改過自新權的理論為中心
What is the right to be forgotten and how it ought to be? focusing on the right to digital redemption |
| Authors: | 孔德澔
Kung, Te-Hao |
| Contributors: | 劉定基
Liu, Ting-Chi
孔德澔
Kung, Te-Hao |
| Keywords: | 被遺忘權
數位上改過自新權
言論自由
個人資料自主權
隱私權
知的權利
個人資料保護法
the Right to be Forgotten
the Right to Digital Redemption
Freedom of Speech
the Right of Information Self-determination
the Right of Privacy
the Right to Know
Personal Data Protection Act |
| Date: | 2020 |
| Issue Date: | 2020-08-03 17:59:37 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 在網際網路如此發達的現代，我們能夠享有網路帶來的極大便利性，但也面臨許多因而產生的問題，假新聞的爭議層出不窮、網路犯罪不斷增長，那些早該被遺忘的過去被牢牢記住，銘刻在網際網路的石碑之上，而網路所造成無法遺忘的情形，也導致被遺忘權的興起，期望能透過被遺忘權妥善處理此一問題。
觀察國際上被遺忘權的著名案例及明文規範被遺忘權的法規，我們可以發現縱使是承認被遺忘權的歐盟，雖然對被遺忘權的行使要件等架構有著具體的規範，但對於被遺忘權的內涵為何卻沒有清楚的論述。透過爬梳相關比較法上學者的見解，可以發現學者們對於被遺忘權的內涵有著各自不同的見解，而被遺忘權的不同內涵，也進而導出不同的被遺忘權樣貌。
有鑑於此，本篇論文從被遺忘權的發展史出發，爬梳被遺忘權發展的脈絡，介紹不同的被遺忘權態樣，並以數位上改過自新權此一態樣的被遺忘權作為核心，詳細探討數位上改過自新權的架構。最後回歸我國法，討論如何將數位上改過自新權適用在我國的法律環境中，找出應對網路世界無法遺忘的問題。
In such an era when the Internet is so well-developed, we enjoy the great convenience brought by the Internet, but we also face the many problems arising from it: controversies of fake news are endless, cybercrime is increasing, and the pasts that should have long been forgotten have instead been firmly remembered and inscribed on the stone tablet of the Internet. The “unforgettable” situation created by the Internet has also led to the rise of the right to be forgotten, which is anticipated to serve as the approach that can properly deal with the presented problem.
From the internationally well-known cases of the right to be forgotten and the written laws explicitly regulating the right to be forgotten, we can find that even though the EU recognizes the right to be forgotten and has specific rules regarding, for example, the elements in exercising the right within the given framework, there is no clear definition of the connotation of the term. Combing through the opinions of scholars from different jurisdictions (from a comparative law perspective), it appears that scholars have varied understandings about the connotation of the right to be forgotten, which then gives rise to the different frameworks of the right to be forgotten.
Therefore, this thesis starts from the history of the right to be forgotten, going through the context of its development and introducing its different forms. Moving on, the thesis will center on “the right to digital redemption,” a new perception of the right to be forgotten, and regard it as the core of the right to be forgotten and further explore its framework. Finally, the thesis will come back to Taiwan to discuss how the right to digital redemption can be adopted in Taiwan and to find out how we shall deal with the “unforgettable” problem in the Internet world. |
| Reference: | 一、中文文獻
（一）專書
李惠宗，憲法要義，2012年。
李震山，多元、寬容與人權保障—以憲法為列舉權之保障為中心，2007年。
法治斌、董保城，憲法新論，2020年。
劉佐國，李世德，個人資料保護法釋義與實務，2012年
Daniel J. Solove著，林錚顗譯，隱私不保的年代，2013年。
（二）期刊論文
王澤鑑，人格權保護的課題與展望（三）—人格權的具體化及保護範圍（6）—隱私權（上），台灣本土法學雜誌，第96期，頁21-44，2007年7月。
李茂生，推動少年司法的心理深層動機-愛、憐憫與贖罪間的交錯，高雄少年，第14期，頁160-176，2010年2月。
李茂生，處理少年事件守密原則之探討，法令月刊第65卷3期，2014年3月，頁18-29。
林明昕，基本國策的規範效力及其對社會正義的影響，國立臺灣大學法學論叢，第45卷特刊，頁1305-1358，2016年11月。
林錫堯，德國聯邦個人資料保護法，法學叢刊，第36卷，第4期，頁1-18，1991年10月。
邱文聰，從資訊自決與資訊隱私的概念區分－評「電腦處理個人資料保護法修正草案」的結構性問題，月旦法學雜誌，第168卷，頁172-189，2009年5月。
范姜真媺，個人資料自主權之保護與個人資料之合理利用，法學叢刊，第57卷第1期，頁69-103，2012年1月。
范姜真媺，個人資料保護法關於「個人資料」保護範圍之檢討，東海大學法學研究第41期，頁91-123，2013年12月。
范姜真媺，網路時代個人資料保護的強化—被遺忘權利的主張，興大法學，第19期，頁61-106，2016年5月。
張志偉，記憶或遺忘，抑或相忘於網路──從歐洲法院被遺忘權判決，檢視資訊時代下的個人資料保護，政大法學評論，148期，頁1-68，2017年3月。
張志偉，從資訊自決與資訊隱私的概念區分，檢視被遺忘權的證立問題，萬國法律，第211期，頁2-15，2017年2月。
張陳弘，美國聯邦憲法增修條文第4條搜索令狀原則的新發展：以Jones, Jardines & Grady案為例，歐美研究，第48卷第2期，頁267-332，2018年6月。
張陳弘，新興科技下的資訊隱私保護：「告知後同意原則」的侷限性與修正方法之提出，國立臺灣大學法學論叢，第47卷第1期，頁201-297，2018年3月。
許炳華，被遺忘的權利：比較法之觀察，東吳法律學報，第28卷1期，頁125-163，2015年7月。
郭玉林，消費者債務清算程序之別除權—其價值顧慮及行使方法，月旦裁判時報第73期，頁72-82，2018年7月。
陳起行，資訊隱私權法理探討—以美國法為中心，政大法學評論，第64期，頁297-341，2000年12月。
楊智傑，個人資料保護法制上「被遺忘權利」與「個人反對權」：從 2014 年西班牙 Google v. AEPD 案判決出發，國會月刊，第43卷7期，頁19-43，2016年5月。
葉俊榮，探尋隱私權的空間意涵－大法官對基本權利的脈絡論證，中研院法學期刊，第18期，頁1-40，2012年5月。
劉定基，大數據與物聯網時代的個人資料自主權，憲政時代，第42卷，第3期，頁265-308，2017年1月。
劉定基，從美國法的觀點評司法院大法官釋字第六八九號解釋－以新聞自由、言論自由、隱私權的保障與衝突為中心，興大法學，第11期，頁195-236，2012年5月
劉靜怡，社群網路時代的隱私困境：以Facebook為討論對象，臺大法學論叢，第41卷1期，頁1-70，2012年3月。
劉靜怡，淺談GDPR的國際衝擊及其可能因應之道，月旦法學雜誌，第286期，頁5-31，2019年3月。
蕭文生，國家組織：第六講 總統，月旦法學教室，第29期，頁48-57，2005年3月。
蘇鑰機，什麼是新聞？，傳播研究與實踐，第1卷1期，頁1-14，2011年1月。
（三）專書論文
李震山，論資訊自決權，載：人性尊嚴與人權保障，頁239-314，2011年。
鄭有為，從消費者保護運動看免責制度之新趨向，載：破產法學的美麗新世界，頁95-147，2012年9月。
（四）學位論文
陳怡汝，被遺忘權利適用上之界限與困境，國立雲林科技大學科技法律碩士論文，2017年6月。
劉汗曦，由病人資訊隱私權觀點論我國全民電子病歷政策，國立政治大學法律學研究所碩士論文，2010年7月。
歐雅婷，被遺忘的權利的研究—以日本案例為中心，東海大學法律學研究所碩士論文，2018年6月。
鄭忻忻，行動應用程式的個人資料保護─公開透明原則的強化與本國實證研究，國立交通大學科技法律研究所碩士論文，2015年1月。
（五）網路資料
王泰銓，如何正確使用（翻譯）歐盟機構的名稱：以the European Council為例，網址：https://www.eusa-taiwan.org.tw/europe_detail/49.htm（最後瀏覽日：2020年6月1日）。
何展旭，歐盟基本權憲章之研究，財團法人國家政策研究基金會國正研究報告，參見https://www.npf.org.tw/2/968 （最後瀏覽日：2020年6月1日）。
依據歐洲隱私權保護法規提出的搜尋結果移除要求常見問題，https://support.google.com/transparencyreport/answer/7347822（最後瀏覽日：2020年6月1日）
孩子在網路上的瘋狂言行，日後竟成了面試時的一大阻礙，避免傷害「未來的自己」，這些超基本，2020年3月5日，參見https://futureparenting.cwgv.com.tw/family/content/index/17380?fbclid=IwAR3iZxi9iK4aC4BnsMaIK8_KNBK7O3-5-KSs-Idlo6GJ5rLs9Z8vd1LjVLs（最後瀏覽日：2020年6月1日）
政大研學會幹部遭爆挪用公費 當事人坦承「做了最壞示範」，蘋果日報，2019年5月13日，網址：https://tw.appledaily.com/new/realtime/20190513/1565576/（最後瀏覽日：2020年6月1日）。
美國「消費者隱私權法」草案，網址：https://stli.iii.org.tw/article-detail.aspx?no=64&tp=1&i=148&d=6852（最後瀏覽日：2020年6月1日）
苦林子，台灣監獄見聞：更生人為何難以回歸社會？，The News Lens 關鍵評論，2018年9月9日，網址：https://www.thenewslens.com/article/103152（最後瀏覽日：2020年6月1日）。
修復式正義，網址：https://www.taedp.org.tw/victims/rjustice（最後瀏覽日：2020年6月1日）
個人資料保護專案辦公室揭牌 扛2大任務，中央通訊社，2018年7月4日，網址：https://www.cna.com.tw/news/afe/201807040170.aspx（最後瀏覽日：2020年6月1日）
鈕承澤涉性侵案 一審判4年，中央社，2020年4月14日，網址：https://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/202004145004.aspx（最後瀏覽日期：2020年6月1日）。
黃彥棻，8成釣魚網站快閃詐騙，資安產品難防，強化員工警覺才是對策，資安周報第53期，2016年12月15日，網址：https://www.ithome.com.tw/news/110323（最後瀏覽日：2020年6月1日）
雷明正，鄭捷伏法／死刑躲不過！500多名死刑犯只有1人被特赦，三立新聞網，2016年5月10日，網址：https://www.setn.com/News.aspx?NewsID=145567（最後瀏覽日：2020年6月1日）。
懶人包一次看「世新男霸凌始末」下場超慘！受害同學「高EQ聲明」點醒萬人，Ettoday新聞雲，2019年6月19日，網址：https://www.ettoday.net/news/20190619/1470407.htm（最後瀏覽日：2020年6月1日）
二、外文文獻
（一）專書
Gloria Gonzalez Fuster, The Emergence of Personal Data Protection as a Fundamental Right of the EU (2014)
Jonathan Zittrain, The Future of the Internet-and How to Stop It (2008)
Martha C. Nassbaum, Anger and Forgiveness (2016)
Meg Leta Jones, Ctrl + Z: The Right to Be Forgotten (2016)
Viktor Mayer-Schönberger, Delete: The Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age(2011)
（二）期刊論文
Amy Kristin Sanders, The GDPR One Year Later: Protecting Privacy or Preventing Access to Information?, Tulane Law Review, 93 TLNLR, 1229-1254(2019)
Bernal, P.A., `A Right to Delete?`, European Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 2, No.2 ,1-24(2011).
Bert-Jaap Koops, Forgetting footprints, Shunning Shadows. A Critical Analsis of the “Right to Be Forgotten” in Big Data Practive, SCRIPTed, Volume 8, Issue 3, 229-256(2011).
Chris Conley, The Right to Delete, AAAI Spring Symposium Series, 53-58(2010)
eanne S. Zechmeister & Catherine Romero, Victim and Offender Accounts of Interpersonal Conflict: Autobiographical Narratives of Forgiveness and Unforgiveness, 82 J. of Personality and Soc. Psychol, 675-686 (2002)
Lawrence Siry, Forget Me, Forget Me Not: Reconciling Two Diffrenent Paradigms of the Right to Be Forgotten, Kentucky Law Journal, Vol103, Issue 3, Article 2, 311-344(2015)
Meg Leta Ambrose, It’s About Time: Privacy, Information Life Cycles, and The Right to Be Forgotten, Stanford Technology Law Review, 16 STNTLR 369, 385-387(2013)
Meg Leta Ambrose, Nicole Friess & Jill Van Matre, Seeking Digital Redemption: The Future of Forgiveness in the Internet Age, 29 Santa Clara High Tech. L.J., 99-163(2012)
Megan Diffenderfer, The Rights of Privacy and Publicity for Minors Online: Protecting the Privilege of Disaffirmance in the Digital, University of Louisville Law Review, 54 ULOUISLR, 131-156(2016)
Michael J. A. Wohl & Nyla R. Branscombe, Group Threat, Collective Angst, and Ingroup Forgiveness for the War in Iraq, Political Psychology, Vol. 30 No. 2, 193-217(2009)
Michael L. Rustad & Sanna Kulevska, Reconceptualizing the Right to Be Forgotten to Enable Transalantic Data Flow, Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 28, 349-417(2015).
O. Carter Snead, Memory and Punishment, 64 Vand. L. Rev., 1195-1164 (2011)
Paul A. Mauger et al., The Measurement of Forgiveness: Preliminary Research, 11 J. of Psychol. and Christianity, 247-262 (1992)
Roslyn Layton & Julian Mclendon, THE GDPR: What it Really Does and How the U.S. Can Chart a Better Course, Federalist Society Review, 19 FEDSOCR 234, 243-245(2018)
Roslyn Layton & Julian Mclendon, THE GDPR: What it Really Does and How the U.S. Can Chart a Better Course, Federalist Society Review, 19 FEDSOCR, 234-248(2018)
Samuel D. Warren & Louis D. Brandeis, The Right to Privacy, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 4, No. 5, 193-220(1890)
（三）專書論文
Frederick Schauer, Every Possible Use of Language ?, in The Free Speech Century,33-47 (Lee C. Bollinger & Geoffrey R. Stone eds., 2019).
（四）網路資料
Agreement on Commission`s EU data protection reform will boost Digital Single Market, available at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-15-6321_en.htm(last visited June 1st, 2020)
Americans Will Never Have the Right to Be Forgotten, TIME(May2014), https://time.com/98554/right-to-be-forgotten/(last visited June 1st, 2020)
Bernard Frischer, New Directions for Cultural Virtual Reality: A Global Strategy for Archiving, Serving, and Exhibiting 3d Computer Models of Cultural Heritage Sites, VIRTUAL RETROSPECT, at 2 (2005), available at https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3161/f1bc67528b84b9d837e0a4a7ab2d512daa5e.pdf?_ga=2.175321829.659110133.1583766307-1660170319.1583766307(last visited June 1st, 2020)
British Library warns UK`s web heritage `could be lost`, available at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8535384.stm(last visited June 1st, 2020)
Daniel J. Solove, NASA v. Nelson: Is There a Constitutional Right to Information Privacy ?, available at https://concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/03/nasa-v-nelson-is-there-a-constitutional-right-to-information-privacy.html (last visited September 20, 2019)
EC Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2010) available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:0609:FIN:EN:PDF(last visited June 1st, 2020)
Effects of Group Forgiveness Intervention on Perceived Stress, State and Trait, Anger, Symptoms of Stress, Self-Reported Health and Forgiveness (Stanford Forgiveness Project), Journal of Clinical Psychology, available at https://learningtoforgive.com/research/effects-of-group-forgiveness-intervention-on-perceived-stress-state-and-trait-anger-symptoms-of-stress-self-reported-health-and-forgiveness-stanford-forgiveness-project/(last visited June 1st, 2020)
Ervin Staub, Promoting Reconciliation After Genocide and Mass Killing in Rwanda—And Other Postconflict Settings: Understanding the Roots of Violence, Healing, Shared History, and General Principles , available at https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195300314.001.0001/acprof-9780195300314-chapter-18?print=pdf (last visited June 1st, 2020)
European Parliament legislative resolution of 12 March 2014 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation) (COM(2012)0011 – C7-0025/2012 – 2012/0011(COD)) (Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading), available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT%20TA%20P7-TA-2014-0212%200%20DOC%20XML%20V0//EN(last visited June 1st, 2020)
French data regulator rejects Google’s right-to-be-forgotten appeal, The Guardian(September 2014), available at https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/sep/21/french-google-right-to-be-forgotten-appeal(last visited June 1st, 2020)
GDPR and the Abusive Potential of Selective Enforcement, available at https://meanwhileinbudapest.com/2018/05/25/gdpr-and-the-power-of-selective-enforcement/(last visited June 1st, 2020)
Guidelines 5/2019 on the criteria of the Right to be Forgotten in the search engines cases under the GDPR (part 1), available at https://edpb.europa.eu/sites/edpb/files/consultation/edpb_guidelines_201905_rtbfsearchengines_forpublicconsultation.pdf(last visited June 1st, 2020)
Guidelines on the Implementation of the Court of Justice of the EUuropean Union Judgement on “GOOGLE SPAIN AND INC V. AGENCIA ESPAÑOLA DE PROTECCIÓN DE DATOS (AEPD) AND MARIO COSTEJA GONZÁLEZ” C-131/12, available at https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/article29/item-detail.cfm?item_id=667236(last visited June 1st, 2020)
Jeffrey Rosen, The Web Means the End of Forgetting, N.Y. TIMES(July 21, 2010),available at https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=The+Web+Means+the+End+of+Forgetting&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8(last visited June 1st, 2020)
Kent Walker, Defending access to lawful information at Europe’s highest court, available at https://www.blog.google/around-the-globe/google-europe/defending-access-lawful-information-europes-highest-court/(last visited June 1st, 2020)
Leah A. Lievrouw, The Next Decade in Internet Time: Ways Ahead for New Media Studies, A Decade in Internet Time: Symposium on the Dynamics of the Internet and Society Oxford Internet Institute(2011), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1959086(last visited november 17, 2020)
Napoleon Xanthoulis, Conceptualising a Right to Oblivion in the Digital World: A Human Rights-Based Approach, SSRN Electronic Journal(2012), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2064503(last visited november 17, 2020)
OECD Guidelines on the Protection of Privacy and Transborder Flows of Personal Data，available at https://www.oecd.org/internet/ieconomy/oecdguidelinesontheprotectionofprivacyandtransborderflowsofpersonaldata.htm(last visited June 1st, 2020)
OECD Privacy Guidelines, available at http://www.oecd.org/internet/ieconomy/privacy-guidelines.htm(last visited June 1st, 2020)
OECD Privacy Principle, available at http://oecdprivacy.org (last visited June 1st, 2020)
OECD work on privacy, available at http://www.oecd.org/sti/ieconomy/privacy.htm(last visited June 1st, 2020)
Peter Fleischer, Adapting our approach to the European right to be forgotten, available at https://www.blog.google/around-the-globe/google-europe/adapting-our-approach-to-european-rig/(last visited June 1st, 2020)
Peter Fleischer, Foggy thinking about the Right to Oblivion, available at http://peterfleischer.blogspot.com/2011/03/foggy-thinking-about-right-to-oblivion.html(last visited June 1st, 2020)
Peter Fleischer, Reflecting on the Right to be Forgotten(Dec 2016), available at https://www.blog.google/around-the-globe/google-europe/reflecting-right-be-forgotten/(last visited June 1st, 2020)
Peter Fleischer, Three years of striking the right (to be forgotten) balance(May 2017), available at https://www.blog.google/around-the-globe/google-europe/three-years-right-to-be-forgotten-balance/(last visited June 1st, 2020)
Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation) , available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52012PC0011&from=EN (last visited June 1st, 2020)
Remove unwanted & explicit personal images from Google, available at https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/6302812?hl=en(last visited June 1st, 2020)
Rick Weiss, On the Web, Research Work Proves Ephemeral, WASH. POST(November 24, 2003), available at https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2003/11/24/on-the-web-research-work-proves-ephemeral/959c882f-9ad0-4b36-88cd-fb7411db118d/(last visited June 1st, 2020)
Robert D. Enright, Suzanne Freedman & Julio Rique, The Psychology of Interpersonal Forgiveness, in Exploring Forgiveness, at 46-47, available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287126993_The_Psychology_of_Interpersonal_Forgiveness_and_Guidelines_for_Forgiveness_Therapy_What_Therapists_Need_to_Know_to_Help_Their_Clients_Forgive(last visited June 1st, 2020)
Terry Kuny, A Digital Dark Ages? Challenges in the Preservation of Electronic Information, 63 RD INT`L FED`N OF LIBRARY ASS`NS AND INSTS. (IFLA) COUNCIL AND GEN. CONFERENCE (1997), available at https://archive.ifla.org/IV/ifla63/63kuny1.pdf(last visited June 1st, 2020)
The end of Super Monday Night Combat, available at https://steamcommunity.com/games/104700/announcements/detail/1661142811548355195(last visited June 1st, 2020)
Theo Bertram ET AL, Three years of the right to be forgotten, available at https://drive.google.com/file/d/1H4MKNwf5MgeztG7OnJRnl3ym3gIT3HUK/view(last visited June 1st, 2020) |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
法律學系
105651049 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105651049 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202000782 |
| Appears in Collections: | [法律學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 104901.pdf | | 4399Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 60 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
