政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/130945
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113822/144841 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51787216      線上人數 : 350
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/130945


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/130945


    題名: 探討審計意見於債務合約中的資訊功能角色 ─兼論國有企業的調節影響
    The Information Role of Audit Opinions in Debt Contract: The Intermediary Influence of State-Owned Enterprises
    作者: 姚昱斕
    Yao, Yu-Lan
    貢獻者: 戚務君
    Chi, Wu-Chun
    姚昱斕
    Yao, Yu-Lan
    關鍵詞: 審計意見
    債務合約
    所有權性質
    Audit opinions
    Debt contracts
    Corporate ownership
    日期: 2020
    上傳時間: 2020-08-03 17:29:31 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本文選取2004年至2017年中國上市公司為研究對象，構建回歸模型分別檢驗了非標準式無保留意見(Modified Audit Opinion，簡稱MAO)對債務合約條件(包括銀行借款利率、借款規模及借款期限)的攸關性，並進一步探討企業所有權性質(以是否為國有企業衡量)的調節影響。研究發現：企業收到MAO會提高下一年度的銀行借款利率，其中以無法表示意見類型的審計意見最為嚴重，而國有性質企業會減緩債務利率提高的現象。除此之外，本文發現無法表示意見與銀行借款規模之間存在顯著負相關關係，然而未發現審計意見與銀行借款期限之間存在關係。整體而言，本文證實在中國市場的債權人會將MAO的資訊納入債務合約中。
    Using listed companies in China from 2004 to 2017 as the sample, this paper examines the relevance of modified audit opinions (MAO) in debt contracting, including interest rate, loan size, and maturity, and further examines the moderated effect of State-Owned Enterprises (SOE). The result shows that loans issued in the year after an MAO are associated with increasing interest spreads, and an MAO with disclaimer opinion having the largest effect. Moreover, the company with SOE could mitigate the effect of increasing interest spreads. In addition, this paper finds a positive association between a disclaimer opinion and loan size, but finds no evidence of an association between an audit opinion and loan maturity. Overall, the result of this paper suggests that lenders incorporate the information contained in MAO in to debt contracting in China market.
    參考文獻: 江金鎖，2011，制度環境、審計意見與銀行貸款——來自中國上市家族企業的經驗證據，經濟與管理，第7期：16-22。
    孫新憲與田利軍，2010，審計意見與銀行貸款續新決策關係研究，審計與經濟研究，第2期：48-53。
    孫錚、李增泉與王景斌，2006，所有權性質、會計資訊與債務契約——來自我國上市公司的經驗數據，管理世界，第10期：100-107。
    陳矜與劉芳蓓，2019，審計意見、所有權性質與債務融資成本，吉林工商學院學報，第35期：12-19。
    閆煥民與王浩宇，2019，審計功能、產權歧視與銀行貸款擔保，財經論叢，第3期：72-82。
    楊臻黛，2007，審計意見的決策有用性——基於銀行信貸決策視角的研究，復旦大學會計系博士論文。
    樊淑紅，2010，審計意見變化與銀行借款關係的實證研究——基於A股市場經驗資料，商業經濟，第2期：95-96。
    魏志華、王貞潔、吳育輝與李常青，2012，金融生態環境、審計意見與債務融資成本，審計研究，第3期：98-105。
    Behn, B. K., J. Choi, and T. Rang. 2008. Audit quality and properties of analyst. Earnings Forecasts 83(2): 327-349.
    Berry, A., and J. Robertson. 2006. Overseas bankers in the UK and their use of information for making lending decisions: Changes from 1985. The British Accounting Review 38: 175–191.
    Blackwell, D. W., T. R. Noland, and D. B. Winters. 1998. The value of auditor assurance: Evidence from loan pricing. Journal of Accounting Research 36(1): 57-70.
    Boolaky, P. K., and R. Quick. 2016. Bank directors’ perceptions of expanded auditor’s reports. International Journal of Auditing 20: 158–174.
    Borisova, G., and W. L. Megginson. 2011. Does government ownership affect the cost of debt? Evidence from privatization. The Review of Financial Studies 24: 2693-2737.
    Brandt, L., and H. Li. 2003. Bank discrimination in transition economies: ideology, information, or incentives?. Journal of Comparative Economics 31: 387–413.
    Chen, C. J., X. Su, and R. Zhao. 2000. An emerging market’s reaction to initial modified audit opinions: Evidence from the Shanghai Stock Exchange. Contemporary Accounting Research 17(3): 429-455.
    Chen, P. F., S. He, Z. Ma, and D.Stice. 2016. The information role of audit opinions in debt contracting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 61: 121-144.
    Choi, S. K., and D. C. Jeter. 1992. The effects of qualified audit opinions on earnings response coefficients. Journal of Accounting and Economics 15: 229-247.
    Citron, D. B., R. J. Taffler, and J. Y. Uang. 2008. Delays in reporting price-sensitive information: the case of going concern. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 27(1): 19-37.
    Faccio, M. 2006. Politically connected firms. The American Economic Review 96(1): 369-386.
    Faccio, M., R. W. Masulis, and J. J. McConnell. 2006. Political connections and corporate bailouts. The Journal Of Finance 6: 2597-2635.
    Frost, C. A. 1997. Disclosure policy choices of UK firms receiving modified audit reports. Journal of Accounting and Economics 23(2): 163-187.
    Ghicas, D. C., A. Papadaki, G. Siougle, and T. Sougiannis. 2008. The relevance of quantifiable audit qualifications in the valuation of IPOs. Review of Accounting Studies 13(4): 512-550.
    Graham, J., S. Li, and J. Qiu. 2008. Corporate misreporting and bank loan contracting. Journal of Financial Economics 89: 44–61.
    Guiral, A., E. Ruiz, and H. Choi. 2014. Audit report information content and the provision of non-audit services: Evidence from Spanish lending decisions. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 23: 44-57.
    Guiral-Contreras, A., J. A. Gonzalo-Angulo, and W. Rodgers. 2007. Information content and recency effect of the audit report in loan rating decisions. Accounting and Finance 47: 285–304.
    Ikenberry, D., J. Lakonishok, and T. Vermaelen. 1995. Market underreaction to open market share repurchases. Journal of Financial Economics 39: 181– 208.
    Knechel, W. R., A. Vanstrawlen, and M. Zerni. 2015. Does the identity of engagement partners matter? An analysis of audit partner reporting decisions. Contemporary Accounting Research 32(4): 1911-3846.
    Krishnagopal, M., and D. D. Williams. 2010. Investor reaction to going concern audit reports. The Accounting Review 85(6): 2075-2105.
    Lina, Z. J., Q. Tangb, and J. Xiao. 2003. An experimental study of users’ responses to qualified audit reports in China. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing & Taxation 12: 1–22.
    Niemi, L., and S. Sundgren. 2012. Are modified audit opinions related to the availability of credit? Evidence from finnish SMEs. European Accounting Review 21(4): 767-796.
    Palmrose, Z., V. Richardson, and S. Scholz. 2004. Determinants of market reactions to restatement announcements. Journal of Accounting and Economics 37: 59-89．
    Pittman, J., S. Fortin. 2004. Auditor choice and the cost of debt capital for newly public firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics 37: 113–136.
    Schneider, A. 2018. Studies on the impact of accounting information and assurance on commercial lending judgments. Journal of Accounting Literature 41: 63-74.
    Taffler, R. J., J. Lu, and A. Kausar. 2004. In denial? Stock market underreaction to going-concern audit report disclosures. Journal of Accounting and Economics 38: 263-296.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    107353051
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107353051
    資料類型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202000669
    顯示於類別:[會計學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    305101.pdf1444KbAdobe PDF20檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋