English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51824079      Online Users : 504
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/130934
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/130934


    Title: 疾病複雜度、醫療品質與市場區隔變數對台灣醫院效率之影響 -資料包絡分析法之運用
    The Effect of Disease Complexity, Medical Quality and Market Segmentation on Taiwan Hospital Efficiency- An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis Approach
    Authors: 黃軍浩
    Haung, Chun-Hao
    Contributors: 李佳玲
    黃軍浩
    Haung, Chun-Hao
    Keywords: 資料包絡分析法
    醫療品質
    疾病複雜度
    市場區隔
    Date: 2020
    Issue Date: 2020-08-03 17:27:53 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究之主要目的在於探討疾病複雜度、醫療品質與市場區隔變數對於台灣醫院效率之影響,以台灣之地區醫院以上等級之醫院為樣本,手工方式收集其營運資料,本文運用資料包絡分析法計算各醫院之相對效率,再進一步分析疾病複雜度、醫療品質及市場區隔變數對於醫院相對效率之影響。
    本研究將疾病複雜度分為門診之疾病複雜度與住院之疾病複雜度,研究結果顯示由於台灣醫療體系下有分級醫療之作法,醫學中心及區域醫院往往負責較嚴重之病人,因此其住院之疾病複雜度與效率有顯著之負向關係;相反地,地區醫院門診之疾病複雜度與效率才有顯著之負向關係。本文進一步發現醫學中心及區域醫院在門診之疾病複雜度,若複雜度愈高,有更好的效率。而醫療品質部分,研究結果顯示地區醫院相較醫學中心及區域醫院更應注意結構品質的調整;而醫學中心及區域醫院在流程品質變數與效率之間有互補關係,但在地區醫院則無此情況;地區醫院則在結果品質變數上與效率有互相替代之關係。最後市場區隔變數中,我們分析地理性區隔變數以及人口統計變數與效率之關係,發現台灣各縣市扶養比在醫學中心及區域醫院中與效率之關係結果顯示顯著負相關、台灣各縣市人口密度在醫學中心及區域醫院或是地區醫院皆呈現顯著正相關以及台灣各縣市平均家戶儲蓄率在全部醫院當中呈現顯著負相關。上述結果也說明醫院除了營運特性外,人口之因素亦會影響醫院營運效率。
    The main purpose of this study is to explore the effect of disease complexity, medical quality and the market segmentation on the efficiency of hospitals in Taiwan. In this study, our samples are taken in the hospitals which level above the district hospitals throughout Taiwan and keyed in by handmade. This study employed Data Envelopment Analysis to assess the relative efficiency of all sample hospitals, then we further analyze the effect of disease complexity, medical quality, and the market segmentation on samples’ relative efficiency.
    In this study, the complexity of disease is divided into outpatient disease complexity and inpatient disease complexity. And the result shows that medical centers and regional hospitals are often responsible for more serious patients because of the practice of graded medical care in Taiwan`s medical system, therefore, it has a significant negative correlation between efficiency and the inpatients disease complexity. In contrast, district hospitals have a significant negative correlation between efficiency and the outpatient disease complexity because they mainly treat outpatients. One particular thing is that medical center and regional hospitals have better efficiency when the outpatients’ disease they treat are more complex. In the mention of medical quality, we show that district hospital should pay more attention to structure quality adjustment than medical centers and regional hospitals. In addition, medical centers and regional hospitals have a complementary correlation between process quality and efficiency, but not in district hospitals. On the other hand, district hospitals have a trade-off correlation between outcome quality and efficiency. At last, in market segmentation, we analyzed the correlation between geographic segmentation and demographic segmentation variables with efficiency. We found that in medical center and regional hospitals, dependency ratio of counties and cities in Taiwan has a significant negative correlation with efficiency, Population density of counties and cities in Taiwan has a significant positive correlation with medical center, regional hospitals and district hospitals’ efficiency, and average household savings rate of counties and cities in Taiwan has a significant negative correlation with all Taiwan hospitals’ efficiency. To sum up, not only the operating property, but also the population factors will affect the efficiency of hospital operation.
    Reference: 中文部分
    中央健康保險署,2016,補充保險費計算公式。
    王媛慧與李文福,2004,我國地區醫院技術效率之研究-DEA方法的
    應用,經濟研究,第40期: 61-95。
    江昇達、王勝廣、高東煒、方文輝、張耀文、高森永與周稚傑,2011,高齡
    患者長期住院醫療利用影響因子之探討,台灣老年醫學暨老年學雜誌,
    第6卷第2期 : 86-104。
    全民健康保險醫療費用協定委員會,2005,全民健康保險醫療費用總額支付制
    度問答輯。
    全國法規資料庫,1994,全民健康保險法。
    全國法規資料庫,2013,全民健康保險醫療品質資訊公開辦法。
    邱芝駖,2004,健康保險成本控制:論總額支付制度影響醫療行為探討,社
    區發展季刊,第145期。
    李延春,1994,醫院經營績效之評估與資料包絡分析法權數設限之研究,國立
    交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
    林江亮、楊志春與郭弘卿,2007,台灣公立醫院經營效率之實證研究,
    現代會計與審計,第3卷第5期 : 45-52。
    林怡伶,2010,總額預算支付制度實施前後對台灣教學醫院經營效率之影響-
    資料包絡分析法三階段之應用,國立台灣科技大學管理學院碩士論文。
    洪志銘、吳淑妍、魏聰哲與黃德秀,2012,由消費支出結構探討台灣產業結構
    調整之趨勢與策略。財團法人中華經濟研究院專題研究報告。
    胡惟欽,2009,茶飲料市場消費行為研究,淡江大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
    洪維河、江東亮與張睿詒,2005,市場結構與組織特性對醫院營運效率之
    影響,管理學報,第22卷第2期 : 191-203。
    孫遜,2003,台北市立綜合醫院營運績效評估之研究,管理學報,第20期
    第6卷 : 993-1022。
    孫遜,2004,資料包絡分析法-理論與應用,台北:揚智文化。
    陳仁惠與黃月桂,2005,不同權屬與評鑑等級醫院之效率評估-DEA法
    之應用,醫護科技學刊,第7卷 : 346-362。
    陳筱華、祝道松與徐永新,2001,病患選擇醫院之關鍵因素及決策行為-
    以產科病人為例,醫務管理期刊,第2卷第1期,p77-92。
    張石柱、蕭幸金與姜美惠,2005,軍人納入全民健保後國軍醫院經營績效
    之實證研究,醫務管理期刊,第6卷第2期 : 215-231。
    陳庭芸,台北市醫療資源空間分析。
    張清溪,2001,所得彈性,台灣大紀元周報第19期。
    張錦年,1997,省立醫院之分配與技術效率評估,中國醫藥學院醫務管理研究
    所碩士論文。
    張錫惠、王巧雲與蕭家旗,1998,我國地區醫院經營效率影響因素之探討
    管理評論,第17期第1卷 : 21-38。
    黃志文,1995,行銷管理,台北 : 華泰書局。
    黃愛玲,2008,女性心理學,廣州 : 暨南大學出版社。
    劉家勇與賴馨儀,2018,由「結構-過程-結果」照護品質理論探討自力支
    援成效之研究,社區發展季刊,第164期 : 210-227。
    鄭士卿、汪琪玲與蕭維萱,2017,保險業集中度及效率對市場競爭程度的
    影響:以日本產險業為例,台大管理論叢,第27卷第28期,p289-318。
    衛生福利部,2016,醫病共享決策簡介。
    衛生福利部全民健康保險會,2005,基礎篇總額基本概念。
    衛生福利統計專區,2017,統計資料Q&A
    歐陽鍾玲,2006,台北市醫療設施分布之地理研究,地理研究,第45期 :
    51-72
    謝盛安,2009,國軍及署立醫院經營效率之研究-二階段資料包絡分析法應
    用,國防大學管理學院財務管理學系碩士論文。
    戴天亮,2001,以資料包絡法評估各臨床科經營效率:以某醫學中心為例。高
    雄醫學院公共衛生研究所碩士論文。
    蕭幸金與張石柱,1997,醫院最適規模之探討。管理學報,第14卷第
    4期 : 611-634。
    鍾漢軍,2006,以資料包絡分析法評估醫院臨床科別經營績效-以某區域教學
    醫院為例,義守大學管理研究所碩士論文。
    藍志堅,2007,以資料包絡分析法進行非營利宗教性財團法人醫院營運效率最
    佳化研究,高雄醫學大學醫務管理學研究所碩士論文。
    羅紀瓊、石淦生與陳國樑 (1996),醫院效率之衡量-DEA方法之應用,
    經濟論文,第24期第3卷 : 375-396。

    英文部分:
    Abu-Eisheh, S. A., and F. Mannering. 2002. Forecasting automobile demand for economies in transition: a dynamic simultaneous-equation system approach. Transportation Planning and Technology 25: 311-331
    Arrieta, A. 2018. Quality and resource efficiency in hospital service provision: A geoadditive stochastic frontier analysis of stroke quality of care in Germany. PLoS
    One 13(9).
    Al-qalawi, U. 2017. Does efficiency of hospitals lead to a higher quality of care? The case of Jordanian public hospitals. International Journal of Economic Perspectives 11(4): 602-610.
    Alvaro, A., and P. F. Jose. 2011. Evaluating hospital efficiency adjusting for quality indicators: An application to Portuguese NHS hospitals. FEP Working Papers 435,
    Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    Amole, B. B., E. O. Oyatoye, A. B. Alabi-Labaika, S. O. Adebiyi. 2016. Data Envelopment Analysis for estimating Health Care Efficiency in the southwest Teaching Hospitals in Nigeria. Journal of Economics & Business Research, 22(2):
    143-159.
    Arrieta, A., and G. Jorge. 2017. Output congestion leads to compromised care in Peruvian public hospital neonatal units. Health Care Management Science 20(2): 157-164.
    Bannicl, R. R., and Y. A. Ozcan. 1995. Efficiency analysis of federally funded hospitals: comparison hospital efficiency: a panel data analysis of DEA efficiency
    scores 1992-2000. Health Care Management Science 6(4): 271-284. 
    Chang. H. 1998. Determinants of hospital efficiency: The case of central government-owned hospitals in Taiwan. Omega International Journal of Management Science 26(2): 307-317.
    Chang, H., W. J. Chang, S. Das, and S. H. Li. 2004. Health care regulation and the operating efficiency of hospitals:Evidence from Taiwan, Journal of Accounting
    and Public Policy 23: 483-510.
    Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes. 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2: 429-444.
    Chen, K. C., H. M. Chen, L. N. Chien, and M. M. Yu. 2019. Productivity growth and quality changes of hospitals in Taiwan: does ownership matter?. Health Care Management Science 22(3): 451-461.
    Chilingerian, J. A. 1995. Evaluating physician efficiency in hospitals: A multivariate analysis of best practices. European Journal of Operational Research 8(3): 548-574
    Choi, J. H., I. Park, I. Jung, and A. Dey. 2017. Complementary effect of patient volume and quality of care on hospital cost efficiency. Health Care Management
    Science 20(2): 221-231.
    Cicek, I., M. Demir. 2015. Efficiency of human resource management: Differences actual/perceptual performance evaluations. Journal of Management, Marketing
    and Logistics 2(4): 403-423
    Donabedian, A. 1966. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Memorial Fund Q 44(3): 166-206.
    Dranove, D. 1987. Rate-setting by Diagnosis related groups and hospital specialization. RAND Journal of Economics 18(3): 417-427.
    Farley, D. E., and C. Hogan. 1990. Case-mix specialization in the market for hospital services. Health Services Research 25(5): 757-783.
    Farrell, M. J. 1957. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 120(3): 253-290.
    Ferreira, D., and R. C. Marques. 2015. Did the corporatization of Portuguese hospitals significantly change their productivity?. The European Journal of Health
    Economics 16: 289-303.
    Hu, H. H., Q. Qi, and C.H. Yang. 2012. Analysis of hospital technical efficiency in China: effect of health insurance reform. China Econ Rev 23, 865-877.
    Horn, S., P. D. Sharkey, A. F. Chambers, and R. A. Horn. 1985. Severity of illness within DRGs: Impact on prospective payment. American Journal of Public Health
    75(10): 1195-1199.
    Izon, G. M., and C. A. Pardini. 2017. Cost inefficiency under financial strain: a stochastic frontier analysis of hospitals in Washington State through the Great
    Reccesion. Health Care Management Science 20(2): 232-245.
    Izon, G. M., and C. A. Pardini. 2018. Association between medicare’s mandatory hospital value-based purchasing program and cost inefficiency. Applied Health
    Economics and Healtah Policy 16(1): 79-90.
    Kim, H. S., Y. H. Kim, J. S. Woo, and S. J. Hyun. 2015. An analysis of organizational performance based on hospital specialization level and strategy type. PLoS One 10(7).
    Ozcan, Y. A., and R. D. Luke. 1993. A national study of the efficiency of hospitals in urban markets. Health Services Research 28: 719-739.
    Penchansky, R., and J. W. Thomas. 1981. The concept of access: Definition and relationship to consumer Satisfaction. Med Care 19(2): 127-140.
    Puig-Junoy, J. 2000. Partitioning input cost efficiency into its allocative and technical components: an empirical DEA application to hospitals. Socio-
    Economic Planning Sciences,Elsevier 34(3): 199-218.
    Sherman, H. D. 1984. Hospital efficiency measurement and evaluation: Empirical test of a new technique. Medical Care 22: 922-938.
    Smith, W. H. 1956. Product differentation and market segmentation as alternative marketing strategies. Journal of Marketing 21(1): 3-8.
    Tiemann, O., and J. Schreyogg. 2009. Effects of ownership on hospital efficiency in Germany. Business Research 2: 115-145.
    Tiemann, O., J. Schreyogg, and R. Busse. 2011. Hospital ownership and efficiency: a review of studies with particular focus on Germany. Health Policy 104(2): 163-
    171.
    Votápková, J., and L. Šťastná. 2013. Efficiency of hospitals in the Czech Republic. Prague Economic Papers, University of Economics, Prague.
    Zuckerman, S., J. Hadley, and L. Lezzoni. 1994 Measuring hospital efficiency with frontier cost functions. Journal of Health Economics 13(3): 255-280.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    107353032
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107353032
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202000909
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    303201.pdf3813KbAdobe PDF2107View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback