| Reference: | Abramowitz, A. (2010). The disappearing center: Engaged citizens, polarization, and American democracy. Yale University Press.
Abramowitz, A. I., & Saunders, K. L. (2008). Is polarization a myth?. The Journal of Politics, 70(2), 542-555.
Adamic, L. A., & Glance, N. (2005). The political blogosphere and the 2004 US election: divided they blog. In Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Link discovery, 36-43.
Aiello, L. M., Barrat, A., Schifanella, R., Cattuto, C., Markines, B., & Menczer, F. (2012). Friendship prediction and homophily in social media. ACM Transactions on the Web, 6(2), 1–33.
Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 27-58.
Apple Daily. (2018). Global Facebook users exceed 2.2 billion. Taiwan has over 19 million. Retrieved from https://tw.appledaily.com/new/realtime/20181127/1474251/
An, J., Quercia, D., & Crowcroft, J. (2014, October). Partisan sharing: Facebook evidence and societal consequences. In Proceedings of the second ACM conference on Online social networks (pp. 13-24).
Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130-1132.
Barberá, P. (2015). How social media reduces mass political polarization. Evidence from Germany, Spain, and the US. Job Market Paper, New York University, 46.
Barberá, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J. A., & Bonneau, R. (2015). Tweeting from left to right: Is online political communication more than an echo chamber?. Psychological science, 26(10), 1531-1542.
Barnidge, M. (2015). The role of news in promoting political disagreement on social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 211-218.
Barnidge, M. (2017). Exposure to political disagreement in social media versus face-to-face and anonymous online settings. Political Communication, 34(2), 302-321.
Barnidge, M., Gil de Zúñiga, H., & Diehl, T. (2017). Second screening and political persuasion on social media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 61(2), 309-331.
Barnidge, M., Ardèvol-Abreu, A., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2018). Content-expressive behavior and ideological extremity: An examination of the roles of emotional intelligence and information network heterogeneity. New Media & Society, 20(2), 815-834.
Bem, D. J., & McConnell, H. K. (1970). Testing self-perception explanation of dissonance phenomena: On the salience of pre-manipulation attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14(1), 23-31.
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, communication & society, 15(5), 739-768.
Bessi, A., Zollo, F., Del Vicario, M., Puliga, M., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., ... & Quattrociocchi, W. (2016). Users polarization on Facebook and Youtube. PloS one, 11(8).
Bimber, B. (2008). The internet and political fragmentation. Domestic perspectives on contemporary democracy, 155-170.
Binder, A. R., Dalrymple, K. E., Brossard, D., & Scheufele, D. A. (2009). The soul of a polarized democracy: Testing theoretical linkages between talk and attitude extremity during the 2004 presidential election. Communication Research, 36(3), 315-340.
Borah, P., Edgerly, S., Vraga, E. K., & Shah, D. V. (2013). Hearing and talking to the other side: Antecedents of cross-cutting exposure in adolescents. Mass Communication and Society, 16(3), 391-416.
Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of computer‐mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.
Boxell, L., Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2017). Greater Internet use is not associated with faster growth in political polarization among US demographic groups. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(40), 10612-10617.
Brundidge, J. (2010). Encountering “difference” in the contemporary public sphere: The contribution of the Internet to the heterogeneity of political discussion networks. Journal of Communication, 60(4), 680-700.
Carpini, M. X. D., Cook, F. L., & Jacobs, L. R. (2004). Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A Review of the empirical literature. Annual Review of Political Science, 7(1), 315–344.
Chang, C. (2014). The influence of ambivalence toward a communication source: Media context priming and persuasion polarization. Communication Research, 41(6), 783-808.
Chen, P. J., & Smith, P. J. (2011). Digital media in the 2008 Canadian election. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 8(4), 399-417.
Chen, H. T., Ping, S., & Chen, G. (2015). Far from reach but near at hand: The role of social media for cross-national mobilization. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 443-451.
Choi, J., & Lee, J. K. (2015). Investigating the effects of news sharing and political interest on social media network heterogeneity. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 258-266.
Clark, C., & Tan, A. C. (2012). Political polarization in Taiwan: a growing challenge to catch-all parties?. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 41(3), 7-31.
Dalton, R. J., Beck, P. A., & Huckfeldt, R. (1998). Partisan cues and the media: Information flows in the 1992 presidential election. American Political Science Review, 92(1), 111-126.
Davis, N. T., & Dunaway, J. L. (2016). Party polarization, media choice, and mass partisan-ideological sorting. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 272-297.
Dewey, J. (1927). The Public and its Problems (Holt, New York).
Diehl, T., Weeks, B. E., & Gil de Zuniga, H. (2016). Political persuasion on social media: Tracing direct and indirect effects of news use and social interaction. New Media & Society, 18(9), 1875-1895.
Dilliplane, S. (2011). All the news you want to hear: The impact of partisan news exposure on political participation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(2), 287-316.
DiMaggio, P., Evans, J., & Bryson, B. (1996). Have American`s social attitudes become more polarized?. American journal of Sociology, 102(3), 690-755.
Ditto, P. H., & Lopez, D. F. (1992). Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. Journal of personality and social psychology, 63(4), 568.
Downing, J. W., Judd, C. M., & Brauer, M. (1992). Effects of repeated expressions on attitude extremity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(1), 17.
Economist Intelligence Unit (2018). Democracy Index 2018: Me too? Political participation, protest and democracy. Retrieved from https://www.eiu.com/public/topical_report.aspx?campaignid=Democracy2018
Edwards, K., & Smith, E. E. (1996). A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 5.
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 12(4), 1143-1168.
Eveland Jr, W. P., & Shah, D. V. (2003). The impact of individual and interpersonal factors on perceived news media bias. Political psychology, 24(1), 101-117.
Eveland Jr, W. P., Morey, A. C., & Hutchens, M. J. (2011). Beyond deliberation: New directions for the study of informal political conversation from a communication perspective. Journal of Communication, 61(6), 1082-1103.
Farrell, H. (2012). The consequences of the internet for politics. Annual review of political science, 15, 35-52.
Festinger, L. (1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance (Vol. 2). Stanford university press.
Fiorina, M. P., Abrams, S. J., & Pope, J. C. (2005). Culture war? The myth of a polarized America. New York: Pearson Longman.
Fiorina, M. P., & Abrams, S. J. (2008). Political polarization in the American public. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 563-588.
Fiorina, M. P., Abrams, S. A., & Pope, J. C. (2008). Polarization in the American public: Misconceptions and misreadings. The Journal of Politics, 70(2), 556-560.
Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016). Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public opinion quarterly, 80(S1), 298-320.
Gaines, B. J., & Mondak, J. J. (2009). Typing together? Clustering of ideological types in online social networks. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 6(3-4), 216-231.
Garrett, R. K. (2009). Politically motivated reinforcement seeking: Reframing the selective exposure debate. Journal of communication, 59(4), 676-699.
Garrett, R. K., Gvirsman, S. D., Johnson, B. K., Tsfati, Y., Neo, R., & Dal, A. (2014). Implications of pro-and counterattitudinal information exposure for affective polarization. Human Communication Research, 40(3), 309-332.
Garrett, R. K., & Stroud, N. J. (2014). Partisan paths to exposure diversity: Differences in pro-and counterattitudinal news consumption. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 680-701.
Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals` social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 17(3), 319-336.
Gil de Zúñiga, H., Molyneux, L., & Zheng, P. (2014). Social media, political expression, and political participation: Panel analysis of lagged and concurrent relationships. Journal of communication, 64(4), 612-634.
Gil de Zúñiga, H., Valenzuela, S., & Weeks, B. E. (2016). Motivations for political discussion: Antecedents and consequences on civic engagement. Human Communication Research, 42(4), 533-552.
Gil de Zúñiga, H., Barnidge, M., & Diehl, T. (2018). Political persuasion on social media: A moderated moderation model of political discussion disagreement and civil reasoning. The Information Society, 34(5), 302-315.
Gilbert, E., & Karahalios, K. (2009, April). Predicting tie strength with social media. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 211-220).
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6),1360-1380.
Gunther, A. (1988). Attitude extremity and trust in media. Journalism Quarterly, 65(2), 279-287.
Gunther, A. C., Miller, N., & Liebhart, J. L. (2009). Assimilation and contrast in a test of the hostile media effect. Communication Research, 36(6), 747-764.
Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. F. (1998). Democracy and disagreement. Harvard University Press.
Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Halpern, D., & Gibbs, J. (2013). Social media as a catalyst for online deliberation? Exploring the affordances of Facebook and YouTube for political expression. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1159-1168.
Halberstam, Y., & Knight, B. (2016). Homophily, group size, and the diffusion of political information in social networks: Evidence from Twitter. Journal of public economics, 143, 73-88.
Hampton, K. N., Lee, C. J., & Her, E. J. (2011). How new media affords network diversity: Direct and mediated access to social capital through participation in local social settings. New Media & Society, 13(7), 1031-1049.
Hart, P. S., & Nisbet, E. C. (2012). Boomerang effects in science communication: How motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies. Communication research, 39(6), 701-723.
Hart, P. S., Feldman, L., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E. (2015). Extending the impacts of hostile media perceptions: Influences on discussion and opinion polarization in the context of climate change. Science Communication, 37(4), 506-532.
Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Publications.
Haythornthwaite, C. (2005). Social networks and Internet connectivity effects. Information, Community & Society, 8(2), 125-147.
Heatherly, K. A., Lu, Y., & Lee, J. K. (2017). Filtering out the other side? Cross-cutting and like-minded discussions on social networking sites. New Media & Society, 19(8), 1271-1289.
Hetherington, M. J., & Rudolph, T. J. (2015). Why Washington won`t work: Polarization, political trust, and the governing crisis. University of Chicago Press.
Himelboim, I., McCreery, S., & Smith, M. (2013). Birds of a feather tweet together:
Integrating network and content analyses to examine cross-ideology exposure on Twitter. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 18(2), 154-174.
Hong, S., & Kim, S. H. (2016). Political polarization on twitter: Implications for the use of social media in digital governments. Government Information Quarterly, 33(4), 777-782.
Huber, J. D. (1989). Values and partisanship in left‐right orientations: Measuring ideology. European Journal of Political Research, 17(5), 599-621.
Huckfeldt, R., Beck, P. A., Dalton, R. J., & Levine, J. (1995). Political environments, cohesive social groups, and the communication of public opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 39(4), 1025.
Huckfeldt, R., Mendez, J. M., & Osborn, T. (2004). Disagreement, ambivalence, and engagement: The political consequences of heterogeneous networks. Political Psychology, 25(1), 65-95.
Hsiao, Y.C. (2014). Political Polarization in Taiwan: An Analysis on Mass Feeling Thermometer toward Political Parties. Journal of Electoral Studies, 21(2), 1-42.
IPP Review. (2019). Taiwan’s 2020 Elections: Is the DPP’s Primary Fair? Retrieved from https://ippreview.com/index.php/Blog/single/id/1014.html
Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405-431.
Iyengar, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2015). Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 690-707.
Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019). The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22, 129-146.
John, N. A., & Dvir-Gvirsman, S. (2015). “I Don`t Like You Any More”: Facebook Unfriending by Israelis During the Israel–Gaza Conflict of 2014. Journal of Communication, 65(6), 953-974.
Kahan, D. M. (2015). The politically motivated reasoning paradigm, part 1: What politically motivated reasoning is and how to measure it. Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences: An interdisciplinary, searchable, and linkable resource, 1-16.
Kim, J., Wyatt, R. O., & Katz, E. (1999). News, talk, opinion, participation: The part played by conversation in deliberative democracy. Political communication, 16(4), 361-385.
Kim, Y. (2011). The contribution of social network sites to exposure to political difference: The relationships among SNSs, online political messaging, and exposure to cross-cutting perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 971-977.
Kim, M., Newth, D., & Christen, P. (2013a). Modeling dynamics of diffusion across heterogeneous social networks: News diffusion in social media. Entropy, 15(10), 4215-4242.
Kim, Y. M., Wang, M., Gotlieb, M. R., Gabay, I., & Edgerly, S. (2013b). Ambivalence reduction and polarization in the campaign information environment: The interaction between individual-and contextual-level influences. Communication Research, 40(3), 388-416.
Kim, Y., Hsu, S. H., & de Zúñiga, H. G. (2013c). Influence of social media use on discussion network heterogeneity and civic engagement: The moderating role of personality traits. Journal of communication, 63(3), 498-516.
Kim, Y. (2015). Does disagreement mitigate polarization? How selective exposure and disagreement affect political polarization. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 92(4), 915-937.
Kim, Y., & Chen, H. T. (2015). Discussion network heterogeneity matters: Examining a moderated mediation model of social media use and civic engagement. International Journal of Communication, 9, 22.
Kim, J., & Hyun, K. D. (2017). Political disagreement and ambivalence in new information environment: Exploring conditional indirect effects of partisan news use and heterogeneous discussion networks on SNSs on political participation. Telematics and Informatics, 34(8), 1586-1596.
Klapper, J. T. (1960). The effects of mass communication.
Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Meng, J. (2011). Reinforcement of the political self through selective exposure to political messages. Journal of Communication, 61(2), 349-368.
Koivula, A., Kaakinen, M., Oksanen, A., & Räsänen, P. (2019). The Role of Political Activity in the Formation of Online Identity Bubbles. Policy & Internet, 11(4), 396-417.
Lau, R. R., Andersen, D. J., Ditonto, T. M., Kleinberg, M. S., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2017). Effect of media environment diversity and advertising tone on information search, selective exposure, and affective polarization. Political Behavior, 39(1), 231-255.
Lee, C., Shin, J., & Hong, A. (2018). Does social media use really make people politically polarized? Direct and indirect effects of social media use on political polarization in South Korea. Telematics and Informatics, 35(1), 245-254.
Lee, F. L. (2016). Impact of social media on opinion polarization in varying times. Communication and the Public, 1(1), 56-71.
Lee, F. L., Liang, H., & Tang, G. K. (2019). Online Incivility, Cyberbalkanization, and the Dynamics of Opinion Polarization During and After a Mass Protest Event. International Journal of Communication, 13, 4940-4959.
Lee, J., & Myers, T. A. (2016). Can social media change your mind? SNS use, cross-cutting exposure and discussion, and political view change. Social Media Studies, 2(2), 87-97.
Lee, J., & Choi, Y. (2019). Effects of network heterogeneity on social media on opinion polarization among South Koreans: Focusing on fear and political orientation. International Communication Gazette, 0(0), 1-21.
Lee, J. K., Choi, J., Kim, C., & Kim, Y. (2014). Social media, network heterogeneity, and opinion polarization. Journal of communication, 64(4), 702-722.
Leeper, T. J. (2014). The informational basis for mass polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(1), 27-46.
Lelkes, Y. (2016). Mass polarization: Manifestations and measurements. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 392-410.
Lelkes, Y., Sood, G., & Iyengar, S. (2017). The hostile audience: The effect of access to broadband internet on partisan affect. American Journal of Political Science, 61(1), 5-20.
Levitan, L. C., & Visser, P. S. (2009). Social network composition and attitude strength: Exploring the dynamics within newly formed social networks. Journal of experimental social psychology, 45(5), 1057-1067.
Lev-On, A., & Manin, B. (2009). Happy accidents: Deliberation and online exposure to opposing views. Online Deliberation: Design, Research and Practice, Todd Davies, Seeta Gangadharan, eds., Forthcoming.
Lin, C.S., & Chou, H.Y. (2014). The Political-Communication Effects of Televised Presidential Debates on First-Time Voters: The Example of 2012 Taiwan President Election. Journal of Electoral Studies, 21(1), 47-87.
Liu, F.C.S. (2009). Partisan Orientation and Selective Exposure during Taiwan`s 2008 Presidential Election Campaign. Journal of Electoral Studies, 16(2), 51-70.
Lowell, A. L. (1919). Public opinion and popular government. Longmans, Green.
Mason, L. (2013). The rise of uncivil agreement: Issue versus behavioral polarization in the American electorate. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(1), 140-159.
Matakos, A., Terzi, E., & Tsaparas, P. (2017). Measuring and moderating opinion polarization in social networks. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 31(5), 1480-1505.
Matthes, J., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Who learns from cross-cutting exposure? Motivated reasoning, counterattitudinal news coverage, and awareness of oppositional views. In Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association, Phoenix, AZ.
McCoy, J., Rahman, T., & Somer, M. (2018). Polarization and the global crisis of democracy: Common patterns, dynamics and pernicious consequences for democratic polities. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(1), 16-42.
McCoy, J., & Somer, M. (2019). Toward a theory of pernicious polarization and how it harms democracies: Comparative evidence and possible remedies. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 681(1), 234-271.
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual review of sociology, 27(1), 415-444.
Meffert, M. F., Chung, S., Joiner, A. J., Waks, L., & Garst, J. (2006). The effects of negativity and motivated information processing during a political campaign. Journal of Communication, 56(1), 27-51.
Min, S. J., & Wohn, D. Y. (2018). All the news that you don`t like: Cross-cutting exposure and political participation in the age of social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 83, 24-31.
Mitchell, A., Gottfried, J., Kiley, J., & Matsa, K.E. (2014). Political Polarization & Media Habits. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from: https://www.journalism.org/2014/10/21/political-polarization-media-habits/
Mutz, D. C., Sniderman, P. M., & Brody, R. A. (Eds.). (1996). Political persuasion and attitude change. University of Michigan Press.
Mutz, D. C. (2002a). Cross-cutting social networks: Testing democratic theory in practice. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 111-126.
Mutz, D. C. (2002b). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 838-855.
Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. Cambridge University Press.
Mutz, D. C., & Mondak, J. J. (2006). The workplace as a context for cross-cutting political discourse. The Journal of Politics, 68(1), 140-155.
Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of general psychology, 2(2), 175-220.
Nie, N. H., Miller, III, D. W., Golde, S., Butler, D. M., & Winneg, K. (2010). The world wide web and the US political news market. American Journal of Political Science, 54(2), 428-439.
Nir, L. (2005). Ambivalent social networks and their consequences for participation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17(4), 422-442.
Page, B. I. (1996). Who deliberates?: Mass media in modern democracy. University of Chicago Press.
Papacharissi, Z. (2002). The virtual sphere: The internet as a public sphere. New media & society, 4(1), 9-27.
Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. Penguin UK.
Parsons, B. M. (2010). Social networks and the affective impact of political disagreement. Political Behavior, 32(2), 181-204.
Passy, F., & Monsch, G. A. (2014). Do social networks really matter in contentious politics?. Social Movement Studies, 13(1), 22-47.
Pew Research Center (2014). Social media and the “spiral of silence.” Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/08/26/social-media-and-the-spiral-of-silence
Price, V., Cappella, J. N., & Nir, L. (2002). Does disagreement contribute to more deliberative opinion?. Political communication, 19(1), 95-112.
Prior, M. (2009). The immensely inflated news audience: Assessing bias in self-reported news exposure. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73(1), 130-143.
Prior, M. (2013). Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 101-127.
Quan-Haase, A., & Young, A. L. (2010). Uses and gratifications of social media: A comparison of Facebook and instant messaging. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(5), 350-361.
Rainie, L., & Smith, A. (2012). Social networking sites and politics. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/∼/media//Files/Reports/2012/PIP_SNS_and_politics.pdf
Rojas, H. (2015). Egocentric publics and perceptions of the worlds around us. In New Technologies and Civic Engagement (pp. 107-116). Routledge.
Roy, J. (2012). Social media’s democratic paradox: Lessons from Canada. European Journal of ePractice, 16(1).
Scheufele, D. A., Nisbet, M. C., Brossard, D., & Nisbet, E. C. (2004). Social structure and citizenship: Examining the impacts of social setting, network heterogeneity, and informational variables on political participation. Political Communication,, 21(3), 315-338.
Scheufele, D. A., Hardy, B. W., Brossard, D., Waismel-Manor, I. S., & Nisbet, E. (2006). Democracy based on difference: Examining the links between structural heterogeneity, heterogeneity of discussion networks, and democratic citizenship. Journal of Communication, 56(4), 728-753.
Sherif, M., & Hovland, C. I. (1961). Social judgment: assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Skitka, L. J., Bauman, C. W., & Sargis, E. G. (2005). Moral conviction: Another contributor to attitude strength or something more? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(6), 895-917.
Skoric, M. M., Zhu, Q., & Lin, J. H. T. (2018). What predicts selective avoidance on social media? A study of political unfriending in Hong Kong and Taiwan. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(8), 1097-1115.
Sniderman, P. M. (1981). A question of loyalty. University of California Press.
Somer, M., & McCoy, J. (2018). Déjà vu? Polarization and Endangered Democracies in the 21st Century. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(1), 3–15.
Spohr, D. (2017). Fake news and ideological polarization: Filter bubbles and selective exposure on social media. Business Information Review, 34(3), 150-160.
Stanley, M. L., Henne, P., Yang, B. W., & De Brigard, F. (2019). Resistance to position change, motivated reasoning, and polarization. Political Behavior, 1-23.
Stroud, N. J. (2010). Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of communication, 60(3), 556-576.
Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Republic. com. Princeton university press.
Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Going to extremes: How like minds unite and divide. Oxford University Press.
Sunstein, C. R. (2018). # Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press.
Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American journal of political science, 50(3), 755-769.
Taiwan Communication Survey. (2019). The 2018 Taiwan Communication Survey (Phase Two, Year Two): media use and social implications. Retrieved from http://www.crctaiwan.nctu.edu.tw/AnnualSurvey_detail_e.asp?ASD_ID=34
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austina & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey: Brooks-Cole.
Tang, G., & Lee, F. L. (2013). Facebook use and political participation: The impact of exposure to shared political information, connections with public political actors, and network structural heterogeneity. Social Science Computer Review, 31(6), 763-773.
Thompson, M. M., Zanna, M. P., & Griffin, D. W. (1995). Let’s not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 361–386). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tilly, C., and S. Tarrow. 2015. Contentious politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tsfati, Y., & Nir, L. (2017). Frames and reasoning: Two pathways from selective exposure to affective polarization. International Journal of Communication, 11, 301-322.
Tucker, J. A., Theocharis, Y., Roberts, M. E., & Barberá, P. (2017). From liberation to turmoil: Social media and democracy. Journal of democracy, 28(4), 46-59.
Tucker, J. A., Guess, A., Barberá, P., Vaccari, C., Siegel, A., Sanovich, S., ... & Nyhan, B. (2018). Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: A review of the scientific literature. Political polarization, and political disinformation: a review of the scientific literature (March 19, 2018).
Turcotte, J., York, C., Irving, J., Scholl, R. M., & Pingree, R. J. (2015). News recommendations from social media opinion leaders: Effects on media trust and information seeking. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(5), 520-535.
TWNIC. (2019). Taiwan Internet Report 2019. Retrieved from https://report.twnic.tw/2019/assets/download/TWNIC_TaiwanInternetReport_2019_EN.pdf
Valentino, N. A., Hutchings, V. L., Banks, A. J., & Davis, A. K. (2008). Is a worried citizen a good citizen? Emotions, political information seeking, and learning via the internet. Political Psychology, 29(2), 247-273.
Valenzuela, S., Kim, Y., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2012). Social networks that matter: Exploring the role of political discussion for online political participation. International journal of public opinion research, 24(2), 163-184.
Van Boven, L., Judd, C. M., & Sherman, D. K. (2012). Political polarization projection: social projection of partisan attitude extremity and attitudinal processes. Journal of personality and social psychology, 103(1), 84.
Ward, J. (2012). Communicating citizenship online. Hampton Press.
Wojcieszak, M. E., & Mutz, D. C. (2009). Online groups and political discourse: Do online discussion spaces facilitate exposure to political disagreement?. Journal of communication, 59(1), 40-56.
Wojcieszak, M. (2010). ‘Don’t talk to me’: effects of ideologically homogeneous online groups and politically dissimilar offline ties on extremism. New Media & Society, 12(4), 637-655.
Wojcieszak, M., & Price, V. (2010). Bridging the divide or intensifying the conflict? How disagreement affects strong predilections about sexual minorities. Political Psychology, 31(3), 315-339.
Wojcieszak, M., & Rojas, H. (2011). Correlates of party, ideology and issue based extremity in an era of egocentric publics. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16(4), 488-507.
Wood, W. (2000). Attitude change: Persuasion and social influence. Annual review of psychology, 51(1), 539-570.
Yang, J., Barnidge, M., & Rojas, H. (2017). The politics of “Unfriending”: User filtration in response to political disagreement on social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 22-29.
Yu, R. P. (2016). The relationship between passive and active non-political social media use and political expression on Facebook and Twitter. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 413-420.
Zhu, Q., Skoric, M., & Shen, F. (2017). I shield myself from thee: Selective avoidance on social media during political protests. Political Communication, 34(1), 112-131. |
