政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/130565
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113648/144635 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51684046      線上人數 : 645
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/130565


    題名: 醫療器材代理商產品選擇策略之研究–以C公司為例
    Research on the strategy of Products Portfolio Selection for Medical Equipment Agent – Taking C Company as an Example
    作者: 洪禎改
    Hung, Jen-Kai
    貢獻者: 詹文男
    Chan, Wen-Nan
    洪禎改
    Hung, Jen-Kai
    關鍵詞: 醫療器材
    原廠
    代理商
    去中間化
    產品組合
    Medical Device
    Original Manufacturer
    Agents
    Disintermediation
    Product Portfolio
    日期: 2020
    上傳時間: 2020-07-01 13:45:28 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 醫療器材產業是整合型的學科，國家產業創新能力不夠或市場規模不夠大的地區，很難發展高端醫療器材產業，全球高端醫療器材的研發與生產，由美國、歐洲、日本等國所主導，其他國家對高端醫療器材產品的需求，主要靠進口來滿足需求。
    醫療器材研發製造廠商進入新市場時，初期會與當地代理商合作，當市場達到經濟規模後，原廠將跨足進入當地市場，原廠想直接銷售給醫療機構，醫療機構想直接從原廠購買，當醫療器材代理商的上下游在共同利益結合下，代理商就面臨「去中間化」的危機，這是代理商常見不利的問題。中國醫療產業市場實施的「兩票制」，更是用政府監管部門直接介入「去中間化」的手段。醫療器材代理商似乎在打一場打不贏的仗。
    本研究的課題主要是藉由個案研究法，分析個案公司自1986年成立至2019年期間與原廠合作的代理過程、產品組合模式等，對個案公司做深入研究，藉由總體環境分析理論、產業競爭分析理論、顧客需求理論分析、企業SWOT優劣分析理論、產品組合理論等方面，對個案在選擇合作原廠與產品組合策略上的研究與分析，希望找到代理商對選擇原廠與選擇產品組合的最佳策略。
    研究結果指出: 婚姻雙方講究門當戶對，在代理商業模式下，選擇合作原廠上，也要考慮雙方資源與企業規模的適配性，醫療器材代理商應該考慮選擇與企業規模相當的原廠合作。在產品選擇上，適當的產品組合，做好市場差異化，可產生代理制衡的綜效。在顧客經營上，衍伸領域內採購需求，可產生顧客綜效，讓顧客專屬陷入。利用以上三個構面的選擇，找出對代理商最有利的代理原廠與產品組合的選擇方案。
    Medical devices industry is an integrated discipline. It is difficult to develop the high-end medical device in an area where the country’s industrial innovation is not good enough or the market size is not large enough. Global high-end medical devices are dominated by the United States, Europe, and Japan those developed countries. The demand for high-end medical devices in other countries mainly depends on import.
    When medical device manufacturers enter new markets, they initially adopt the business model of agents. Once the market has reached economic scale, the original manufacturer may step into the local market. The original manufacturer hopes to sell products directly to hospitals, and hospital wants to directly purchase from the original manufacturer. When the suppliers and buyers of medical device has a common interest, the agent will face the crisis of "Disintermediation", which is a common problem for agents. "Two-invoice policy" implemented in China medical field is a means of direct intervention by government in "Disintermediation". Medical device agents seem to be fighting an unwinnable battle.
    The subject of this research is mainly to analyze the company C from its establishment of 1986 to 2019 about its agent process and product portfolio. Through the case study by overall environmental analysis theory, industrial competition analysis theory, customer demand theory, enterprise SWOT advantages and dis-advantages analysis theory, product portfolio theory… etc., to research and analyze the case on the selection of cooperative original manufacturer and product portfolio strategy. I hope to find the best strategy for medical device agent to select the original manufacturer and product portfolio.
    The results of the study pointed out: Marriage parties should be in fair conditions. Under the agency business model, the selection of the original manufacturer for cooperation should consider the adaptability of the two parties` resources to the scale of the enterprise. In terms of product selection, proper product portfolio and market differentiation can create a comprehensive effect in agent’s checks and balances. In terms of customer management, customer exclusiveness to develop demand in the field can generate customer synergy. Use the selection of the above three facets to find out the most favorable original manufacturer and product portfolio for agents.
    參考文獻: 一、中文部分
    1.王冠東(2003)，國際醫療器材廠商在台行銷通路決策之研究，未出版碩士論文，淡江大學，台北。
    2.司徒達賢(2011)，策略管理新論-觀念架構與分析方法，智勝出版社，台北。
    3.邱志聖(2018)，策略行銷分析:架構與實務應用(第四版)，智勝出版社，台北。
    4.吳建穎(2003)，製造商權力對通路合作與衝突影響之研究--以進口醫療器材業為例，未出版碩士論文，銘傳大學，台北。
    5.食品藥物管理署(2004)，醫療器材管理辦法，衛生福利部食品藥物管理署。
    6.食品藥物管理署(2020)，醫療器材管理法，衛生福利部食品藥物管理署。
    7.郭大維(2019)，全球眼科醫材市場概況分析(2019.6)，工研院產科國際所，新竹。
    8.陳玉美(2006)，國內醫療器材進口代理商選擇產品決策過程之研究，未出版碩士論文，淡江大學，台北。
    9.陳柏憲(2010)，顧客關係、品牌知名度、企業形象、服務品質、顧客滿意度與顧客忠誠度間關係之研究，未出版碩士論文。
    10.衛生福利部(2004)，醫療法，衛生福利部。
    11.衛生福利部(2004)，藥事法，衛生福利部。

    二、英文部分
    1.Anderson, E. W. & M. W. Sullivan (1993), “ The Antecedents and Consequences of Customer Satisfaction for Firms,” Marketing Science, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 125-143.
    2.Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2006). Qualitative Research in Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods: United States Edition.
    3.Cardozo, R.N., “An Experimental Study of Customer Effect, Expectation and Satisfaction, “Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.2, 1965, pp.244-249.
    4.Coase, R. H.（1937）, “The Nature of the Firm.” Economica, Vol.4, pp.386-405.
    5.Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
    6.Engel, J.F., r.d. Blackwell, and P.W. Miniard (2000), Consumer Behavior , 8th ed., Rinehart and Winston, NEW YORK.
    7.Griffin, G., 2002, “Image: It’s all in the Mind (That’s Why It Drives Sales),” Instant and Small Commercial Printer, 21(8), 12-15.
    8.Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
    9.Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.
    10.Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching(2nd ed.) London: Sage.
    11.Myers, M. D. (2013). Qualitative research in business and management, Sage.
    12.Park, C. Whan, Bernard J. Jaworski, and Deborah J. MacInnis (1986). Strategic Brand Concept-Image Management.Journal of Marketing, 50. 135-145
    13.Philip Kotler, Swee Hoon Ang, Siew Meng Leong & Tan Chin Tiong (1996) Marketing Management: An Asia Perspective, Prentice Hall
    14.Porter, M. E (1990).The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Free Press. New York
    15.Porter, M. E (1980) , Competitive Strategy, Free Press, New York.
    16.Robertson, T. S., & Gatignon, H., 1986, Competitive effects on technology diffusion, Journal of Marketing, 20(3), 1-12.
    17.Sauerhaft, S., Atkins, C. (1989) "Image Wars`, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
    18.Smith, J. K. (1983). Quantitative versus Qualitative Research: An Attempt to Clarify the Issue. Educational Researcher, 12(3), 6-13.
    19.The Wall Street Journal (2014) Where (in the Human Body) Venture Capital Is Going Eyes and Ears Draw Biggest Increases in Investments，New York
    20.Van Maanen, J. (1979). Reclaiming Qualitative Methods for Organizational Research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 520-526.
    21.Williamson, O. E. (1975), “Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications” New York: Free Press.
    22.Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods, 3rd edn. Applied Social Research Methods Series, vol. 5: Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
    23.Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods(4th ed.) Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)
    107932162
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107932162
    資料類型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202000544
    顯示於類別:[經營管理碩士學程EMBA] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    216201.pdf2266KbAdobe PDF20檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋