政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/129851
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 114205/145239 (79%)
造訪人次 : 52685272      線上人數 : 791
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 文學院 > 哲學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/129851


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/129851


    題名: 從使用因明談清辨是否繼承龍樹的精神
    Does Bhāviveka Inherit Nāgārjuna?--From the Perspective of the Use of Hetuvidyā
    作者: 林恕安
    Lin, Su-An
    Lin, Su-An
    貢獻者: 哲學系
    關鍵詞: 清辨;因明;中觀;歸謬法;自立論證
    Bhāviveka;Hetuvidyā;Madhyamaka;Prasaṅga;Svatantra
    日期: 2018-12
    上傳時間: 2020-05-26 13:38:20 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 清辨（Bhāviveka, 500-570 A. D.）與龍樹（Nāgārjuna, 150- 250 A. D.）以及其他中觀學家如佛護（Buddhapālita, 470-540 A. D.）、月稱（Candrakīrt, 600-650 A. D.）等最大差異在於其著作中大量採用因明（hetuvidyā）論式，然而論式的使用在某種程度上接受了一套既有的軌則，而此有違龍樹在《迴諍論》（Vigrahavyāvartanī）中遮破使用量（pramāṇa）的看法。那麼，清辨又為何要依此方式說明中觀的立場，其背景與積極意義為何呢？此文將討論清辨是否成功地以因明說明中觀的內涵，若是，則他如何解決使用量所產生的形上疑慮？勝義簡別在這其中又如何扮演其角色？再者，一直以來，清辨雖被視為中觀的繼承者，但卻抑於佛護、月稱一系而在修證的判定上不受重視，此處也將釐清清辨雖以不同的方式說明，但其內涵是具有其傳承與說服力的。
    The major difference between Bhāviveka and Nāgārjuna as well as other Madhyamikas such as Buddhapālita and Candrakīrt etc. is Bhāviveka`s application of Buddhist logic (hetuvidyā) in his works. However, to a certain degree, his use of inference has to accept the system of logical rules, which, in turn, violates the view in Nāgārjuna`s Vigrahavyāvartanī where the means of acquiring knowledge (pramāṇa) is denied. Then, what are the reasons that Bhāviveka applies hetuvidyā when he explains the content of Madhyamaka? What is the background and positive meaning behind his application? This paper discusses whether or not Bhāviveka has successfully explained the content of Madhyamaka by applying hetuvidyā. If he does, how does he solve the doubt in metaphysics when applying it? In other words, how does he avoid considering pramāṇa as real? What role does the qualifi cation of “from the ultimate point of view” play within it? Additionally, though Bhāviveka is considered as the adherent of the Madhyamaka school, he is not highly valued regarding cultivation when compared to Buddhapālita and Candrakīrt. This paper clarifi es that his method has inherited the spirit of Middle Way and it is convincing if we examine his philosophy as a whole.
    關聯: 台大佛學研究, No.36, pp.1-44
    資料類型: article
    顯示於類別:[哲學系] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    464.pdf1790KbAdobe PDF2147檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋