Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/129016
|
| Title: | 微信之即時性書寫實踐研究 ——以中國東部都會區年輕世代為例
Realtime writing practices on WeChat: a case study of young adult users in eastern China |
| Authors: | 張怡瑩
Zhang, Yi-Ying |
| Contributors: | 王淑美
Wang, Su-mei
張怡瑩
Zhang, Yi-Ying |
| Keywords: | 即時性書寫
即時性
書寫
媒介實踐
社群媒體
智慧型手機
微信
中國
年輕成年人
Realtime writing
Immediacy
Writing
Media practices
Social media
Smartphone
WeChat
China
Young adults |
| Date: | 2020 |
| Issue Date: | 2020-03-02 11:42:33 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 2012年，中國透過手機上網的人數首次超過電腦，而微信朋友圈這一即時性書寫平台也在同年推出，代表了中國網際網路行動轉向的正式開端。「等一下，我發個朋友圈」標誌著原本只發生在獨立時空下的書寫活動嵌入日常生活中。「隨時隨地」，超越過往時空限制，即時性書寫成為科技公司藉由電子媒介之可能性形塑的又一理想，而開啟數位科技書寫生命歷程的第一代人成為檢驗其可行性的最佳人選，因此本研究選取年輕世代作為研究對象。
本研究沿著文化研究關注使用者能動性的傳統，從媒介實踐（media practices）的角度出發，強調日常生活中實踐的多樣性，還借鏡「複媒體」（polymedia），希望打破單一平台中心的研究方法，試圖在年輕世代長期延續和日益複雜的實踐中探討微信即時性書寫的意義。
本研究結合深度訪談和使用者日常記錄的資料收集方式，了解年輕世代一路走來的數位書寫經驗和日常生活的具體實踐。結果發現使用者與社會之間的角力，不僅極大地影響了微信及其他社群平台的整體發展趨勢，也滲透進個人每日的微觀實踐，體現了即時性書寫與日常生活的複雜關係，有時對日常生活進行了重組、活化和微顛覆，有時則鞏固了原有的時空秩序，成為刻意的經營。
本研究還發現，中國年輕世代希望透過即時性書寫所實現的時空超越是建立在其對現存的集體空間、生活秩序的不滿，並非徹底拒絕社會性，而陷入原子化的孤立狀態，相反，他們積極地在線上建構新的書寫空間，想象新的互動方式，達到公私兼顧的狀態。
In 2012, the number of people accessing the Internet via mobile phone surpassed computer in China for the first time, representing the beginning of China`s Internet transition to mobile. In the same year, WeChat launched Moments (called "pengyouquan" in Chinese), a realtime writing platform. "Wait a minute, I want to share a post on moments." This phrase has marked the transfer of writing activities from indoor to everyday situations. "Anytime, anywhere", beyond the limitations of time and space, real-time writing has become another ideal for technology companies to shape with the possibility of electronic media. The younger generation born after 1990 in eastern China gradually grew accustomed to recording daily life in the form of online digital writing and actively practiced realtime writing, who was selected as the research object of this study.
The research follows the tradition of cultural studies, which pays attention to the relationship between users and society, and understands media as practice, which emphasizes the varieties of media practice in daily life. At the same time, this study also draws on the concept of "polymedia", hoping to break through the transitional focus of the platform in the field of social media research. This study attempts to explore the significance of realtime writing practices on WeChat from the long-term and complex practices of young adults.
This study combines the methods of in-depth interviews and daily records of users to understand the digital writing experience and the daily practices of young adults. It was found that the wrestling between users and society not only greatly affected the overall development trend of WeChat and other platforms, but also penetrated into the daily micro practices of individuals. Realtime writing practices sometimes reorganized, activated and microscopically subverted daily life, but sometimes consolidated the original spatiotemporal order and became a deliberate operation, reflecting the complex relationship between this writing form and daily life.
This study also finds that the practice of young adults are based on its dissatisfaction with the existing collectivism and the order of daily life. On the contrary, they are actively constructing new writing spaces online, imagining new ways of interaction to achieve a state of taking into account both public and private. |
| Reference: | 中文部分
霍煒譯（2003）。《做文化研究：索尼隨身聽的故事》。北京：商務印書館。（原書：Du Gay, P., Hall, S., Janes, L., Madsen, A. K., Mackay, H., & Negus, K. [1997]. Doing cultural studies: The story of the Sony Walkman. Sage.）
賴合新（2015）。《探討 LINE 推播新聞之使用行為--以情境理論分析》。國立政治大學傳播學院碩士論文。
盧嵐蘭（2005）。《媒介消費：閱聽人與社會》。台北：揚智文化。
鄭宇君（2016）。〈社交媒體之雙重性：人的連結與技術的連結〉。《傳播、文化與政治》，4:1-25。
趙偉妏譯（2010）。《符號與空間的經濟分析》。台北：韋伯文化。（原書：Lash, S. & Urry, J. (1993). Economies of signs and space (Vol. 26). Sage.）
趙庭輝（1999）。〈英國媒體與文化研究的回顧：伯明翰大學當代文化研究中心的傳統〉。《傳播文化》，7:47-100。
解亞珠（2016）。〈近三十年中國古代日記文本研究綜述〉。《江蘇科技大學學報 (社會科學版)》，16(03)，30。
馮建三譯（1995）。《電視，觀眾與文化研究》。台北：遠流。（原書：Morley, D. [1992]. Television, Audiences and Cultural Studies.）
渠東、汲喆譯（2011）。《宗教生活的基本形式》。北京：商務印書館。（原書：Durkheim, É. [1912]. Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse: le système totémique en Australie.）
黄含韵（2017）。〈社交媒体年龄层用户差异显著〉。《中国社会科学报》，2017-06-15(003)。
陳向明（2002）。《社會科學質的研究》。台北：五南。
陳玉箴譯（2003）。《媒介概念十六講》。台北：韋伯文化出版。（原書：Silverstone, R.[1999].Why Study the Media?. SAGE.）
許家齊（2017）。《受阻礙的電子休閒時光:中年家庭主婦平板使用》。國立政治大學新聞學系碩士論文。
曹家榮（2015）。〈行動通訊的持續完成:[講手機] 的俗民方法學探問〉。《新聞學研究》，（124），1-37。
張旭東、魏文生譯（2010）。《發達資本主義的抒情詩人：論波德萊爾》。台北：臉譜。（原書：Benjamin, W. [1938]. Charles baudelaire：Ein lyriker im Zeitalter des Hochkapitalismus. Perseus Books Group.）
張逸安譯（2004）。《聰明行動族──下一場社會革命》。台北：聯經出版。（原書：Rheingold, H. [2002]. Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution. Perseus Books Group.）
張岩冰（2011）。《女性主義與青年文化》。開封：河南大學出版社。（McRobbie, A. [1990]. Feminism and youth culture: from ‘Jackie’to ‘Just Seventeen’. Macmillan International Higher Education.）
崔玺譯（2016）。《媒介儀式》。北京：中國人民大學出版社。（原書：Couldry, N. [2005]. Media rituals: beyond functionalism. Routledge.）
徐夢芸（2008）。《文化研究：民族誌方法與生活文化》。台北：韋伯。（Gray, A. [2003]. Research practice for cultural studies: Ethnographic methods and lived cultures. Sage.）
孫慧英（2009）。〈浅析我国文化产业相关研究的区域差异〉。《新聞界》，2009(06):20-22。
胡泳。（2008）。《众声喧哗: 网络时代的个人表达与公共讨论》。桂林：广西师范大学出版社。
洪淑苓（2003）。〈女性節日文化初探: 以近代方志中的 [元宵走橋] 等習俗為例〉。《臺大文史哲學報》，2003（59）: 297-336。
洪世民譯（2017）。《在一起孤獨》。台北：時報文化。（原書：Turkle, S. [2011].Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. Basic Books.）
姚俊安（2019）。《網路社交服務平台使用者的自我呈現 —以微信朋友圈為例》。淡江大學傳播學院碩士論文。
邱林川、陳韜文、茅知非（2017）。〈傳播科技與新媒體事件〉。《傳播與社會學刊》，第40 期，頁27–31。
邱林川、陳韜文（2009）。〈邁向新媒體事件研究〉。《傳播與社會學刊》，第9期，頁19–37。
周懿瑾、魏佳純（2016）。〈「點贊」還是「評論」？社交媒體使用行為對個人社會資本的影響——基於微信朋友圈使用行為的探索性研究〉。《新聞大學》，2016(1)。
周蕾（1995）。《寫在家國以外》。牛津大學出版社。
肖斌（2015）。〈微信朋友圈對大學生人際交往的影響研究———基於強弱關係理論的視角〉。《教育學術月刊》，（95~98）。
汪雅倩、王學琛（2017）。〈從社交平臺到表演舞臺:微信分組設置對熟人關係的回歸〉。《新聞與傳播研究》，2017(10)。
李美華、孔祥明、王婷玉、林嘉娟、黃玉枝、陳雅潔等譯（1998）。《社會科學研究方法》。台北：時英。（原書：Babbie, E.[1995], the practice of social research.[8th ed.].Belmont,CA:Wadsworth）
李政賢、廖志恆、林靜如譯（2007）。《質性研究導論》。台北：五南。（原書：Flick, U. [1996]. Qualitative sozialforschung.）
何道寬譯（2014）。《媒介、社會與世界：社會理論與數字媒介實踐》。上海：復旦大學出版社。（原書：Couldry, N. [2012]. Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice. Polity.）
何道寬譯（2003）。《傳播的偏向》。北京：中國人民大學出版社。（原書：Harold A. Innis.[1951]. The bias of communication. University of Toronto Press.）
何春蕤（1990）。〈口述與書寫 一個理論的再思〉。《中外文學》，19(2)，73-91。
米歇爾•福柯著，汪民安编（2015）。《自我技術 福柯文選3》。北京：北京大學出版社。
——Foucault, M.,（1982）。《自我技術》
——Foucault, M.,（1983a）。《自我書寫》
——Foucault, M.,（1983b）。《論倫理學的係譜學：研究進展一覽》
朱曉文、鄂翌婷（2017）。〈社交網路服務平臺使用對大學生社會資本影響的實證分析〉。《西安交通大學學報( 社會科學版)》，2017(09)。
伍翎瑄（2014）。〈微信朋友圈的自我呈現及其策略的影響因素〉。《科技傳播》，2015-8。
賴嘉玲 (2014)。〈當流動科技闖進藝術殿堂：從博物館視聽導覽之使用談其對藝文消費之介入〉。《新聞學研究》，（119），121-160。
石婉婷（2014）。《日常生活的科技社交角色——以Facebook打卡為核心的媒體實踐為例》。國立政治大學傳播學院碩士論文。
王德威（2010）。《抒情傳統與中國現代性︰在北大的八堂課》。北京：三聯書店。
王淑美（2014b）。〈傳播科技與生活韻律-關於研究方法的探討〉。《傳播研究與實踐》，4(1)， 23-43。
王淑美（2014a）。〈馴化 IM: 即時通訊中的揭露, 協商與創造〉。《 中華傳播學刊》，(25)，161-192。
王右君（2019）。〈試探 [他者] 在社群網站自我敘事與記憶建構中扮演的角色——以臉書親子文個案為例〉。《新聞學研究》，(141)，39-81。
王心遠譯（2014）。《數碼人類學》。北京：人民出版社。（原書：Horst, H. A., & Miller, D. [Eds.]. [2012]. Digital anthropology. A&C Black.）
王志宏譯（2008）。《日常生活與文化理論導論》。北京：商務印書館。（原書：Highmore, B. [2002]. Everyday Life and Culture Theory an Introduction. Routledge.）
中國互聯網中心（2009年10月）。〈2009年中國網民社交網絡應用研究報告〉。取自中國互聯網信息中心網頁（CNNIC）http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/index_4.htm
CNNIC & CR Nielsen（2009年10月）。〈2009年中國移動互聯網與3G用戶調查報告〉。取自中國互聯網信息中心網頁（CNNIC）http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/index_4.htm
中國互聯網信息中心（2011年3月）。〈2010年中國網民社交網站應用研究報告〉。取自中國互聯網信息中心網頁（CNNIC）http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/201108/P020120709345277353319.pdf
中國互聯網信息中心（2012年11月）。〈2012年中國手機網民上網行為研究報告〉，取自中國互聯網信息中心網頁（CNNIC）http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/ydhlwbg/201211/P020121116518463145828.pdf
中國互聯網信息中心（2012年12月）。〈2012年中國網民社交網站應用研究報告〉。取自中國互聯網信息中心網頁（CNNIC）http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/sqbg/201302/P020130219611651054576.pdf
中國互聯網信息中心（2013年1月）。〈第31次中國互聯網絡發展狀況統計報告〉。取自中國互聯網信息中心網頁（CNNIC）http://www.cac.gov.cn/2014-05/26/c_126548789.htm
中國互聯網信息中心（2013年11月）。〈2013年中國社交類應用用戶行為研究報告〉。取自中國互聯網信息中心網頁（CNNIC）http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/201409/P020140901333379491503.pdf
中國互聯網信息中心（2011年3月）。〈2010年中國網民手機上網行為研究報告〉，取自中國互聯網信息中心網頁（CNNIC）http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/201108/P020120709345274527429.pdf
中國互聯網信息中心（2019年2月）。〈第43次中國互聯網絡發展狀況統計報告〉，取自中國互聯網信息中心網頁（CNNIC）http://www.cac.gov.cn/2019-02/28/c_1124175677.htm
網宿科技（2019）。〈中國互聯網發展報告2018〉，取自https://www.wangsu.com/Upload/201902/20190219152128_8313.pdf
英文部分
Adam, B. (1992). Modern times: The technology connection and its implications for social theory. Time & Society, 1(2), 175-191.
Albrechtslund, A. (2008). Online social networking as participatory surveillance. First Monday, 13(3).
Andrejevic, M. (2004). The work of watching one another: Lateral surveillance, risk, and governance. Surveillance & Society, 2(4).
Andrejevic, M. (2007). iSpy: Surveillance and power in the interactive era (p. 182). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Bamman, D., O`Connor, B., & Smith, N. (2012). Censorship and deletion practices in Chinese social media. First Monday, 17(3).
Beam, M. A., Child, J. T., Hutchens, M. J., & Hmielowski, J. D. (2018). Context collapse and privacy management: Diversity in Facebook friends increases online news reading and sharing. new media & society, 20(7), 2296-2314.
Beer, D. (2009). Power through the algorithm? Participatory web cultures and the technological unconscious. New media society, 11 (6), 985-1002.
Bernstein, M. S., Bakshy, E., Burke, M., & Karrer, B. (2013, April). Quantifying the invisible audience in social networks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 21-30). ACM.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
boyd, D. (2014). It`s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press.
boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of computer‐mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.
Bräuchler, B., & Postill, J. (Eds.). (2010). Theorising media and practice (Vol. 4). Berghahn Books.
Bull, M. (2007). Sound moves: iPod culture and urban experience. Routledge.
Campbell, S. W., & Park, Y. J. (2008). Social implications of mobile telephony: The rise of personal communication society. Sociology Compass, 2(2), 371-387.
Campell, S. (2008). Mobile technology and the body: Apparatgeist, fashion, and function. In J. E. Katz (Ed.), Handbook of communication studies (pp. 153-164). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Castells, M., Fernandez-Ardevol, M., Qiu, J. L., & Sey, A. (2007). Mobile communication and society: A global perspective. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Chan, J. M. (Ed.). (2014). New media and the myth of the mediated centre. Communication & Society, 27, 1–21.
Chesher, C. (2012). Between image and information: The iPhone camera in the history of photography. In Studying Mobile Media (pp. 106-125). Routledge.
Child, J. T., Duck, A. R., Andrews, L. A., Butauski, M., & Petronio, S. (2015). Young adults’ management of privacy on Facebook with multiple generations of family members. Journal of family communication, 15(4), 349-367.
Christofides, E., Muise, A., & Desmarais, S. (2012). Hey mom, what’s on your Facebook? Comparing Facebook disclosure and privacy in adolescents and adults. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 48–54.
Costa, E. (2013, March 10). Convivial practices, gossiping and the materiality of the smartphone [Online forum comment]. Retrieved from https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/global-social-media/2013/03/10/convivial-practices-gossiping-and-the-materiality-of-the-smartphone/
Costa, E. (2018). Affordances-in-practice: An ethnographic critique of social media logic and context collapse. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3641–3656.
Couldry, N. (2004). Theorising media as practice. Social semiotics, 14(2), 115-132.
Couldry, N. (2008). Mediatization or mediation? Alternative understandings of the emergent space of digital storytelling. New media & society, 10(3), 373-391.
Daniel, M. (2013, November 24). What will we learn from the fall of Facebook? [Online forum comment]. Retrieved from https://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/global-social-media/2013/11/24/what-will-we-learn-from-the-fall-of-facebook/
Davis, J. L. & Jurgenson, N. (2014). Context collapse: theorizing context collusions and collisions. Information, Communication & Society 17(4): 476–485.
De Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life, translated by S. Rendall (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984)
de Seta, G., & Proksell, M. (2017). V-Day selfies in Beijing: Media events and user practices as micro-acts of citizenship. In Selfie Citizenship (pp. 29-37). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
de Souza e Silva, A. (2006). From cyber to hybrid: mobile technologies as interfaces of hybrid spaces. Space & Culture, 9 (3), 261-278.
Duffy, B. E., & Chan, N. K. (2019). “You never really know who’s looking”: Imagined surveillance across social media platforms. New Media & Society, 21(1), 119–138.
Duplantier, A. (2016). Authenticity and How We Fake It: Belief and Subjectivity in Reality TV, Facebook and YouTube. McFarland.
Eslami, M., Rickman, A., Vaccaro, K., Aleyasen, A., Vuong, A., Karahalios, K., ... & Sandvig, C. (2015, April). I always assumed that I wasn`t really that close to [her]: Reasoning about Invisible Algorithms in News Feeds. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 153-162). ACM.
Fortunati, L. (2005). The mobile phone: Local and global dimension. In K. Nyíri (Ed.), A sense of place: The global and local in mobile communication (pp. 61-70).Vienna, AT: Passagen Verlag.
Gant, D., & Kiesler, S. (2002). Blurring the boundaries: Cell phones, mobility, and the line between work and personal life. In Wireless world (pp. 121-131). Springer, London.
Gibson, J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Goggin, G. (2011). Global media culture. London and New York: Routledge.
Guerrero-Pico, M., Masanet, M. J., & Scolari, C. A. (2019). Toward a typology of young produsers: Teenagers’ transmedia skills, media production, and narrative and aesthetic appreciation. New Media & Society, 21(2), 336-353.
Gye, L. (2007). Picture this: The impact of mobile camera phones on personal photographic practices. Continuum, 21(2), 279-288.
Haddon, L., & Kim, S. D. (2007). Mobile phones and web-based social networking-Emerging practices in Korea with Cyworld. Journal-Communications Network, 6(1), 5.
Hampton, K. N., Goulet, L. S., Marlow, C., & Rainie, L. (2012). Why most Facebook users get more than they give. Pew Internet & American Life Project, 3, 1-40.
Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hirsch, E., & Silverstone, R. (Eds.). (2003). Consuming technologies: Media and information in domestic spaces. Routledge.（初版1992）
Hirsch, E., & Silverstone, R. (Eds.). (2003). Consuming technologies: Media and information in domestic spaces. Routledge.
Hjorth, L. (2006). Postal presence: A case study of mobile customisation and gender in Melbourne. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 19(2), 29-40.
Hjorth, L. (2007). Snapshots of almost contact: The rise of camera phone practices and a case study in Seoul, Korea. Continuum, 21(2), 227-238.
Hjorth, L., Burgess, J., & Richardson, I. (Eds.). (2012). Studying mobile media: Cultural technologies, mobile communication, and the iPhone. Routledge.
Hjorth, L., Wilken, R., & Gu, K. (2012). Ambient intimacy: A case study of the iPhone, presence, and location-based social media in Shanghai, China (pp. 43-62). Routledge.
Hootsuite & We Are Social(2019，January 31)Digital 2019: Global Digital Overview[Online forum comment].Retrieved from https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2019-global-digital-overview
Horst, H. A. (2012). New media technologies in everyday life. Digital anthropology, 61-79.
Hulme, M., & Peters, S. (2001, April). Me, my phone and I: The role of the mobile phone. In CHI 2001 Workshop: Mobile Communications: Understanding Users, Adoption, and Design, Seattle (pp. 1-2).
Ito, M., Gutierrez K, Livingstone S, et al. (2013) Connected Learning: An Agenda for Research and Design. Irvine, CA: Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.
Ito, M., & Okabe, D. (2005). Technosocial situations: Emergent structurings of mobile email use. Personal, portable, pedestrian: Mobile phones in Japanese life, 20(6), 257-273. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Java A., Song X., Finin T., Tseng B. (2009) Why We Twitter: An Analysis of a Microblogging Community. In: Zhang H. et al. (eds) Advances in Web Mining and Web Usage Analysis. SNAKDD 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5439. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Jenkins, H. (2006) Convergence Culture: where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.
Jensen, J. L. (2010). The Internet omnopticon-Mutual surveillance in social media. Report. Internet Research 11.0: Sustainability, Participation, Action. Gothenburg Sweden, 19-21.
Kanter, M., Afifi, T., & Robbins, S. (2012). The impact of parents “friending” their young adult child on Facebook on perceptions of parental privacy invasions and parent–child relationship quality. Journal of Communication, 62(5), 900-917.
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2011). The early bird catches the news: Nine things you should know about micro-blogging. Business horizons, 54(2), 105-113.
Karl, K. A., & Peluchette, J. V. (2011). “Friending” professors, parents and bosses: A Facebook connection conundrum. Journal of Education for Business, 86(4), 214-222.
Katz J., Aakhus M. (2002). Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Katz, E. (1980). Media events: The sense of occasion. Studies in Visual Communication, 6(3), 84-89.
Kennedy-Lightsey, C. D., & Frisby, B. N. (2016). Parental privacy invasion, family communication patterns, and perceived ownership of private information. Communication Reports, 29(2), 75-86.
Knights, M. (2001). Diaries of The Seventeeth Century, [Online forum comment].Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/civil_war_revolution/diaries_01.shtml
Levinson, P. (2004). Cellphone: The story of the world’s most mobile medium and how it has transformed everything. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lievens, B., Van den Broek, W., & Pierson, J. (2007, July). The Mobile (R) evolution in Everyday Life: A Border Crossing Between Public and Private Space?. In Sydney, NSW: Paper presented at the Mobile Media 2007 conference.
Ling, R. (2004). The mobile connection: The cell phone`s impact on society. Elsevier.
Litt E. (2012). Knock, knock. Who’s there? The imagined audience. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56, 330–345.
Litt, E., & Hargittai, E. (2016). The imagined audience on social network sites. Social Media+ Society, 2(1), 2056305116633482.
Livingstone, S. (2008). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: Teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy, and self-expression. New Media & Society, 10, 393–411.
Madianou, M. & Miller, D. (2012a). Migration and new media: Transnational families and polymedia . London: Routledge.
Madianou, M. (2014). Smartphones as polymedia. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 667-680.
Madianou, M.& Miller, D. (2012b). Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(2), 169-187.
Mannell, K. (2019). A typology of mobile messaging’s disconnective affordances. Mobile Media & Communication, 7(1), 76-93.
Martin, B. (1982). A Sociology of Contemporary Popular Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.
Marwick, A. (2005). I’m More Than Just a Friendster Profile: Identity, Authenticity and Power in Social Networking Services. Chicago, IL: Association for Internet Researchers.
Marwick, A. E., & boyd, D. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New media & society, 13(1), 114-133.
Marwick, A. E., & boyd, D. (2014). Networked privacy: How teenagers negotiate context in social media. New media & society, 16(7), 1051-1067.
Meyrowitz, J. (1985). No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.
Meyrowitz, J. (2003). Global nomads in the digital veldt. In K. Nyíri (Ed.), Mobile democracy: Essays on society, self and politics (pp. 91-102). Vienna, AT: Passagen Verlag.
Miller, D. (1987). Material culture and mass consumption.
Miller, D. (2011). Tales from facebook. Polity.
Miller, D., Costa, E., Haynes, N., McDonald, T., Nicolescu, R., Sinanan, J., ... & Wang, X. (2016). How the world changed social media (Vol. 1). UCL press.
Mina, An Xiao. (2013, February 27). A Curated History of the Grass Mud Horse Song [Online forum comment]. Retrieved from https://88-bar.com/2012/02/a-curated-history-of-the-grass-mud-horse-song/
Mina, An Xiao. (2013, September 13) Memes, The Street Art of the Internet [Online forum comment].Retrieved from https://creativemornings.com/talks/an-xiao-mina
Moll, R., Pieschl, S., & Bromme, R. (2014). Competent or clueless? Users’ knowledge and misconceptions about their online privacy management. Computers in human behavior, 41, 212-219.
Moores, S. (2000). Media and everyday life in modern society. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Morley, D. (2005). Family television: Cultural power and domestic leisure. Routledge.（初版1986）
Morris, B. (1991). Western conceptions of the individual.
Murray, S. (2008). Digital images, photo-sharing, and our shifting notions of everyday aesthetics. Journal of Visual Culture, 7(2), 147-163.
Nansen, Bjorn, Arnold, Michael, Gibbs, Martin R., & Davis, Hilary. (2009). Domestic orchestration: Rhythms in the mediated home. Time & Society, 18, 181-207.
Ok, H. (2011). New media practices in Korea. International Journal of Communication, 5, 29.
Okabe, D., & Ito, M. (2005). Keitai in public transportation. Personal, portable, pedestrian: Mobile phones in Japanese life, 205-217. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Ong W. J. (1975). The writer’s audience is always a fiction. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 90(1), 9–21.
Ong, W. J. (2013). Orality and literacy. Routledge.
Palfrey, J., & Gasser, U. (2008). Born digital: Understanding the first generation of digital natives. New York, NY, US: Basic Books.
Palmer, D. (2012). iPhone photography: Mediating visions of social space. In Studying Mobile Media (pp. 93-105). Routledge.
Papacharissi, Z. (2012). Without you, I`m nothing: Performances of the self on Twitter. International journal of communication, 6, 18.
Papacharissi, Z. (2013). 12 A Networked Self Identity Performance and Sociability on Social Network Sites. Frontiers in new media research, 207.
Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (2016). Digital ethnography: Principles and practices. SAGE
Raymond, W. (1958). Culture and Society 1780-1950. London: Chatto and Windus.
Raymond, W. (1974). Television: Technology and cultural form. London, Fontana.
Rosen, J. (2004). The naked crowd: Reclaiming security and freedom in an anxious age. New York: Random House.
Scheidt, L. A., & Wright, E. (2004). Common visual design elements of weblogs.
Shapiro, L. A., & Margolin, G. (2014). Growing up wired: Social networking sites and adolescent psychosocial development. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 17, 1–18.
Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2003). Mobile transformations of public` and private` life. Theory, culture & society, 20(3), 107-125.
Silverstone, R. (1994). Television And Everyday Life. Routledge.
Silverstone, R. (2005). The sociology of mediation and communication. In The SAGE handbook of sociology, 188-207.
Svensson, M. (2014). Voice, power and connectivity in China’s microblogosphere: Digital divides on SinaWeibo. China Information, 28(2), 168-188.
Takahashi, T. (2011) Japanese Youth and Mobile Media. In Thomas, M (ed.) Deconstructing Digital Natives. NY and London: Routledge.
Tomlinson, J. (2007). The culture of speed: The coming of immediacy. Sage.
Tong, J., & Zuo, L. (2014). Weibo communication and government legitimacy in China: A computer-assisted analysis of Weibo messages on two ‘mass incidents’. Information, Communication & Society, 17(1), 66-85.
Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. NY etc.: cop.
Turkle, S. (2008). Always-on/Always-on-you: The tethered self. In J. E. Katz (Ed.), Handbook of communication studies (pp. 121-138). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
van Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Van Loon, J. (2007). Media technology: Critical perspectives. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Vitak, J. (2012). The impact of context collapse and privacy on social network site disclosures. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(4), 451-470.
Vitak, J., Blasiola, S., Patil, S., & Litt, E. (2015). Balancing audience and privacy tensions on social network sites: Strategies of highly engaged users. International Journal of Communication, 9, 20.
Wuthnow, R. (1989). Meaning and moral order: Explorations in cultural analysis. Univ of California Pre. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程
105464070 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1054640701 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202000269 |
| Appears in Collections: | [傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 070101.pdf | 2828Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 292 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
