政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/128976
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51818185      Online Users : 534
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/128976


    Title: 代工套牢：台灣電腦代工廠商的發展與升級
    Lock-in of Contract Manufacturing: the Development and Upgrading of Taiwan Computer Contract Manufacturers
    Authors: 陳俊銘
    Chen, Jun-MIng
    Contributors: 溫肇東
    王振寰
    Wen, Jordan Chao-tung
    Wang, Jenn-Hwan
    陳俊銘
    Chen, Jun-MIng
    Keywords: 代工
    套牢
    製造服務
    產業升級
    Contract Manufacturing
    Lock-in
    Servitization of Manufacturing
    Industrial Upgrading
    Date: 2020
    Issue Date: 2020-03-02 11:35:00 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 台灣高科技產業的發展過程中，一直被認為是以資本及勞力密集的低利潤代工生產為主要發展模式，故而接續的產業發展目標，應朝向「技術升級」或「產業轉型」兩途徑。前者意指投入研發活動以提高廠商技術能力，後者則指朝向品牌通路發展，將國家產業結構的重心自製造業導向轉型成服務業為主。然而，上述兩途徑皆忽略了將「生產製造」所具有的技術及知識視為專業生產服務的產業現況。本文透過對台灣電腦產業發展過程及現狀的重新檢視後發現，「經濟理性」與「人情信任」皆無法充分解釋台灣電子業代工廠商的競爭利基。首先，台灣高科技廠商具有獨特的生產流程知識與技術能力，成為「技術密集的製造服務」（Technology-intensive Manufacturing Service，TiMS）的專業提供者，已不同於純粹資本與勞力密集的代工層次。其次，台灣高科技代工廠商謹守代工領域的「行規信任」，藉由上述技術能力與委託客戶在整體生產流程相互嵌入（Inter-embedded），使台灣電腦代工廠商與價值鏈的互動不僅為經濟理性的勢力競爭（Force Competition），更具有雙方信任合作的價值共創（Value Co-production），因而在全球產業鏈佔有難以取代的一席之地。上述因為代工廠商的技術能力、加上行規信任，而與客戶形成生產鑲嵌的互動關係，本文稱之為「代工套牢」（Lock-in by Contract Manufacturing）。第三，本文也將指出，台灣電腦代工廠商在市場競爭驅動下，發掘並掌握了下游新興市場及上游製程技術的興起，進而從製造區塊分別向兩端延伸，獲取了愈來愈大比例的產業鏈利潤。最後，本文認為對後進國家（Catching-up Country）而言，技術基底的生產能力依舊是國家的重要發展方向，尤其若前沿技術的自主創新尚未出現成效，更應注意自身所處產業鏈位置的競爭優勢，以免被更為後進的國家所取代。
    In the development process of Taiwan`s high-tech industry, it has always been considered that capital and labor-intensive low-profit OEM production is the main development model. Therefore, the continuous industrial development goals should be directed to the "technology upgrade" or "industrial transformation". The former refers to investing in R & D activities to improve the technological capabilities of manufacturers, while the latter refers to the development of brand channels, and the focus of the national industrial structure is shifted from manufacturing-oriented to service-oriented. However, both of the above approaches ignore the status quo of the industry that regards the technology and knowledge of "manufacturing" as professional production services. After reviewing the development process and current status of Taiwan`s computer industry, this article finds that neither "economic rationality" nor "human trust" can fully explain the competitive niche of Taiwan`s electronics foundries.First of all, Taiwan`s high-tech manufacturers have unique production process knowledge and technical capabilities, and become professional providers of "Technology-intensive Manufacturing Service" (TiMS), which is different from pure capital and labor-intensive OEM levels. . Secondly, Taiwan`s high-tech foundries adhere to the "rules of trust" in the foundry field. With the above-mentioned technical capabilities and entrusted customers in the overall production process (Inter-embedded), Taiwan computer foundries and value chain interaction It is not only a competition for economic rational forces (Force Competition), but also a value co-production of trust and cooperation between the two parties. Therefore, it has an irreplaceable place in the global industry chain. Because of the technical capabilities of the foundry manufacturers and the trust of the regulations, the above-mentioned interactive relationship with production inlays has been formed with customers. This article calls it "Lock-in by Contract Manufacturing".Third, this article will also point out that, driven by market competition, Taiwanese computer OEMs have discovered and mastered the rise of downstream emerging markets and upstream process technologies, and then extended from the manufacturing blocks to both ends, gaining increasing success Proportion of industrial chain profits. Finally, this article believes that, for the Catching-up Country, the production capacity of the technology base is still an important development direction of the country, especially if the independent innovation of cutting-edge technology has not yet achieved results, it should pay more attention to the position of the industry chain in which it is located. Competitive advantage so as not to be replaced by more backward countries.
    Reference: 中文部分：
    王正芬，1999，《台灣資訊電子產業版圖》。台北市：財訊。
    王振寰，1999，<全球化，在地化與學習型區域：理論反省與建構>，《台灣社會研究季刊》，第34期，69-112。
    林毓柔， 2006，《電子設計自動化技術對台灣半導體產業價值網的影響》。台北：國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
    吳思華、沈榮欽，1999，「台灣積體電路產業的發展與形成」，台灣產業研究，第一卷第一期，頁57-150。收錄於蔡敦浩編《管理資本在台灣》。台北：遠流
    吳思華，1999，「台灣積體電路產業的動態網路」，台灣產業研究，第二期，頁65-127，台北：遠流出版社
    施振榮，1992，《再造宏碁》，台北：天下文化。
    柯志明，1993，《台灣都市小型製造業的創業、經營與生產組織》。台北：中央研究院民族學研究所。
    洪世章、周婉婷，2010，〈整合式服務創新：台灣企業之比較個案研究〉，《科技管理學刊》，第十五卷第一期，頁49-76。
    余佩儒、陳信宏、溫蓓章，2014，〈製造服務化發展模式之研究〉，《臺大管理論叢》，第25卷第1期，頁325-354。
    余佩儒，2017，〈產業脈絡對製造服務化發展模式影響之比較研究〉，《科技管理學刊》，第二十二卷第一期，頁67-96。
    徐美雯，2001，〈矽智財權 (SIP) 之商業模式與產業現況分析〉。《資訊工業透析：半導體與關鍵零組件》，7：2-18。
    徐進鈺，2000，〈台灣半導體產業技術發展歷程：國家干預、跨國社會網絡與高科技發展〉。頁101-132，收錄於《台灣產業技術發展史研究論文集》。高雄：國立科學工藝博物館。
    徐進鈺，1999，〈流動的鑲嵌：新竹科學工業園區的勞動力市場與高科技發展〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》，第35期，75-118。
    徐進鈺，1997，〈台灣半導體產業技術發展歷程：國家干預、跨國社會網絡與高科技發展〉，《台大地理學報》，第23期，33-48。
    曾孝明，2004，台灣教育的宏觀與微觀 & 台灣產業的對焦與失焦，台北：御書房。
    曾孝明，2005，台灣的科技產業的研究與政策是哪門子的專業？，科技報導，第278-279期。
    曾孝明，2006，更加強化無形資產才會是贏家，科技報導，第293-294期。
    曾孝明，2007a，製鞋和個人電腦製造的雷同度，科技報導，第302-303期。
    曾孝明，2007b，台灣的發展極限：褓姆薪資的人才，科技報導，第311-312期。
    張元杰，李亭林，簡文強，秦子閔，2013，〈區位優勢、吸收能耐與創新績效：研發子公司之觀點〉，《臺大管理論叢》，第23期第2卷，199-232。
    張維安編，2001，《台灣的企業組織結構與競爭力》。台北: 聯經。
    陳東升，2003，《積體網路：台灣高科技產業的社會學分析》。台北：群學。
    陳信宏、劉孟俊，2005，「產業發展模式與經濟產出：檢視「高科技高附加價值」，《科技發展政策報導》，SR9409期，1-20頁。
    張如心，2006，《矽說台灣：台灣半導體產業傳奇》。台北：天下
    張俊彥、游伯龍，2001，《活力：台灣如何創造半導體與個人電腦產業奇蹟》。台北：時報。
    資訊工業策進會，2007，《2007資訊工業年鑑》。台北：資訊工業策進會。
    蘇立瑩 （1994）. 也有風雨也有晴-電子所二十年的軌跡. 新竹, 工業技術研究院電子工業研究所
    謝國雄，1989，〈黑手變頭家：台灣製造業中的階級流動〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》2:11-54。
    謝國雄，1991，〈網絡式生產組織：台灣外銷工業中的外包制度〉，《中央研究院民族學研究所集刊》71:161-182。
    瞿宛文、安士敦 2003，《超越後進發展：台灣的產業升級策略》，台北市：聯經。

    英文部分：
    Abernathy, W. J., and J. M. Utterback. 1978. &quot;Patterns of industrial innovation.&quot; Technology Review 80(7):40-47.
    Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39–58.
    Amin, A., and N. Thrift. 1992. &quot;Neo-Marshallian nodes in global networks.&quot; International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 16(4):571-587.
    Archbugi, D and Michie. J. 1997 “Technological globalization or nations systems of innovation.” Futures, 29: 121-137.
    Baldwin, Carliss, and Kim Clark. 2003. &quot;Managing in an age of modularity.&quot; Pp. 149-171 in Managing in the Modular Age: Architectures, Networks, and Organizations, edited by Raghu Garud, Arun Kumaraswamy, and Richard Langlois. Oxford Blackwell Publishing.
    Baum, Joel, Calabrese, Tony, and Silverman Brian (2000). Don`t go it alone: alliance network composition and startups` performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management, 21(3): 267-294
    Breznitz, D. 2005. “Development, flexibility and R&D performance in the Taiwanese IT industry: capability creation and the effects of state-industry coevolution”, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 153-187.
    Brown, Clair, and Greg Linden. 2005. &quot;Offshoring in the Semiconductor Industry: A Historical Perspective.&quot; Institute of Industrial Relations. University of California, Berkeley.Working Paper Series. Paper iirwps-120-05.
    BusinessWeek Online, 2005, “Why Taiwan Matters - The global economy couldn`t function without it. But can it really find peace with China?” May, 16. http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/05_20/b3933011.htm，引用日期：2006年10月27日
    Chang, P.L., and C.T. Tsai. 2002. &quot;Finding the Niche position - Competition strategy of Taiwan`s IC design industry.&quot; Technovation 22(2):101-111.
    Chen, C. 2004. The effects of knowledge attribute, alliance characteristics, and absorptive capacity on knowledge transfer performance. R&D Management, 34 (3): 311-321.
    Chu, Wan-wen, 2009. “Can Taiwan`s Second Movers Upgrade via Branding?”, Research Policy, 38(6):1054-1065.
    Coase, R. H.(1937), The Nature of the Firm. In Williamson, Oliver E and Winter, Sidney G （ed.）(1991), The Nature of the Firm : Origins, Evolution, and Development, New York : Oxford University Press.
    Coffey, W. J. and Bailly, A. S. (1991). Producer Services and Flexible Production: An Exploratory Analysis, Growth and Change, 22(4), 95-117.
    Cooke, P., M. Uranga, and G. Etxebarria. 1997. `Regional innovation systems: institutional and organizational dimensions`, Research Policy,26(4-5): 474-91. (in Edquist, V:1, 156-171)
    Dedrick, Jason, and Kenneth L. Kraemer. 1998. Asia`s Computer Challenge: Threat or Opportunity for the United States and the World? New York: Oxford University Press.（張國鴻、吳明機 譯）. 2000. 亞洲電腦爭霸戰：創造全球競賽新規則。台北市：時報文化。
    Dosi, Giovanni. 1988. &quot;Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation.&quot; Journal of Economic Literature 26:1120-71.
    Ernst, Dieter. 2000. &quot;What permits David to grow in the shadow of Goliath? The Taiwanese model in the computer industry.&quot; Pp. 110-140 in International Production Networks in Asia, edited by Michael Borrus, Dieter Ernst, and Stephan Haggard. London: Routledge.
    Ernst, Dieter. 2004a. &quot;Global production networks in East Asia`s electronics industry and upgrading prospects in Malaysia.&quot; Pp. 89-157 in Global Production Networking and Technology Change in East Asia, edited by Shahid Yusuf, M. Anjum Altaf, and Kaoru Nabeshima. Washington D.C.: The World Bank.
    Ernst, Dieter. 2004b. &quot;Internationalization of innovation: why is chip design moving to Asia? &quot; Working paper series, East-West Center, University of Hawaii.
    Ernst, D., and L. Kim. 2002. &quot;Global production networks, knowledge diffusion, and local capability formation.&quot; Research Policy 31: 1417-29.
    Escribano, A., Fosfuri, A., & Tribó, J. A. (2009). Managing external knowledge flows: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 38 (1): 96-105.
    Evans, Peter. 1979. 帝國主義、依賴與依賴發展，收於蕭新煌編（1985），低度發展與發展：發展社會學選讀，台北：巨流。
    Frank, 1964. 低度發展的發展—依賴理論的基本假設，收錄於蕭新煌編（1985），低度發展與發展—發展社會學選讀，台北：巨流。
    Fuller, Douglas B. , Akintunde I. Akinwande, and Charles G. Sodini. 2003. &quot;Leading, following or cooked goose? innovation successes and failures in Taiwan`s electronics industry.&quot; Industry and Innovation 10(2):179-196.
    Garud, Raghu, and Arun Kumaraswamy. 1993. &quot;Changing Competitive Dynamics in Network Industries: An Exploration of Sun Microsystems` Open Systems Strategy.&quot; Strategic Management Journal 14:351-369.
    Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity, Cambridge: Polity Press.
    Granovetter, Mark. 1985. &quot;Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.&quot; American Journal of Sociology 91:481-510.
    Gereffi, G., & Korzeniewicz, M.（eds.）（1994）.Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism. Westport: Praeger Press.
    Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy,12(1): 78-104.
    Gourevitch, P., Bohn, R., Mckendrick, D., 2000. “Globalization of Production: Insights from The Hard Disk Drive Industry.”
    Harrison, B. 1994. Lean and Mean: The Changing Landscape of Corporate Power in the Age of Flexibility. New Yor: Basic Books.
    Hobday, M. (2000) East versus Southeast Asian innovation systems: comparing OEM- and TNC-led growth in electronics. In: Linsu, K. and Nelson, R. (eds.) Technology, Learning, and Innovation: Experiences of Newly Industrializing Economies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 129-169.
    Hsieh, Yi-Ching, Neng-Pai Lin, Hung-Chang Chiu (2002), Virtual factory and relationship marketing - a case study of a Taiwan semiconductor manufacturing company, International Journal of Information Management 22: 109-126
    Humphrey, J. and Schmitz, H. 2002. How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading in industrial clusters? Regional Studies, 36(9):1017-1027.
    Kim, Sangbae, and Jeffrey A. Hart (2002), “The Global Political Economy of Wintelism: A New Mode of Power and Governance In the Global Computer Industry,”in James M. Rosenau and J.P. Singh, eds., Information Technologies and Global Politics, Albany: State University of New York Press.
    Langlois, Richard. 1992. &quot;External economies and economic progress: The case of the microcomputer industry.&quot; Business History Review 66(1):1-50.
    —. 1998. &quot;Schumpeter and Personal Capitalism.&quot; Pp. 57-82 in Microfoundations of Economic Growth: A Schumpeterian Perspective, edited by Gunnar Eliasson and Christopher Green with Charles McCann. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    Lee, Ji-Ren, Jen-Shyang Chen, and Ming-Je Tang, 2005, &quot;Exploring the Growth Strategy of Contract Electronics Manufacturers in Taiwan: A Competence-based Perspective&quot;, Advances in Applied Business Strategy, Volume 7A.
    Lewin, A., S. Massini, and C. Peeters, 2011. “Microfoundations of Internal and External Absorptive Capacity Routines”. Organization Science 22(1): 81-98.
    Malerba, F., and L. Orsenigo. 1997. &quot;Technological Regimes and Sectoral Patterns of Innovative Activities.&quot; Industrial and Corporate Change, 6(1):83-117.
    Mathews, J. and D. S. Cho. 2000. Tiger Technology: The Creation of a Semiconductor Industry in East Asia. Cambridge University Press.
    Mathews, John A. 1997. ‘A Silicon Valley of the East ： Creating Taiwan’s Semiconductor Industry’ California Management Review, 39：4
    Meaney, Connie (1991) “Creating a competitive niche: state policy and Taiwan’s semiconductor Industry,” paper presented at the Center for Chinese studies, University of California, Berkeley. April 27, 1991.
    Moore, James, 1996, “The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems”. Harpercollins.
    Morris, Charles, and Charles H. Ferguson, 1993. “How Architecture Wins Technology Wars,” Harvard Business Review, March-April 1993.
    Ó’Riain. S.（2004）. The Politics of Mobility in Technology Driven Commodity Chains: Developmental Coalitions in the Irish Software Industry” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 28(3) 642-663.
    Pfeffer, J. and G. R. Salancik (2003). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective, Stanford University Press.
    Porter, M.E. 1980. Competitive Strategy, Free Press, New York.
    Porter, M.E. 1985. Competitive Advantage, Free Press, New York.
    Piore, Michael J., and Charles F. Sabel. 1984. The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity NY: Basic Books.
    Prahalad, C. and Ramaswamy, V. (2004), &quot;Co‐creating unique value with customers&quot;, Strategy & Leadership, Vol. 32 No. 3, p.4-9.
    Prahalad, C. and Ramaswamy, V. (2004), The Future of. Competition: Co-creating Unique Value with Customers, Harvard Business. School Press.
    Sassen, S. (1991, 2001) The Global City :New York , London , Tokyo . Princeton , Nj:Princeton University press.
    Saxenian, A. 1994. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Saxenian, A., and J.-Y. Hsu. 2001. &quot;The Silicon Valley-Hsinchu connection: technical communities and industrial upgrading.&quot; Industrial and Corporate Change 10(4): 893-920.
    Schmitz, H. 1995. &quot;Collective Efficiency - Growth Path for Small-Scale Industry.&quot; Journal of Development Studies 31(4):529-566.
    Sofka, W. 2008. Globalizing domestic absorptive capacities. Management International Review, 48 (6): 769-792.
    Storper, M. 1997. The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy. NY: The Guilford Press.
    Sturgeon, T. J. 2002. &quot;Modular production networks: a new American model of industrial organization.&quot; Industrial and Corporate Change 11(3):451-496.
    Sturgeon, T. J., and R. K. Lester. (2004). `The new global supply base: new challenges for local suppliers in East Asia`, in S. Yusuf, M. A. Altaf and K. Nabeshima(eds.). Global Production Networking and Technology Change in East Asia, Washington D.C.: The World Bank, pp.35-87.
    Sturgeon, Tim and Ji-Ren Lee, 2005, &quot;Industry Co-evolution: A Comparison of Taiwan and North America’s Electronics Contract Manufacturing in North America and Taiwan&quot;, Suzanne Berger and Richard K. Lester (eds) Global Taiwan: Building Competitive Strengths in a New International Economy, New York, NY: M.E., Sharpe, Inc.
    Todorova, G., & Durisin, B. 2007. Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 32 (3): 774-786.
    Tsai, W. P. 2001. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44 (5): 996-1004.
    Upton, D. M. (1995). What really makes factories flexible? Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 74-81.
    Upton, D.M., & McAfee, A. (1996). The real virtual factory. Harvard Business Review, 74(4), 123-133.
    Utterback, J. M., and W. J. Abernathy. 1975. &quot;A Dynamic Model of Process and Product Innovation.&quot; Omega - The International Journal of Management Science 3(6):639-656.
    Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1985. 世界體系分析︰理論與詮釋的問題，收於蕭新煌編（1985），低度發展與發展：發展社會學選讀，台北：巨流。
    Wang, J. H. and Lee, C. K. (2007) Global production networks and local institutional building: the development of the information technology industry in Suzhou, China, Environment and Planning A, 39 (8): 1873-1888.
    Weiss, L. (2003) Introduction: bringing domestic institutions back in. In: Weiss, L. (ed.) States in the Global Economy: Bringing Domestic Institutions Back In, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1-33.
    West, Joel. 2003. &quot;How Open is Open Enough? Melding Proprietary and Open Source Platform Strategies.&quot; Research Policy 32:1259-1285.
    Williamson, Oliver E. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications : A Study in the Economics of Internal Organization. New York : Free Press.
    Williamson, Oliver E. (1981). The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach. The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 87, No.3, pp.548-577.
    Williamson, Oliver E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism : firms, markets, relational contracting. New York : Free Press, 1st ed.
    Williamson, Oliver E. (1986). Economic Organization : Firms, Markets, and Policy Contro. New York : New York University Press.
    Williamson, Oliver E. (1988). Visible and Invisible Governance. The Journal of Finance, Vol. 43, No.3, pp.567-591.
    Williamson, Oliver E. (1999). Public and private bureaucracies: A Transaction Cost Economics Perspective. Journal of Law Economics & Organization, Vol. 15, No.1, pp.306-342.
    Williamson, Oliver E. (2005). The Economics of Governance. The American Economic Review, Vol. 95, No.2, pp.1-18.
    Description: 博士
    國立政治大學
    科技管理與智慧財產研究所
    93359501
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093359501
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202000281
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute of TIPM] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    950101.pdf3530KbAdobe PDF238View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback