政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/128767
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51784938      Online Users : 416
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/128767


    Title: 臺灣華語詞彙結構：詞彙聯想的實證
    Lexical organization in Taiwan Mandarin: Evidence from word association tasks
    Authors: 曾子伊
    Tseng, Tzu-Yi
    Contributors: 萬依萍
    Wan, I-Ping
    曾子伊
    Tseng, Tzu-Yi
    Keywords: 詞彙結構
    詞彙聯想
    心理詞彙
    臺灣華語
    語意與音韻關聯
    Lexical networks
    Word associations
    Semantic-phonological organization
    Mental lexicon
    Taiwan Mandarin
    Date: 2020
    Issue Date: 2020-03-02 10:57:08 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 至今心理詞彙結構的相關理論和模型多數支持概念間的觸發連結是透過激發作用(activation)傳遞的。而影響該連結與激發的因素又涵蓋詞頻、具體抽象度、真詞作用(lexical effect)、詞性與音韻關聯。詞彙聯想測試被廣泛應用於心裡詞彙與記憶的研究，透過反應詞與刺激詞之間的關係，來追究詞彙聯想與擷取過程中各階段間的作用。然而目前多數與臺灣華語心理詞彙相關的研究並未以重要的語言學影響因素為實驗設計基礎，因此本研究目標以涵蓋上述影響特徵的自由雙字詞彙聯想測試，為臺灣華語心理詞彙結構提出一個概括性的探討。主要的研究問題分為兩大方向：（一）語意與音韻何者對臺灣華語詞彙結構的影響較大？（二）各種語言學特徵對臺灣華語詞彙結構的影響為何？

    本研究提出的新興實驗方法，以平衡臺灣華語所有21個音節子音首，在雙字刺激詞的兩個子音音節首的分布，自10位（5男5女；平均年齡23.8歲，標準差1.9歲）臺灣華語母語語者收集共406個華語雙字詞彙。詞彙聯想結果顯示：（一）臺灣華語詞彙偏向以語意組構；（二）語意關聯以聚合關係(paradigmatic relation)為主；語意、韻尾、名詞刺激詞與反應詞間的一致性等在臺灣華語詞彙結構中有較強的連結。鑒於本研究尚有幾許研究限制，建議後續較大規模的跨聲調語言研究；而本研究探討人類大腦詞彙的組構能對於未來在人類與人工智慧的神經網路聯結上提供概括性參考與貢獻。
    Current theories and models of lexical organization assume that the stimulation of an association results in an activation spreading to the related concepts within mental networks. Several factors have also been suggested to affect those connections to meet different purposes of lexical access such as frequency, imageability, lexical effect, lexical categories, and phonological similarity. Word association tasks have been widely implemented to psychological research of mental lexicon and memory; through the relations between stimuli and responses, different levels of processing are able to be traced. However, most research related to Mandarin lexicon investigated the associated responses without concerning linguistic features in Mandarin as the basis. The present study therefore aims to provide an outline of the lexical organization in Taiwan Mandarin by free word associations. Topics to be explored involve 1) the tendency of lexical organization, and 2) the influences of linguistic features in Taiwan Mandarin lexicon.

    With the new methodology conducted, in which the 21 possible onsets for disyllabic words and linguistic influences in Taiwan Mandarin are considered, total of 406 responses are collected from ten Taiwan Mandarin native speakers (age mean= 23.8 years old; SD= 1.9; 5 males and 5 females). The results of free word associations in the present study suggest the following: 1) a semantic tendency of lexical organization in Taiwan Mandarin; 2) the tendency of paradigmatic relation, semantic instead of phonological relation, rhyming relation, and the consistency of syntactic categories in nouns are presented during associations in Taiwan Mandarin lexicon. However, regarding limited literature and the small scale of the present study, further research on phonological organization in mental lexicon across languages is suggested. The understanding of lexical organization in human brains may contribute to the further research on the functions of associations and networks between human and artificial intelligence.
    Reference: Aitchison, J. 2012. Words in the mind: An introduction to the mental lexicon. John Wiley
    & Sons.
    Aldridge, M., Fontaine, L., Bowen, N., & Smith, T. 2018. A new perspective on word
    association: how keystroke logging informs strength of word association. WORD, 64(4), 218-234.
    Beckage, N. M., & Colunga, E. 2016. Language networks as models of cognition:
    Understanding cognition through language. In Towards a Theoretical Framework for Analyzing Complex Linguistic Networks, 3-28. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
    Bock, K., & Levelt, W. J. 1994. Language production: Grammatical encoding (pp.
    945-984). Academic Press.
    Caplan, J. B., & Madan, C. R. 2016. Word imageability enhances association-memory
    by increasing hippocampal engagement. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28(10), 1522-1538.
    Chan, S. W. (Ed.). 2016. The Routledge encyclopedia of the Chinese language. Routledge.
    Chang, Y. L., Wu, J. Y., Chen, H. C., & Wu, C. L. 2016. The Development of Chinese
    Radical Remote Associates Test. Psychological Testing (63), 1, 59-81.
    Chen, J. Y., Chen, T. M., & Dell, G. S. 2002. Word-form encoding in Mandarin
    Chinese as assessed by the implicit priming task. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(4), 751-781.
    Chen, J. Y., & Li, C. Y. 2011. Word form encoding in Chinese word naming and word
    typing. Cognition, 121(1), 140-146.
    Chinese Knowledge Information Processing Group (CKIP). Technical Report no.93- 05,
    Academia Sinica, Taiwan.
    Chinese Knowledge Information Processing Group (CKIP). Extended-HowNet (E-
    HowNet) 2.0. Academia Sinica, Taiwan.
    Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. 1975. A spreading-activation theory of semantic
    processing. Psychological review, 82(6), 407.
    Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R. 1969. Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal
    of verbal learning and verbal behavior, 8(2), 240-247.
    De Deyne, S., & Storms, G. 2008. Word associations: Network and semantic
    properties. Behavior Research Methods, 40(1), 213-231.
    De Deyne, S., Navarro, D. J., & Storms, G. 2013. Better explanations of lexical and
    semantic cognition using networks derived from continued rather than single-word associations. Behavior research methods, 45(2), 480-498.
    De Deyne, S., Verheyen, S., & Storms, G. 2016. Structure and organization of the
    mental lexicon: A network approach derived from syntactic dependency relations and word associations. In Towards a theoretical framework for analyzing complex linguistic networks (pp. 47-79). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
    De Groot, A. M. 1989. Representational aspects of word imageability and word
    frequency as assessed through word association. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(5), 824.
    De Simone, F., & Collina, S. 2016. The Picture–Word Interference Paradigm:
    Grammatical Class Effects in Lexical Production. Journal of psycholinguistic research, 45(5), 1003-1019.
    De Young, K. P., Lavender, J. M., Washington, L. A., Looby, A., & Anderson, D. A.
    2010. A controlled comparison of the word repeating technique with a word association task. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry, 41(4), 426-432.
    Dell, G. S. 1985. Positive Feedback in Hierarchical Connectionist Models: Applications
    to Language Production 1. Cognitive Science, 9(1), 3-23.
    Dell, G. S. 1986. A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence
    production. Psychological review, 93(3), 283.
    Dell, G. S. 1988. The retrieval of phonological forms in production: Tests of predictions
    from a connectionist model. Journal of memory and language, 27(2), 124-142.
    Dell, G. S. 1990. Effects of frequency and vocabulary type on phonological speech
    errors. Language and cognitive processes, 5(4), 313-349.
    Dell, G. S., Chang, F., & Griffin, Z. M. 1999. Connectionist models of language production:
    Lexical access and grammatical encoding. Cognitive Science, 23(4), 517-542.
    Dell, G. S., Oppenheim, G. M., & Kittredge, A. K. 2008. Saying the right word at the
    right time: Syntagmatic and paradigmatic interference in sentence
    production. Language and cognitive processes, 23(4), 583-608.
    Dell, G. S., & O`Seaghdha, P. G. 1991. Mediated and convergent lexical priming in
    language production: A comment on Levelt et al (1991).
    Dell, G. S., & O`Seaghdha, P. G. 1992. Stages of lexical access in language
    production. Cognition, 42(1-3), 287-314.
    Dell, G. S., Reed, K. D., Adams, D. R., & Meyer, A. S. 2000. Speech errors,
    phonotactic constraints, and implicit learning: a study of the role of experience in
    language production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory,
    and Cognition, 26(6), 1355.
    Duanmu, S. 1990. A formal study of syllable, tone, stress and domain in Chinese
    Languages, Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    Duanmu, S. 2000. The Phonology of Standard Chinese. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Entwisle, D.R. 1966. Word associations of young children. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins
    Press. Greidanus, T. and L. Nienhuis. 2001. Testing the quality of word knowledge in a second language by means of word associations: types of distractors and types of associations. The Modern Language Journal 85.4: 567–77.
    Forster, K. I. 1976. Accessing the mental lexicon. In R. Wales & E. Walker (Eds.), New
    approaches to language mechanisms. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
    Fromkin, V. A. 1971. The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language, 27-
    52.
    Garrett, M.F. 1975. Syntactic process in sentence production In G. Bower (Ed.).
    Psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory. 9:133-177.
    Hsieh, S. K. 2006. Hanzi, concept and computation: A preliminary survey of Chinese
    characters as a knowledge resource in NLP (doctoral dissertation). Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen.
    Hsieh, S. K. 2016. Chinese Semantics. In: Sin-Wai Chan (ed). The Routledge Encyclopedia
    of the Chinese Language.
    Hu, J. F., Chen, Y.C., Zhuo, S.L., Chen, H. C., Chang, Y. L., & Sung, Y. T. 2017. Word
    Association Norms and Associated Responses: Reference Index for 1200 Two-
    Character Chinese Words. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 49(1), 137-160.
    Huang, C. R., Lee, L. H., Qu, W., Hong, J. F., & Yu, S. 2008. Quality Assurance of
    Automatic Annotation of Very Large Corpora: A Study based on Heterogeneous Tagging Systems. LREC 2008. 2725-2729.
    Huang, C. R. & Hsieh, S. K. 2015. Chinese Lexical Semantics. In: William S-Y Wang and
    Chaofen Sun (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Chinese Linguistics. ISBN: 978-0-19-985633-6. Oxford University Press.
    Huang, C. R., Chen K. J., Chang, L. P. & Hsu, H. L. 1995. An introduction to
    Academia Sinica Balanced Corpus. [In Chinese]. Proceedings of ROCLING VIII
    81-99.
    Huang, P.S., Chen, H. C., Huang, H. C., & Liu, C. H. 2009. The Development of
    Divergent Thinking Test of Word Associative Strategy (DTTWAS). Psychological Testing, 56(2), 153-177.
    Huang, P. S., Chen, H. C., & Liu, C. H. 2012. The development of Chinese word
    remote associates test for college students. Psychological Testing, 59(4), 581-607.
    Jarema, G., & Libben, G. 2007. The mental lexicon: core perspectives. BRILL.
    Kittredge, A. K., Dell, G. S., Verkuilen, J., & Schwartz, M. F. 2008. Where is the effect
    of frequency in word production? Insights from aphasic picture-naming errors. Cognitive neuropsychology, 25(4), 463-492.
    Lee, H. Y. (李孝儀). 2014. The Analysis of Chinese Word Remote Associates Test
    Among High School Students in Taiwan, Master Thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Lee, J. (李杰). 2012. 英—漢雙語心理詞典詞彙聯想測試研究, Master Thesis, Xihua
    University, China.
    Lee, H. M., & Lee, Y. S. 2011. Emotionality ratings and free-association norms of 267
    common two-character chinese words. Formosa Journal of Mental Health, 24(4), 495-524.
    Levelt, W. J. 1983. Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14(1), 41-104.
    Levelt. W. J. 1989. Speaking: From informtion to arriculation Cambridge. MA: MlT Press.
    Levelt, W. J. 1993. Speaking: From intention to articulation (Vol. 1). MIT press.
    Ma, W. Y., & Huang, C. R. 2006. Uniform and Effective Tagging of a Heterogeneous
    Giga-word Corpus. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-5).
    Ma, W. Y., & Shih, Y. Y. 2018. Extended HowNet 2.0–An Entity-Relation Common-
    Sense Representation Model. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-2018).
    Malhi, S. K. 2018. Processing Concrete and Abstract Relationships in Word Pairs.
    McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. 1981. An interactive activation model of context
    effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological review, 88(5), 375.
    Mednick, S. 1962. The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological
    review, 69(3), 220.
    Meyer, AS. 1991. The time course of phonological encoding in language production:
    Phonological encoding inside a syllable. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 69-89.
    Meyer, A.S., & Dell, G.S. 1993. An experimental analysis of positional and phonotactic
    Morton, J. 1969. Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological
    review, 76(2), 165.
    Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. 2004. The University of South
    Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Behavior Research
    Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(3), 402-407.
    Nissen, H. B., & Henriksen, B. 2006. Word class influence on word association test
    results 1. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 389-408.
    Nozari, N., Kittredge, A. K., Dell, G. S., & Schwartz, M. F. 2010. Naming and
    repetition in aphasia: Steps, routes, and frequency effects. Journal of memory and
    language, 63(4), 541-559.
    Oppenheim, G. M., & Dell, G. S. 2008. Inner speech slips exhibit lexical bias, but not
    the phonemic similarity effect. Cognition, 106(1), 528-537.
    Rebei, A., Anderson, N. D., & Dell, G. S. 2019. Learning the phonotactics of button
    pushing: Consolidation, retention, and syllable structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
    Reeves, L. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. 1998. Words and meaning: From
    primitives to complex organization. Psycholinguistics, 2, 157-226.
    Sailor, K., Brooks, P. J., Bruening, P. R., Seiger-Gardner, L., & Guterman, M. 2009.
    Exploring the time course of semantic interference and associative priming in the picture–word interference task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(4), 789-801.
    Sheng, L., McGregor, K. K., & Marian, V. 2006. Lexical–semantic organization in
    bilingual children: Evidence from a repeated word association task. Journal of
    Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49(3), 572-587.
    Smith, E. E., Shoben, E. J., & Rips, L. J. 1974. Structure and process in semantic
    memory: A featural model for semantic decisions. Psychological review, 81(3), 214.
    Tang, Marc & Wan, I-Ping. 2019. Predicting Speech Errors in Mandarin Based on
    Word Frequency. In Su, Qu and Zhan, Weidong (Eds.), From Minimal Contrast to Meaning Construct, Frontiers in Chinese Linguistics 9. 289-304. Springer, Peking University Press.
    Team, R. C. 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing; 2015.
    Taiwan Ministry of Education. 1994. The Ministry of Education Recompiled Mandarin
    Dictionary. (http://dict.revised.moe.edu.tw/)
    Vitevitch, M. S. 2008. What can graph theory tell us about word learning and lexical
    retrieval?. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research.
    Vitevitch, M. S., & Goldstein, R. 2014. Keywords in the mental lexicon. Journal of
    memory and language, 73, 131-147.
    Wan, I. P. 2007. Mandarin speech errors into phonological patterns. Journal of Chinese
    Linguistics, 35(1), 185-220.
    Wan, I. P. & Tang, M. A corpus study of lexical speech errors in Mandarin. Manuscript.
    Wan, I. P. & Ting, J. 2019. Semantic relationships in Mandarin speech errors. Taiwan
    Journal of Linguistics (17), 2, 33-66.
    Wang, W. S., & Sun, C. 2015. The Oxford handbook of Chinese linguistics. Oxford
    University Press.
    Warren, R. E. 1974. Association, directionality, and stimulus encoding. Journal of
    Experimental Psychology, 102(1), 151.
    Yip, M. 1980. The Tonal Phonology of Chinese. Ph.D. dissertation. MIT.
    Yu, P. (余萍). 2014. 淺析心理詞彙與學習詞典中觀結構的構建. The Guide of Science
    & Education (8), 145-146.
    Zhang, J. & Chen, D. 2018. An Empirical Study on Chinese College Students’ Associative
    Reaction to Chinese Mental Lexicon. Applied Linguistics (4), 75-84.
    Zhang, P. 2010. Choice of Prompt Words and Classification of Responses in Word
    Association Tests: A Reexamination. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages (1), 41-45.
    Zhao, C. 2012. A Review of Lexical Representation Research. Contemporary Foreign
    Languages Studies (7), 38-44.
    Zhao, Y. 2013. liu xue sheng yu mu yu zhe xin li ci hui de bi jiao yan jiu (留學生與母語
    者心理詞彙的比較研究). Science & Technology Information (18), 62-63.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    語言學研究所
    106555004
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1065550042
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202000123
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute of Linguistics] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    004201.pdf4224KbAdobe PDF2154View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback