Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/128567
|
| Title: | 論保險業公司治理 —以獨立董事效能強化為中心
Corporate Governance of Insurers: Focus on Enhancing the Effectiveness of Independent Directors |
| Authors: | 陳品璇
Chen, Pin-Syuan |
| Contributors: | 林建智
Lin, Jan-Juy
陳品璇
Chen, Pin-Syuan |
| Keywords: | 公司治理
獨立董事適格性
獨立董事效能
企業文化
保險監理
corporate governance
competence of independent directors
effectiveness of independent directors
corporate culture
insurance regulation |
| Date: | 2020 |
| Issue Date: | 2020-02-05 17:36:24 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 我國保險業歷年來多次發生有心人士掏空保險公司、五鬼搬運之事件，涉及的標的金額龐大，公司遭掏空的贓款在事後亦難以完全追回。有心人士一己之私利，不但損害保戶的利益，也耗費主管機關龐大的成本進行墊付。要杜絕保險業掏空弊案，保險業勢必要建立一個良好的公司治理架構，其中，獨立董事是公司治理架構中的關鍵角色。
惟本研究發現現有公司治理的研究大多針對一般公司或金融業中的銀行，鮮少有針對保險業公司治理法制層面的探討。本研究認為基於保險產業的特殊性，有必要就保險業的公司治理研究，本研究探討保險業公司治理的特殊性、公司治理的模式、保險業公司治理法源的普遍依據及效力、公司治理原則的差異化適用方法，以及評鑑方法等，並以國際上主要國家的保險業公司治理相關監理方法為例，建構出保險業的公司治理架構。
再者，獨立董事是公司治理架構中的關鍵角色，如何提升獨立董事的效能，是保險業公司治理的重點。本研究以實際訪談我國保險業獨立董事，了解保險業實務運作的現況及缺失，並以國內外問題保險業、重大裁罰案件為例，歸納出案例中削弱獨立董事效能的因素，並從獨立董事的專業性、獨立性、企業文化三個方面闡述削弱獨立董事效能的因素。
本研究認為，欲強化保險業獨立董事的效能，獨立董事自身、保險業、監理機關都是不可或缺的重要角色，因此本研究從獨立董事自身、保險業、監理機關三個角度分析如何強化保險業獨立董事的效能，並將效能強化的項目分為獨立董事的專業性、獨立性，以及公司的企業文化三項，期盼塑造一個對獨立董事友善的企業文化，以提升保險業獨立董事的效能，建構保險業良好的公司治理架構。
There is no one but knows that the frequent occurrence of hollowed out cases of insurance industry in Taiwan. The amount involved is huge, and it is difficult to completely recover the stolen money that has been hollowed out. In order to eradicate the shortcomings of the insurance industry, the insurance industry must establish a good corporate governance structure. Among them, independent directors play a key role in the corporate governance structure.
Based on the particularity of the insurance industry, this study considers it is necessary to study the corporate governance of the insurance industry. This study takes the supervision methods of insurance company governance in other countries as examples to construct the corporate governance structure of the insurance industry. Furthermore, it cannot be over emphasized the importance of the independent directors in the corporate governance structure. This study interviewed three independent directors of insurance industries in Taiwan. Taking the insurance sanction cases as examples, this study sorted the main fact in the cases, trying to categorize the factors that weaken the effectiveness of independent directors of insurance industries.
This study held the view that the independent director itself, insurance company and the competent authorities play the indispensable roles in enhancing the effectiveness of independent directors. This study elaborate how to strengthen the effectiveness of independent directors by the above three different roles, hoping to built a friendly insurance corporate culture to the independent directors in order to enhancing the effectiveness of independent directors. |
| Reference: | 一、中文部分
(一)書籍
1.王文宇（2018），《公司法論》，六版，元照。
2.陳彥良（2007），《公司治理法制 : 公司內部機關組織職權論》，臺灣財經協會。
3.曾宛如（2008），《公司管理與資本市場法制專論》，初版，元照。
4.黃銘傑（2006），《公司治理與企業金融法制之挑戰與興革》，初版，元照。
5.楊岳平（2011），《公司治理與公司社會責任—企業併購下股東、債權人、員工、投資人之保護》，初版，元照。
6.葉銀華（2015），《公司治理 : 全球觀點.台灣體驗》，初版，滄海。
7.葉銀華、李存修、柯承恩（2002），《公司治理與評等系統 Corporate Governance And Rating System》，初版，商智文化。
8.劉連煜（2000），《公司法理論與判決研究(二)》，初版，自版。
9.劉連煜（2002），〈公司利益輸送之法律防制〉，氏著，《公司法理論與判決研究（三）》，自版。
10.賴英照（2017），《股市遊戲規則 : 最新證券交易法解析》，三版，自版。
(二)期刊文章
1.王文宇（2009），〈董事之資訊請求權〉，《月旦法學教室》，86期，頁18-19。
2.王志誠（2019），〈金融機構公司治理實務守則之特性及發展－以金融機構負責人之兼任職務為中心〉，《財稅研究》，48卷4期，頁87-113。
3.朱德芳（2006），〈效率、併購與公司治理以敵意併購法規範為核心〉，《中原財經法學》，17期，頁195-259。
4.余雪明（2002），〈臺灣新公司法與獨立董事（上）〉，《萬國法律》，123期，頁63-77。
5.李田香、譚順平（2012），〈併購在上市公司治理效率中的作用〉，《人民論壇》，29期，頁78-79。
6.張揚、郝臣、李慧聰、褚玉萍（2012），〈保險公司治理特殊性分析——三家上市保險公司的案例研究〉，《管理案例研究與評論》，5卷4期，頁265-276。
7.陳彥良（2018），〈我國公司法制之再進化－以二○一八年公司法修正為中心〉，《財金法學研究》，1卷2期，頁177-205。
8.程佩瑜（2004），〈OECD亞洲國家公司治理白皮書簡介〉，《存款保險資訊季刊》，17卷3期，頁103-110。
9.黃銘傑（2011），〈「股東」平等原則 vs.「股份」平等原則──初探股東平等原則復權之必要性及可行性〉，《月旦民商法雜誌》， 31 期，頁5-22。
10.楊岳平（2019），〈論金融控股公司治理的改革方向──以獨立董事與提名委員會為中心〉，《臺大法學論叢》，48卷2期，頁683 - 750。
11.鄭村（2018），〈機構投資人盡職治理功能之推動〉，《證券服務》，666期，頁11 - 14。
(三)網際網路
1.ETtoday新聞雲（2018/6/21），〈董事長好，小股東不好！南山人壽獨董：破億酬金合理〉，檢自：https://www.ettoday.net/news/20180621/1195744.htm ，最後瀏覽日：2019/12/16。
2.ETtoday新聞雲（2019/1/29），〈金融股權透明化 顧立雄年後約談金融家族〉，檢自：https://www.ettoday.net/news/20190129/1368978.htm#ixzz5tjzkWOib ，最後瀏覽日：2019/11/16。
3.工商時報 （2019/06/10），〈新公司法 如何強化公司治理？〉，檢自：https://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20190610000232-260202?chdtv ，最後瀏覽日：2019/12/2。
4.工商時報（2009/01/18），〈霧峰林家甜蜜復仇 宣告失敗〉，檢自：https://www.coolloud.org.tw/node/34151 ，最後瀏覽日：2019/11/16。
5.工商時報（2019/10/4），〈明年起薪酬會成員 獨董要佔過半〉，檢自：https://ctee.com.tw/news/tax-law/154276.html ，最後瀏覽日：2019/10/30。
6.中時電子報（2015/08/12），〈幸福人壽原董座 鄧文聰：60億追不回我全負責〉，檢自：https://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20150806003111-260901?chdtv ，最後瀏覽日：2019/11/14。
7.天下雜誌（2019/9/17），〈台灣金融業最具野心的數位投資，為何變600萬保戶的夢魘？〉，檢自：https://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5096886 ，最後瀏覽日：2019/11/23。
8.自由時報（2014/8/14），〈國寶朱國榮 爭議大金主〉，檢自：https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/focus/paper/804481 ，最後瀏覽日：2019/11/13。
9.自由電子報（2019/10/15），〈保險業狂吃紅單！ 9個半月遭金管會重罰一億多元〉，檢自：https://ec.ltn.com.tw/article/breakingnews/2947357 ，最後瀏覽日：2019/12/4。
10.保險業內部控制及稽核制度實施辦法第三十六條之二修正草案總說明，檢自：https://reurl.cc/L151Ra ，最後瀏覽日：2019/11/5。
11.保險業公開資訊觀測站，檢自：https://ins-info.ib.gov.tw/index.aspx ，最後瀏覽日：2019/12/1。
12.保險業負責人應具備資格條件準則修正草案總說明，檢自：https://reurl.cc/6geLoy ，最後瀏覽日：2019/12/4。
13.現代保險新聞網（2006/10/1），〈前國華產險董事長 被求刑20年的省思〉，檢自：https://www.rmim.com.tw/news-detail-5744 ，最後瀏覽日：2019/11/15。
14.經濟日報（2008/3/29），〈歐系外資爭取華山產過半董監〉，檢自：http://www.fu-ling.com/stock-bulletin.asp?newsNo=s17127 ，最後瀏覽日：2019/11/22。
15.聯合新聞（2019/8/23），〈掏空幸福人壽資產 鄧文聰再被判20年〉，檢自：https://udn.com/news/story/7321/4005484 ，最後瀏覽日：2019/11/14。
二、英文部分
(一)書籍
1.A. A. Berle. (1968). The modern corporation and private property (Rev. ed. ed.): Harcourt, Brace & World.
2.M. Friedman. (2007). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits, Corporate ethics and corporate governance
3.I. M. Fund. (2014). Switzerland: Report on observance of standards and codes.
(二)期刊文章
1.D. K. Denis and J. J. McConnell. (2003). International corporate governance. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38(1), 1-36. doi:10.2307/4126762
2.D. Mayers and C. W. Smith. (2010). Compensation and board structure: Evidence from the insurance industry. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 77(2), 297-327. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6975.2010.01352.x
3.E. F. Fama and M. C. Jensen. (1983). Agency problems and residual claims. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 327-349. doi:10.1086/467038
4.J. M. Lyons. (2010). Representing independent directors after sarbanes-oxley: The growing role of independent counsel. Business Law Today, 19(3), 55.
5.J. Pfeffer. (2009). Shareholders first? Not so fast. Harvard Business Review, 87(7, 8), 90-91.
6.K. J. M. Cremers and S. M. Sepe. (2018). Institutional investors: Corporate governance, and firm value. Seattle University Law Review, 41(2), 387-418.
7.K. John and L. W. Senbet. (1998). Corporate governance and board effectiveness. Journal of Banking and Finance, 22(4), 371-403. doi:10.1016/S0378-4266(98)00005-3
8.L. Bebchuk and A. Hamdani. (2017). Independent directors and controlling shareholders. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 165(6), 1271.
9.M. C. Jensen and W. H. Meckling. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
10.M. E. King. (2017). Commonsense principles of corporate governance. The CPA Journal, 28-33.
11.M. R. Huson and L. T. Starks. (2001). Internal monitoring mechanisms and ceo turnover: A long‐term perspective. Journal of Finance, 56(6), 2266.
12.N. Boubakri. (2011). Corporate governance and issues from the insurance industry. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 501-518.
13.OECD reveals key areas for asian corporate governance reform (white paper on corporate governance in asia). International Financial Law Review, 22(5), 5.
14.R. Spiller. (1972). Ownership and performance: Stock and mutual life insurance companies. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 39(1), 17-25. doi:10.2307/251647
15.S. Cheng. (2008). Board size and the variability of corporate performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(1), 157-176. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.10.006
16.S. Claessens. (2002). Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. Journal of Finance, 57(6), 2741-2771. doi:10.1111/1540-6261.00511
17.Shleifer and R. W. Vishny. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737-783. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x
(三)網際網路
1.A. o. B. Insurers. Retrieved from: https://www.abi.org.uk/about-the-abi/about-us/, last visited 2019/10/9.
2.A. o. B. Insurers. Improving corporate governance and shareholder engagement. Retrieved from: https://www.ivis.co.uk/media/5929/ABI-Report-Improving-Corporate-Governance-and-Shareholder-Engagement.pdf, last visited 2019/10/9.
3.Circular 2017/2,corporate governance – insurers. Retrieved from: https://www.finma.ch/en/~/media/finma/dokumente/dokumentencenter/myfinma/rundschreiben/finma-rs-2017-02.pdf?la=en, last visited 2019/10/9.
4.Companies act 2006. Retrieved from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/contents, last visited 2019/10/6.
5.D. P. Ch.Hsu and S. Fehlmann. (2018). Aida questionnaire on the corporate governance of insurers , report for switzerland. Paper presented at the AIDA World Congress 2018, Brazil. Retrieved from: https://de.baerkarrer.ch/publications/AIDA%20Corporate%20Governance%20Questionnaire_SWISSFINAL.PDF , last visited 2019/10/6.
6.Directive on information relating to corporate governance(2018). Retrieved from: https://www.six-exchange-regulation.com/dam/downloads/regulation/admission-manual/directives/06_16-DCG_en.pdf. , last visited 2019/10/7.
7.European company regulation (reg. [eu] no. 2157/2001), Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/GA/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32001R2157 , last visited 2019/10/6.
8.F. C. Authority(FCA). (2018). The senior managers and certification regime:Guide for insurers. Retrieved from: https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/policy/guide-for-insurers.pdf , last visited 2019/12/4.
9.F. O. o. P. Insurance. Swiss quality assessment (SQA). Retrieved from: https://www.finma.ch/FinmaArchiv/bpv/e/themen/01345/index.html?lang=en , last visited 2019/10/14.
10.F. R. Council(FRC). (2014). Guidance on risk management, internal control and related financial and business reporting. Retrieved from: https://www.frc.org.uk/getattachment/d672c107-b1fb-4051-84b0-f5b83a1b93f6/Guidance-on-Risk-Management-Internal-Control-and-Related-Reporting.pdf , last visited 2019/12/4.
11.Financial services and markets act 2000. Retrieved from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/8/pdfs/ukpga_20000008_en.pdf. , last visited 2019/10/9.
12.FINMA. (2012). Sanctions in the kpt case [Press release]. Retrieved from: https://www.finma.ch/en/news/2012/01/mm-kpt-20120111 , last visited 2019/11/23.
13.G. I. Association,Positions of german insurers 2017(2017). Retrieved from: https://www.en.gdv.de/resource/blob/24488/92c5c08f245dc424a95261f3875cf754/positions-of-german-insurers-2017-data.pdf , last visited 2019/10/9.
14.IAIS. Retrieved from: https://www.iaisweb.org/page/about-the-iais/strategic-plan ,last visited 2019/10/5.
15.IAIS. (2009). Issues paper on corporate governance. Retrieved from: https://www.iaisweb.org/page/supervisory-material/issues-papers/file/34277/issues-paper-on-corporate-governance-july-2009 , last visited 2019/10/3.
16.IAIS. (2014, 2019). Report from expert team conducting the self-assessment and peer review of icps 4, 5, 7, and 8. Retrieved from: https://www.iaisweb.org/file/34580/aggregrate-report-from-the-expert-team-conducting-the-self-assessment-and-peer-review-of-icp-4-5-7-and-8 , last visited 2019/10/2.
17.IAIS. (2016). Issues paper on cyber risk to the insurance sector. Retrieved from: https://www.iaisweb.org/file/61857/issues-paper-on-cyber-risk-to-the-insurance-sector , last visited 2019/11/25.
18.IAIS. (2017). Handbook for assessing implementation of iais supervisory material. Retrieved from: https://www.iaisweb.org/file/67655/public-2017-field-testing-technical-specifications , last visited 2019/10/2.
19.IAIS. (2018). Application paper on the composition and the role of the board. Retrieved from: https://www.iaisweb.org/page/supervisory-material/application-papers//file/77741/application-paper-on-the-composition-and-the-role-of-the-board , last visited 2019/11/23.
20.IAIS. (2018). Insurance core principles. Retrieved from: https://www.iaisweb.org/page/supervisory-material/insurance-core-principles/file/77910/all-adopted-icps-updated-november-2018 , last visited 2019/10/3.
21.IAIS. (2019). Application paper on proactive supervision of corporate governance. Retrieved from: https://www.iaisweb.org/page/supervisory-material/application-papers//file/80572/application-paper-on-proactive-supervision-of-corporate-governance , last visited 2019/10/2.
22.J. Gal. (2018). Aida questionnaire on the corporate governance of insurers , report for german. Paper presented at the AIDA World Congress 2018, Brazil. Retrieved from: https://www.dvfvw.de/images/pdf/aida_ergebnisse/3b_german%20national%20report%20on%20corporate%20governance_gal_aida_2018.pdf , last visited 2019/10/3.
23.Limited liability companies act. Retrieved from: https://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/2006/en20060624.pdf. , last visited 2019/10/3.
24.NAIC. (2009). Solvency modernization initiative :Country comparison analysis Switzerland. Retrieved from: https://www.naic.org/documents/committees_smi_int_solvency_switzerland.pdf , last visited 2019/10/17.
25.OECD. Retrieved from: http://www.oecd.org/corporate/ , last visited 2019/5/8.
26.OECD. G20/OECD principles of corporate governance. Retrieved from: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/g20-oecd-principles-of-corporate-governance-2015_9789264236882-en , last visited 2019/12/2.
27.Penrose report(2004). Retrieved from: http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/independent_reviews/penrose_report/indrev_pen_index.cfm , last visited 2019/11/24.
28.S. F. M. S. Authority. (2010). Observations from the first swiss qualitative assessment. Retrieved from: https://www.finma.ch/en/~/media/finma/dokumente/dokumentencenter/4dokumentation/finma-mitteilungen-archiv/beilage_finma-mitteilung-5-2010_bericht-sqa-20100201.pdf?la=en , last visited 2019/10/18.
29.S. F. M. S. Authority. (2017). Annual report 2017. Retrieved from: https://www.finma.ch/en/~/media/finma/dokumente/dokumentencenter/myfinma/finma-publikationen/geschaeftsbericht/20180327-jahresbericht-2017.pdf?la=en , last visited 2019/10/12.
30.S. F. M. S. Authority. Risk categories for insurance companies. Retrieved from: https://www.finma.ch/en/supervision/insurers/categorisation/ , last visited 10/14/2019.
31.Marja Luukkonen. (2018). Aida questionnaire on the corporate governance of insurers , report for Finland. Paper presented at the AIDA World Congress 2018, Brazil. Retrieved from: https://reurl.cc/NaA4g6 , last visited 2019/10/3.
32.Ss 5/16 corporate governance: Board responsibilities (2018). Retrieved from: https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/prudential-regulation/supervisory-statement/2018/ss516update.pdf?la=en&hash=9FA09D82A6431745BBA95B3943C9AD13A5FB40A7 , last visited 2019/10/9.
33.Swiss financial market supervision act, Retrieved from: https://www.admin.ch/opc/en/classified-compilation/20052624/index.html , last visited 2019/10/7.
34.The UK corporate governance code, Board Leadership and Company Purpose(2018). Retrieved from: https://www.frc.org.uk/getattachment/88bd8c45-50ea-4841-95b0-d2f4f48069a2/2018-UK-Corporate-Governance-Code-FINAL.pdf , last visited 2019/10/7.
三、訪談資料
1.陳品璇，2019/5/17。當面訪談，我國某保險公司獨立董事X，國立政治大學。
2.陳品璇，2019/5/21。當面訪談，我國某保險公司獨立董事Y，國立政治大學。
3.陳品璇，2019/5/22。當面訪談，我國某保險公司獨立董事Z，國立政治大學。 |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
風險管理與保險學系
105358013 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105358013 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202000045 |
| Appears in Collections: | [風險管理與保險學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 801301.pdf | 1816Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 43 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
