Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/128561
|
| Title: | 綠色債券溢價研究—以美國市場為例
Analysis of Green Bond Premium – Evidence from the U.S. Market |
| Authors: | 王莙貽
Wang, Chun-Yi |
| Contributors: | 岳夢蘭
王莙貽
Wang, Chun-Yi |
| Keywords: | 綠色債券
綠色債券溢價
永續投資
Green bonds
Green premium
Sustainable investing |
| Date: | 2019 |
| Issue Date: | 2020-02-05 17:09:23 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究以美國市場發行之綠色債券作為研究對象，探討綠色債券是否相對於普通債券具有綠色債券溢價，以及債券特性與發行人對於綠色債券的資訊揭露，是否與綠色債券溢價具關聯性。本研究首先採用配對法，為25檔綠色債券配對一檔同發行人及同債券特性之普通債券，並運用兩階段迴歸得到經流動性修正後之收益率差作為綠色債券溢價，進一步分析債券特性對於綠色債券溢價之影響性。除此之外，本研究亦進一步探討綠色債券發行人發行綠債後，對於綠色債券資訊揭露之各種方式，以分析資訊透明對於綠色債券溢價是否亦具有影響性。
本研究之實證結果顯示，美國發行之綠色債券存在-2bp之綠色債券溢價，顯示綠色債券收益率低於相比較之普通債券。進一步分析影響綠色債券溢價之因素，實證結果發現評等、發行人產業、附帶可贖回條款、債券發行人定期公布綠色債券相關資訊以及公布資金管理報告皆顯著影響綠色債券溢價。但發行人是否提供綠色債券的資金保證提供者之資訊，則對綠色債券溢價不具影響力。故根據本研究之實證結果，可說明當綠色債券資訊透明度愈高、資訊不對稱降低時，的確可增加投資人的投資信心進而提高綠色債券發行人之融資能力、降低綠色債券投資項目之融資成本。
This paper examines whether green bonds exist green bond premium compared to otherwise similar conventional bonds in the U.S. bond market. Further, this paper also studies the relationship between the variation of green bond premium and the bond characteristics as well as the disclosure of green bonds. First, we use a matching method to match 25 green bonds to conventional bonds with same issuers and characteristics. Then, applying a two-step regression procedure, we estimate liquidity-adjusted yield premium and use it as green bond premium. Finally, we analyze how bond features and information transparency can affect green bond premium.
Our empirical result indicates that on average there is a green bond premium of -2 basis points in the U.S. bond market, which means green binds’ yields are lower than conventional bonds’. Furthermore, evidence shows that rating, sectors, call options, and disclosure of loan reports and loan management of proceeds all have significant effects on the magnitude of green bond premium, while whether issuers disclose loan assurance providers does not. In conclusion, the result provides evidence that greater information transparency of green bonds can boost investors’ confidence, so that green bond issuers are able to expand the funding capacity of green bond issuers and lower the cost of green projects. |
| Reference: | Baker, M., Bergstresser, D., Serafeim, G., & Jeffrey, W. (2018). Financing the respo-
nse to climate change: the pricing and ownership of U.S. green bonds. SSRN. Retrieved
form https://ssrn.com/abstract=3275327
Bao, J., Pan, J., & Wang, J. (2011). The illiquidity of corporate bonds. The Journal of Finance, 66(3), 911–946.
Bachelet, M., Becchetti, L., & Manfredonia, S. (2019). The green bonds premium puzzle: the role of issuer characteristics and third-party verification. Sustainability, 11(4), 1098.
Bour, T. (2019). The green bond premium and non-financial disclosure: financing the future, or merely greenwashing? Maastricht University. Master’s thesis. Retrieved form https://finance-ideas.nl/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/msc.-thesis-tom-bour.pdf
Climate Bonds Initiative. (2019). Green bonds: the state of the market 2018. Retrieved form https://www.climatebonds.net/resources/reports/green-bonds-state-market-2018
Chandrasekaran. (2018). The liquidity risk effects on green bond yield spreads. Erasmus University Rotterdam. Master’s thesis. Retrieved form https://pdfs.semant-
ics-cholar.org/fef3/ab159168e2f2484d2222386be10bc9a78a21.pdf
Chen, L., Lesmond, D., & Wei, J. (2007). Corporate yield spreads and bond liquidity.
Journal of Finance, 62 (1), 119–149.
Derwall, J., Koedijk, K., & Horst, J. Ter. (2011). A tale of values-driven and profit-
seeking social investors. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(8), 2137–2147.
Dhaliwal, D., Radhakrishnan, S., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2012). Nonfinancial disc-
losure and analyst forecast accuracy: international evidence on corporate social respo-
nsibility disclosure. The Accounting Review, 87(3), 723–759.
Ehlers, T., & Packer, F. Green Bond Finance and Certification. (2017). BIS Quarterly Review. SSRN. Retrieved form https://ssrn.com/abs-tract=3042378
Flaherty, M., Gevorkyan, A., Radpour, S. & Semmler, W. (2017), Financing climate policies through climate bonds–a three stage model and empirics, Research in Interna-
tional Business and Finance, 42, 468–479.
Flammer, C. Corporate green bonds. (2018). Boston University. Working paper. SSRN.
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3125-518
Fong, K. Y. L., Holden, C. W., & Trzcinka, C. A. (2017). What are the best liquidity proxies for global research? Review of Finance, 21(4), 1355–1401.
Helwege, J., Huang, J.-Z., & Wang, Y. (2014). Liquidity effects in corporate bond sp-
reads. Journal of Banking and Finance, 45, 105–116.
International Capital Market Association. (2017). The green bond principle 2017. Retrieved from https://www.icmagroup.org/assets/documents/Regulatory/Green-
Bonds/GreenBondsBrochure-JUNE2017.pdf
Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2017). The consequences of mandatory corporate sustai-
nability reporting. Harvard Business School. Working paper (11-100). SSRN.
https://ssrn.com/abstract=1799589
Kapraun, J., and Scheins, C. (In)-Credibly green: which bonds trade at a green bond
premium? (2019). SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3347337
Lu, C. W., Chen, T. K., and Liao, H. H. (2010). Information uncertainty, information asymmetry and corporate bond yield spreads. Journal of Banking and Finance, 34(9), 2265-2279
Östlund, E. (2015). Are investors rational profit maximisers or do they exhibit a green preference? – evidence from the green bond market. Stockholm School of Economics.
Master’s thesis in Economics (21875).
Park, S. K. (2018). Investors as regulators: green bonds and the governance challeng-
es of the sustainable finance revolution. Stanford Journal of International Law, 54(1), 1–48.
Peng, J., & Brucato, P. F. (2004). An empirical analysis of market and institutional mechanisms for alleviating information asymmetry in the municipal bond market.
Journal of Economics and Finance, 28(6), 226-238
Petrova, A. (2016). Green bonds: lower returns or higher responsibility? Radboud University. Master’s thesis (S4461746). Retrieved from https://theses.ubn.ru.nl/bits-
tream/handle/123456789/3225/Petrova%2C_Antoniya_1.pdf?sequence=1
Reed, P., Cort, T., & Yonavjak, L. (2019). Data-driven green bond ratings as a market
catalyst. The Journal of Investing, 28(2), 66-76
Schmitt, S. (2017). A parametric approach to estimate the green bond premium. NOVA
University. Master’s work project. Retrieved from https://run.unl.pt/bitstream/10362/-
28402/1/Schmitt_2018.pdf
Schuster, P., & Uhrig-Hombourg, M. (2012). The term structure of bond market liqu-
idity conditional on the economic environment: an analysis of government guaranteed bonds. Working paper. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstr-
act_id=2033170.
Wulandari, F., Dorothea, S., Andreas, S., & Chen, S. (2018). The impact of liquidity risk on the yield spread of green bonds. Finance Research Letters, 27, 53–59.
Zerbib, O. D. (2019). The effect of pro-environmental preferences on bond prices: ev-
idence from green bonds. Journal of Banking & Finance, 98(1), 39-60. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
財務管理學系
106357021 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106357021 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202000039 |
| Appears in Collections: | [財務管理學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 702101.pdf | 837Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
