政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/127752

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/127752

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | Items with full text/Total items : 114205/145239 (79%)
Visitors : 52610382 Online Users : 781

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Scope

please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results

please goto advance search for comprehansive author search

Adv. Search

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

Goto mobile version

政大典藏 > College of Social Science > Department of Political Science > Theses > Item 140.119/127752

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/127752

Title:	國會助理立法涉入之研究：以第九屆立法院為例 The Legislative Involvement of Congressional Assistants: The Case of Legislative Yuan from 2016 to 2019
Authors:	歐陽正霆 Ouyang, Cheng-Ting
Contributors:	盛杏湲 Sheng, Shing-Yuan 歐陽正霆 Ouyang, Cheng-Ting
Keywords:	立法院立法參與國會助理立法涉入 Legislative Yuan Legislative Participation Congressional assistants Legislative Involvement
Date:	2019
Issue Date:	2019-12-06 09:27:18 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	政治學界針對國會所累積研究不勝枚舉，但其中有關國會助理的研究並不多，在有限的文獻中，學界普遍肯定國會助理的重要性，也進一步指出可將國會議員與助理視為政治生命共同體，亦或同屬一政治企業的共同夥伴。然而既有研究大多僅透過推論或旁敲側擊的方式來了解國會助理，並無較完整的理論工具來剖析助理對立法問政的涉入情形。因此本文針對於第九屆立法院服務之立法委員與法案助理，進行深入訪談與問卷調查，文中提出並界定了立法涉入的概念，同時以問政情境、問政方式、分工及溝通模式等角度切入，除描述助理的立法涉入程度外，筆者也提出了一套理論架構，試圖解釋為何助理在不同情況下立法涉入的程度會有差異。研究結果發現，助理的確是立法運作中重要的一環，在議題設定、討論及決策等過程中，均有相當程度參與，證明了過去學界有關政治企業與生命共同體的推論並無訛誤。但立法委員絕非橡皮圖章照單全收，還是相當的有自己的想法。同時也發現了立法委員若較重視該次問政，會有較高的自主性，因而予助理較低的授權程度，同時也會更積極與助理討論以尋求協助及確保問政結果符合己意。再者，研究結果顯示，由於立法委員會考量問政方式的政治風險與對其之關心程度，因此助理的立法涉入空間會因為問政方式而有所不同。最後在分工模式部分，相較於「立委強勢型」，「助理強勢型」分工模式下，助理大致上會有較高的立法涉入空間，證明了在分析助理的立法涉入程度時，應將立法委員與助理的資深程度併同納入分析。 There were many inspiring researches on congress in the past, but rarely on congressional assistants. In a limited literature, the academic community generally recognized the importance of congressional assistants. Furthermore, researchers point out congress members and their assistants can be regarded as a single political career community, or partners of one enterprise. However, most of the existed theses only analyze congressional assistants through inference or indirect approach. There is no complete theoretical tool to analyze the involvement of the assistants in legislative progress. Therefore, this thesis conducts interviews and surveys of the legislators and legislative assistants of the ninth Legislative Yuan, and defines the concept of legislative involvement. At the same time, the thesis also examines how the situation, type, domination, and communication of representatives can influence legislative involvement of assistants. In addition to describing the actual picture of assistants’ legislative involvement, I also propose a theoretical framework to explain why the legislative involvement of the assistants is quite different, depending on circumstances. The study finds that legislative assistants do play an important role in Legislative Yuan and soak in the representatives’ activities, such as setting agenda, discussing, and the process of decision-making.. It reveals that the views of political enterprises and career communities in the past are correct. However, it does not mean the legislators are just rubber stamps. On the contrary, they are rather independent. When members pay more attention to a legislative activitity, they will hold onto the process more autonomously. As a result, they would give assistants a lower authorization and discuss with assistants more frequently to ensure the consequences match their expectaions. The results also reveal that legislators consider their own concerns and political risks of representative behavior, as results the involvement of the assistants vary as the type of representative behavior different. At last, compared to “legislator-dominated” division mode, assistants get involved more deeply in “assistant-dominated” mode. It also proves researchers need to take both the seniorities of legislator and assistants into consideration, instead of analyzing them separately.
Reference:	A. 英文部分 Butler, Warren H.. 1966. “Administering Congress: The Role of the Staff.” Public Administration Review 26(1):3-13. Carmines, Edward G., Matthew Fowler. 2017. “The Temptation of Executive Authority: How Increased Polarization and the Decline in Legislative Capacity Have Contributed to the Expansion of Presidential Power.” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 24(2):369-398. Cox, Gary W. and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press. Davidson, Roger H. and Walter J. Oleszek. 2010. Congress and Its Members. Washington D.C: A Division of Congressional Quarterly Inc. DeGregorio, Christine, and Kevin Snider.1995. “Leadership Appeal in the U.S. House of Representatives: Comparing Office holders and Aides.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 20:491-511. DeGregorio, Christine. 1996. Networks of Champions: Leadership, Access, and Advocacy in the U.S. House of Representatives. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Fox, Harrison W., and Susan Webb Hammond. 1977. Congressional staffs: the invisible force in American lawmaking. New York: The Free Press. Geddes, Barbara. 2003. Paradigms and Sand Castles: Theory Building and Research Design in Comparative Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Gerrity, Jessica C., Nancy S. Hardt and Kathryn C. Lavelle. 2008. “The Interest Group: Staff Connection in Congress: Access and Influence in Personal, Committee, and Leadership Offices.” Political Science and Politics 41(4):913-917. Hall, Richard L..1987. “Participation and Purpose in Committee Decision Making.” American Political Science Review 81(1):105-127. Herrnson, Paul S.. 1994. “Congress`s Other Farm Team: Congressional Staff.” Polity 27(1):137-156. Mahoney, James, Gary Goertz. 2004. “The Possibility Principle and Case Selection: Choosing Negative Cases in Comparative Analysis.” American Political Science Review 98(4), 653-669. Malbin, Micheal J.. 1980. Unelected Representatives: Congressional Staff and the Future of Representative Government. New York: Basic Books. Manley, John F.. “Congressional Staff and Public Policy-Making: The Joint Committee on Internal Revenue Taxation.” The Journal of Politics 30(4):1046-1067. Marcy, Carl. 1952. “The Staff of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and Its Work—A Case Study of the Legislation Reorganization Act.” American Bar Association Journal 38(2):154-156. Mayhew, David. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press. McCubbins, Mathew D. and Gregory W. Noble. 1995. The Appearance of Power: Legislators, Bureaucrats, and the Budget Process in the United States and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Miller, Warren and Donald Stokes.1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” The American Political Review 57(1):45-56. Nemoto, Kuniaki, Eillis Krauss, Robert Pekkanen. 2008. “Policy Dissension and Party Discipline: The July 2005 Vote on Postal Privatization in Japan.” British Journal of Political Science 38(3):499-525. Parker, Glenn R.. 1996. Congress and the Rent-Seeking Society. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. Patterson, Samuel C.. 1970. “The Professional Staffs of Congressional Committees.” Administrative Science Quarterly 15(1): 22-37. Price, David E.. 1971. “Professionals and Entrepreneurs: Staff Orientations and Policy-Making on Three Senate Committees.” Journal of Politics 33(3):316-336. Romzek, Barbara S., and Jennifer A. Utter. 1996. “Career Dynamics of Congressional Legislative Staff: Preliminary Profile and Research.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 6(3): 415-442. Salisbury, Robert H., and Kenneth A. Shepsle. “Congressional Staff Turnover and the Ties-That-Bind1981.” The American Political Science Review 75(2):381-396. Scheiner, Ethan, Robert Pekkanen, Michio Muramatsu, and Ellis Krauss. 2013. “When Do Interest Groups Contact Bureaucrats Rather than Politicians? Evidence on Fire Alarms and Smoke Detectors from Japan.” Japanese Journal of Political Science 14(3):283–304. Schiller, Wendy J.. 1995. “Senators as Political Entrepreneurs: Using Bill Sponsorship to Shape Legislative Agendas.” American Journal of Political Science 39(1):186-203. Smith, Steven. 2007. Party Influence in Congress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. B. 中文部分立法院，2018，《立法院公報》，107(93):243-284。甘霖，2003，〈立法委員個人助理之研究〉，文化大學政治學研究所碩士論文。田倩惠，2008，〈國會助理立法資訊尋求行為之研究〉，國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所碩士論文。田麗虹，2013，《國會助理工作手冊》(初版)，新北市：博碩。何景榮譯，Peter Burnham, Karin Gilland, Wyn Grant, Zig Layton-Henry原著，2008，《政治學研究方法》，臺北：韋伯。林立生，2007，〈我國立法院國會助理政治公關角色與功能之研究〉，開南大學公共事務管理學系碩士論文。林麗真，2007，〈國會助理選民服務工作內容及工作成就感之研究〉，政治大學行政管理碩士學程學位論文。邱訪義、李誌偉，2016，〈影響行政部門提案三讀通過之制度性因素--總統、官僚、與政黨〉，《臺灣民主季刊》，13(1)：39-84。洪雅亭，2014，〈當政治成為一種職業：國會助理勞動過程初探〉，國立中正大學政治所碩士論文。盛杏湲，2001，〈立法委員正式與非正式立法參與之研究：以第三屆立法院為例〉，《問題與研究》，40(5):81-104。盛杏湲，2005，〈選區代表與集體代表：立法委員的代表角色〉，《東吳政治學報》，21:1-40。盛杏湲，2008，〈政黨的國會領導與凝聚力：2000年政黨輪替前後的觀察〉，《臺灣民主季刊》，5 (4):1-46。盛杏湲，2014，〈議程設定與立法產出：行政機關與立法機關在立法過程中的影響力〉，《轉型中的行政與立法》，東吳大學政治學系國會研究中心編，臺北：五南出版社。陳淑貞，2004，〈我國國會助理專業能力分析之研究〉，國立臺灣師範大學工業科技教育研究所碩士論文。曾愛文，2011，〈國會法案助理資訊行為之研究〉，臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所在職進修碩士班學位論文。黃士豪，2017，〈誰要議題所有權？立法委員立法提案與議題所有權的建立〉，《臺灣民主季刊》，14(1):1-51。黃秀端、陳中寧、許孝慈，2017，《認識立法院》(初版)，臺北市：五南。蔡曉雯，2003，〈年輕國會助理的權力覺察與行動策略研究〉，國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商系碩士論文。羅清俊，2000，〈猜猜看誰把醃肉帶回家了：補助款利益在縣市分配的分析〉，《人文及社會科學集刊》，12(1):1-45。
Description:	碩士國立政治大學政治學系 105252009
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105252009
Data Type:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/NCCU201901268
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Political Science] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
200901.pdf	1131Kb	Adobe PDF2	175	View/Open

All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - Feedback