政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/127737
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51627079      Online Users : 584
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/127737


    Title: 新聞客觀性：論記者在新聞實踐中的新聞客觀性展現
    Journalistic Objectivity: Discussion of News Objectivity Performance From The News Practice of Journalist
    Authors: 郭逸
    Kuo, Yi
    Contributors: 孫式文
    Sun, Se-Wen
    郭逸
    Kuo, Yi
    Keywords: 記者
    新聞客觀性
    客觀
    事實
    中立
    實用客觀性
    主動過程
    Journalist
    News objectivity
    Objectivity
    Fact
    Neutrality
    Pragmatic Objectivity
    Active Process
    Date: 2019
    Issue Date: 2019-12-06 09:23:51 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 新聞客觀性是記者產製新聞的原則，過往多為二元的解釋，也就是新聞事實與記者的個人觀點必須分開。但新聞工作環境變遷，實際在新聞工作中的新聞客觀性，已產生差異，應找出更與時俱進的解釋。本研究從記者的新聞實踐中探詢記者對新聞客觀性的展現，以Ward的實用客觀性及Maras的主動過程等新聞客觀性的概念為基底，並使用深度訪談法訪問23位記者。結果顯示，記者在產製新聞的過程中，依然保有新聞客觀性，因為記者追求更貼近事實的新聞事實；透過維持中立的解釋性媒介驅動臨場感，記者涉入新聞並使閱聽眾更感同身受；而獨家新聞和專題新聞自我掌控程度較高，更能呈現新聞客觀性；本研究主要發現在於現今記者對新聞客觀性的認知與呈現，趨於特定群眾化，已非過去講求大眾接受的解釋層次，記者產製新聞更在意閱聽眾的想法及市場導向；組織的控制和即時新聞的普及則是阻礙新聞客觀性的元兇。
    News Objectivity is the principle for journalists. The explanation for news objectivity in the past is always binary, which means the news fact should be separated from journalists’ opinions. However, the news-work environment changes, the explanation for news objectivity would be different ,and it needs to be defined more accurately. The research discusses the news objectivity performance from the news practice of journalists. The basic theory of the research is the Pragmatic Objectivity proposed by Stephen Ward and the Active Process proposed by Steven Maras. By the in-depth interview, the research interviews 23 journalists and evidence that the journalists still keep news objectivity on their work. Journalists search for the news fact closes to the actual fact as possible and keep neutrality by interpretive medium for driving the feeling of presence, aiming to make the audience feel the same feeling; furthermore, due to higher control, exclusive news and special report show more news objectivity for journalists. Most importantly, The research finds that news objectivity nowadays should be explained as specific massification, but not for the republic as always. Journalists pay more attention to the audience and make the news market-oriented. Also, the control from the company and popularization of instant news are the two main culprits for the news being lack of news objectivity.
    Reference: 王悅、李立峯（2014）。〈記者心中的角色模範及其影響初探：香港個案研究〉。《新聞學研究》，119：1-43。
    王淑美（2018）。〈網路速度與新聞—轉變中的記者時間實踐及價值反思〉。《中華傳播學刊》， 33：65-98。
    王偊菁（2016）。〈網路即時新聞對電視新聞工作之影響〉。國立政治大學傳播學院碩士在職專班碩士論文。
    李金銓（1993）。《國際傳播的挑戰與展望》。台北：時報。
    吳堂靖（2016）。〈臉書使用者的網路新聞創用—守門或分享？〉。國立政治大學新聞學系碩士論文。
    林宇玲（2018）。〈解讀美國的新聞客觀性：《客觀性在新聞》〉。《新聞學研究》，134：219-224。
    林秀雲譯（2016）。《社會科學研究方法》，臺北：雙葉書廊。（原書：Babbie, E. [2015]. The Practice of Social Research. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning US.）
    胡幼慧、姚美華（2008）。〈一些質性方法上的思考：信度與效度？如何抽樣？如何收集資料、登錄與分析〉。胡幼慧（編），《質性研究：理論、方法與本土女性研究實例》（二版）（頁223-236）。高雄市：巨流。
    施盈廷（2008）。〈線上新聞媒體的角色定位：從內容提供者到公共辯論的倡導者〉。《中華傳播學刊》，12：53-87。
    郝志東（2009）。〈媒體的專業主義和新聞工作者的角色—以2008年海祥兩岸媒體對臺灣立法委員選舉的評論、報導為例〉。《新聞學研究》，101：311-346。
    畢恆達（1996）。〈詮釋學與質性研究〉，胡幼慧（編）。《質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》。台北：巨流。
    徐佳士（1974）。〈我國報紙新聞「主觀性錯誤」研究〉。《新聞學研究》，13：3-36。
    高明慧（2007）。〈台灣電視新聞正確性之個案研究〉。國立政治大學傳播學院碩士在職專班碩士論文。
    財團法人卓越新聞獎基金會（2017）。《別對我撒謊：24篇撼動世界的調查報導。書籍簡介》，取自：https://www.feja.org.tw/31823。
    張文強（2005）。〈新聞工作的常規樣貌：平淡與熱情的對峙〉。《新聞學研究》，84：1-40。
    陳向明（2002）。《社會科學質的研究》。臺北：五南。
    陳信宏譯（2016）。《媒體失效的年代》，臺北：天下文化（原書：Jarvis, J. [2014]. Geeks bearing gifts: Imagining New Futures for News, New York: CUNY Journalism Press）。
    陳雅惠（2018）。〈傳播工具與社會資本—新聞工作者如何經營人脈？〉。中華傳播學會2018年年會論文，新竹：玄奘大學。
    陳昺麟（2001）。〈社會科學質化研究之紮根理論實施程序及實例之介紹〉。《勤益學報》，19：327-342。
    許臺軒（2018年10月25日）。《川普、假新聞夾擊 美聯社總編：事實不容妥協》。取自：https://news.tvbs.com.tw/tech/1016676。
    許馨文（2004）。《音樂聆聽經驗的意義建構：以十二個大學生聽、說歌曲〈菊花夜行軍〉為例》。中華傳播學會2004年年會論文。
    管中祥（2014年5月22日）。《管中祥：你客觀了嗎？》，取自：
    https://opinion.cw.com.tw/blog/profile/47/article/1399。
    劉平君（2011）。〈客觀真實、多元真實與超真實： 後現代社會的新聞認知〉。《傳播與社會期刊》，18：79-114。
    劉蕙苓（2014）。〈匯流下的變貌：網路素材使用對電視新聞常規的影響〉。《新聞學研究》，121：41-87。
    劉蕙苓（2018）。〈台灣記者的3L人生：數位時代的工作狀況與趕工儀式〉。《傳播與社會學刊》，43：39-71。
    閻岩、周樹華（2014）。〈媒體偏見：客觀體現和主觀感知〉。《傳播與社會期刊》，30：227-264。
    闕志儒（2011）。〈新聞客觀性是否顛撲不破？一種來自網際網路的挑戰〉。《臺大新聞論壇》，10：55-83。
    蘇蘅（2018）。〈新聞專業的新視野：媒體實踐與台灣的問題〉。《傳播文化》，17：16-51。
    Altheide D.L. (1984). Media hegemony: A failure of perspective. Public Opinion Quarterly, 48(2), 476-490.
    Boudana, S. (2011). A definition of journalistic objectivity as a performance. Media, Culture & Society, 33(3), 385-398.
    Borger, M., Van Hoof, A., Sanders, J. (2019). Exploring participatory journalistic content: Objectivity and diversity in five examples of participatory journalism. Journalism. 20(3), 444-466.
    Costera Meijer, I. (2012). Valuable journalism: A search for quality from the vantage point of the user. Journalism, 14(6), 754-770.
    Deuze, M. (2005). What is journalism? Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsidered. Journalism, 6(4), 442-464.
    Deuze, M., & Witschge, T. (2017). Beyond journalism: Theorizing the transformation of journalism. Journalism, 19(2), 165-181.
    Esser, F. & Umbricht, A. (2013). Competing models of journalism? Political affairs coverage in US, British, German, Swiss, French and Italian newspapers. Journalism, 14(8), 989-1007.
    Glaser, G. & Strauss, L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
    Hanitzsch, T., Hanusch, F., Mellado, C., Anikina, M., Berganza, R., & , Cangoz, I., Yuen, K. W. (2011). Mapping journalism cultures across nations: A comparative study of 18 countries. Journalism Studies, 12, 273-293.
    Harless, J. D. (1990) Media Ethics, Ideology, and Personal Constructs: Mapping Professional Enigmas. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 5(4), 217-32.
    Heinonen, A. (2011). The Journalist’s Relationship with Users New dimensions to conventional roles. Singer, J. B. (Ed.). Participatory journalism: guarding open gates at online newspapers. West Sussex, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
    Hindman, E. B., & Thomas, R. J. (2014). When old and new media collide: The case of WikiLeaks. New media & society, 16(4), 541-558.
    Hujanen, J. (2012). At the crossroads of participation and objectivity:
    Reinventing citizen engagement in the SBS newsroom. New Media & Society, 15(6), 947-962.
    Iggers, J. (1998). Good News, Bad News: Journalism Ethics and the Public Interest. Westview, Boulder, CO.
    Kovach, B. & Rosenstiel, T. (2001). The elements of journalism. New York: Crown.
    Lee, J. (2015). The double-edged sword: The effects of journalists` social media activities on audience perceptions of journalists and their news products. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(3), 312-329.
    Lippmann, W. (1920). Liberty and the News. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Hone.
    Maras, S. (2013). Objectivity in Journalism. Oxford, United Kingdom: Polity Press.
    Maras, S. (2013.02.25). Should journalism strive for objectivity? Available at: http://politybooks.com/should-journalism-strive-for-objectivity/
    McQuail, D. (1992) Media Performance: Mass Communication and the Public Interest. London, England: Sage.
    McQuail, D. (1994). Mass communication theory. An introduction. London, England: Sage.
    McQuail, D. (2010). McQuail’s mass communication theory. Sage Publications Limited.
    Mellado, C., Humanes, M. L., & Márquez-Ramírez, M. (2017). The influence of journalistic role performance on objective reporting: A comparative study of Chilean, Mexican, and Spanish news. International Communication Gazette, 80(3), 250-272.
    Morrison, A. & Tremewan, P. (1992) The Myth of Objectivity. In: Comrie, M. & McGregor, J. (eds.) Whose News? Dunmore Press, Palmerston North, pp. 114-132.
    Mothes, C. (2016). Biased Objectivity: An Experiment on Information Preferences of Journalists and Citizens. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(4), 1073-1095.
    Muñoz-Torres, J. R. (2012). Truth and objectivity in journalism: Anatomy of an endless misunderstanding. Journalism Studies, 13(4), 566-582.
    Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
    Overholser, G. (2006). On Behalf of Journalism: A Manifesto for Change, accessed 21 November 2011 at: http://www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/Overholser/20061011_JournStudy.pdf.
    Pandit, N. R. (1996). The creation of theory: A recent application of the grounded theory method. The qualitative report, 2(4), 1-15.
    Pressman, M. (2018.11.05). Journalistic Objectivity Evolved the Way It Did for a Reason. Available at: http://time.com/5443351/journalism-objectivity-history/
    Robinson, S., & Culver, K. B. (2019). When White reporters cover race: News media, objectivity and community (dis)trust. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 1-17.
    Ruigrok, N. (2008). Journalism of attachment and objectivity: Dutch journalists and the Bosnian War. Media, War & Conflict, 1(3), 293-313.
    Schiller, D. (1981). Objectivity and the news: The public and the rise of commercial journalism. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    Schudson, M. (1978). Discovering the news: A social history of American newspapers. New York, NY: Basic Books.
    Schudson, M. (2001). The objectivity norm in American journalism. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 2(2), 149-170.
    Shoemaker, P. J., & Reese, S. D. (1996). Mediating the Message: Theories of Influences of Mass Media Content. New York: Longman.
    Skovsgaard, M., Albæk, E., Bro, P., & de Vreese, C. (2013). A reality check: How journalists’ role perceptions impact their implementation of the objectivity norm. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 14(1), 22-42.
    Strauss, A & Corbin, J (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research：Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    Tuchman, G. (1972). Objectivity as strategic ritual – Examination of newsmens’ notions of objectivity. American Journal of Sociology, 77(4). 660-679.
    Tong, J. (2015). Being Objective With a Personal Perspective. Science
    Communication, 37(6), 747-768.
    Ward, S. J. A. (1999). Pragmatic news objectivity: Objectivity with a human face. Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics, and Public Policy, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    Ward, S. J. A. (2004). The Invention of Journalism Ethics: The Path to Objectivity and Beyond. McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal & Kingston.
    Ward, S. J. A. (2008). The handbook of mass media ethics. In Wilkins, L., & Christians, C. G. (Eds.), PRAGMATIC OBJECTIVITY (pp. 76-81). Routledge.
    Ward, S. J. A. (2017.03.17). ENGAGEMENT AND PRAGMATIC OBJECTIVITY. Available at: https://ethics.journalism.wisc.edu/2017/03/27/engagement-and-pragmatic-objectivity/
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程
    106464010
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106464010
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU201901251
    Appears in Collections:[Master`s Program in Communication] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    401001.pdf1323KbAdobe PDF2153View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback