政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/127714
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113648/144635 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51682009      線上人數 : 603
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/127714


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/127714


    題名: 論繼承股份時行使共有股份權利之爭議－以出席股東會為討論中心
    How to Exercise Rights of Stocks Succeeded by Individuals: Focusing on Issues of Attending Shareholders’ Meeting
    作者: 周振鋒
    Chou, Cheng-Fong
    貢獻者: 法律系
    關鍵詞: 股份共有;公司法第 160 條;股東權;股東會;出席定足數;全體同意;多數決;分割投票
    Co-ownership of Stocks;Article 160 of the Company Act;Stockholder Rights;Shareholders’ Meeting;Quorum;Unanimous Consent;Majority Rule;Split Voting
    日期: 2018-12
    上傳時間: 2019-12-04 14:51:00 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 股份可為數人所共有，但共有股份時應如何行使股東權利，規範上並不明確。共有股份除涉及共有人彼此間權利義務關係，亦與公司營運密切相關。近期發生爭議在於公同共有股份出席股東會性質上屬於管理股權行為抑或是行使股權行為？依照民法規定，管理行為由共有人過半數即可，惟權利行使須得全體共有人同意為之。但全體同意易生僵局，對於股東會開會定足數的滿足有不利影響。更可惜者，司法實務就此爭議見解相當分歧，且未提供令人滿意的論述。本文擬以近期發生之訴訟案件說明繼承時共有股份權利行使之爭議與產生僵局之問題，除評析司法實務見解外，並藉此探討修正現行規定之可行性，協助共有人於共有股份關係下能維護自身權益外，亦能避免僵局產生。
    As corporate stocks can be co-owned by individuals, but how they as a whole exercise the rights of stocks is unsolved under the existing body of Taiwan’s corporation law. For example, whether attending shareholders’ meeting should be regarded as managing co-owned stocks could be a legal issue. According to the Taiwan Civil Code, any behaviors of managing stocks should be invalid without co-owners’ majority consent, and there should be a unanimous consent authorizing the behaviors that substantially exercise stocks rights. However, the requirement of unanimous consent can easily result in a deadlock among co-owners, which may have adverse effect on counting attended stocks for the quorum purpose. This issue could be even worse as court opinions diverge. This article is expected to analyze the reasonableness of courts opinions and to provide proposal for future reform.
    關聯: 財金法學研究, Vol.1, No.3, pp.341-366
    資料類型: article
    顯示於類別:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML2343檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋