English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51689257      Online Users : 615
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/125806


    Title: 台灣電力市場改革過程中公平交易機制之研究:需量反應的角色
    Study on Fair-Trade Mechanism of Electricity Market Reform Process in Taiwan : The Role of Demand Response
    Authors: 楊宗霖
    Yang, Tsung-Lin
    Contributors: 許志義
    Hsu, Jyh-Yih
    楊宗霖
    Yang, Tsung-Lin
    Keywords: 需量反應
    儲能系統
    電力市場改革
    結構-行為-績效
    競爭法
    競爭違法態樣
    潛在競爭
    需量競價
    聚合商
    輔助服務
    缺電成本
    Demand Response
    Energy Storage System
    Electricity Market Reform
    Structure-Conduct-Performance
    Competition Law
    Illegal Behavior Patterns
    Potential Competition
    Demand Bidding
    Aggregator
    Ancillary Service
    Outage Cost
    Date: 2019
    Issue Date: 2019-09-05 17:08:06 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究旨在探討「需量反應」對於台灣能源轉型與電力市場改革所扮演的角色,並分析需量反應在我國電力市場改革過程中,市場行為主體可能遭遇的違反競爭法行為態樣。首先、說明需量反應之定義與發展趨勢,整理美國需量反應與儲能系統之政策法規與相關案例,提出可供台灣參考之競爭政策意涵。根據本文探討美國聯邦能源管制委員會近十年各項行政命令之結論顯示:引進以能源物聯網(energy internet)為導向的新型態與新式樣的營運模式,逐步開放潛在競爭者(如需量反應、儲能系統、虛擬電廠、微電網等之營運者)進入電力市場,成為美國聯邦能源管制機關落實公平競爭環境的一貫立場。
    接著,根據結構-行為-績效(Structure-Conduct-Performance, SCP)理論,闡述市場行為主體藉由需量反應參進市場的過程中,可能存在違反公平交易法之情事。依照我國電力市場改革的進程區分為三種市場結構,分別說明較可能發生之違反公平交易法行為態樣:(1)「單一買方模式」包括:獨占綜合電業之限制競爭行為、聚合商之不實廣告與損害營業信譽行為;(2)「批發競爭模式」包括:電網業之電力調度、配售電公司與聚合商及大用戶之水平聯合行為;(3)「零售競爭模式」包括:零售市場業者之結合、水平聯合、其他限制競爭行為(杯葛、差別待遇、低價利誘、迫使參與限制競爭、搭售)、不公平競爭行為(不實廣告、損害營業信譽)。同時,探討現行台電需量競價措施、聚合商需量反應方案是否有違反公平競爭之虞。
    最後,針對政府、台電公司、產業界、學術界、電力用戶的不同角度,提出具體建議,以建構需量反應參與台灣電力市場之公平交易機制。
    The purpose of the study is to explore the role of "demand response" in energy transition and electricity market reform, and to analyze the illegal behavior patterns faced by demand response market participant, contravening the competition law in regard to the electricity market reform in Taiwan. First, this study explained the definition and development trend of demand response, sorted out the regulations and related cases of the US demand response and energy storage system, and proposed the competition policy implications for Taiwan. According to this article, the conclusions of Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Orders for the past decade show that the introduction of emerging business model with energy internet, and the gradual opening of potential competitors (such as demand response, energy storage systems, virtual power plants, micro-grids, etc.) have become the consistent position of the energy authorities to implement a positive competitive environment.
    Then, based on Structure-Conduct-Performance (SCP) theory, the study explained that in the process of participation in the market through demand response, there might have some illegal behavior patterns contravening the Fair-Trade Act. According to the process of electricity market reform, it is divided into three market structures, which respectively explain the illegal behaviors. In single buyer model: there are some potential illegal pattern, such as restrictive competition by the vertical-integrated utility, unfair competition by aggregators. In wholesale competition model, there are some potential illegal pattern, such as power dispatch, concerted action by retailers, aggregators and large users. In retail competition model, there are some potential illegal pattern, such as merger, concerted action, other restrictive competition behaviors, and unfair competition by retailers. Simultaneously, it is necessary to discuss whether the current Taipower demand bidding and the aggregator demand response program violate the fair competition.
    Finally, specific suggestions were made for different perspectives of the government, Taipower, industry, academia and users to construct a fair-trade mechanism for demand response to participate in Taiwan electricity market.
    Reference: 一、中文文獻
    (一)圖書部分
    公平交易委員會(2006)。公處字第095142號處分書。
    公平交易委員會(2017)。認識公平交易法。台北市:公平交易委員會。
    台電公司(2017)。台電公司「用戶群代表需量反應服務採購案」招標規範。
    台電公司(2018)。台電公司「用戶群代表需量反應採購案」招標規範。
    台電公司(2018)。需量反應負載管理措施。
    台電公司(2018)。台灣電力公司永續報告書。
    汪渡村(2015)。公平交易法。台北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
    許志義、鄭欽龍、周文賢、陳澤義(1990)。台灣產業缺電成本之研究。台北市:中華經濟研究院。
    許志義、陳澤義(2003)。電力經濟學:理論與應用。台北市:華泰文化事業股份有限公司。
    陳正倉、林惠玲、陳忠榮、莊春發(2016)。產業經濟學。台北市:雙葉書廊有限公司。

    (二)期刊論文部分
    王京明(2017)。新電業法下能源轉型之風險初探。經濟前瞻,第171期,頁86~93。
    王京明、郭婷瑋、洪紹平、許志義、孫承祥(2015)。我國推動電業自由化之最適市場運作模式研究。台電工程月刊,第805期,頁61~81。
    吳進忠(2019年6月)。需量反應參與電力交易之經驗與未來展望。「2019台灣電業發展關鍵議題評析研討會」發表之簡報,集思北科大會議中心。
    許志義(2005)。論智慧財產權與競爭政策之立法取向。經濟情勢暨評論,第10卷第4期,頁64~77。
    許志義、謝嘉豪(2012)。台電需求面管理之經濟分析-用戶計劃性減少用電措施案例。台灣銀行季刊,第63卷第3期,頁53-84。
    許志義、盧姵君、楊宏澤(2014)。住宅部門需量反應電價方案之益本分析。台電工程月刊,第789期,頁48~59。
    許志義、黃鈺愷、王京明(2014)。美國電力自由化政策與法規探討:以賓澤馬及加州為焦點。台電工程月刊,第795期,頁1~15。
    許志義、吳仁傑(2014)。論電力需量反應與虛擬電廠發展趨勢。台灣經濟論衡,vol.12, no.6,頁59~83。
    許志義、盧姵君(2014)。論競爭市場電力調度之公平交易機制。公平交易季刊,第22卷第4期,頁119~140。
    許志義、王京明、黃鈺愷(2015)。我國電業自由化違反競爭法行為態樣之探討。公平交易季刊,第23卷第4期,頁1~34。
    許志義(2016)。以缺電成本訂定雙贏電價。能源資訊平台,能源簡析。
    許志義、洪穎正(2016)。電力需求面管理與用戶群代表法制革新:先進國家案例及其對台灣之政策意涵。台灣能源期刊,第3卷第2期,頁137~153。
    許志義、柳育林(2017)。從電業法修正看綠能業者發展契機。資策會產業情報研究所產業研究報告。
    許志義(2018)。善用人工智慧,發揮範疇經濟價值。哈佛商業評論,2018年11月號,頁57。
    許志義、楊宗霖(2019)。分散式綠電架構下新興產業發展契機。永續產業發展期刊,第84期,頁43~56。
    聯齊科技(2019年5月)。Ecogenie朝向智慧能源新生活。「2019台北國際電腦展(COMPUTEX TAIPEI 2019)」發表之刊物,台北世界貿易中心。

    (三)網路資源部分
    王京明(2017)。新電業法下能源轉型路漫漫!。檢自http://eip.iner.gov.tw/msn.aspx?datatype=YW5hbHlzaXM=&id=MTQ1(檢索日期2019年8月4日)
    行政院經濟部(2017)。台電攜手國際廠商首次導入用戶群代表:聚沙成塔建構虛擬電廠,目標每次降低20萬瓩用電負載。檢自https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/AE5575EAA0A37D70/3f9b1ecc-79a3-4f4f-86e6-e943fa9828d9(檢索日期2019年8月4日)
    林菁樺(2018)。台電用戶群制復活,估可減200萬度電。檢自https://ec.ltn.com.tw/article/paper/1224913(檢索日期2019年8月10日)
    陳文姿(2019)。用電旺季,比發電更划算的「需量反應」成潮流,全球前三大電力集團Enel看上台灣市場潛力。檢自https://e-info.org.tw/node/219350 (檢索日期2019年8月4日)。
    黃麗芸(2017)。台電節電新制測試未過,確定解約處理。檢自https://www.cna.com.tw/news/afe/201707310271.aspx(檢索日期2019年8月10日)
    黃漢華(2017)。台灣能源轉型邁向自主「需量反應」率先起跑。檢自https://www.gvm.com.tw/article.html?id=22770(檢索日期2019年8月10日)
    Huang, A. (2019)。台灣是缺電,還是太「浪費」電—拼命蓋電廠其實不見得有用。檢自https://www.thenewslens.com/article/98103(檢索日期2019年8月10日)
    鏡週刊(2017)。花10萬打點電價6折,台電黃牛攬客直擊。檢自https://www.mirrormedia.mg/story/20170913inv001/(檢索日期2019年8月10日)

    二、英文文獻
    Braithwait, S., Hansen, D. and Kirsch, L. (2006). Incentives and Rate Designs for Efficiency and Demand Response. Madison, Wisconsin: Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. [online] Smartgrid.gov. Available at: https://www.smartgrid.gov/files/Incentives_Rate_Design_for_Efficiency_Demand_Response_200612.pdf [Accessed 20 Jun. 2019].
    Bade, G. (2016). Updated: Supreme Court upholds FERC Order 745, affirming federal role in demand response. [online] Utility Dive. Available at: https://www.utilitydive.com/news/updated-supreme-court-upholds-ferc-order-745-affirming-federal-role-in-de/412668/ [Accessed 19 Jun. 2019].
    CPUC (2019). Final report of the California public utilities commission’s working group on load shifting. San Francisco: California Public Utilities Commission. [online] Gridworks.org. Available at: https://gridworks.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/LoadShiftWorkingGroup_report.pdf [Accessed 20 Jun. 2019].
    Faruqui, A., Hledik, R. (2018, December). Reinventing Demand Response for the Age of Renewable Energy. Paper presented at the Demand Response Trends International Expert Workshop, Taipei Taipower Building.
    FERC (2010). Order No. 676-F: Standards for Business Practices and Communication Protocols for Public Utilities. [online] Ferc.gov. Available at: https://www.ferc.gov/whats-new/comm-meet/2010/041510/E-4.pdf [Accessed 20 Jun. 2019].
    FERC (2011). Order No. 745: Demand Response Compensation in Organized Wholesale Energy Markets. [online] Ferc.gov. Available at: https://www.ferc.gov/EventCalendar/Files/20110315105757-RM10-17-000.pdf [Accessed 20 Jun. 2019].
    FERC (2011). Order No. 755: Frequency Regulation Compensation in Organized Wholesale Power Markets. [online] Ferc.gov. Available at: https://www.ferc.gov/whats-new/comm-meet/2011/102011/E-28.pdf [Accessed 20 Jun. 2019].
    FERC (2013). Order No. 676-G: Standards for Business Practices and Communication Protocols for Public Utilities. [online] Ferc.gov. Available at: https://www.ferc.gov/whats-new/comm-meet/2013/022113/E-3.pdf [Accessed 20 Jun. 2019].
    FERC (2013). Order No. 784: Third-Party Provision of Ancillary Services; Accounting and Financial Reporting for New Electric Storage Technologies. [online] Ferc.gov. Available at: https://www.ferc.gov/whats-new/comm-meet/2013/071813/E-22.pdf [Accessed 20 Jun. 2019].
    FERC (2016). Order No. 825: Settlement Intervals and Shortage Pricing in Markets Operated by Regional Transmission Organizations and Independent System Operators. [online] Ferc.gov. Available at: https://www.ferc.gov/whats-new/comm-meet/2016/061616/E-2.pdf [Accessed 20 Jun. 2019].
    FERC (2017). Assessment of Demand Response and Advanced Metering Staff Report. [online] Ferc.gov. Available at: https://www.ferc.gov/legal/staff-reports/2017/DR-AM-Report2017.pdf [Accessed 20 Jun. 2019].
    FERC (2018). Assessment of Demand Response and Advanced Metering Staff Report. [online] Ferc.gov. Available at: https://www.ferc.gov/legal/staff-reports/2018/DR-AM-Report2018.pdf [Accessed 20 Jun. 2019].
    FERC (2018). Order No. 841: Electric Storage Participation in Markets Operated by Regional Transmission Organizations and Independent System Operators. [online] Ferc.gov. Available at: https://www.ferc.gov/whats-new/comm-meet/2018/021518/E-1.pdf [Accessed 20 Jun. 2019].
    Gheorghiu, I. (2019). Tesla, others question storage hourly requirements, charges in FERC Order 841 compliance plans. [online] Utility Dive. Available at: https://www.utilitydive.com/news/tesla-others-question-storage-hourly-requirements-charges-in-ferc-order-8/548315/ [Accessed 19 Jun. 2019].
    Haffner, R., Batura, O., Ryszka, K. and Bergen, K. (2017). Competition policy and an internal energy market. Brussels: European Parliament. [online] Europarl.europa.eu. Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2017/607327/IPOL_STU(2017)607327_EN.pdf [Accessed 20 Jun. 2019].
    ISO New England (2018). ISO Newswire - Updates - Price-responsive demand explained: Q&A with Henry Yoshimura, ISO Director of Demand Resource Strategy. [online] Isonewswire.com. Available at: http://isonewswire.com/updates/2018/6/6/price-responsive-demand-explained-qa-with-henry-yoshimura-is.html [Accessed 19 Jun. 2019].
    Liu, S. (2012, November). System Flexibility for Integrating 33% Renewable Generation in California ISO. Paper presented at the Clean Energy Regulatory Forum Workshop 4, Pennsylvania. [online] Cleanskies.org. Available at: http://www.cleanskies.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/ShuchengLiu_CERF4_11092012.pdf [Accessed 20 Jun. 2019].
    Martini, P. (2013). DR2.0: A Future of Customer Response. [online] S3.amazonaws.com. Available at: https://s3.amazonaws.com/fonteva-customer-media/00Do0000000Yi66EAC/DR%202.0%20A%20Future%20of%20Customer%20Response.pdf [Accessed 20 Jun. 2019].
    Renaud, J. and Lin, V. (2016). Demand Response. [online] Asmag.com.tw. Available at: https://www.asmag.com.tw/seminar/2016manage/download/%E6%9E%97.pdf [Accessed 3 Jul. 2019].
    St. John, J. (2019). San Diego Gas & Electric Hits Snag in California Microgrids Rollout. [online] Greentechmedia.com. Available at: https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/san-diego-gas-electric-faces-challenge-to-microgrid-rollout?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Issue%3A+2019-05-29+Utility+Dive+Load+Management+%5Bissue%3A21148%5D&utm_term=Utility+Dive%3A+Load+Management&fbclid=IwAR15R8USyA0qFcvtKSN1SvLCDH8y5cfDs8xkpqA8V6AXsOME82TZ0G4JZ4c#gs.jibu3d [Accessed 19 Jun. 2019].
    Utility Dive. (2018). MISO plans storage market roles in response to FERC Order 841. [online] Available at: https://www.utilitydive.com/news/miso-plans-storage-market-roles-in-response-to-ferc-order-841/529996/ [Accessed 19 Jun. 2019].
    Walton, R. (2018). New England fully integrates demand response into wholesale markets. [online] Utility Dive. Available at: https://www.utilitydive.com/news/new-england-fully-integrates-demand-response-into-wholesale-markets/525233/ [Accessed 19 Jun. 2019].
    Walton, R. (2018). MISO previews storage changes, enacts five-minute energy market settlements. [online] Utility Dive. Available at: https://www.utilitydive.com/news/miso-previews-storage-changes-enacts-five-minute-energy-market-settlements/531034/ [Accessed 19 Jun. 2019].
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    經濟學系
    106258002
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106258002
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU201900631
    Appears in Collections:[經濟學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    800201.pdf4879KbAdobe PDF2130View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback