政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/125020

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/125020

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文筆數/總筆數 : 113822/144841 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51769331 線上人數 : 529

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜尋範圍

查詢小技巧：

您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果

若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料

進階搜尋

主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手機版

政大機構典藏 > 外國語文學院 > 英語教學碩士在職專班 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/125020

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/125020

題名:	對比隱性教學及顯性教學探究字彙學習: 廣泛閱讀對國小學生字彙學習之影響 Implicit or Explicit? Exploring Effects of Extensive Reading on Taiwanese Primary Students’ Vocabulary Learning
作者:	周孟薇 Chou, Meng-Wei
貢獻者:	劉怡君 Liu, Yi-Chun 周孟薇 Chou, Meng-Wei
關鍵詞:	內隱學習外顯學習廣泛閱讀字彙學習詞彙知識 implicit learning explicit learning extensive reading vocabulary learning vocabulary knowledge
日期:	2019
上傳時間:	2019-08-07 17:02:56 (UTC+8)
摘要:	字彙學習是學習語言中重要的關鍵，而學習者字彙量也影響了在閱讀文本中理解量的多寡。許多字彙教學方式中，以內隱學習方式 (implicit learning) 和外顯學習方式 (explicit learning) 為兩大主要的教學方向。本研究目的是探究透過廣泛閱讀中閱讀分級讀本的方式和外顯學習方式對EFL國小學童字彙學習的影響。主要的研究方向有: (1) 廣泛閱讀是否能改善EFL國小學童的字彙學習 (2) 廣泛閱讀在字彙學習中可以提供哪方面的詞彙知識 (3) 學生的語言程度內隱學習方式及外顯學習方式是否有關連性及影響。研究對象為臺中市某國小兩班五年級學生，實驗前先進行前測，其中控制組班級以外顯學習方式為主，實驗組班級則以外顯學習和內隱學習一起進行為期四個月的課程。最後，透過成對樣本t檢定及後測結果探討學習方式的成效。資料來源包含學生字彙成績測驗、問卷。研究結果有下列幾點: 第一，透過廣泛閱讀，能有效加強字彙學習。第二，語言程度較弱的學生接受廣泛閱讀後，在字彙認知性知識(receptive knowledge) 和操作性知識 (productive knowledge) 較其他組學生有明顯進步。第三，內隱學習方式對於語言程度較弱，但願意花時間閱讀的學生，語言學習上有明顯的進步。此研究結果也建議教學者能融入廣泛閱讀在課室教學中。透過繪本閱讀加強字彙的學習，也同時加深學生對單字的應用，提升學習的成效。此外，本研究結果亦提供英語教師教學上的參考及未來研究方向的建議。 Vocabulary learning plays an important role in language learning. Students’ vocabulary size influences their reading comprehension. In vocabulary learning, implicit learning and explicit learning are the two major approaches. The purpose of the present study aims to explore the effect of EFL students’ vocabulary learning through implicit instructions and explicit instructions. The study attempts to answer three research questions: (1) Does extensive reading improve EFL students’ vocabulary learning? (2) What can extensive reading afford students’ vocabulary learning? (3) How does learners’ language proficiency relate to their implicit and explicit vocabulary learning? In this study, the participants of the study were two classes of fifth-grade elementary school students in Taichung City. First, all the students took the pretest. Then, the controlled group received the explicit instructions in class while the experimental group received both the explicit and implicit instructions in four-month period. Last, the post-tests and Paired Sample t-test were administered to analyze the learning effectiveness. The multiple data were collected including vocabulary pretests and posttests, surveys. The results reveal that 1) extensive reading is effective to vocabulary learning. 2) extensive reading enhances low language proficiency students’ receptive knowledge and productive knowledge. 3) implicit learning has a positive influence on the low proficiency students. The findings of the study suggest that integrating extensive reading into classroom activities enhances not only receptive knowledge of vocabulary learning but also productive knowledge of vocabulary application. Furthermore, pedagogical implications and suggestions for future studies were provided as well.
參考文獻:	Abolghasem, M. (2015). The effect of explicit versus implicit teaching on Iranian EFL learners’ vocabulary knowledge. International Journal of English language, literature and translation studies,2 (3) Anderson, R. C., Shirey, L. L., Wilson, P. T., and Fielding, L. G. (1987). Interestingness of children`s reading material. In Snow, R. E., and Farr, M. J. (eds.), Aptitude, Learning, and Instruction: Vol. III. Cognitive and Affective Process Analyses, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 287–299. Anderson, R. C., Wilson, P. T., & Fielding, L. G. (1988). Group Reading and How Children Spend Their Time outside of School. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 285-303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.23.3.2 Ahmad, N.Marzieh, M. & Afshin, S. (2015). Explicit and implicit learning in vocabulary acquisition. Asian Journal of Education and e-Learning (ISSN: 2321 – 2454) Volume 03 – Issue 01 Al-Homoud, F., & Schmitt, N. (2009). Extensive reading in a challenging environment: A comparison of extensive and intensive reading approaches in Saudi Arabia. Language Teaching Research, 13(4), 383–401. Cameron, Lynee. (2001). Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chen, H. J. (1998). Second language vocabulary learning strategies – a preliminary investigation of Chinese EFL learners. The proceedings of the seventh international symposium on English teaching, 1, 219-230. Cho, K.-S. and Krashen, S. (1994). Acquisition of vocabulary from the Sweet Valley Kids series: adult ESL acquisition. Journal of Reading, 37, 662–667. Day, R. R., & Bamford, J. (1998). Extensive reading in the second language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Day, R. R., & Bamford, J. (2002). Top ten principles for teaching extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 14, 136–141 Dilek Karakoça, Gül DurmuĢoğlu Köseb.(2017). The impact of vocabulary knowledge on reading, writing and proficiency scores of EFL learners. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(1), 352-378 Ellis, N. C. (1994b). Introduction: implicit and explicit language learning – an overview. In Ellis, Nick (ed.). Implicit and explicit learning of languages. London etc.: Academic Press, 1-31. Ellis, N. C. (1994c). Vocabulary acquisition: the implicit ins and outs of explicit cognitive mechanisms. In Ellis, Nick (ed.). Implicit and explicit learning of languages. London etc.: Academic Press, 211-282. Grabe, William. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly. 25 (3): 375-406. Grabe, W. & Stoller, F. (1997). Reading and vocabulary development in a second language: A case study. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition (pp. 98-122). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Grabe, W. & Stoller, F. (2002). Teaching and researching reading. Harlow, UK: Longman. Gass, S. (1999).Incidental vocabulary learning: Discussion. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21,3 ,19-333 Gu, Y., & Johnson, R. K. (1996). Vocabulary learning strategies and language learning outcomes. Language Learning. 46 (4), 643 – 79. Harmer, J. (1991). The Practice of English Language Teaching. New York : Longman. Hayashi, K. (1999). Reading strategies and extensive reading in EFL classes. RELC Journal. 30. 114-132. Horst, M. (2005). Learning L2 vocabulary through extensive reading: A measurement study. Canadian Modern Language Review. 61(3), 355–382. Huckin, T., & Coady, J. (1999). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: A review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 181-193. Hulstijn, Jan H. (2001). Intentional and incidental second language vocabulary learning: a reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal and automaticity. In Robinson, Peter (ed.). Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge: C.U.P., 258-287. Hunt, A. and Beglar, D. (2005) A Framework for Developing EFL Reading Vocabulary. Reading in a Foreign Language, 17, 23-59. Khamesipour, M. (2015). The effects of explicit and implicit instruction of vocabulary through reading on EFL learners` vocabulary development. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(8), 1620-1627. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0508.11 Kojic-Sabo, I., & Lightbown, P. M.(1999).Students’ approaches to vocabulary learning and their relationship to success. The Modern Language Journal, 83(2), 176-192. Krashen, S. (1984). Writing: Research, Theory and Applications. Beverly Hills: Laredo Krashen, S. D. (1989). We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the Input Hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal, 73(4), 440-464. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb05325.x. Lao, C. Y. & Krashen, S. (2000). The impact of popular literature study on literacy development in EFL: more evidence for the power of reading. System, 28, 261-270. Laufer, B., & Sim, D. D. (1985). Taking the easy way out: Non-use and misuse of contextual clues in EFL reading comprehension. English Teaching Forum, 23, 7–10, 22 Laufer, B. (1989). ‘What percentage of lexis is essential for comprehension’, in Lauren, C. and Nordman, M. (eds), From Humans Thinking to Thinking Machines. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 316–23. Liu, N. & Nation, I. S. P. (1985). Factors affecting guessing vocabulary in context. RELC Journal, 16, 33-42. Loucky, J. P. (2003). Enhancing students` English reading and vocabulary skills using CALL innovations. Seinan Women`s University, Tandai Kiyo, 49. Marzban, A., & Kamalian, K. (2013). Effects of implicit versus explicit vocabulary instruction on intermediate EFL learners` vocabulary knowledge. ELT Voice, 3(6), 84-95 Mostafa, M. (2012). Implicit Vs. Explicit Vocabulary Learning: Which Approach Serves Long-term Recall Better? The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies – Vol 18(2): 1 – 12 Nagy, W. E., Herman, P. A., & Anderson, R. C. (1987). Learning word meanings from context during normal reading. American Educational Research Journal, 24, 237-270. Nagy, W. & Herman, F`. (1987). Breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge: Implications for acquisition and instruction. In Mckeown, M., & Curtis, M. (eds), The nature of vocabulary acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. (pp 19-35). Nation, P. & Waring, R. (1997). Vocabulary size, texts coverage and word lists. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy, eds. Vocabulary : Description, acquisition and pedagogy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 6–19. Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. Paribakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. B. (1997). Vocabulary enhancement activities and reading for meaning in second language vocabulary development. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy (pp.174-200). New-York: Cambridge University Press. Pigada, M., & Schmitt, N. (2006). Vocabulary acquisition from extensive reading: A case study. Reading in a Foreign Language, 18(1), 1–28. Rashidi, N., & Ganbari Adivi, A. (2010). Incidental Vocabulary Learning Through Comprehension Focused Reading of Short Stories. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning Year 53 No. 217. Reber, A. S. (1976). Implicit learning of synthetic languages: The role of instructional set. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 88-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.2.1.88 Richards, J.C., & Rodgers, T.S.(2001). Approach and methods in language teaching: A description and analysis. Cambridge, London: Cambridge University. Richard, J.C. & Schmidt, R. (Eds.). (2002). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (3rd ed.). London: Longman. Schmitt, N. (2008). Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language teaching research, 12(3), 329. Wallace, C. (2008). Vocabulary: The Key to Teaching English Language Learners to Read. Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 36-39. Yugandhar, Dr. K. (2016). Content-theme-based instruction to increase the quality of EFL class. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL), 8(4), 86-90. Zimmerman, C. (1997). Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition: A Rationale for Pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
描述:	碩士國立政治大學英語教學碩士在職專班 104951013
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104951013
資料類型:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/NCCU201900605
顯示於類別:	[英語教學碩士在職專班] 學位論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
101301.pdf	1882Kb	Adobe PDF2	131	檢視/開啟

在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回饋