政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/124859

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/124859

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51702778 Online Users : 550

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Scope

please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results

please goto advance search for comprehansive author search

Adv. Search

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

Goto mobile version

政大典藏 > College of Science > Department of Psychology > Theses > Item 140.119/124859

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/124859

Title:	癌症病人術前憂慮量表之編製與心理計量特性 Development and Psychometric Properties of the Preoperative Cancer Patient’s Worry Scale (PCPWS)
Authors:	李昀芷 Li, Yun-Jhih
Contributors:	吳治勳 Wu, Chih-Hsun 李昀芷 Li, Yun-Jhih
Keywords:	憂慮癌症病人手術前生活品質 Worry Cancer Patients Preoperative period Quality of life
Date:	2019
Issue Date:	2019-08-07 16:33:22 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	研究背景：憂慮（worry）為「人們面對不確定且包含一個或多個負向結果之問題時可能啟動之內在心理問題解決的嘗試」。由於癌症病人幾乎均會經歷不確定的治療過程，憂慮應為病人診斷至治療過程常見之經驗。而診斷至治療前常被認為較具壓力，應為臨床介入之良好時間點,然目前卻少有適用於此重要時期之癌症病人憂慮相關評估工具。研究方法：本研究重新整理癌症病人憂慮相關量表及臨床實務經驗，編製「癌症病人術前憂慮量表（Preoperative Cancer Patient’s Worry Scale, PCPWS）」。研究參與者來自北部某醫學中心，共有 348 位入院接受腫瘤切除手術之癌症病人，其中乳癌病人 173 位（皆為女性），頭頸癌病人 175 位（男性 140 人、女性 35 人）。病人於手術前一天入院時填寫 PCPWS 量表、情緒壓力、害怕情緒評估,以及術後 1、3、6 個月追蹤填寫生活品質評估量表。研究結果：本研究編製之 PCPWS 共有 12 個題項，探索性因素分析結果顯示具有「社會角色（5 題）」與「疾病負擔（6 題）」兩因素，而「6. 經濟問題」未屬任一因素，各因素皆具良好內部一致信度（Cronbach’s α = .88 與.87）驗證性因素分析亦顯示本量表之二因素結構（χ2 = 86.82、RMSEA = .07、SRMR = .03、GFI =.96、CFI = .98）具有良好之建構效度。PCPWS 亦具有良好之同時性效標關聯效度，「社會角色」、「疾病負擔」分別與「情緒壓力（r = .52, p < .01；r = .67, p < .01）」、「害怕情緒（r = .54, p < .01;r = .70, p < .01）」具顯著正相關；以及良好之預測性效標關連效度，不論是否控制情緒壓力或害怕情緒，乳癌病人（55 人）術前之「社會角色」均能預測術後 3 個月之生理與心理範疇的生活品質；而頭頸癌病人（36 人）術前之「社會角色」則能顯著預測術後 1 個月社會與環境範疇的生活品質。討論與結論：整體而言，本研究編製之 PCPWS 具有良好之信效度，可作為臨床上術前評估癌症病人憂慮之工具。本研究參與者在「疾病負擔」的擔心程度顯著高於「社會角色」（t = 15.59, p < .001），但「社會角色」對術後生活品質則有較穩定的預測。此結果可能反應出癌症病人雖然在「疾病負擔」上有較高的憂慮，但是對「社會角色」的憂慮，反而對後續之生活品質有較佳的預測力，顯示在臨床上應多關注病人在術前「社會角色」部份的擔心。然而由於完成完整追蹤的人數較少，故本研究較難以對 PCPWS如何預測生活品質的歷程/原因有較完整的推論，此部份需有待後續相關研究之補足。 Background: Worry represents “an attempt to engage in mental problem-solving on an issue whose outcome is uncertain but contains the possibility of one or more negative outcomes.” Due to the uncertainty of the disease and following treatments, cancer patients usually experienced “worry”. However, there were few measurements to evaluate worry in the preoperative period, which had been found one of the most stressful time for patients and maybe an effective phase for intervention. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to develop a “Preoperative Cancer Patient’s Worry Scale (PCPWS)”. Methods: Three hundred and forty-eight cancer patients, 173 breast cancer patients (all female) and 175 head and neck cancer patients (140 males, and 35 females), who admitted to the medical center for operation were included in the study. Participants were asked to fill the PCPWS and distress thermometer one day before surgery, and followed up by WHOQOL at 1, 3, and 6 months after the surgery. Results: Results of the exploratory factor analysis showed that the PCPWS is composed of two factors “social role (5-items)” and “disease burden (6-items)”, both factors had good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α= .88 and.87). The results of the confirmatory factor analysis also showed the PCPWS had good construct validity. As to criterion-related validity, “social role” and “disease burden” both had significant positively relations with emotional distress and fear measures supported the PCPWS had good concurrent validity. The significant predictions of the “social role” to the physical and the mental QOL at three months after operation in breast cancer patients, and to the social and the environmental QOL at one month after operation in head and neck cancer patients supported a good predictive validity. Discussion and Conclusion: In conclusion, the PCPWS has good psychometrics properties and is a suitable instrument to evaluate worry in cancer patients during the preoperative period in clinical settings. Although participants were worrier in “disease burden” than in “social role” (t = 15.59, p < .001), but “social role” was a better predictor to QOL after surgery. These results reflected that although cancer patients did worry more about their “disease burden”, but worries in their “social role” was a stronger predictor to their QOL afterwards. Thus, it is important for us to attend to patients’ “social role” worries during the pre-operative period. However, due to the relatively small sample size, the process from “social role” worries to QOL remain unclear. Future study is needed to further clarify the process.
Reference:	邱皓政（2006）。量化研究與統計分析（基礎版）：SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。台北：五南。姚開屏（2001）。台灣簡明版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷之發展及使用手冊。台北：世界衛生組織生活品質問卷台灣版問卷發展小組。鄧閔鴻（2010）。廣泛性焦慮疾患的心理病理：病態憂慮、注意偏誤、與憂慮的後設認知（博士論文）。取自：http://dx.doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2010.00289 鄧閔鴻、吳翠殷、張素凰、侯育銘（2015）。臺灣版賓州憂慮量表的因素結構與心理計量特性。中華心理衛生學刊，28，521-568。 Boehnke, K., Schwartz, S., Stromberg, C., & Sagiv, L. (1998). The Structure and Dynamics of Worry: Theory, Measurement, and Cross-National Replications. Journal of Personality, 66(5), 745-782. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00031 Bowling, A. (2001). A Review of Disease-Specific Quality of Life Measurement Scales. Philadelphia: Open University Press. Calman, K. C. (1984). Quality of life in cancer patients — an hypothesis. Journal of Medical Ethics, 10(3), 124-127. doi:10.1136/jme.10.3.124 Carli, F., Gillis, C., & Scheede-Bergdahl, C. (2017). Promoting a culture of prehabilitation for the surgical cancer patient. Acta Oncologica, 56(2), 128-133. doi:10.1080/0284186X.2016.1266081 D`Errico, G. M., Galassi, J. P., Schanberg, R., & Ware, W. B. (2000). Development and validation of the Cancer Worries Inventory. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 17(3-4), 119-137. doi:10.1300/J077v17n03_07 Davey, G. C. L. (1994). Pathological worrying as exacerbated problem-solving. In G. C. L. Davey & F. Tallis (Eds.), Worrying: Perspectives on theory, assessment and treatment. (pp. 35-55). Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons. Davey, G. C. L. (2006). A mood-as-input account of perseverative worrying. In G. C. L. Davey & A. Well (Eds.), Worry and its psychological disorders: Theory, assessment and treatment (pp. 217-237). Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons. Davey, G. C. L., Hampton, J., Farrell, J., & Davidson, S. (1992). Some characteristics of worrying: Evidence for worrying and anxiety as separate constructs. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(2), 133-147. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(92)90036-O Dugas, M. J., Schwartz, A., & Francis, K. (2004). Brief report: Intolerance of uncertainty, worry, and depression. Cognitive Therapy Research, 28(6), 835-842. doi:10.1007/s10608-004-0669-0 Eysenck, M. W. (1984). Anxiety and the worry process. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 22(6), 545-548. doi:10.3758/bf03333903 Herschbach, P., Berg, P., Dankert, A., Duran, G., Engst-Hastreiter, U., Waadt, S., . . . Henrich, G. (2005). Fear of progression in chronic diseases: Psychometric properties of the Fear of Progression Questionnaire. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 58(6), 505-511. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.02.007 Herschbach, P., Keller, M., Knight, L., Brandl, T., Huber, B., Henrich, G., & Marten-Mittag, B. (2004). Psychological problems of cancer patients: A cancer distress screening with a cancer-specific questionnaire. British Journal of Cancer, 91(3), 504-511. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6601986 Hirai, K., Shiozaki, M., Motooka, H., Arai, H., Koyama, A., Inui, H., & Uchitomi, Y. (2008). Discrimination between worry and anxiety among cancer patients: Development of a Brief Cancer-related Worry Inventory. Psycho-Oncology, 17(12), 1172-1179. doi:10.1002/pon.1348 Holaway, R. M., Rodebaugh, T. L., & Heimberg, R. G. (2006). The Epidemiology of Worry and Generalized Anxiety Disorder. In G. C. L. Davey & A. Well (Eds.), Worry and its psychological disorders: Theory, assessment and treatment (pp. 3-19). Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons. Hu, L. t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118 Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Kline, R. B. (2011). Data Preparation. In D. L. Todd (Ed.), Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (pp. 46-73). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Koerner, N., & Dugas, M. J. (2006). A cognitive model of Generalized Anxiety Disorder: The role of intolerance of uncertainty. In G. C. L. Davey & A. Well (Eds.), Worry and its psychological disorders: Theory, assessment and treatment (pp. 201-216). Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons. Meeten, F., & Davey, G. C. L. (2011). Mood-as-input hypothesis and perseverative psychopathologies. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(8), 1259-1275. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2011.08.002 Mitchell, A. J., Baker‐Glenn, E. A., Granger, L., & Symonds, P. (2010). Can the Distress Thermometer be improved by additional mood domains? Part I. Initial validation of the Emotion Thermometers tool. Psycho‐Oncology: Journal of the Psychological, Social Behavioral Dimensions of Cancer, 19(2), 125-133. doi:10.1002/pon.1523 Mitchell, A. J., Baker‐Glenn, E. A., Park, B., Granger, L., & Symonds, P. (2010). Can the Distress Thermometer be improved by additional mood domains? Part II. What is the optimal combination of Emotion Thermometers? Psycho‐Oncology: Journal of the Psychological, Social Behavioral Dimensions of Cancer, 19(2), 134-140. doi:10.1002/pon.1557 National Comprehensive Cancer Network. (2019). NCCN Practice Guidelines in Oncology—V. 3.2019, Distress Management. Retrieved from https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/distress.pdf Parker, P. A., Pettaway, C. A., Babaian, R. J., Pisters, L. L., Miles, B., Fortier, A., . . . Cohen, L. (2009). The effects of a presurgical stress management intervention for men with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 27(19), 3169-3176. doi:10.1200/JCO.2007.16.0036 Roemer, L., Orsillo, S. M., & Barlow, D. H. (2013). Generalized anxiety disorder. In D. H. Barlow (Ed.), Anxiety and its disorders: The nature and treatment of anxiety and panic. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Roth, A. J., Kornblith, A. B., Batel-Copel, L., Peabody, E., Scher, H. I., & Holland, J. C. (1998). Rapid screening for psychologic distress in men with prostate carcinoma. Cancer, 82(10), 1904-1908. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980515)82:10<1904::Aid-cncr13>3.0.Co;2-x Sarafino, E. P., & Smith, T. W. (2014). Health psychology: Biopsychosocial interactions. USA: John Wiley & Sons. Sibrava, N. J., & Borkovec, T. D. (2006). The cognitive avoidance theory of worry. In G. C. L. Davey & A. Wells (Eds.), Worry and its psychological disorders: Theory, assessment and treatment (pp. 239-256). Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons. Simard, S., Thewes, B., Humphris, G., Dixon, M., Hayden, C., Mireskandari, S., & Ozakinci, G. (2013). Fear of cancer recurrence in adult cancer survivors: A systematic review of quantitative studies. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 7(3), 300-322. doi:10.1007/s11764-013-0272-z Simonelli, L. E., Siegel, S. D., & Duffy, N. M. (2017). Fear of cancer recurrence: A theoretical review and its relevance for clinical presentation and management. Psycho‐Oncology, 26(10), 1444-1454. doi:10.1002/pon.4168 Szabó, M., & Lovibond, P. F. (2002). The cognitive content of naturally occurring worry episodes. Cognitive Therapy Research, 26(2), 167-177. doi:10.1023/a:1014565602111 Tallis, F., Davey, G. C. L., & Bond, A. (1994). The Worry Domains Questionnaire. In G. C. L. Davey & F. Tallis (Eds.), Worrying: Perspectives on theory, assessment and treatment. (pp. 286-297). Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons. Tallis, F., Davey, G. C. L., & Capuzzo, N. (1994). The phenomenology of non-pathological worry: A preliminary investigation. In G. C. L. Davey & F. Tallis (Eds.), Worrying: Perspectives on theory, assessment and treatment. (pp. 61-89). Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons. van Rijsoort, S., Emmelkamp, P., & Vervaeke, G. (1999). The Penn State Worry Questionnaire and the Worry Domains Questionnaire: Structure, reliability and validity. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy: An International Journal of Theory & Practice, 6(4), 297-307. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0879(199910)6:4<297::AID-CPP206>3.0.CO;2-E Vickberg, S. M. J. (2001). Fears about breast cancer recurrence: Interviews with diverse sample. Cancer Practice, 9(5), 237-243. doi:10.1046/j.1523-5394.2001.009005237.x Vickberg, S. M. J. (2003). The Concerns About Recurrence Scale (CARS): A systematic measure of women`s fears about the possibility of breast cancer recurrence. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 25(1), 16-24. doi:10.1207/S15324796ABM2501_03 Wang, G. L., Hsu, S. H., Feng, A. C., Chiu, C. Y., Shen, J. F., Lin, Y. J., & Cheng, C. C. (2011). The HADS and the DT for screening psychosocial distress of cancer patients in Taiwan. Psycho‐Oncology, 20(6), 639-646. doi:10.1002/pon.1952 Waters, E. A., Liu, Y., Schootman, M., & Jeffe, D. B. (2012). Worry about cancer progression and low perceived social support: Implications for quality of life among early-stage breast cancer patients. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 45(1), 57-68. doi:10.1007/s12160-012-9406-1 Wells, A. (2006). The metacognitive of worry and General Anxiety Disorder. In G. C. L., Davey. & A. Well (Eds.), Worry and its psychological disorders: Theory, assessment and treatment (pp. 179-199). Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons. Yao, G., Chung, C. W., Yu, C. F., & Wang, J. D. (2002). Development and verification of validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan version. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, 101(5), 342-351.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學心理學系 104752021
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104752021
Data Type:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/NCCU201900421
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Psychology] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
202101.pdf	1750Kb	Adobe PDF2	66	View/Open

All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - Feedback