政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/124660
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113822/144841 (79%)
造访人次 : 51770625      在线人数 : 539
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/124660


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/124660


    题名: 審計委員會自願性設置與審計委員會品質、公司績效及企業價值之關聯性研究
    The Effect of Audit Committee Voluntary Formation on Audit Committee Quality, Corporation Performance, and Firm Value
    作者: 段立安
    Tuan, Li-An
    贡献者: 林宛瑩
    段立安
    Tuan, Li-An
    关键词: 審計委員會
    公司績效
    企業價值
    Audit Committee
    Corporation Performance
    Firm Value
    日期: 2019
    上传时间: 2019-08-07 15:53:45 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 自2006年證券交易法將審計委員會設置納入法律規範以來，金融監督管理委員會採取漸進式方式逐年擴大獨立董事及審計委員會之強制設置，並於2022年底涵蓋所有上市(櫃)公司。本研究欲探討於政府政策推行強制設置下，審計委員會設置性質不同是否產生審計委員會品質、企業價值及公司績效上之落差，以瞭解制度下審計委員會實際運作情形及影響性。
    本文以2010至2017年台灣上市(櫃)公司為研究對象，探討審計委員會設置性質之不同對審計委員會品質、企業價值及公司績效之影響。實證結果發現，自願性設置審計委員會之公司相較於強制設置者有較高之審計委員會品質。此外，實證結果亦顯示審計委員會設置性質之不同對企業價值及公司績效有不同之影響。自願性設置審計委員會之公司除有較高之審計委員會品質外，其企業價值亦較高；而非自願性設置(強制設置)者則審計委員會設置對企業價值有顯著負向之影響。在公司績效上，實證研究有不同於企業價值之研究結果。於未區分審計委員會設置性質下，審計委員會設置對公司績效有負向顯著之影響。在區分審計委員會設置性質下，審計委員會自願性設置有較小之負向影響；而強制設置者則其設置有較顯著之負向影響。
    Since Securites and Exchange Act involed the formation of audit committee in 2006, the Financial Supervisory Commission in Taiwan have expanded the scope of regulations on establishments of audit committee. Based on the enlarging scope of regulations, extended to all listed companies by 2022, and the increasing attentions on audit committee, this study attempts to examine whether differences exist on the quality of audit committees who established it voluntarily or not, and connects the different formation of audit committee to their impacts on firm value and corporation performance.
    Using listed companies in Taiwan as the sample from 2010 to 2017, this research is aimed at finding relationship among the different formations of audit committee and their influences. The empirical results indicate that the audit committee of companies voluntarily adopting it have higher qualities. Besides, these audit committees have significantly positive effects on their firm value. However, the audit committee of companies unvoluntarily formed it haves significantly negative effects. Otherwise, the results show that the formation of audit committee has significantly negative effect on corporation performance. By dividing the formations of audit committees, the results indicate that the voluntary formation may reduce its negative effects and the unvoluntary foarmation may aggravate the effects.
    參考文獻: 中文文獻
    李合龍與戴凱平，2014，審計委員會特性與企業價值之關聯性，商業現代化學刊，第七卷，第四期：319-336。
    李建然、廖秀梅與張卉瑜，2016，審計委員會設置及其品質對公司價值的影響，中華會計學刊，第十二卷，第二期：231-265。
    李建然、廖秀梅與蔡佳育，2016，上市櫃公司自願設置審計委員會及審計委員會品質之決定因素，當代會計，第一期：1-34。
    邱士芳，2017，淺談回台上市實務系列：關於審計委員會與監察人，富拉凱投資銀行小草文摘電子報，第三期。
    洪芳潔，2014，審計委員會之設立及品質對分析師預測之影響，國立成功大學會計研究所碩士論文。
    陳家偉，2009，由企業成長機會與代理衝突分析獨立董事兼任與公司績效之相關性，財務金融學刊，第十七卷，第四期：123-151。
    游博凱，2012，審計委員會特性對公司經營績效與資訊揭露品質之影響，國立臺中科技大學會計資訊系會計與財稅碩士班碩士論文。
    張晉源與林有志，2011，企業選擇設置審計委員會之經濟性決定因素，高苑學報，第十七卷，第二期：55-69。
    蘇誌翔，2017，自願性設置審計委員會及其品質與內部控制缺失之影響，國立臺中科技大學會計資訊系會計與財稅碩士班碩士論文。
    蘇裕惠、楊孟萍與許聖偉，2018，公司增加獨立董事席次及設置審計委員會與盈餘品質之研究－法規擴大強制範圍之影響，當代會計，第二期：241-268。
    英文文獻
    Beasley, M. S., and S. E. Salterio. 2001. The relation between board characteristics and voluntary improvements in audit committee composition and experience. Contemporary Accounting Research 18 (4): 539-570.
    Baxter, P. 2010. Factors associated with the quality of audit committees. Pacific Accounting Review 22 (1): 57-74.
    Collier, P. 1993. Factors affecting the formation of audit committees in major UK listed companies. Accounting and Business Research 23 (91A): 421-430.
    Chung, K. H. 1994. A Simple Approximation of Tobin`s q. Financial Management 23 (3): 70-74.
    Collier, P., and A. Gregory. 1999. Audit committee activity and agency costs. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 18 (4-5): 311-332.
    Carcello, J. V., and T. L. Neal. 2003. Audit committee characteristics and auditor dismissals following “new” going-concern reports. The Accounting Review 78 (1): 95-117.
    Chan, K. C., and J. Li. 2008. Audit committee and firm value: Evidence on outside top executives as expert-independent directors. Corporate Governance: An International Review 16 (1): 16-31.
    Fan, J. P. H., and T. J. Wong. 2002. Corporate Ownership Structure and the Informativeness of Accounting Earning in East Asia. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33 (3): 401-425.
    Gaur, S. S., H. Bathula, D. Singh. 2015. Ownership concentration, board characteristics and firm performance. Management Decision 53 (5): 911-931.
    Greco, G. 2011. Determinants of board and audit committee meeting frequency. Managerial Auditing Journal 26 (3): 208-229.
    Jensen, M. C., and M. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4): 305-360.
    Jensen, M. C. 1993. The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems. Journal of Finance 48 (3): 831-880.
    Klein, A. 1998. Firm Performance and Board Committee Structure. The Journal of Law and Economics 41 (1): 275-304.
    Klein. 2002. Economic Determinants of Audit Committee Independence. Accounting Review 77 (2): 435-452.
    Khan, A., S. Tanveer , and U. Malik. 2016. An empirical analysis of corporate governance and firm value: Evidence from KSE-100 Index. Accounting 3 (2): 119-130.
    Lipton, M., and J. W. Lorsch. 1992. A Modest Proposal for Improved Corporate Governance. The Business Lawyer 48 (1): 59-77.
    Lukas, Y. S. 2009. Governance Mechanisms and Firm Value: The Impact of Ownership Concentration and Dividends. Corporate Governance: An International Review 17 (6): 694-709.
    Menon, K., and J. D. Williams. 1994. The use of audit committees for monitoring. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 13 (2): 121-139.
    Raghunandan, K., and D. V. Rama. 2007. Determinants of audit committee diligence. Accounting Horizons 21 (3): 265-279.
    Rainsbury, E. A., M. E. Bradbury, and S. F. Cahan. 2008. Firm characteristics and audit committees complying with “best practice” membership guidelines. Accounting and Business Research 38 (5): 393-408.
    Sharma, V., V. Naiker, and B. Lee. 2009. Determinants of audit committee meeting frequency: Evidence from a voluntary governance system. Accounting Horizons 23 (3): 245-263.
    Sharma, V. D., and E. R. Iselin. 2012. The association between audit committee multipledirectorships, tenure, and financial misstatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 31 (3): 149-175.
    Tanyi, P. N., and D.B. Smith. 2015. Busyness, Expertise, and Financial Reporting Quality of Audit Committee Chairs and Financial Experts. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 34 (2): 59-89.
    Trotman, A. J., and K. R. Duncan. 2018. Internal Audit Quality: Insights from Audit Committee Members, Senior Management, and Internal Auditors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 37 (4): 235-259.
    Yermack, D. 1996. Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics 40 (2): 185-211.
    Yin, F., S. Gao, W. Li, and H. Lv. 2012. Determinants of audit committee meeting frequency: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Managerial Auditing Journal 27 (4): 425-444.
    Yang S., and X. Ren. 2017. Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor Shareholdings and Corporate Operating. Canadian Public Policy 43 (2): 99-106.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    106353027
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106353027
    数据类型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU201900524
    显示于类别:[會計學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    302701.pdf969KbAdobe PDF20检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈