政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/124455
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 114401/145431 (79%)
造訪人次 : 53135311      線上人數 : 716
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/124455


    題名: 論通訊保障及監察法第18條之1第3項的證據排除規定
    The Exclusionary Rule in the Communication Security and Surveillance Act
    作者: 李榮耕
    貢獻者: 法學評論
    關鍵詞: 通訊監察;監聽;違法通訊監察;違法監察;證據排除;核心地位規定
    Communication Surveillance;Interception;Unlawful Communication Surveillance;Unlawful Interception;The Exclusionary Rule of Evidence;Central-Role Provision
    日期: 2019-03
    上傳時間: 2019-07-24 16:07:09 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 為了促使偵查機關遵循通訊保障及監察法的各樣法定程序，立法者於該法中制定有證據排除的規定。該條的規範模式與刑事訴訟法的類似規定相當不同，是以特定條文的違反為適用的要件。這樣的立法方式，同時有著涵蓋過廣及過窄的問題。亦即，並不是所有第5條或第6條所規定所有的事項或程序，都應有證據排除規定的適用，該二條以外的條文也不當然就沒有適用證據排除規定的需要。在參考美國的立法例後，我們的建議是，通訊保障及監察法的證據排除規定應以「通訊監察違法」為要件。再者，在判斷是否構成違法的通訊監察時，可以借鏡美國聯邦最高法院於Giordano案及Chavez案所建立的雙階審查理論，決定是否排除所取得的通訊內容。
    In order to make the law enforcement complies with the procedureset by the Communication Security and Surveillance Act (CSSA), thelegislators enacted a provision with respect to the exclusionary rule ofevidence in that act. Only if the police force is in violation of art. 5 or 6,the exclusionary rule in the CSSA applies, which is different from thesimilar provision in the Criminal Procedure Code. Therefore, theexclusionary rule in the CSSA has two issues: over-coverage and undercoverage.Not all violation of those requirements in art. 5 and 6 shouldbe applied by the exclusionary rule. In addition, the aforementioned ruleshould apply to violation of certain provisions other than art. 5 and 6.After referring to the legal framework of the United States, it isrecommended that the exclusionary rule of the CSSA should be revised.The said rule should apply when the interception is unlawful. Moreover,according to the two-level test established by Giordano and Chavez,courts should look into whether the violated provision plays a central role in the communication surveillance law, and then determine whetherthe police substantially disobey the provision at issue. If so, theviolation constitutes unlawful interception and the exclusionary ruleapplies.
    關聯: 法學評論, 156, 261-311
    資料類型: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/ 10.3966/102398202019030156004
    DOI: 10.3966/102398202019030156004
    顯示於類別:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    79.pdf595KbAdobe PDF2242檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋