政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/124433
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 114900/145937 (79%)
造訪人次 : 54005039      線上人數 : 675
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/124433


    題名: 論警察危害防止與刑事追訴的分與合
    Discussion on Police Deterrence of Danger and Litigation of Criminal
    作者: 陳英淙
    Chen, Ying-Chung
    貢獻者: 法學評論
    關鍵詞: 危害防止;刑事追訴;警察雙重功能措施;整捆措施;司法行政處分;縮短程序之即時強制;直接強制
    Deterrence of Danger;Litigation of Criminal;Dual Functions of Police;Massnahmenbuendel;Administrative Act on Judicial;Immediate Coercion;Direct Compulsory
    日期: 2017-12
    上傳時間: 2019-07-24 16:01:44 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 行政權與司法權係兩個獨立且相互制衡的運轉機制，警察既隸屬於內政部，復又必須接受檢察官的指揮偵查，故警察任務與職權分屬行政與司法性質乃勢所必然，本文首先探討其危害防止和刑事追訴的本質。再者，行政權與司法權的界限，在警察行使職權時，卻呈現出判斷上及分類上的困難，是為警察雙重功能措施，需予以辨明，此屬於分的層次；反之，刑事訴訟法卻出現「得使用強制力，不得逾越必要程度」的字眼，遭到有否符合法治國明確性原則的質疑，又強制力的種類、強制執行的其他要件，均有深究的必要，這屬於合的範疇。本文於討論上述問題時，均分別指出我國法律制定上、及法律概念上值得商榷之處，並提出判準之道；最後，於文末簡評兩則案例加以印證。
    Executive power and judicial power are two independent mechanisms that check and balance each other under the concept of the separation of powers. While the police is subordinate to the Ministry of Interior, according to the Code of Criminal Procedure, it is subject to the investigations of prosecutors. In this research, the nature of deterrence of danger on executive power and litigation of criminal on judicial power are first discussed. Due to the diverse nature of both executive power and judicial power, difficulties on judgment and classification often occur when the police exercise their power. Hence, the dual functions of police should be clarified to resolve the conflicts. However, the Code of Criminal Procedure states that ＂... may be arrested by force ..., but such force may not be excessive.＂ The statement has attracted criticism due to its relatively ambiguous definition which violates the principle of clarity of a Legal state. In addition, it is necessary to clarify the different types of force as well as other essential conditions regarding the forced exercise of law. This research aims to discuss the nature of task and duty of police on administration and judicature, the discrimination and combination on deterrence of danger, and the litigation of criminal. Several guidelines on the legislation of law as well as legal concept in Taiwan are also addressed in this research. Two cases studies are further provided to validate the argument stated in this research.
    關聯: 法學評論, 151, 91-150
    資料類型: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/ 10.3966/102398202017120151002
    DOI: 10.3966/102398202017120151002
    顯示於類別:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    57.pdf1712KbAdobe PDF2273檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋