政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/124239
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113822/144841 (79%)
造访人次 : 51777821      在线人数 : 616
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/124239


    题名: 國際社會對於分離運動與民族自決之態度差異:以克里米亞與科索沃為例
    Different Attitude in International Community toward Separatism and National Self-Determination: Cases of Crimea and Kosovo
    作者: 莊令暘
    Chuang, Ling-Yang
    贡献者: 趙竹成
    蘇卓馨

    莊令暘
    Chuang, Ling-Yang
    关键词: 民族自決權
    獨立運動
    新現實主義
    新自由主義
    Self-determination
    Independent movement
    Neorealism
    Neoliberalism
    日期: 2019
    上传时间: 2019-07-01 11:08:34 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 美國前總統威爾遜在第一次世界大戰後提出民族自決權的概念,主旨在於每個族群都擁有不受他者干涉下自由決定其政治地位的權利,是天賦人權的延伸與高尚表現;然而,後續至近代的發展中,聯合國的決議、獨立風潮下各國的實踐、國際法院與各國法院的判決,均針對民族自決權創設了不少執行者的附加條件,許多進行獨立運動的族群在過程中也因此被視為分離主義而遭到武力鎮壓。國際間的行為者對於民族自決權的應用與獨立運動之實踐往往有不同的反應,筆者希望藉著探討近代以來最具代表性的科索沃及克里米亞案例,將美國、俄羅斯等強權對於不同獨立運動的態度差異做出比較,並從中找尋其判斷標準。
    本文的文獻蒐集與討論包含民族自決權之發展沿革、公投對於獨立運動之必要性與有效性、剖析科索沃與克里米亞案例衝突成因、兩案例過程與現行國際法是否牴觸、國際社會主要國家之態度歧異等層面,最終總結得出,在民族自決權方面的國際建制依據國際機構決議、國家實踐、各層級法院之判例後仍對其定義曖昧不明.而另一方面,國家給予獨立運動民族的承認,基於各個條件相似的案例卻呈現出國家矛盾的決策,顯示國際關係仍回到現實主義、叢林法則的利益考量;至於新自由主義所提倡的國際建制之規範作用,筆者發現唯有具備承受違反國際法成本的能力,該國才會與其正面衝突,反之則不然。
    The right to self-determination was after the first World War proposed by former American president, Woodrow Wilson. Its subject, which was derived from the concept of natural rights, expresses that people should possess the right to freely determine their international political status without interference. However, development in past decades, including resolutions of United Nations, practices of nations, judgements of ICJ and national courts, have been imposing limitations and conditions upon this right. Thus, many ethnic groups attempting to become independent have been considered separatism and forcibly suppressed. Actors in international society have been differently reacting toward implementation of the right to self-determination and national practices. Therefore, the author looks forward to scrutinizing the iconic cases of Crimea and Kosovo, and analyzes attitudinal differences between United States, Russian, and other strong powers. By doing so, it can be possible to summarize the criteria of decisions made by these nations.
    Data gathered and analyzed in this thesis include the development of the right to national self-determination, the effectiveness and necessity of plebiscites, the fundamental causes of these two cases, violations of international laws, and different attitude of strong powers. In conclusion, international regimes concerning the right to national self-determination are still unspecific. It sums up that the paradox of national acknowledgement in different cases represents international relations still resorts to supremacy of interests, derived from realism. As for international regimes promoted by neoliberalism, it turns out only countries that are capable of affording the costs would dare to confront them.
    參考文獻: 一、中文文獻
    專書
    Neuman, W. L.,朱柔若譯,(2000),社會研究方法-質化與量化取向,臺北:揚智
    Robert D. Kaplan,林添貴譯,(2017),地理的復仇:一觸即發的區域衝突、劃疆為界的地緣戰爭,剖析地理與全球布局終極關鍵,臺北:麥田
    丘宏達著,陳純一修訂,(2012),現代國際法,臺北:三民書局
    丘宏達編輯,陳純一助編,(1996),現代國際法參考文件,臺北:三民書局
    包宗和,(2011),國際關係理論,臺北,五南書局
    施正鋒等人(主編),(2014),動亂中的烏克蘭,臺北:翰蘆
    洪泉湖等人(主編),(2017),當代歐洲民族運動:從蘇格蘭獨立公投到克里米亞危機,臺北市:聯經
    倪世雄,(2010),當代國際關係理論,臺北:五南書局
    張亞中、左正東,(2011),國際關係總論(第三版),新北市:揚智
    程顥,(2015),國際公法,臺北:新保成
    蔡育岱,(2010),國際關係之理論與實際,臺北:鼎茂圖書
    期刊、論文
    石忠山(2008),民族自決旗幟下之權力競逐─試論德國在科索沃獨立中之角色,台灣國際研究季刊,第4卷第3期,頁119-142
    吳志中,(2008),從法國看科索沃的獨立以及對台灣的啟示,台灣國際研究季刊,第4卷第3期,頁87-118
    施正鋒,(2017),由民族自決權看台灣的主權取得,台灣國際研究季刊,第13卷第1期,頁1-53
    高英茂,(2015),俄國兼併克里米亞的國際政治及意涵,台灣國際研究季刊,第11卷第2期,頁177-184
    許菁芸、宋鎮照,(2013),地緣政治與國家主權的關係研究-以車臣和科索沃獨立省思臺海兩岸問題,政治學報,第56期,頁55-78
    郭秋慶,(2015),歐洲聯盟對烏克蘭的政策,台灣國際研究季刊,第11卷第2期,頁1-19
    陳牧民,(2008),由國際社會承認新國家之經驗看美國承認科索沃獨立,台灣國際研學會主辦「科索沃獨立之觀察與分析座談會」(二),頁1-13
    陳牧民,(2008),美國為何承認科索沃獨立,台灣國際研究季刊,第4卷第3期,頁19-33
    曾怡仁、吳政嶸,(2009),密特蘭尼的功能主義國際關係理論─一種比較的觀點,台灣國際研究季刊,第5卷第4期,頁143-167
    廖福特,(2010),國際法院認定科索沃人民宣布獨立不違法的國際法意涵,新世紀智庫論壇,第51期,頁29-39。
    劉文斌,(2006),科索沃獨立運動之困境,問題與研究,第45卷第5期,頁91-110
    鄭瑞耀,(1997),國際關係「新自由制度主義」理論之評析,問題與研究,第36卷第12期,頁1-22
    賴怡忠,(2008),中國面對科索沃獨立的尷尬處境,台灣國際研究季刊,第4卷第3期,頁67-85。
    顏建發,(2015),烏克蘭危機與中國的戰略處境和選擇,台灣國際研究季刊,第11卷第2期,頁51-72。
    碩博士學位論文
    何溢恩,(2014),中共對人道主義干涉政策研究:以科索沃與利比亞衝突為例,國立政治大學東亞研究所碩士學位論文
    周建宏,(2016),俄羅斯兼併克里米亞-地緣政治的視角,國立政治大學俄羅斯研究所碩士學位論文
    楊天立,(2012).論安理會決議之法律效力,國立政治大學外交研究所碩士學位論文
    蕭巧怡,(2004),俄羅斯聯邦與車臣問題,國立臺灣大學社會科學院政治學系碩士學位論文
    謝介豪,(2012),2008年俄羅斯對南奧塞梯衝突之決策:一個理性決策模式分析,國立臺灣大學社會科學院政治學系碩士學位論文
    網路資源
    王梅玲,比較研究(Comparative research),上網日期2018/9/11,檢自http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1679273/
    台灣獨立建國聯盟,國際法上的公民投票問題,上網日期2018/2/20.檢自 https://www.wufi.org.tw/%E5%9C%8B%E9%9A%9B%E6%B3%95%E4%B8%8A%E7%9A%84%E5%85%AC%E6%B0%91%E6%8A%95%E7%A5%A8%E5%95%8F%E9%A1%8C/
    法源法律網,國際法院規約(民國34年06月26日),上網日期2018/2/19,檢自https://www.lawbank.com.tw/treatise/lawrela.aspx?lsid=FL017741&ldate=19450626&lno=1
    阿波蘿新聞網,科索沃宣布獨立事件,上網日期2019/3/21.檢自https://tw.aboluowang.com/2008/0219/75329.html
    美國之音,中菲國際仲裁案與經典案例(2):尼加拉瓜訴美國案,上網日期2019/4/8.檢自https://www.voacantonese.com/a/us-nicaragua-20160617/3383569.html
    報導者,加泰隆尼亞獨立公投後,留下難解僵局,上網日期2018/2/20.檢自https://www.twreporter.org/a/opinion-catalonia-vote-for-independent?fbclid=IwAR0Zv-rIiHeF_QTJQ43fhfXRcBg37KFjYfXc5VTUOz5a_e7gN9L-QOkQ5c4
    新華澳報,關於自決權的“內外劃分學說”及其評析(上), 上網日期2018/2/20.檢自http://waou.com.mo/detail.asp?id=63068

    二、英文文獻
    專書
    Baldwin, David A. (1993). Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. New York: Columbia University Press.
    Bereday, George Z. F. (1964). Comparative method in education. New York : Holt, Rinehart and Winston
    Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Division of Intercourse and Education. (1914) Report of the International Commission to Inquire into the Causes and Conduct of the Balkan War. Washington, D.C.: The Endowment
    Carr, Edward Hallett .(1964). The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. 450th ed. edition. New York: Harper Perennial.
    Damrosch, L. F. (2009). International law: Cases and materials. St. Paul, MN: West.
    Henry H. Perritt, Jr (2010). The Road to Independence for Kosovo: A Chronicle of the Ahtisaari Plan. New York: Cambridge University Press
    Kaczorowska, A. (2004). Public international law: 150 leading cases. London: Old Bailey Press.
    Keohane, R. O. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press
    Keohane, R. O. (1989). International institutions and state power: essays in international relations theory. Boulder: Westview Press.
    Keohane, R. O. (1993). Neorealism and its critics. New York: Columbia University Press.
    Keohane, R. O. (2002). Power and Governance in a Partially Globalized World. New York: Routledge.
    Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (2011). Power and interdependence (4th ed., Longman Classics in Political Science). Pearson.
    Krasner, S. D. (1983). International regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    Kuzio, T. (2007). Ukraine - Crimea - Russia: Triangle of conflict. Stuttgart: Ibidem-Verlag.
    Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The tragedy of Great Power politics. New York: Norton.
    Morgenthau, Hans Joachim (1978). Politics among nations: the struggle for power and peace. New York: Knopf
    Sakwa, R. (2015). Frontline Ukraine: Crisis in the Borderlands. I.B. Tauris
    Waltz, Kenneth (1979). Theory of international politics. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
    Weller, M. (2009). Contested statehood: Kosovos struggle for independence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    期刊、論文
    Doyle, M. (1986). Liberalism and World Politics. The American Political Science Review, 80(4), 1151-1169.
    Doyle, M. (2005). Three Pillars of the Liberal Peace. The American Political Science Review, 99(3), 463-466.
    Ikenberry, G. John. (2018). “The End of Liberal International Order?” International Affairs 94 (1), 7–23.
    Lake, David A. (2011). “Why ‘Isms’ Are Evil: Theory, Epistemology, and Academic Sects as Impediments to Understanding and Progress.” International Studies Quarterly 55 (2), 465–480.
    Malcolm, N. (1998). Kosovo: Only Independence Will Work. The National Interest, (54), 23-26
    網路資源
    b92, Putin: If Kosovo could do it, so could Crimea, Retrieved March 31, 2019, from https://www.b92.net/eng/news/world.php?yyyy=2016&mm=01&dd=11&nav_id=96651
    Balkan Insight, Bitter Memories of Kosovo’s Deadly March Riots, Retrieved March 12, 2019, from https://balkaninsight.com/2015/03/17/bitter-memories-of-kosovo-s-deadly-march-riots/
    Balkan Insight, Putin Says Kosovo Precedent Justifies Crimea Secession, Retrieved March 31, 2019, from https://balkaninsight.com/2014/03/18/crimea-secession-just-like-kosovo-putin/
    BBC, Arab Uprisings, Retrieved September 11, 2018, from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-12813859
    BBC, Catalonia crisis: Spain moves to suspend autonomy, Retrieved March 13, 2019, from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-41678086
    BBC, Crimea annexation: Putin admits sanctions `damaging`, Retrieved April 4, 2019, from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-31945962
    BBC, Crimea referendum: What does the ballot paper say?, Retrieved March 29, 2019, from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26514797
    BBC, EU splits on Kosovo recognition, Retrieved September 20, 2018, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7249909.stm
    BBC, Russia`s Crimea plan detailed, secret and successful, Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26644082
    BBC, Serbia and Kosovo react to ICJ ruling, Retrieved March 19, 2019, from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-10733676
    BBC, Serbia and Kosovo react to ICJ ruling, Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-10733676
    BBC, Serbia recalls ambassador from US, Retrieved September 20, 2018, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7251802.stm
    BBC, Ukraine crisis: Putin signs Russia-Crimea treaty, Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26630062
    BBC, Ukraine crisis: Russia and sanctions, Retrieved April 4, 2019, from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26672800
    BBC, Ukraine protests after Yanukovych EU deal rejection, Retrieved March 29, 2019, from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-25162563
    Be In Kosovo, COUNTRIES THAT HAVE RECOGNIZED KOSOVO AS AN INDEPENDENT STATE, Retrieved February 28, 2019, from http://www.beinkosovo.com/countries-that-have-recognized-kosovo-as-an-independent-state/
    CNN, U.S., other powers kick Russia out of G8, Retrieved September 11, 2018, from https://edition.cnn.com/2014/03/24/politics/obama-europe-trip/index.html
    CNN, Ukraine Fast Facts, Retrieved March 30, 2019, from https://edition.cnn.com/2014/02/28/world/europe/ukraine-fast-facts/index.html.
    EADaily, Косовские сербы надеются только на чудо или на Бога Подробнее, Retrieved March 11, 2019, from https://eadaily.com/ru/news/2018/12/21/kosovskie-serby-nadeyutsya-tolko-na-chudo-ili-na-boga
    EUobserver, EU sanctions add to Putin`s Crimea headache, Retrieved April 4, 2019, from https://euobserver.com/foreign/126986
    EUobserver, Merkel: Comparing Crimea to Kosovo is `shameful`, Retrieved September 11, 2018, from https://euobserver.com/foreign/123454
    European Council, Conclusions on Ukraine, Retrieved April 4, 2019, from https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/141707.pdf
    European Union, EU sanctions against Russia over Ukraine crisis, Retrieved April 4, 2019, from https://europa.eu/newsroom/highlights/special-coverage/eu-sanctions-against-russia-over-ukraine-crisis_en
    Europeanwesternbalkans, Russia uses the Serbia-Kosovo dispute to assert its influence in the Western Balkans, Retrieved March 21, 2019, from https://europeanwesternbalkans.com/2018/10/30/russia-uses-serbia-kosovo-dispute-assert-influence-western-balkans/
    General Assembly, 1960, 1514(XV). Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples, Retrieved September 11, 2018, from http://www.un-documents.net/a15r1514.htm
    General Assembly, 1970, 2625 (XXV). Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, Retrieved September 11, 2018, from http://www.un-documents.net/a25r2625.htm
    GOV.UK, Foreign Secretary welcomes Kosovo ruling, Retrieved March 21, 2019, from https://www.gov.uk/government/news/foreign-secretary-welcomes-kosovo-ruling
    International Court of Justice(ICJ). Accordance with international law of the unilateral declaration of independence in respect of Kosovo (Request for Advisory Opinion) , Retrieved September 11, 2018, from https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/141
    Lamer, C.J. and L’Heureux‑Dubé, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin, Iacobucci, Major, Bastarache and Binnie JJ., 1998, Reference re Secession of Quebec Retrieved September 11, 2018, from https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/1643/index.do
    Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law [MPEPIL], Åland Islands, Retrieved February 19, 2019, from http://opil.ouplaw.com/abstract/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1884?rskey=oFihQD&result=1&prd=OPIL
    NATO Review, Sanctions after Crimea: Have they worked?, Retrieved April 4, 2019, from https://www.nato.int/DOCU/review/2015/Russia/sanctions-after-crimea-have-they-worked/EN/index.htm
    Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, OHCHR, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Retrieved February 19, 2019, from https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/cescr.aspx
    Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, OHCHR, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Retrieved February 19, 2019, from https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx
    Panorama, France calls for all nations to recognize Kosovo, Retrieved March 20, 2019, from https://www.panorama.am/en/news/2010/07/23/france/1075644
    Republic of Kosovo Assembly, Comprehensive Proposal for the Kosovo Status Settlement, Retrieved February 19, 2019, from http://www.unmikonline.org/regulations/2001/reg09-01.htm
    Reuters, Crimean parliament votes unanimously to become part of Russia-RIA, Retrieved March 21, 2019, from https://uk.reuters.com/article/ukraine-crisis-vote/crimean-parliament-votes-unanimously-to-become-part-of-russia-ria-idUKL6N0M31W620140306
    Reuters, Serbia recalls ambassador after U.S. recognizes Kosovo, Retrieved February 19, 2019, from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-kosovo-serbia-envoy-idUSL1888220320080218
    Reuters, Serbia signs strategic energy deal with Russia, Retrieved March 21, 2019, from https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-russia-serbia-idUKL2515142420080125
    Reuters, Ukrainian court sentences ex-president Yanukovich to 13 years in prison, Retrieved March 30, 2019, from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ukraine-crisis-yanukovich-idUSKCN1PI27B.
    SpiegelOnline, World Reaction Split on Kosovo Independence, Retrieved March 20, 2019 from http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/europe-s-latest-country-world-reaction-split-on-kosovo-independence-a-535935.html
    The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica, Fourteen Points UNITED STATES DECLARATION, Retrieved September 11, 2018, from https://www.britannica.com/event/Fourteen-Points
    The Guardian, Crimean coup is payback by Putin for Ukraine`s revolution, Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/feb/28/vladimir-putin-crimean-coup-russia-ukraine
    The Guardians, Serbia and Kosovo sign historic agreement, Retrieved March 12, 2019, from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/apr/30/serbia-kosovo-historic-agreement-brussels
    The Moscow Times, Obama Extends Sanctions Against Russia, Citing Threat to `National Security`, Retrieved April 4, 2019, from https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2015/03/04/obama-extends-sanctions-against-russia-citing-threat-to-national-security-a44433
    The Moscow Times, Trump Extends U.S. Sanctions Against Russia Over Crimea, Retrieved April 4, 2019, from https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2019/03/05/trump-extends-us-sanctions-against-russia-over-crimea-a64711
    The New York Times, Kosovo Declares Its Independence From Serbia, Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/18/world/europe/18kosovo.html
    The New York Times, Russia Responds to Western Sanctions With Import Bans of Its Own, Retrieved April 4, 2019, from https://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/08/world/europe/russia-sanctions.html
    The United States Department of Justice, CONSTITUTION OF UKRAINE, Retrieved March 29, 2019, from https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/eoir/legacy/2013/11/08/constitution_14.pdf
    The White House, Executive Order -- Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Ukraine, Retrieved April 4, 2019, from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2014/03/06/executive-order-blocking-property-certain-persons-contributing-situation
    UNIAN, Another Russian military involved in attack on Ukraine`s naval boats identified (Photo), Retrieved April 23, 2019, from https://www.unian.info/society/10375380-another-russian-military-involved-in-attack-on-ukraine-s-naval-boats-identified-photo.html
    UNMIK, UNITED NATIONS RESOLUTION 1244, Retrieved March 15, 2019, from https://unmik.unmissions.org/united-nations-resolution-1244
    UNMIK, UNMIK/REG/2001/9, Retrieved February 1, 2019, from http://www.unmikonline.org/regulations/2001/reg09-01.htm
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    外交學系
    106253025
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106253025
    数据类型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU201900038
    显示于类别:[外交學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    302501.pdf2421KbAdobe PDF217检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈