English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51629985      Online Users : 565
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/124114
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/124114


    Title: 稅務訴訟中法官背景對訴訟結果影響之研究
    The study on the effects of judges` social background on tax litigation outcome
    Authors: 林至容
    Lin, Chih-Jung
    Contributors: 陳明進
    Chen, Ming-Chin
    林至容
    Lin, Chih-Jung
    Keywords: 社會背景
    納稅者權利保護法
    Social background
    Taxpayer Right Protection Act
    Date: 2019
    Issue Date: 2019-07-01 10:42:18 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文以最高行政法院105年至107年營利事業所得稅案件判決書,探討我國稅務訴訟中法官的社會背景對訴訟結果之影響。實證結果顯示,法官之社會背景確實對上訴人勝訴率有所影響。此外,納稅者權利保護法的通過及施行亦對上訴人勝訴率產生正向影響,確實達到當初立法之目的與精神。最後,經分析納保法通過後之判決書,發現稅務專庭各庭間產生顯著差異,上訴人可能因此面臨不同之訴訟結果。
    This paper examines how judges’ social background influence the tax litigation outcome. By collecting verdicts of corporate income tax in supreme administrative court from 2016 to 2018, the empirical result illustrates that judges’ social background are significantly related to the corporate income tax litigation. In addition, the enforcement of the Taxpayer Right Protection Act substantially enhances the probability of winning rate, which achieve the initial purpose of the law. Finally, we find that the specialized tax courts have differences between themselves, causing the appellants undertaking unstable risk of the litigation outcome inevitably.
    Reference: 王全三、廖珮真與林敬偉,2010,訴訟代理人專業背景對所得稅訴訟案件的影響,台大管理論叢,第20卷第2期:173-207。
    王金壽與魏宏儒,2011,法官的異議與民主可問責性,政大法學評論,第119期:41-45。
    林秀鳳、陳岳鴻,2016,一視同仁?法官專業化對稅務訴訟代理人訴訟績效之影響,中華會計學刊,第12卷第1期:1-42。
    陳清秀,2010,推計課稅之研討,台灣法學雜誌公法特刊,第195-215頁。
    陳清秀,2017,納稅者權利保護法對稅務訴訟審理之影響(上),植根雜誌,第33卷第11期:417-440。
    黃士洲、簡銀瑩與林世銘,2014,官官相護?訴訟當事人身分影響稅務訴訟結果之初步證據,台大管理論叢,第25卷第1期:185-214。
    葛克昌,2011,租稅法發展專題回顧:近年來行政法院判決之分析,台大法學論叢,第40卷第S期:1907-1944。
    葛克昌,2017,未施行前納保法應否適用,稅務旬刊,第2377期:24-25。
    葛克昌與馮嵩崴,2018,事實審可否提出反證推翻推計—最高行政法院107年度判字第6號判決,月旦裁判時報,第76期:41-46。
    蔡孟彥,2017,納稅者權利保護法施行後爭點主義之研討,月旦裁判時報,第65期:79-93。
    Ashenfelter, O., T. Eisenberg, and S. J.Schwab. 1995. Politics and the judiciary: The influence of judicial background on case outcomes, Journal of Legal Studies, 24(2) : 257-281.
    Collins, P.M. Jr., K. L. Manning, R. A. Carp. 2010. Gender, critical mass, and judicial decision making, Law and Policy, 32(2): 260-281.
    Edwards, W. 1961. Behavioral decision theory, Annual Review of Psychology, 12:473-498.
    Howard, R.M. 2005. Comparing the decision making of specialized courts and general courts: an exploration of tax decisions, The Justice System Journal, 26(2): 135-148.
    Langevoort, D. C. 1998.Behavioral theories of judgment and decision making in legal scholarship: A literature review, Vanderbilt Law Review,51(6): 1499-1540.
    Schneider, D. M. 2005. Using the social background model to explain who wins federal appellate tax decisions: Do less traditional judges favor the taxpayer? Virginia Tax Review, 25(1): 201-249.
    Simon, H.A.1959. Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science, The American Economic Review, 49 (6): 253-183
    Steffensmeier, D., and C. Herbert. 1999. Women and men policymakers: Does the judge`s gender affect the sentencing of criminal defendants, Social Forces, 77 (3): 1163-1196.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    106353103
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106353103
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU201900051
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    310301.pdf1923KbAdobe PDF2139View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback