政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/124040
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51713788      Online Users : 707
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/124040


    Title: 從媒體範例評價看中國大陸新聞改革中的範式轉變
    Journalistic Paradigm Shift in China`s Media Reforms: Evidence from Media Exemplar Evaluations
    Authors: 潘忠黨
    Pan, Zhong-Dang
    陳韜文
    Chan, Joseph Man
    Contributors: 新聞學研究
    Keywords: 大陸新聞改革;新聞專業主義;新聞範式;媒體範例
    Mainland China media reforms;journalistic professionalism;journalistic paradigm;media exemplar
    Date: 2004-01
    Issue Date: 2019-06-27 13:26:47 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 作者分析了2002年對中國新聞從業者和新聞專業學生的問卷調查數據。結果顯示，受新聞改革和傳媒全球化的影響，「黨的新聞事業」和「專業主義新聞」這兩大新聞範式在中國新聞從業者當中並存。前者表現為新聞人員對黨的喉舌的稱許，後者更多地表現對西方主流媒體的讚揚；前者體現於新聞人員強調媒體的對民宣講、為民說話方面的功能，後者更多地體現為他們強調媒體的信息擴散功能；與前者相關的是新聞人員希望加強黨的宣傳工作及官方的新聞理論等方面的訓練，與後者相關的是他們希望加強廣博的人文教育。不同的新聞範式影響之下，新聞人員對改革過程中出現的新型媒體也有不同的評價。這些實證觀察在4種不同樣本中都存在，體現了新聞範式的一些基本特徵，即內部統一、廣泛共享、對思維和判斷的規範作用等。本文並探討了這些實證結果對我們理解新聞範式、新聞專業主義、全球化和中國新聞改革過程的意義。
    This paper reports findings from the 2002 surveys of China`s journalists and journalism students. It shows that, under the influences of media reforms and media globalization, two journalistic paradigms, ”party journalism” and ”professional journalism,” now co-exist among China`s journalists. While the former is associated with praises for the Party organs, the latter has complements for the western media; while the former is rooted in emphasizing the media`s policy explanations and popular advocacy roles, the latter is built upon the idea of the media as a disseminator; while the former is related to its emphasis on training in party propaganda policies and the official journalism theories, the latter tends to favor the teaching of a broad liberal arts education. These competing paradigms are also found to influence how journalists evaluate innovative media outlets that have emerged during the reforms. These observations reveal some basic characteristics of journalistic paradigms: an internally coherent configuration, broadly-shared ideas, and a structuration of adherents` reasoning and judgments. The implications of the findings for the understanding of journalistic paradigms, professionalism, globalization, and China`s media reforms are also discussed.
    Relation: 新聞學研究, 78, 1-43
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[Mass Communication Research] Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    941.pdf2201KbAdobe PDF2158View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback