English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 114014/145046 (79%)
Visitors : 52053275      Online Users : 530
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/123121


    Title: 歷史制度論的方法立場與理論建構
    The Characteristics of Theory and Method in Historical Institutionalism
    Authors: 黃宗昊
    Huang, Tsung-Hao
    Contributors: 問題與研究
    Keywords: 新制度論;歷史制度論;理性選擇理論;質化研究;量化研究
    new institutionalism;historical institutionalism;rational choice theory;qualitative research;quantitative research
    Date: 2010-09
    Issue Date: 2019-04-23 09:16:54 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 歷史制度論是一問題意識、方法立場與理論建構三者緊密結合的學派。研究者始自經驗的問題意識，欲解答大問題與真實世界的難題，並由此引導出特定的方法立場與理論建構模式。在方法立場上，歷史制度論者同意質化研究的「因果過程模式」，並運用比較方法進行系統性、脈絡性的歷史過程分析。但歷史制度論者並未拘泥於質化方法的基本教義，面對量化陣營的質疑，反而持開放的立場並提出多元的回應方式。在理論建構上，歷史制度論者具有「中程理論」的共識，並從整體觀點和權力途徑探討制度運作，能結合不同「變」與「常」的成分，發展出各種有效解釋歷史過程的制度變遷模式，不致如理性選擇制度論般，對於長期歷史過程的分析流於線性、簡化。
    As a school, historical institutionalism integrates research agenda, theory and method as a whole. Researchers in this field intend to answer ”big questions” and to solve real-world puzzles, inducing specific characteristics in their theory and method. In aspect of method, historical institutionalists agree on ”causal process model” in the qualitative researches and analyze historical process systematically with the comparative method. Facing the challenge from quantitative researchers, historical institutionalists are not constrained by the fundamentalism of qualitative research and offer plural responses. In aspect of theory, historical institutionalists have consensus on ”mid-range theory” and analyze institutions from holism and power approach. They combine elements of ”continuity” and ”change” to develop various patterns of institutional change explaining the historical process effectively. Their patterns are not similar to the model of rational choice institutionalism, which is too linear and simplistic.
    Relation: 問題與研究, 49(3), 145-176
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[問題與研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    395.pdf1803KbAdobe PDF2370View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback