English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51781724      Online Users : 605
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/123051


    Title: 評「論國際關係理論中的建構主義」
    Review of “On Constructivism in International Relations Theory”
    Authors: 黃旻華
    Huang, Min-Hua
    Contributors: 問題與研究
    Keywords: 建構主義;科學實存論;第三次大辯論;國際關係理論
    constructivism;scientific realism;the third debate;; international relations theory
    Date: 2000-11
    Issue Date: 2019-04-15 16:35:03 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 莫大華博士的「論國際關係理論中的建構主義」一文,是國內近來少數對於「建構主義」有系統介紹的文章。然而莫文並未有效闡明近二十年來的國關理論的發展,以及「建構主義」在「第三次大辯論」的角色和地位,使得該文產生若干誤解。其中主要問題在於將Alexander Wendt 視同與其他建構主義學者為一「建構主義巨型理論」卻沒有提及Wendt 與這些學者的明顯差異。如此一來,不但模糊不同「建構主義」流派的發展,也使其對於「建構主義」的介紹不夠周全。
    Dr. Mo`s “On Constructivism in International Relations Theory”is one of a few recent articles that introduce the theoretical framework of Constructivism. However, this article creates much serious misunderstanding. The main problem lies in its conflation of different variants of Constructivism. The failure to recognize the different theoretical origins of Alexander Wendt and other constructivists not only makes the introduction misleading, but also creates ambiguity that confuses readers about what Constructivism is. This article traces the shortcomings of Dr. Mo`s article and proposes some clarifications in order to help encourage a comprehensive understanding the theoretical evolution of Constructivism over the past decade. The main argument is that a sophisticated distinction of different variants of Constructivism is necessary and important to further our theoretical exploration.
    Relation: 問題與研究, 39(11), 71-94
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[問題與研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    325.pdf1762KbAdobe PDF2172View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback