English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 114205/145239 (79%)
Visitors : 52846387      Online Users : 667
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/123019


    Title: 南沙主權糾紛對台海兩岸關係的意義與影響
    ROC-PRC Relations and the South China Sea Dispute
    Authors: 陳欣之
    Chen, Hsin-Chih
    Contributors: 問題與研究
    Keywords: 中華民國;中共;兩岸關係;南沙群島;主權爭端
    South China Sea territorial dispute;Taiwan-PRC relations;Spratly Islands;East Asia security
    Date: 1999-07
    Issue Date: 2019-04-15 16:23:15 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 中華民國與中共各自宣稱擁有南沙群島主權，但是中華民國對中共在南沙伸張主權的行為，長久以來採取默示的行為，在某種程度上，侵害了中華民國對南沙群島的主權主張，讓中華民國強調兩岸分治的事實主張產生了矛盾，更加劇中共「一個中國」非事實主張的氣勢。東協部分國家雖亦為南沙主權糾紛的當事國，卻因為支持中共「一個中國」的論調，排斥中華民國參與解決南沙主權糾紛的意願，使得中華民國未能在一國際問題上表達立場。更有甚者，中共不放棄以武力解決兩岸統一問題的立場，讓中華民國領有的南沙太平島，亦不能自外於中共的武力威脅及軍事攻擊之外，進而為和平解決兩岸分治現況與南沙主權糾紛的期望，投下負面的陰影。中華民國目前採取的南沙糾紛處理政策，亦沒有換取中共的善意回應。為了和平解決南沙主權糾紛，中華民國應重新檢討現有的南沙政策，強調中華民國與中共二者分別治理部分領土的現實，為和平解決兩岸問題帶來新的思考方向。
    Most discussions of the South China Sea dispute focus on the PRC’s attitudes towards ASEAN member countries. Few, however, discuss the security implications regarding ROC-PRC relations. As these two sides are vital actors in the South China Sea territorial dispute, a Taiwan Strait crisis could dramatically influence East Asian regional security. Strategically, Taiwan can not defend the only island that she occupies in the Spratly Islands, Itu-Aba Island, without diminishing the defense capabilities around the Taiwan area. From the diplomatic side, although the ROC participates in the Workshop on Managing Potential Conflicts in the South China Sea, she is excluded from any bilateral or multilateral dialogues regarding the Spralty Islands dispute. The economic value of the Spratly islands to the ROC, are moreover, also very limited. Lacking the military projection power to defend effectively her sovereignty over the Spratly Islands and further constrained by ASEAN’s ‘One China’ policy, the Republic of China faces the erosion of her sovereignty if Taipei still takes a passive attitude toward the PRC’s military activities in the Spratly Islands. ROC rejects the propaganda that Taiwan is part of the PRC but her silence towards Beijing’s Spralty Islands policy gives international societies the impression that Beijing is the only representative of China’ to discuss this territorial problem with the other countries. This tendency will put Taiwan’s international position in danger and destroy the ROC’s pretext that the ROC and PRC are two equal political identities prior to the future unification of whole China.
    Relation: 問題與研究, 38(7), 23-41
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[問題與研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    292.pdf1580KbAdobe PDF2217View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback