政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/123016
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51722553      Online Users : 611
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大典藏 > Journals of NCCU > Issues & Studies > Articles >  Item 140.119/123016


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/123016


    Title: 西歐民族主義起源的兩種解釋艾禮．坎度理(Elie Kedourie)與厄尼斯特．蓋爾勒(Ernest Gellner)的觀點分析
    Two Interpretations of the Origins of European Nationalism: Elie Kedourie and Ernest Gellner
    Authors: 蔡英文
    Tsai, Ying-Wen
    Contributors: 問題與研究
    Keywords: 民族自決;民族性;道德自律;西歐現代性;高級文化;鄉邦文化
    national self-determination;higher culture;German romanticism;industrial society
    Date: 1999-05
    Issue Date: 2019-04-15 16:22:09 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文主旨在於闡釋艾禮．坎度理(Elie Kedourie)與厄尼斯特．蓋爾勒(Ernest Gellner)的民族主義論述，這兩位英國國當代的學者，分別以不同的進路闡述民族主義的歷史起源。坎度理透過觀念史的研究途徑解釋康德的道德自律學說，如何在德國的浪漫主義中，被轉化成為民族自決的理論。而蓋爾勒則以社會人類學的進路，闡述民族主義─做為現代主權國家正當性基礎的理念─如何在西方現代性的處境當中被構成。前者說明十九世紀德國知識階層的處境與浪漫主義思潮之交織在構成民族主義上的作用，後者則強調西方啟蒙之高級文化乃是民族主義學說之構成的重要歷史條件。
    This essay tries to expound an Kedourie and Gellner`s discourse on Nationalism. Each interprets the origins of European nationalism via a different approach. Roughly speaking, Kedourie singles out Kant as a crucial progenitor of nationalism, arguing that the severely individualist and universalist ethic of Kant, with its stress on individual self-determination, is either the intellectual warrant or the historic cause of the doctrine of national self-determination. Opposed to that interpretation, Gellner emphasizes the cultural demand of western industrial society as the historic case of nationalism. Gellner argues that the modern sovereign state has to integrate political power and culture in its response to the challenge of industrial society; otherwise it would lose its legitimacy. This essay also critiques the viewpoints about the cause of nationalism in each perspective.
    Relation: 問題與研究, 38(5), 77-102
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[Issues & Studies] Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    289.pdf2017KbAdobe PDF2230View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback