English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51717798      Online Users : 552
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/122997


    Title: 九○年代澳洲基廷政府與霍華德政府對國家利益觀點之比較分析
    A Comparative Analysis of the National Interest Perceptions of the Keating and Howard Administrations
    Authors: 丁永康
    Ting, Yong-Kang
    Contributors: 問題與研究
    Keywords: 國家利益;國家認同;基廷政府;霍華德政府
    national interest;national identity;Keating Administration;Howard Administration
    Date: 1998-07
    Issue Date: 2019-04-15 10:01:05 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 國家利益概念一直是研究國際政治、分析各國外交政策常用的。在界定一個國家的國家利益之前,必須先知悉什麼是「國家認同」 (national identity)?以及這個國家的歷史、文化背景、地緣政治、經濟前景以及綜合國力大小。冷戰結束後,澳洲政府與學術界為重新界定國家利益而辯論。澳洲在找尋歸類的過程中,爆發「認同危機」 (identity crisis):「我們是誰?」「我們屬於哪裡?」以及問「我們站在那一邊?」。隨著澳洲政府改組,吾人以「國家利益」概念,分析九○年代澳洲基廷工黨政府及霍華德聯盟黨政府如何處理「國家利益」?兩個不同的政黨,在執政期間有何區別?吾人列舉五項指標作為分析比較澳洲工黨政府與聯盟黨政府國家利益的同異:一、國家定位;二、經濟利益;三、政治體制;四、軍事安全;五、價值觀。
    The concept of national interest is always useful for studying international politics and analyzing foreign policies. Before defining a country`s national interest, we must know its “national identity” as well as its history, cultural background, geopolitical situation, economic perspective, and comprehensive national power. After the cold was, the government of Australian debated with local academic circles the definition of their national interest. During this debate, an identity crisis erupted, with Australians asking themselves: “Who are we? Where do we belong? Where do we stand?” this article uses the concept of national interest to analyze and compare the policy views of the Keating labor government and the Howard coalition government of the 1990s, using five indexes: (1) national identity; (2) economic interest; (3) political system; (4) military security; (5) value system.
    Relation: 問題與研究, 37(7), 65-81
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[問題與研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    270.pdf1342KbAdobe PDF2190View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback