Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/122811
|
| Title: | 平台的價值共創機制之研究：以台灣大車隊為例
An Explorative Study of the Value Co-Creation Mechanism of Platform: the Case of Taiwan Taxi Co. |
| Authors: | 蔡家昌
Tsai, Chia-Chang |
| Contributors: | 吳豐祥
Wu, Feng-Shang
蔡家昌
Tsai, Chia-Chang |
| Keywords: | 平台
價值共創
平台經濟模式
Google Analytics
服務主導邏輯
Platform
Value Co-Creation
Platform Revolution
Google Analytics
Service Dominant Logic |
| Date: | 2019 |
| Issue Date: | 2019-04-01 15:11:31 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 大數據、雲端計算、共享經濟的興起對平台企業的商業模式演進產生了巨大影響，過去的平台業者的商業模式是以企業為中心，採取的主要策略是以行銷補貼的方式來獲取大量的消費者和生產者，透過收取平台雙方或某一方的費用或是平台雙方的供需媒合的手續費，來維持平台的運營和獲利來源，但各個平台之間的競爭造成消費者低忠誠度和各個平台業者的行銷成本大幅提高，結果就是平台業者所能收取的費用和媒合抽成的利潤愈來愈低，也造成平台業者原有的商業模式面臨極大的挑戰。
在上述的情況之下，平台業者需要跳脫傳統以企業主導產品(或服務)的思維，轉為以服務主導的策略，方能跳脫以收取月租費或媒合抽成的商業模式。同時，需要和消費者在平台上一起合作，透過適當的價值主張以吸引不同的生產者，並整合各方資源再轉化成最終產品(或服務)，這樣才能做到平台的價值共創，以提升平台營運的績效。然而，有關平台價值共創機制的研究仍然非常少。因此，本研究的主要目的即是探討有關平台業者的價值共創之機制。研究問題上主要包括平台業者應如何與不同的參與者互動？如何整合所有參與者的資源？如何建置有效的支持性系統和激勵制度？如何形成正向循環？等，以使所有參與者都能夠因為價值共創而提高附加價值，並提升平台業者的營運績效。
本研究本質上是具有探索性的，因此採用質性研究做為主要的研究方法。同時選擇了「台灣大車隊」平台公司做為主要的研究對象。研究上除了進行相關次級資料的蒐集外，也選擇個案公司的十位高階主管，進行深入的訪談。此外，研究者也直接或間接參與了個案公司有關價值共創的會議和討論，以取得第一手的資料。研究期間並進行進行三角驗證以提升信度和效度。另外，本研究也輔以GA (Google Analytics)的分析工具，就實際營運的績效進行分析，以做為輔助驗證價值共創之成效。
本研究所得到的結論，主要包括：(1)平台業者會透過逐步深化消費者服務的價值主張，並透過開放且即時互動的系統支持價值共創；(2)平台業者會透過會員積點與綁定數位支付的有效閉環管理，以提升價值共創效益；(3)平台業者會激發消費者投入資源，以提昇價值共創；(4)平台業者會透過平台資源的誘因，激發生產者的投入，以提升價值共創效益；(5) 平台業者價值共創績效(包含用戶數增加、忠誠度提高和滿意度提升等)，會對於平台新消費者的加入產生正向影響；(6)平台業者的價值共創機制，會對於平台消費者的投入產生正向影響；(7)平台業者的價值共創機制，會對於其組織學習和資訊數據外部性反饋產生正向影響。
The rise of Big Data, Cloud Computing and Sharing Economy have a significant impact on business model for enterprise. The business model for enterprise was business-centric which adopted marketing subsidy as main strategy to attract tones of consumers and other participants (venders) as well as charged both parties or either side, or both side for matching-service platform to maintain platform operation and obtain profits. However, competition from each platform results in low consumer loyalty and increasing marketing cost in large. As a consequence, the charge from platforms and profit from matching-service platform is getting lower as well as business model of platform confronts extreme challenges.
Under those circumstances, platform corporations should think outside the box of product (or service)-led and turn into service-led strategy that will get rid of business model of monthly fee or commission. Meanwhile, platform corporations have to work together with consumers on the platform to attract variety of participants with value proposition as well as integrate all resources into finished products (or services) in order to create together the platform value and enhance operational performance of platform corporations. However, the research for mechanism of creation together the platform value is still very rare. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to investigate the value co-creation mechanism of platform corporations. The topics of this research include how to interact with different participants by platform corporations, how to integrate all resources from participants, and how to set up systematic supports and incentives? How to form a positive cycle, and so on, to make all participants increase value-added due to value co-creation, as well as enhance operational performance of platform corporations.
The essence of this research is exploratory; therefore, quality research is the main research method. Meanwhile, Taiwan Taxi Co. is picked to be the main research object. In this research, in addition to related secondary data collected, conduct in-depth interviews with ten senior executives. Besides, the researcher participated directly and indirectly in the company’s meeting and discussion of relevant value co-creation to obtain original sources. During study period, triangular verification was conducted to enhance reliability and validity. Moreover, Google Analytics and actual operational performance analysis were supplement to verify the performance of value creation.
The conclusions in this study include: (1) platform corporation will support the value creation through deepening gradually the value proposition of consumer services and open and instant interactive system. (2) platform corporation will increase the benefits of value creation through effective closed-loop management of membership reward points and digital payment bound. (3) platform corporation will enhance value creation by motivating consumers to invest resources. (4) platform corporation will improve the value creation of platform by stimulation of input of participants through the incentives of platform resources. (5) the performance of value co-creation mechanism for platform industry will positively influence on the new consumer participation, including amount of users, loyalty and satisfaction, etc.(6) the performance of value co-creation mechanism for platform industry will have a positive effect on consumer input. (7) the performance of value co-creation mechanism for platform industry will have a positive impact on organization learning and network externality of information data. |
| Reference: | 參考文獻 (英)
Akaka, M. A., Vargo, S. L., and Lusch, R. F. (2013). The complexity of context: A service ecosystems approach for international marketing. Journal of International, 21(4), 1–20.
Akaka, M.A. and Vargo, S.L. (2014). Technology as an Operant Resource in Service (Eco) Systems. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 12(3), 367–384.
Amara, N., Halilem, N. and Traoré, N. (2016). Adding value to companies` value chain: Role of business schools scholars. Journal of Business Research, 69, 1661-1668.
Armstrong, M. (2006). Competition in two‐sided markets. The RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 668-691.
Au, Y.A., and Kauffman, R.J. (2001). Should we wait? network externalities and electronic billing adoption. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(2), 47-63.
Auh, S., Bell, S. J., McLeod, C. S., and Shih, E. (2007). Co-production and customer loyalty in financial services. Journal of Retailing, 83(3), 359-370.
Basole, R.C. and Rouse, W.B. (2008). Complexity of Service Value Networks Conceptualization and Empirical Investigation. IBM Systems Journal, 47, 53-68.
Becker, G S. (1965). A Theory of the Allocation of Time. Economic Journal, 75(2), 493-517.
Benkler, Y. (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. P.528. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Berg, Bruce Lawrence and Lune, Howard. (2012). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences (8th ed.). p.3, Boston.
Brodie, R. J., Glynn, M. S. and Little, V. (2006). The service brand and the service dominant logic: Missing fundamental premise or the need for stronger theory? Marketing Theory, 6, 363-376.
Chandler, J. D., and Vargo, S. L. (2011). Contextualization and value-in-context: How context frames exchange. Marketing Theory, 11(1), 35-49.
Chen, T. F. (2009). Building a platform of business model 2.0 to creating real business value with web 2.0 for web information services industry. International Journal of Electronic Business Management, 7(3), 168-180.
Claycomb, C., Lengnick-Hall, C.A. and Inks, L.W. (2001). The Customer as a Productive Resource: A Pilot Study and Strategic Implications. Journal of Business Strategies, 18, 47-68.
Clifton B. (2016). Successful Analytics: Gain Business Insights by Managing Google Analytics.
Cova, B. and Salle, R. (2008), Marketing solutions in accordance with the S-D logic: co-creating value with customer network actors. Industrial Marketing Management, 37(3), 270-277.
Craighead, C. W., and Shaw, N. G. (2003). E-commerce value creation and destruction: A resourcebased, supply chain perspective. ACM SIGMIS Database, 34(2), 39-49.
Díaz-Chao, Á., Sainz-González, J. and Torrent-Sellens, J. (2015). ICT, innovation, and firm productivity: New evidence from small local firms. Journal of Business Research, 68(7), 1439-1444.
Díaz-Chao, Á., Sainz-González, J. and Torrent-Sellens, J. (2016). The competitiveness of small network-firm: A practical tool. Journal of Business Research, 69, 1769–1774.
Edvardsson, B., Tronvoll, B. and Gruber, T., (2011). Expanding understanding of service exchange and value co-creation: A social construction approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(2), 327–339.
Eisenmann, T. R., Parker, G., and Alstyne, M. (2006). Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Business Review, 84(10), 92–101.
Eisenmann, T. R., Parker, G., and Alstyne, M. (2008). Opening Platforms: How, When and Why? California Management Review, 50(4), 31-53.
Etgar, M. (2008). A Descriptive Model of the Consumer Co-Production Process. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 97-108.
Evans, David S., (2003). The Antitrust Economics of Multi-Sided Platform Markets. Yale Journal on Regulation, 20(2), 325-381.
Evans, Joel R. and Barry Berman (2001). Conceptualizing and Operationalizing the Business-to-Business Value Chain. Industrial Marketing Management, 30(2), 135-148.
Evans, David S. and Schmalensee, Richard. (2008). Markets with Two-Sided Platforms. Issues in Competition Law and Policy, 1(28).
French, Aaron M. and Shim, J. P. (2016). The Digital Revolution: Internet of Things, 5G, and Beyond. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 38-40.
Frow, Pennie, McColl-Kennedy, Janet R., Hilton, Toni, Davidson, Anthony, Payne, Adrian and Brozovic, Danilo (2014). Value propositions: a service ecosystems perspective. Marketing Theory, 14(3), 327-351.
Fuchs, V. (1968). The Service Economy, New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Gemunden HG, Heydebreck P and Herden R. (1992). Technological interweavement a means of achieving innovation success. R&D Management, 22(4), 359-76.
Given, Lisa M. (2008). The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. SAGE Publications.
Golden-Biddle, Karen and Locke, Karen. (1993). Appealing Work: An Investigation of How Ethnographic Texts Convince. Organization Science - ORGAN.
Grönroos, C. (2000). Service Management and Marketing A Customer Relationship Management Approach. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., Hoboken
Grönroos, C. (2008). Service Logic: Revisited Who Creates Value And Who Co-Creates. European Business Review, 20, 298-314.
Grönroos, C. (2009). Marketing as promise management: regaining customer management for marketing. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 24(5/6), 351-359.
Grönroos, C. (2011). Value co-creation in service logic: A critical analysis. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 279-301.
Grönroos, C., and Gummerus J. (2014). The service revolution and its marketing implications: Service logic vs service-dominant logic. Managing Service Quality, 24(3), 206-229.
Grönroos, C., and Ravald, A. (2011). Service business logic: Implications for value creation and marketing. Journal of Service Management, 22(1), 5-22.
Grönroos, C., and Voima, P. (2013). Critical service logic: Making sense of value creation and co-creation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(2), 133-150.
Hagiu, Andrei and Wright, Julian, (2015). Multi-sided platforms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 43(C), 162-174.
Hakansson, H. and Prenkert, F. (2004). Exploring the Exchange Concept in Marketing. Rethinking Marketing, 5, 91-92.
Han, J.K., N. Kim and H.B. Kim (2001). Entry barriers: A dull-, one-, or two-edged sword for incumbents? Unraveling the paradox from a contingency perspective. Journal of Marketing, 65(1), 1–14
Hoyer Wayne D., Chandy Rajesh, Dorotic Matilda, Krafft Manfred and Singh Siddharth S. (2010). Consumer cocreation in new product development. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 283-296.
Hubbert, Amy. R. (1997). Customer contributions and roles in service delivery. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 8(3), 193-205.
Huemer, A.K. and Vollrath, M., (2012). Learning the lane change task: Comparing different training regimes in semi-paced and continuous secondary tasks. Applied Ergonomics, 45, 639-646.
Jenkins, Henry (2009). Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century, MIT Press.
Jin, B. H. and Li, Y. M., (2012). Analysis of emerging technology adoption for the digital content market. Information Technology Management, 13(3), 149-165.
Kalaignanam, K., and R.Varadarajan (2006). Customers as Co-Producers: Implications for Marketing Strategy Effectiveness and Marketing Operations Efficiency. in R.F.Lusch and S.L.Vargo (Eds.), Toward a Service-Dominant Logic for Marketing: Dialog, Debate and Directions. (Armonk, NY: M.E.Sharpe), 270-281.
Katz, M., and Shapiro, C. (1994). System competition and network effects. Journal of Economic, (8), 93-115.
Kim C, Oh E and Shin N (2010). An empirical investigation of digital content characteristics, value, and flow. J Comput Inform Syst, 50(4), 79-87.
Klein, Heinz and Myers, Michael. (1999). A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 23-31.
Lee, J., Lee, J. and Lee, H. (2003). Exploration and exploitation in the presence of network externalities. Management Science, 49(4), 553-570.
Lee, M. S., Hsiao, H. D., and Yang, M. F., (2010), The Study of the Relationships among Experiential Marketing, Service Quality, Customer Satisfaction and Customer Loyalty. International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 3(2), 352-378.
Lengnick-Hall C A. (1996). Customer contributions to quality: A different view of the customer-oriented firm. Academy of Management Review, 21(3), 791–824.
Lovelock, C., and Wirtz, J. (2004). Services Marketing: People, Technology, Strategy, 5th Edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Lusch, R F, and Nambisan, S. (2015). Service Innovation: A Service-Dominant Logic Perspective, MIS Quarterly, 39(1), 155-175.
Lusch, RF, and Vargo, SL, (2006). Service-dominant logic: reactions, reflections and refinements, Marketing Theory, 6, 281-288.
Maglio P P and Spohrer J. (2008). Fundamentals of service science. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 18-20.
Maglio P P, Vargo S L, Caswell N, and Spohrer J. (2009). The service system is the basic abstraction of service science. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 7(4), 395-406.
McColl-Kennedy, J. R., Cheung, L., and Ferrier, E. (2015). Co-creating service experience practices. Journal of Service Management, 26(2), 249-275.
Nambisan, S., and Baron, R. A. (2009). Virtual Customer Environments Testing a Model of Voluntary Participation in Value Co-creation Activities. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(4), 388-406.
Nicholas, D. Clark, D., and Jamali, H. (2014). Evaluating information seeking and use in the changing virtual world: the emerging role of Google Analytics. Learned Publishing, 27(3), 185-194.
Normann, R., and Ramirez, R. (1993). From value chain to value constellation: designing interactive strategy. Harvard Business Review, 65-77.
O’Hern, M.S. and Rindfleisch, A. (2009). Customer Co-Creation: A Typology and Research Agenda. Review of Marketing Research, 6, 84-106.
Ojasalo K. (2010). The shift from co-production in services to value co-creation. The Business Review, 16(1), 171-177.
Oz Shy (2001). The Economics of Network Industries. Cambridge University Press New York, NY, USA.
Parker, Geoffrey and Van Alstyne, Marshall W., (2016). Innovation, Openness, and Platform Control. Management Science, 64(7), 2973-3468.
Parker, G., Van Alstyne, M.W., and Choudary, S. P. (2016). Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy - and How to Make Them Work for You. W. W. Norton Company.
Parsons, D. W., Jones, S., Zhang, X., Lin, J. C. H., Leary, R. J., Angenendt, P., ... Kinzler, K. W. (2008). An integrated genomic analysis of human glioblastoma multiforme. Science, 321(5897), 1807-1812.
Payne, A., and Holt, S. (2001). Diagnosing customer value: Integrating the value process and relationship marketing. British Journal of Management, 12, 159-182.
Payne, A., Storbacka, K. and Frow, P. (2008), Managing the co-creation of value. Academy of Marketing Science Journal, 36(1), 83-96.
Porter, M. E. and Millar, V. A. (1985). How information gives you competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 63(4), 149-160.
Porter, M., (1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Harvard Business Review, 2, 73-93.
Prahalad, C. K., and Ramaswamy, V. (2000). Co-Opting Customer Competence. Harvard Business Review, 78, 79-90.
Prahalad, C. K., and Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 5-14.
Premkumar, G. P. (2003). Alternate distribution strategies for digital music. Communications of the ACM, 46(9), 89–95.
Racino, J. (1999). Policy, Program Evaluation and Research in Disability: Community Support for All. London: Haworth Press.
Ramaswamy, V. and Ozcan K. (2013). Strategy and co-creation thinking. Strategy & Leadership, 41(6), 5-10.
Ramaswamy, V. and Chopra N. (2014). Building a culture of co-creation at Mahindra. Strategy & Leadership, 42(2), 12-18.
Ramírez R. (1999). Value co-production: Intellectual origins and implications for practice and research. Strategic Management Journal, 20(1), 49-65.
Ricketts T, and Henry P. (2002). Evaluation of an adaptive, directional-microphone hearing aid. Int J. Audiol, 41(2), 100-112.
Rochet, J.C. and J. Tirole (2002). Cooperation Among Competitors: Some Economics of Payment Card Associations. Rand Journal of Economics, 33(4), 1-22.
Rochet, J.C. and J. Tirole (2004). Two-Sided Markets: An Overview. The Economics of Two-Sided Markets, Toulouse, France.
Sawng, Y.-W., Lee, J., and Motohashi, K. (2015). Digital convergence service from the viewpoint of provider and user factors using technology acceptance and diffusion model. Cluster Comput, 18(1), 293-308.
Schau, H. J., Muniz, A. M., and Arnould, E. J. (2009). How Brand Community Practices Create Value. Journal of Marketing, 73, 30-51
Scott W. Kelley, Steven J. Skinner and James Donnelly (1992). Organizational Socialization of Service Customers. Journal of Business Research, 25(3), 197-214.
Shapiro, C. and Varian, H.R. (1999). A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Boston. Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
Sheth, J.N., Sisodia, R.S. and Sharma, A. J. (2000). The antecedents and consequences of customer-centric marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(1), 55-66.
Spohrer J, Maglio P. P, Bailey J, and Gruhl D, (2007). Steps toward a science of service systems. Computer, 40(1), 71-77.
Stake, R. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Techatassanasoontorn, A. A., and Kauffman, R. J. (2014). Examining the growth of digital wireless phone technology: A take-off theory analysis. Decision Support Systems, 58, 53-67.
Toffler, Alvin (1980), The Third Wave. William Morrow, Newsweek, 48.
Tollo, G. di, Tanev, S., Davide, De M., and Ma, Z. (2012). Neural networks to model the innovativeness perception of co-creative firms. Expert Systems with applications, 39, 12719-12726.
Van Alstyne, Marshall W., and Geoffry G. Parker, and Sangeet P. Choudary. (2016). Pipelines, Platforms, and the New Rules of Strategy. Harvard Business Review, 54-60.
Vargo, S.L. and Lusch, R.F. (2004). Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1-17.
Vargo, S.L. and Lusch, R.F. (2006). Service-Dominant Logic: What It Is, What It Is Not, What It Might Be. In: Lush, R.F. and Vargo, S.L., Ed., The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialog, Debate, and Directions, M. E. Shape, New York, pp. 43-56.
Vargo, S.L. and Lusch, R.F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: Continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 1-10.
Vargo, S.L. and Lusch, R.F. (2010). From repeat patronage to value co-creation in service ecosystems: A transcending conceptualization of relationship. Journal of Business Market Management, 4(4), 169-179.
Vargo, S.L. and Lusch, R.F. (2011). It`s all B2B…and beyond: Toward a systems perspective of the market. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), 181-187.
Vargo, S.L. and Lusch, R.F. (2014). Service-dominant logic: Premises, perspectives, possibilities. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.
Vargo, S.L. and Lusch, R.F. (2016). Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 44, 5-23.
Vargo, S.L. and Lusch, R.F. Service-dominant logic 2025. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34 (1), 46-47.
Vargo, S.L, Maglio, P.P, and Akaka, M.A, (2008). On value.and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective. European Management Journal, 26(3), 145-152.
Viktor Mayer-Schönberger and Kenneth Cukier (2014). Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think. Eamon Dolan/Mariner Books; Reprint edition.
Wang, Y., Kung, L., Wang, W. Y. C., and Cegielski, C. G. (2017). Integrated big data analytics-enabled transformation model: application to health care. Information & Management, in press.
Wikström S. (1996). The customer as co-producer. European Journal of Marketing, 30(4), 6-19.
Wikström S. (1996). Value creation by company-consumer interaction. Journal of Marketing Management, 12(5), 359-374.
Yin, R.K. (1989). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Newbury Park, California: Sage.
Yin, R.K. (1994). Case Study Research Design and Methods: Applied Social Research and Methods Series. Second edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research Design and Methods. 3rd Edition, Sage, Thousand Oaks.
Zeithaml, V., Rust, R. and Lemon, K. (2001). The customer pyramid: creating and serving profitable customers. California Management Review, 43(4), 118-142.
Zeithaml, V. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22.
參考文獻 (中)
陳威如、王詩一，2016。決勝平台時代：第一本平台化轉型實戰攻略。台北：商周出版
陳威如、余卓軒，2013。平台革命。台北：商周出版
杜鵬、李慶芳、周信輝、方世杰，2017。「（創）串新」的服務模式：以價值共創觀點探索尚品宅配的服務流程與本質。管理學報，34 卷，3 期，401-430 |
| Description: | 博士
國立政治大學
科技管理與智慧財產研究所
98359505 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098359505 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/DIS.NCCU.TIIPM.001.2019.F08 |
| Appears in Collections: | [科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 950501.pdf | 3671Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 3 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
