政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/122741

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/122741

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文笔数/总笔数 : 113656/144643 (79%)
造访人次 : 51695618 在线人数 : 609

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜寻范围

查询小技巧：

您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果

若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据

进阶搜寻

主页 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上传 ‧ 说明 ‧ 关于政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手机版

政大機構典藏 > 外國語文學院 > 語言學研究所 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/122741

请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/122741

题名:	以量化語料庫方法研究中文“導致”的三個近義詞在不同主題下之語義韻 A study of semantic prosody of three near-synonyms of cause in Mandarin Chinese under different topics: A quantitative corpus-based perspective
作者:	巫孟宸 Wu, Meng-Chen
贡献者:	陳正賢萬依萍 Chen, Cheng-Hsien Wan, I-Ping 巫孟宸 Wu, Meng-Chen
关键词:	語義韻語義偏好主題規則化評估語義網路分析 Semantic prosody Semantic preference Topic Rule-based evaluation Semantic network analysis
日期:	2019
上传时间:	2019-04-01 14:34:51 (UTC+8)
摘要:	本論文之主要目的為探討文本主題如何影響一個詞彙的語義韻 (semantic prosody)。主題在此定義為在新聞類文體中不同類別的文章，其涵蓋文本的範圍小於語域 (register)之範圍。我們查驗了一個混合語義韻之詞 (產生)，與兩個強語義韻之詞 (釀成、促成)在蘋果日報中不同主題下的語義韻分布。我們以規則化的詞語所引列方法來決定這三個詞的語義韻分布，並運用語義網路分析來探尋它們的典型語意場 (semantic field)。研究結果指出，主題對產生的語義韻有中等強烈的影響，但對釀成與促成反而影響程度不大，因此建議了詞彙的語義韻之主題依賴。我們的分析結果指出，新聞文章下的某一主題之內容可能是強化正/負語義韻趨勢的來源，同時揭示了主題下某一詞彙的常規用法。 The objective of this study is to investigate how the semantic prosody (SP) of a lexical item may be mediated by the topic of the texts. Topic is defined as different categories of articles in news genre, covering a smaller scope of texts than register. In particular, we examine the SP distributions of three near synonyms: a mixed-SP node word, i.e., chansheng, and two strong-SP node words, i.e., niangcheng and cucheng, under different topics in the self-collected Apple Daily News corpus. We determine their SP distributions via a rule-based concordance line analysis on the Apple Daily News corpus and utilize semantic network analysis to further discover their prototypical semantic fields. The results indicate that topic has moderately strong effect on chansheng, a mixed-SP node word, but weak effect on niangcheng and cucheng, strong-SP node words, suggesting the topic-dependency of the lexical SP. Our analysis suggests that the subject matters of the news articles under a given topic may be the source that intensifies the positive/negative SP tendency of a node word, and also reveals the conventionalized usage of the node word under the topic.
參考文獻:	Almende, B.V., Benoit, Thieurmel, & Titouan, Robert. (2018). visNetwork: Network visualization using’vis. js’ library. R package version 2.0.5. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=visNetwork Bednarek, Monika. (2008). Semantic preference and semantic prosody re-examined. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 4, 119-139. doi:10.1515/CLLT.2008.006 Blei, David M, Ng, Andrew Y, & Jordan, Michael I. (2003). Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993-1022. doi:10.1162/jmlr.2003.3.4-5.993 Cohen, Stanley, & Young, Jock. (1981). The manufacture of news: Social problems, deviance and the mass media. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Pubns. Ellis, Nick C, & Ogden, Dave C. (2017). Thinking about multiword constructions: Usage‐based approaches to acquisition and processing. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9, 604-620. doi:10.1111/tops.12256 Ellis, Nick C, Römer, Ute, & O`Donnell, Matthew Brook. (2016). Usage-based approaches to language acquisition and processing: Cognitive and corpus investigations of construction grammar. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Limited. Evert, Stefan. (2008). Corpora and collocations. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus linguistics. An international handbook (Vol. 2, pp. 1212-1248). Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter. Freeman, Linton C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 35-41. doi:10.2307/3033543 Gablasova, Dana , Brezina , Vaclav, & McEnery, Tony. (2017). Collocations in corpus‐based language learning research: Identifying, comparing, and interpreting the evidence. Language Learning, 67, 155-179. doi:10.1111/lang.12225 Gries, Stefan Th. (2013). 50-something years of work on collocations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 18, 137-166. doi:10.1075/ijcl.18.1.09gri Griffiths, Thomas L, & Steyvers, Mark. (2004). Finding scientific topics. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences, 101, 5228-5235. doi:10.1073/pnas.0307752101 Halliday, M.A.K., & Hasan, Ruqaiya. (1989). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Hoey, Michael. (1991). Pattern of lexis in text. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Huang, Chu-Ren, & Hsieh, Shu-Kai. (2010). Infrastructure for cross-lingual knowledge representation-towards multilingualism in linguistic studies. Taiwan NSC-granted Research Project (NSC 96-2411-H-003-061-MY3). Huang, Ting-Hao, Chen, Yun-Nung, & Kong, Lingpeng. (2015). Acbima: Advanced Chinese bi-character word morphological analyzer. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Eighth SIGHAN Workshop on Chinese Language Processing. Huang, Ting-Hao, Ku, Lun-Wei, & Chen, Hsin-Hsi. (2010). Predicting morphological types of Chinese bi-character words by machine learning approaches. Paper presented at the Proceedings of LREC. Hunston, Susan. (1995). A corpus study of some English verbs of attribution. Functions of Language, 2, 133-158. doi:10.1075/fol.2.2.02hun Hunston, Susan. (2004). Counting the uncountable: problems of identifying evaluation in a text and in a corpus. In A. Partington, J. Morley, & L. Haarman (Eds.), Corpora and Discourse (Vol. 9, pp. 157-188). Bern, CH: Peter Lang. Hunston, Susan. (2007). Semantic prosody revisited. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 12, 249-268. doi:10.1075/ijcl.12.2.09hun Khedr, Ayman E, Salama, S.E., & Yaseen, Nagwa. (2017). Predicting stock market behavior using data mining technique and news sentiment analysis. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications, 9, 22. doi:10.5815/ijisa.2017.07.03 Krestel, Ralf, Fankhauser, Peter, & Nejdl, Wolfgang. (2009). Latent dirichlet allocation for tag recommendation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the third ACM conference on Recommender systems. Ku, Lun-Wei, Liang, Yu-Ting, & Chen, Hsin-Hsi. (2006). Opinion extraction, summarization and tracking in news and blog corpora. Paper presented at the Proceedings of AAAI. Li, Meixia, & Jiao, Aihui. (2017). The study of semantic prosody of Chinese logical resultative formulae: A corpus-assisted discourse analysis approach. GSTF Journal of Law and Social Sciences (JLSS), 2. Louw, Bill. (1993). Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer? The diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies. Text and technology: In honour of John Sinclair, 240, 251. Louw, Bill. (2000). Contextual prosodic theory: Bringing semantic prosodies to life. Words in context: A tribute to John Sinclair on his retirement, 48-94. Manning, Christopher D., & Schütze, Hinrich. (1999). Foundations of statistical natural language processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Morley, John, & Partington, Alan. (2009). A few frequently asked questions about semantic—or evaluative—prosody. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14, 139-158. doi:10.1075/ijcl.14.2.01mor O`Halloran, Kieran. (2007). Critical discourse analysis and the corpus-informed interpretation of metaphor at the register level. Applied Linguistics, 28, 1-24. doi:10.1093/applin/aml046 Pang, Bo, & Lee, Lillian. (2008). Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2, 1-135. doi:10.1561/1500000011 Partington, Alan. (1998). Patterns and meanings: Using corpora for English language research and teaching (Vol. 2). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Partington, Alan. (2004). "Utterly content in each other`s company": Semantic prosody and semantic preference. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9, 131-156. doi:10.1075/ijcl.9.1.07par Partington, Alan. (2017). Evaluative clash, evaluative cohesion and how we actually read evaluation in texts. Journal of Pragmatics, 117, 190-203. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2017.06.008 Pennington, Jeffrey, Socher, Richard, & Manning, Christopher. (2014). Glove: Global vectors for word representation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2014 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP). Rosch, Eleanor. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 104, 192. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.192 Sinclair, John. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. London, UK: Oxford University Press. Sinclair, John. (2004). The search for units of meaning Trust the Text (pp. 34-58). London, UK: Routledge. Stefanowitsch, Anatol, & Gries, Stefan Th. (2003). Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8, 209-243. doi:10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste Stubbs, Michael. (1995). Collocations and semantic profiles: On the cause of the trouble with quantitative studies. Functions of Language, 2, 23-55. doi:10.1075/fol.2.1.03stu Stubbs, Michael. (2001a). On inference theories and code theories: Corpus evidence for semantic schemas. Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 21, 437-465. doi:10.1515/text.2001.007 Stubbs, Michael. (2001b). Words and phrases: Corpus studies of lexical semantics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. Wang, Shih-Ming, & Ku, Lun-Wei. (2016). ANTUSD: A large Chinese sentiment dictionary. Paper presented at the LREC. Wei, Naixing, & Li, Xiaohong. (2014). Exploring semantic preference and semantic prosody across English and Chinese: Their roles for cross-linguistic equivalence. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 10, 103-138. doi:10.1515/cllt-2013-0018 Xiao, Richard, & McEnery, Tony. (2006). Collocation, semantic prosody, and near synonymy: A cross-linguistic perspective. Applied Linguistics, 27, 103-129. doi:10.1093/applin/ami045
描述:	碩士國立政治大學語言學研究所 104555004
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104555004
数据类型:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/THE.NCCU.GIL.001.2019.A07
显示于类别:	[語言學研究所] 學位論文

文件中的档案:

档案	大小	格式	浏览次数
500401.pdf	3052Kb	Adobe PDF2	476	检视/开启

在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回馈