政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/121684
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113648/144635 (79%)
造访人次 : 51621725      在线人数 : 504
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/121684


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/121684


    题名: 論WTO/SPS協定與Codex瘦肉精安全標準之適當性
    On the Food Safety Standard and Its Adequacy in WTO/SPS Agreement and Codex/Ractopamine
    作者: 譚偉恩
    許耀明
    贡献者: 法律系
    关键词: Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex);International Food Safety Standard;Non-Tariff Barriers;Ratopamine;SPS Agreement
    食品安全法典委員會;國際食品安全標準;非關稅貿易障礙;瘦肉精;SPS協定
    日期: 2015-06
    上传时间: 2018-12-28 16:01:21 (UTC+8)
    摘要: Trade barriers should be eliminated or managed because they contradict or weaken the value of trade liberalization. However, any promotions of liber-alization without limitations or restraints are doubtful. Considering a matter in this aspect, this essay reviews the SPS Agreement and its Annex A which are both legal documents regarding human health protection and food safety standards under the WTO system. Meanwhile, this essay also inspects maxi-mum residue limits (MRLs) for the amount of the drug—Ractopamine—allowed in the tissues of animal, an international standard made by the Codex, delegated by the SPS Agreement. By reviewing the two documents above, this essay examines whether or not the WTO is excessive or unjust to block trade barriers regarding human health protection and food safety standards. Based on the historical background about the formation process of SPS Agreement and the practice of the Codex’s safety standards mentioned in the SPS Agree-ment’s Annex A, this essay does not only point out the flaws in the SPS Agreement, but also rebuts some hypotheses being a part of foundations of international organizations from the Neoliberal Institutionalism perspective.
    「貿易障礙」自GATT到WTO時期均一直被視為是對貿易自由化此一價值的減損或否定，故應予設法消除或管制。然而，任何「自由化」的追求均不宜是毫無限制的。基於此一思考，本文檢視目前WTO中涉及維護人體健康及相關食品安全標準的法律文件—《SPS協定》及其附件A，並以該協定所肯認之一項國際組織的安全標準—瘦肉精（Ractopamine）的殘留值為例，討論維護消費者食品安全法益的貿易障礙是否在追求自由化的國際貿易法律規範中受到過度與不當之限制。經由追溯《SPS協定》設立的歷史背景以及Codex在制定瘦肉精安全標準上之實踐，本文不但發現《SPS協定》在規範層面上存有缺失，並對新自由制度主義（Neoliberal Institutionalism）的基本理論假設提出質疑與修正。
    關聯: 科技法學評論,Vol.12,No.1,pp.1-55.
    数据类型: article
    显示于类别:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML2371检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈