English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51719174      Online Users : 639
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/121269


    Title: 為何不需要一個世界政府？─霍布斯論國際關係與自然狀態的(不)完美類比
    Why Not a World Government? Thomas Hobbes on a (Dis)qualified Analogy between State of Nature and International Relations
    Authors: 周家瑜
    Chou, Chia-yu
    Contributors: 政治系
    Keywords: Hobbes;equality;vain-glory;world government;international relations
    霍布斯;平等;虛榮之心;世界政府;國際關係
    Date: 2015-09
    Issue Date: 2018-12-07 17:16:29 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: In order to answer the long-standing question of why Hobbes does not justify a world government as a super-Leviathan, this paper examines Hobbes’s accounts of international relations and the pre-civil state of nature. One common view tends to emphasize the differences between “the agents” in these two realms, namely states as artificial persons and individuals as natural persons; the other common view emphasizes the differences of “the relations between the agents”. By re-examining Hobbes’s account of the pre-civil state of nature, I argue that both of these common views are not sufficient. This essay intends to argue that if Hobbes’s assumption of equality about the original state of nature is re-examined, it can be seen that what actually causes a state of war is not so much the equal ability of men as men’s common tendency of considering themselves superior to others, namely vain-glory.
    本文的問題意識在於：為何證成了國內主權者的霍布斯，未能繼續完成其 世界政府的推論，以及這是否是一個邏輯上的不一致。一般論者的回答可分兩 種：一、認為行為主體（國家與個人）的差異使得國際政治領域遠較原初自然 狀態緩和，因此不需要一個作為超級利維坦的世界政府；二、差異存在於行為 主體之間的關係。本文主要論證為：這兩種回答均有不足之處，若是深入檢視 霍布斯對於原初自然狀態的論述，本文試圖指出：原初自然狀態中的「人人認 為自己較他人優越」的心態平等為回答此一疑問的關鍵。
    Relation: 人文及社會科學集刊, Vol.27, No.3, pp.445-470
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[政治學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    445-470.pdf873KbAdobe PDF2400View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback