政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/121045
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51785399      Online Users : 239
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/121045


    Title: 韓國中小型企業的創新與定價
    Innovation and Pricing Strategies of Small and Medium Enterprises in Korea
    Authors: 姜權一
    Kang, Kwonil Paul
    Contributors: 許牧彥
    Hsu, Muyen
    姜權一
    Kwonil Paul Kang
    Keywords: 創新
    定價
    中小型企業
    Innovation
    Pricing strategy
    Small and medium enterprises
    Date: 2018
    Issue Date: 2018-11-23 15:20:43 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 韓國中小企業（SMEs）在韓國的經濟增長中發揮了重要作用。 為了使中小企業繼續發展，必須從公司獲得持續的利潤，而定價策略在這方面非常重要。 另一方面，有利可圖的定價需要公司不斷創新。
    基於這一現實，本文考察了市場結構，創新和定價理論之間的關係，並通過深入的問卷調查研究了韓國中小企業應該採用何種定價理論。
    根據調查，在寡頭壟斷市場的情況下，所有樣本都主要通過產品創新和選定的基於價值的定價來提高產品價值。在壟斷競爭的情況下，通過產品模仿使用新產品降低成本的樣品根據產品差異化程度使用基於成本的定價和基於競爭的定價。通過流程創新在產品開發中降低成本的樣本使用基於成本的定價來定價策略。
    除了本論文，還需要進一步研究，以了解未來創新與定價策略之間的關係。
    Korean small and medium enterprises (SMEs) have taken an essential role in economic growth of Korea. In order for SMEs to continue developing, it is essential to obtain a continuous profit from the company, and pricing strategy is very important in this regard. On the other hand, profitable pricing requires continuous innovation by the company.
    Based on this reality, this thesis examines the relationship between market structure, innovation, and pricing theory, and examines what kind of pricing theory Korean SMEs should pursue through in-depth questionnaires.
    According to the survey, in the case of the oligopoly market, all samples were improved product value primarily through product innovation and selected Value-based Pricing.
    In case of monopolistic competition, samples which achieved cost down with the new product through the product imitation uses the Cost-based Pricing and the Competition-based Pricing according to the degree of product differentiation.
    And samples which achieved the cost down in the product development through the process innovation use the Cost-based Pricing for their pricing strategy.
    In addition to this thesis, further research is required to understand the relationship between future innovation and pricing strategy.
    Reference: Barringer, B.R. Bluedorn, A.C. (1999), “The relationship between corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 20, pp. 421-444
    Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2011), Business Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Chanaron, J.J., (1990), Innovation Technologique et Developpement economique, Cours d’Economie Appliquee, DGES, Universite Pierre Mendes France, Grenoble.
    Christine Greenhalgh & Mark Rogers (2010), Innovation Intellectual Property, and Economic Growth, Research Policy: Princeton University Press.
    Damanpour, F. (1991), “Organizational Innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 14, No.4, pp. 555-590
    De Beers Company introduction, from:
    https://www.debeersgroup.com/the-group/about-debeers-group/sales/global-sightholder-sales
    Dutta, Shantanu, Mark Zbaracki, and Mark Bergen, (2001). “Pricing Process as a Capability: A Case Study,” Marketing Science Institute Working Paper, No. 01-117. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.k
    Fagerberg, J. Mowery, D.C. Nelson, R.R. (2004), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation: Oxford University Press, USA.
    Foreign Consumer Recognition Result of Korean Products, Jan 22 2018, from: http://www.ieconomic.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=7603
    Garcia, Rosanna and Roger Calantone (2002), "A Critical Look at Technological Innovation Terminology and Innovativeness Typology: A Literature Review," Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19 (2), 110-32.
    Gummesson, E. (2000), Qualitative Methods in Management Resarch: SAGE.
    Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., Kilic, K., Alpkan, L. (2008), An Integrated Innovation Model: How Innovations are born and What are their Impacts on Firm Performance?, Proceedings of 15th European Operations Management Association (EUROMA) Conference, pp.92-101, Gröningen, The Netherlands.
    Hague, D.C., (1971). Pricing in Business. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
    Hervas-Oliver J.L., Ripoll, F.S., Boronat-Moll, C. (2014), Process innovation strategy in SMEs, organizational innovation and performance: A misleading debate?, Small Business economics 43(4).
    Hinterhuber, Andreas. (2008), “Customer Value‐Based Pricing Strategies: Why Companies Resist.” Journal of Business Strategy, vol. 29, pp. 41–50.
    Hinterhuber, A. (2003), Towards value-based pricing - An intergrative framework for desicion making. Industrial Marketing Management, 765-778
    Hurwich, Michael. (2016), Value Based Pricing for a New product innovation (http://www.spmgglobal.com/single-post/2016/06/14/Value-Based-Pricing-for-a-New-Product-Innovation)
    Industry gets religion, Feb 18 1999, from: http://www.economist.com/node/186620
    Jagmohan Raju, Z. John Zhang, (2010), Smart Pricing: How Google, Priceline, and Leading Businesses Use Pricing Innovation for Profitability, Pearson Prentice Hall.
    Jelassi, Tawfik and Enders Albrecht (2008), Strategies for e-Business, 2nd edition: Pearson.
    John S. Blackburn, (2012), Market Structure Differences and Pricing Strategies, Managerial Economics.
    Khalaf, L., Kichian, M., (2000), Testing the Pricing-to-Market Hypothesis: Case of the Transportation Equipment Industry, Bank of Canada Working Paper.
    Leech, B. (2002), Asking questions – techniques for semi-structured interviews, Political Science and Politics, 665-668.
    Luo, Yadong, Jinyun Sun, and Lu Stephanie Wang. (2011), "Emerging Economy Copycats: Capability, Environment, and Strategy,": Academy of Management Perspectives, 25 (2), 37-56.
    Luo, Yadong, Jinyun Sun, and Lu Stephanie Wang. (2011), "Emerging Economy Copycats: Capability, Environment, and Strategy," Academy of Management Perspectives, 25 (2), 37-56.
    Market Structure & Pricing Decisions, from: https://www.tutorialspoint.com/managerial_economics/market_structure_pricing_decisions.htm
    Methods to Price Your Product, from: http://www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/$department/deptdocs.nsf/all/agdex1133
    Micu, Adrian, Micu, Angela L. (2003), Strategic Pricing, BULETINUL Universităţii Petrol – Gaze din Ploieşti, Vol. LVIII No. 2, Seria Ştiinţe Economice.
    Ministry of Science and ICTㆍKorea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning, 2017. 2016 National R&D Project Report and Analysis.
    Monroe, Kent B., (1990). Pricing: Making Profitable Decisions. New York: McGraw Hill.
    Nagle, T.T., Hogan, J. E., & Zale, J., (2011). The Strategy and Tactics of Pricing – A guide to growing more progitable. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
    Nagle, T. T., Holden, R. K, (2002), The Strategy and Tactics of Pricing, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.
    Noble, Peter M. and Thomas S. Gruca, (1999). “Industrial Pricing: Theory and Managerial Practice,” Marketing Science, 18 (3), 435-54.
    Nugent, Jeffery B. and Seung-Jae Yhee (2001). Small and Medium Enterprises in Korea: Achievements, Constraints and Policy Issue: World Bank Institute.
    Nugent, Jeffrey B., and Seung-Jae Yhee. (2002). “Small and Medium Enterprises in Korea: Achievements, Constraints and Policy Issues”: Small Firm Dynamism in East Asia, pp. 85–119.
    Oslo Manual (2005), Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development.
    Process innovation, from: http://www.psi.org.uk/publications/archivepdfs/Small%20firms/SF3.pdf
    Rao, A.R., M.E. Bergen, & S. Davis (2000), “How to Fight a Price War,” Harvard Business Review.
    Robert J. Graham, (2013). Managerial Economics for Dummies, Wiley.
    Rosenberg, N. (1982). Inside the Black Box. Cambridge University Press.
    Ruby P. Lee, Kevin Zheng Zhou (2012), Is Product Imitation Good for Firm Performance?: An Examination of Product Imitation Types and Contingency Factors, Journal of International Marketing, Vol. 20, No. 3, 1-16
    Schnaars, Steven P. (1994), Managing Imitation Strategies: How Later Entrants Seize Markets from Pioneers. New York: The Free Press/Macmillan.
    Schumpeter, J.A. (1934), The theory of economic development: an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle, Harvard Economic Studies, Vol. 46: Harvard College, Cambridge, MA.
    Scitovsky, Tibor (1986). “Economic Development in Taiwan and South Korea, 1965–1981.” In Lawrence J. Lau, ed., Models of Development: A Comparative Case Study of Economic Growth in South Korea and Taiwan. San Francisco, Calif.: ICS Press.
    Shenkar, Oded. (2010b), "Imitation Is More Valuable Than Innovation," Harvard Business Review, 28-29
    Silvio M. Brondoni. (2012), Innovation and Imitation: Corporate Strategies for Global Competition, Emerging Issues in Management, Symphonya.
    Small and medium-sized companies, use the flexible price strategy when entering the US!, July 31 2015, from: http://news.joins.com/article/18358121
    Smith, G.E., Nagle, T.T., (1994), Financial Analysis for Profit Driven Pricing, MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 25, 3, pp. 71-80.
    Sveinn Porarinsson. (2013), Deciding on the Price of a Product/Service in a Start-up Setting: Coping with diverse objectives, market dynamics and uncertainty, University of Gothenburg.
    Vinding, A.L. (2006), “Absorptive capacity and innovative performance: A human capital approach,” Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 507-517.
    Wan, D. Ong, C. H. Lee, F. (2005), “Determinants of firm innovation in Singapore,” Technovation, Vol. 25, pp. 261–26.
    William F. Samuelson, Stephen G. Marks, (2014), Managerial Economics: Wiley
    Xueyi, Zhu and Fang Cunhao, (2010). “Evolution of SME Policy in Japan and Korea: Experience and Policy Implications.”
    Yin, R. K. (2009), Case Study Research: Design and Method, 4th edition. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
    . (1994), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Newbury Park: Sage.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    科技管理與智慧財產研究所
    1023641401
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1023641401
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/THE.NCCU.TIIPM.032.2018.F08
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute of TIPM] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    140101.pdf1148KbAdobe PDF2127View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback