| Reference: | 參考書目
中文部份：
1、林清山，心理與教育統計學。修正版、台北：東華書局，民國69年。
2、廖素華，國小校長領導方式、教師人格特質與教師工作滿足的關係。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文，民國67年。
3、鄭伯壎，領導行為研究：領導方式、情境因素及人格屬性對工人工作滿足的影響。國立台灣大學心理研究所碩士論文，民國66年。
4、陳森王，員工個人屬性、需求層次，工作特性與工作滿足的關係。國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，民國70年。
5、潘養源，影響金融工作人員績效與工作滿足因素之研究。國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，民國68年。
6、朱曉石，領導型態、認知方式對績效的影響。國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，民國69年。
7、許士軍，管理學。初版，台北：東華書局。民國70年。
二、英文部份：
1. Adam, J. S. Toward an understanding of inequity Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1963, 67, 422-436.
2. Bachman, J. G. Faculty satisfaction and the dean’s influence: An organizational study of 12 liberal art colleges. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1968, 52, 55-61.
3. Bachman, J., Smith, C., & Slesinger, J. Control, performance, and satisfaction : An analysis of structural and indivdual effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966, 4,127-136.
4. Badin, I. J. Some moderator influence on relationships between consideration, inititting structure and organizational criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974, 59, 380-382.
5. Dahl, R. A. The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 1957, 2, 201-213.
6. Etzioni, A. A comparative analysis of complex organizations. New York: The Free Press, 1975, 3-22.
7. Fiedler, F.E. A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGeaw-Hill, 1967.
8. French, J.R.P., & Raven, B. The bases of social power. In Studies in social power, ed. by Dorwin Cartwright: The Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1959, 150-167.
9. Herberg, F. Work and anture of man, Cleveland : World Press, 1966.
10. Herberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. The motivation to work. New York: Wiley, 1959.
11. Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. Management of organizational behavior : Utilizing human resources. New Jersey : Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1977, 159-188.
12. Hersey, P., Blanchard, K.H., & Hambleton, R.K. Leadership scale. Ca. : Center for Leadership Studies, 1980.
13. Hersey, P., Blanchard, K.H., & Natemeyer, W. E. Situational leadership, perception, and the impact of power. Ca. : Center for Leadership Studies, 1979.
14. Hersey. P., & Natemeyer, W. F. Power perception profile. Ca.: Center for Leadership Studies, 1979.
15. Hoppock. R. Job satisfaction. New York : Harper & Brother, 1935.
16. House, R.J. A path goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly,
1971, 16, 321-329.
17. House, R.J., & Nitchell, T.R. Path-goal theory of leadership. Contemporary Business, 1974, 3, 81-98.
18. Invancevish, J. An analysis of control, bases of control, and satisfaction in an organizational setting, Academy of Management Journal, 1970, 13, 427-436.
19. Ivancevich, J.M., & Donnelly, J.H. Leader influence and performance. Personnel Psychology 1970, 23, 539-549.
20. Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., & White, R.K. Pattern of aggressive behavior in experimental created social climates. Journal of Social Psychology, 1939, 10, 271-299.
21. Likert, R. The human organization. New York : McGraw-Hill, 1967.
22. Locke, E.A. What is job satisfaction ? Organizational Behavior and Human performance, 1969, 4, 309-336.
23. Lord, R.G., Phillips, J.S., & Rush, M.C. Effects of sex and personality on porception of emergent leadership, influence and social power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1980, 65, 176-182.
24. Nunnally, J.C. Psychemetric theory. New Yoek : McGraw-Hill,1967, 226.
25. Porter, L.W. A study of perceived need satisfaction in bottom and middle management jobs, Journal of Applied Psychology, 1961, 45, 1-10.
26. Posner, B.Z. Measuring the bases of power: Updating French and Raven, Santa Clara : University of Santa Clara, 1980.
27. Powell, B.Z. Leadership and power : Related concepts in search of a conceptual framework. American Institute for Decision Science Symposium, 1980, 352-354.
28. Price, J. Handbook of organizational measurement, Lexington, MA : D.C. Health, 1972.
29. Raven, B.H., & Kruglanski, W. Conflict and power. In Swingle, P.C.(ed.), The structure of conflict. New York : Academic Press, 1975, 177-219.
30. Rusell, B. Power, New York : Norton & Co., 1938, 9-25.
31. Smith. P.C., Kendall, L.M., & Hulin, C.L. The measurement` of satisfaction in work and retirement. Chicago : Rand-McNally, 1969.
32. Stogdill, R. M. Handbook of leadership : A survey of theory and research. New York : Free Press, 1974.
33. Stogdill, R. M., & Coons, A.E.(ed). Leader behavier : Its deseription and measurement. Columbus : Bureau of Business Research, Ohio State University, 1963.
34. Student, K. R. Supervisory influence and workgroup performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 1968, 52, 183-194.
35. Tannenbaum, A.S. (ed.). Control in organizations. New York : McGraw-Hill, 1968.
36. Tannenbaum, R., & Schmidt. W.H. How to choose a leadership pattern. Harvard Business Review Mar-Apr, 1958), 95-102.
37. Tannenbaum, R., Weschler, I.R., & Massarik, F. Leadership and organization. New York : McGraw-Hil 1961.
38. Wanous, J.P., & Lawler, E.E., III. Measurement and meaning of Job satisfaction. Journal of of Applied Psychology, 1972, 56, 95-105.
39 Weiss, D.J., Dawis, R.V. England, G.W., & Lofquist L.G. Manual for the Minnesota satisfaction questionnaire; Minnesota studies in vocational rehabilitation. Vocational Psychology Research, University of Minnesota, 1967.
40. Wheelwright, S.C., & Makridakis, S. Forecasting methods for management. New York : John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1973, 108-131.
41. Yuki, G.A. Leadership in Organizations.
42. Zald, M. N. Political economy : A framewerk for comparative analysis. In M. M. Zald (ed.). Power in organizations. Nashville, Vanderbilt University Press, 1970. |
