Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/119960
|
| Title: | 新建校舍用後評估之研究－以新北市新設校為例
A Study of the Post Occupancy Evaluation for the New School in New Taipei Municipality |
| Authors: | 廖菁芬
Liao, Ching-Fen |
| Contributors: | 湯志民
Tang, Chih-Min
廖菁芬
Liao, Ching-Fen |
| Keywords: | 新設校
用後評估
學校建築特色
支援區域
New school
POE(the Post Occupancy Evaluation))
School building features
Support area |
| Date: | 2018 |
| Issue Date: | 2018-09-03 16:00:29 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究針對新北市近十年9所新設校，進行校舍用後評估，希望透過用後評估的問卷調查、校舍建築基本資料的蒐集和建校相關人員的訪談，能夠了解下列事項：
一、了解新北市近十年9所新設校用後評估各層面是否符應需求。
二、了解新北市近十年9所新設校各校之各層面的資料比較。
三、了解新北市近十年9所新設校有何共通性問題，提出解決策略。
四、新北市近十年9所新設校中各校有關綠建築指標的比較。
本研究之問卷依據 Preiser W. F. E., Rabinowitz H. Z. and White E. T.所編撰的Elementary School Post-occupancy Evaluation量表編譯，並依據不同身分填答者加以編撰而成研究之量表，再依據回收之問卷，進行統計分析。調查對象為9所新設校之學生、教師和家長，計有學生870人、教師320人和家長180人，共計1,370人，學生問卷回收850份，有效樣本821份，教師問卷回收為304份，有效樣本281份，家長問卷回收177份，有效樣本167份，共計有效樣本為1,269份。
資料分析經百分比、平均數、標準差、單因子變異數分析和卡方考驗，並輔以訪談設校人員，獲致研究結果如下。
一、新北市近十年9所新設校之用後評估大致符合需求
二、新北市近十年9所新設校之用後評估在性別和身分別變項有顯著差異存在
三、新北市近十年9所新設校各校之間用後評估比較，以「充足的教育設備」滿意度最高，而「支援區域」滿意度較低。
四、彙整新北市近十年9所新設校的共通性問題有8個，其中以「學校人員的更迭頻繁」最嚴重，「學校、設計單位和工程單位意見難以整合」次之。
五、新北市近十年9所新設校之設校歷程以D校最久、A校次之；設校問題以B校最多、C校和F校較少；用後評估整體滿意度以D校4項最高，各校比較則以「充足的教育設備」滿意度排序第1，「學校建築特色」次之。
This study is aimed at the Post Occupancy Evaluation for the New School of New Taipei Municipality in the past ten years. After the POE(post occupancy evaluation) questionnaire survey and interviews with the principal and director of general affairs office of new school, the following items can be understood:
1.Whether the items of POE and the educational requirements are consistent will be understood of 9 new schools in New Taipei Municipality in the past ten years.
2.Compare the data of all levels of the 9 new schools in New Taipei City in the past ten years.
3.Find out the common problems of new schools during the construction and propose solutions.
4.Compare the green building indicator between the 9 new schools.
The questionnaire of the study was compiled according to the Elementary School Post-occupancy Evaluation scale by Preiser W. F. E., Rabinowitz H. Z. and White E. T. It was edited into three questionnaires for different identities(students, teachers and parents). There are 870 students, 320 teachers, and 180 parents who were the samples of the research object. Withdraw the questionnaire are 850 students, 304 teachers, and 177 parents and the valid samples are 821 students, 281 teachers, and 167 parents. The total quantity are 1269.
The main findings are listed as follows after the statistical data of the questionnaires, and analysis by percentage, standard deviation, single factor variance, chi-square test, and Interview with school staff.
1.The items of POE and the educational requirements are consistent.
2.There is significant difference exists in gender and identity of the POE survey analysis.
3.The item of “Educational Adequacy” is most satisfied in the POE survey, the times of “Support Area” is dissatisfied.
4.There are 8 common problems of new school during construction, the most serious one is “frequent personnel replacement”, the next is “difficult to make a consensus among school staff, design unit and construction unit.
5.The longest history for preparation is school D, the next is school A. school B has the 8 common problems, school C and school F has only one common problem. There are 4 items satisfaction for school D. The item of “Educational Adequacy” is listed 1st position in 9 new schools, the item of “Building Features” is the next one. |
| Reference: | 參考文獻
中文部分
王明蘅，(1988)。「設計」之設計或者是設計運算理論之概念模型。中華民國建築學會學術研究發表會論文集，l95-198。
王振復，(1993)。建築美學。中國，上海：地景企業股份有限公司。
吉武泰水，(1964)。建築計畫研究。日本京都市：鹿島出版會。
西山卯三，(1952)。日本の住宅問題。日本京都：岩波新書。
朱家榮，(2009)。國立成功大學圖書館建築用後評估之研究。國立政治大學，臺北市。
朱柔若譯，(2000)。社會研究方法：質化與量化取向。臺北市：揚智出版社。
李俊仁譯，(1977)。建築計劃(Architectural Programming)上、下。建築師雜誌。
林明地，(2002)。學校與社區關係。臺北市：五南圖書。
林晏州，(1998)。高雄都會公園使用後之評估。國家公園學報，9，48-64。
吳明隆，(2016)。論文寫作與量化研究。臺北市：五南圖書。
吳建邦，(2006)。新設國中學校建築用後評估之研究—以臺南縣大橋國中為例(未出版碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
姜振田，(2007)。桃園縣國民中學教師對學校建築滿意度及需求之研究。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
高橋鷹志，(1991)。シリーズ「人間と建築」，環境 と行動。日本東京：朝倉書店。
陳格里，(1982)。建築規劃的理論探討。東海學報，399-412。
陳格里，(1982)。建築規劃的理論探討。東海學報，399-412。
陳格里，(1983)。建築規劃理論的初探。中華民國建築學刊，5，102-l11。
陳格里，(1997)。圖書館建築與用後評估研究。大學圖書館，1(4)。
陳凱，(2008)。中國城市房屋質量：統計實驗樣品房屋住房後評估研究(未出版碩士論文)。同濟大學，中國上海。
黃世孟，(1987)。建築空間規劃研究與理論建構之序說。中華民國建築學刊，9，70-85。
黃世孟，(1989)。從建築物用後評估探討學校建築之規劃與設計。建築師雜誌，72-76。
黃建彰，(2017)。新北市國民小學教師對學校建築使用滿意度之研究。淡江大學，臺北市。
曾思瑜，(1995)。老人公寓用後評估--以高雄市立仁愛之家老人公寓松柏樓為例。建築學報，14，9-29。
曾漢珍，(1994)。國民中小學學校建築規劃設計合理化之研究：以系統整合之觀點分析。(未出版博士論文)。臺灣大學，臺北市。
湯志民，(2006)。臺灣的學校建築。臺北市：五南圖書。
湯志民，(2006)。學校建築與校園規劃。臺北市：五南圖書。
湯志民，(2014)。校園規劃新論。臺北市：五南圖書。
鈴木成文等，(1975)。建築計畫，臺北市：實教出版社。
齊姆林，雷詹斯坦著，李婉婉譯，(1983)。「建築物用後評估」簡介。建築師雜誌，8(11):32。
蔡保田，(1977)。學校建築學。臺北市：臺灣商務印書館。
蔡保田，(1984)。學校建築的理論與實際之研究。臺北縣：陳玉芳文化。
劉綺文，(1999)。淡江大學圖書館使用後評估初議。淡江大學建築學系，臺北縣。
賴協志，(2004)。臺北市國民小學運動場地規劃與用後評估之研究。國立政治大學，臺北市。
謝文全，(2015)。教育行政學。臺北市：高等教育出版社。
魏麗敏、陳明珠，(2014)。建構校園美學之心境界。教育研究月刊，237，42-52。
英文部分
Alex Zimmerman & Mark Martin, (2001). Post-occupancy evaluation: benefits and barriers. Building research & information, 29(2), 168-174.
Baird, George, (1995). The space of appearance. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Barrett, P. (1995). Facilities management-toward best practice. NJ: Blackwell Science Ltd.
Bechtel, R., (1980). What are post-occupancy evaluation? A layman’s guide to POE for housing. Final draft report. Tucson, AZ: Environment Research and Development Foundation.
Beckwith, J., (1988). Playground equipment: A designer’s perspective. VA: Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance.
Chris Watson, (2003). Review of Building Quality Using Post Occupancy Evaluation
Craig M. Zimring & Janet E. Reizenstein, (1980). Post-Occupancy Evaluation: An Overview Environment and behavior, 12(4).
Doidge, C., (2001). Post occupancy evaluation. Retrieved from: http://cebe.cf.ac.uk/aee/abstracts/aeePage32.html
Hoy & Miskel, (2013). Educational administration: theory, research, and practice. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.
Ian Cooper, (2001). Post-occupancy evaluation - Where are you? Building Research and Information 29(2) ·
John Zeisel, (1978). Inquiry by Design: Tools for environment behavior research, Cambridge: Harvard University.
Kosecoff, j., & Fink, A. (1982). Evaluation basics: A practitioner’s manual. Sage Publications, London.
Lyons, J. B. (2002). The learning environment: Do school facilities really affect a child’s education? Learning by Design, 11, 10-13.
Mel J. Barlex, (2006). Guide to post occupancy evaluation. London: University of Westminster.
Osmond, H., (1966). Some psychiatric aspects of design. In L. B. Holland (Ed.), Who designs America? Garden City, New York: Doubleday.
Phil Roberts, (2001). Who is post-occupancy evaluation for? Building research & information, 29(6), 463-465.
Preiser, W. F. E., (1969). Behavioral design criteria in student housing-the measurement of verbalized response to physical environment. Blacksburg, VA: Polytechnic Institute and State University.
Preiser, W., Rabinowitz, H. Z., & White, E. T., (1988). Post-occupancy evalution. New York: Van Nosrtrand Reinhold. Prentice-Hall.
Preiser, W. F. E., (1995). Post evaluation: How to make building work better, Facilities, 13(11), 24.
Rabinowitz, H. Z., (1975). Buildings in Use study. Milwaukee, WI: University of Wisconsin, School of Architecture and Urban planning.
Sanoff, H. (n. d.). School building assessment methods. Retrieved from: http://www.edfacilities.org/pubs/sanoffassess.pdf
Theodore Kowalski, (1989). Planning and managing school facilities, London: Westport. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
學校行政碩士在職專班
100911017 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100911017 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/THE.NCCU.MESA.012.2018.F02 |
| Appears in Collections: | [Master of Education in School Administration] Theses
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 101701.pdf | 6658Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 207 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
