English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51663716      Online Users : 593
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/119183


    Title: A Study of Recognition of Pre-Existing Condition and Its Application Issues: Focusing on the Civil Judgment Bao Sian No.18 (2014) of Tainan District Court
    保前疾病之認定與適用問題
    Authors: 陳俊元
    Contributors: 風管系
    Keywords: 健康保險;追溯保險;等待期間;疾病;告知義務
    health insurance;retroactive insurance;waiting periods;sickness;duty of disclosure
    Date: 2017-12
    Issue Date: 2018-08-03 17:15:58 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 保險法第127 條規定：「保險契約訂立時，被保險人已在疾病或妊娠情況中者，保險人對是項疾病或分娩，不負給付保險金額之責任。」本條在疾病之認定與適用上頗有爭議。在疾病的認定上，學說似乎已經有限縮保險法第127 條之傾向，故對於疾病之認定應該審慎為之，以避免保險人不當脫免責任。對於第51 條與第127 條之關係，可認為兩者規範對象不同，各有其適用範圍。就立法論而言，可考慮進一步將追溯保險之要件明文化，以避免爭議。對健康保險而言，只要能適當掌握保險與疾病之範圍，似可考慮刪除第127 條，更能避免與其他法條之混淆與衝突。
    The Article 127 of Insurance Act provides that: “If, at the time an insurance contract is entered into, the insured is already sick or pregnant, the insurer is not obligated to pay the insured amount for the sickness or pregnancy.” However, there are controversies about the definition of sickness and the application of this article. For recognition of sickness, recent arguments intend to narrow down the scope of sickness. This paper also argues that scrutinizing of sickness is required to prevent insurers avoiding their liability. Regarding the application relation of Article 51 and Article 127, this study agrees with the argument that they have different targets and scopes. For legislative policy, it is worth of consideration to codify the elements of retroactive insurance to avoid controversies. As for health insurance, deletion of Article 127 is recommended if the scope of insurance and sickness can be properly recognized, and this should be also helpful for avoiding the ambiguity and conflict with other articles.
    Relation: 靜宜法學,6, 77-101
    Providence Law Review
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[風險管理與保險學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    812.pdf1301KbAdobe PDF2506View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback